Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Tuesday, July 06, 2010

One major under-discussed environmental danger

I worry that this interview with author Stan Cox about his book Losing Our Cool: Uncomfortable Truths About Our Air-Conditioned World (and Finding New Ways to Get Through the Summer) might not get through to people. And the reason is that Cox drifts a little too far into the sanctimonious zone about air conditioning, talking about how he never, ever uses it if he’s in control, and focusing his energies on talking about people who’ve given up on air conditioning, even when they live in super hot climates.  And doing that thing people do, where they drift off into refusing to admit there could ever be any value to the thing they’re trying to get people to give up, like how he gets into scientifically iffy territory of suggesting that people would have fewer allergies if they didn’t use A/C and got out more.  (I suspect the rise in allergic people compared to the past has more to do with the fact that we can keep them alive now, whereas in the past they would have died from the flu or tuberculosis at a young age.) When it comes to environmentalism, there’s a real danger in taking an absolutist position, which is that people will tune you out completely, since they find that impossible.

Which is too bad, because on the whole, Cox is right.  Air conditioning is one of the great environmental disasters of our time.  It’s way overused, and to make it worse, it allowed people to build bigger houses and public buildings on the grounds that they could cool them off pretty easily, and it discouraged the use of more energy efficient ways to cool off your home.  It’s created cultural acclimation of the sort where people will never accept anything less than air conditioning, even when opening a window would actually be just as good.  Believe me, I know.  This has been the ongoing war of my adult life.  I grew up in the Southwest—-interestingly, my family’s migration there has a lot to do with the problem of allergies and the attempts to avoid them rather than die of respiratory illness—-and out there, they don’t really use the same kind of air conditioning that you see in many places.  (Though that’s changing rapidly—-air conditioning is such a status symbol that it’s being installed even where it’s not necessary.)  We had evaporation cooling in most homes, which isn’t something that works as well in more humid environments.  Subsequently, when I moved to Austin and started to have to live with for-real air conditioning, I hated it.  I still hate it.  I like cooling off in the A/C, due to being human, and I’ll run it rather than sit around sweating.  But I’ve always been one of those people who waits until the last possible minute to flick it on, and then I sigh sadly, because I don’t look forward to having all the natural humidity in the air and my nostrils sucked out.  As you can imagine, the vast majority of people I encounter disagree strongly with this strategy.  I can have some effect on choosing windows and fans over A/C, but the compromise position always falls short of my “wait until there’s no other possible way to get the temperature below 90” strategy that I employed when I lived alone. 

Because of all this, I think that a much better strategy for dramatically reducing A/C use is to avoid the cold turkey arguments, and start talking about how to remake our culture so A/C is a last, not first, ditch effort.  From my war on A/C, I’d say that in many places, you could cut it by 70% with a few small adjustments to our cultural expectations of what temperature a room should be, and by getting people to consider taking many steps to cool off before resorting to the A/C, such as wearing fewer clothes at home, opening windows, using fans, building in places where there’s shade, drawing curtains, shutting doors to rooms you’re not using instead of air conditioning the whole house, etc.*  Right now, for instance, I’m looking into buying some boxer shorts to wear around the house instead of the pajama pants I usually wear.  That will buy me at least an hour or two more a day where I don’t resort to the A/C.  I do think there’s value to pointing out the physical discomforts of A/C, but this process is going to take a lot of hand-holding.  The belief that every place should have A/C on at full blast has just become so ingrained, as only someone who gets super cold and uncomfortable in full blast A/C (ahem) can really tell you.

 

 

Read All...

Posted by Amanda Marcotte at 11:26 AM • (285) Comments

Thursday, July 30, 2009

AIEEEEEE

A couple weeks back, assholes throughout the conservative blog world were touting unseasonably cool weather in the Midwest as proof that Al Gore copulates with rhinos.

Glenn Reynolds et al. are strangely silent about the fact that the actual goddamn sun is currently sitting on my front porch asking for a cup of sugar.

The average high temperature in Portland in July is 80 degrees. It’s currently 80 degrees at midnight. And that’s significantly cooler than the last two nights. Today I went to Lowe’s, because the rumor was that they had some window AC units left. To HA! They got 11 pallets of units this morning, which were gone in one hour.

My point, besides venting some of this GODDAMN HEAT at you, is that using this GODDAMN HEATWAVE as proof of global climate change would be foolish. Exactly as foolish as the legions of bloggers attempting to use cool temperatures as refutation. Anecdotes are not data, wingnuts, and in case you forget, I’m going to keep yelling at you about the GODDAMN HEAT in the Pacific Northwest in the summer of 2009.

 

Posted by Auguste at 04:09 AM • (71) Comments