Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Governing By Osmosis Previous entry: The blizzard in St. Paul - diversity is MIA

Mario Kart politics

So this year the argument for voting Republican is the same that it has been since Nixon—-a cadre of demonized people (non-white people, loose women, homosexuals, feminists, atheists, Muslims, people who read books that lack the reassuring presence of firearms mentions on every other page) who think they’s so great are about to win and make you, Joe White Voter, feel like even more of a loser than you are.  So show them that this is still Asshole America and vote for McCain. Unfortunately, this sort of argument can be shockingly effective.  It’s Mario Kart politics, of the blue turtle shell philosophy.  The blue turtle shell is the most asshole of all weapons.  Most weapons confer some strategic advantage on the bearer.  Other colored turtle shells tend to take out people in your immediate vicinity, so that you can pull some places ahead.  Mushrooms give you a boost of speed.  Banana peels keep those behind you from catching up and passing you.  But the blue turtle shell?  All that does is fuck up the guy in the front, without conferring advantage to anyone but maybe the guy right behind him.  It doesn’t help you. 

Much, perhaps most, of the Republican voters are people of privilege who openly cling to that privilege and it’s purely a vote of self-interest.  Most working class people still vote Democratic.  But the middle class tends to split nearly 50/50. They’re up for grabs.  And this “be resentful/be afraid” dog and pony show is for them.  Barbara Ehrenreich wrote an interesting book in the 80s called Fear of Falling: The Inner Life of the Middle Class, and what’s brilliant about it is that she put her finger on why middle class Americans relate so strongly to fear.  It’s because our position in the middle class is tenuous.  That’s even more true nowadays.  People without health insurance worry about getting sick.  But so do people with health insurance, who carry the knowledge that the coverage they’ve been buying all those years may end up being an illusion yanked on a technicality.  It’s easy to dismiss people with full time jobs, the ability to purchase cars and make rent, and college degrees.  But their fear is very real.  They are one paycheck away.  Some cope by pursuing hope—-if we vote Democratic long enough, one day we’ll get enough power to rebuild the liberal state that made a stable middle class a reality in the mid-20th century. 


But Republicans chip off a lot by saying, “Look, here’s a blue turtle shell.”  You may not pull ahead into that secure 1st place, but you can fuck someone up and that feels good, right?  Of course, the irony here is that even the blue turtle shell in Mario Kart is less asshole-y than the blue turtle shell politics.  In the game, the shell always takes out the person in first place.  But Republican politics are all about building a fortress around that class of people.  You get to fuck shit up by voting Republican, but only by putting people deemed “uppity” in their place.  This is the key to understanding how the right wing noise machine wins people over. 

Take the McCain ad that showed the throngs of people who turn out to hear Obama speak, and juxtaposed him with women who are famous for being disobedient.  You just knew that it was some loud racist dog whistling, but it was too easy to latch onto the hints of sexuality in it.  I’ve been convinced by a couple of interviews—-Adam Serwer on Counterspin and Bryant Welch on my own Reality Cast—-that the point of pairing off Obama with these women and focusing on his celebrity was to argue that he’s, well, uppity.  Showing the crowds and Obama makes the argument—-ohmigodblackmanhassomethingyoudonthave!—-but including Paris Hilton drives home the point.  Above all, Paris Hilton symbolizes someone who has a lot and deserves nothing.  She is this symbol to all Americans, left or right.  Right wingers think she should be living in a gutter, cast out because she’s a sexual woman who doesn’t seem to feel an ounce of shame over it.  But even more liberal Americans flinch at her vapidity.  She is an icon of undeserving.  Associating her with Obama is saying he’s undeserving, an argument that’s mainly made on unspoken racism, because Obama’s actual experience would be considered more than enough if he were white.  The argument is the same as the Helms’ “Hands” ad: The black person has something you don’t have.  Clearly, you deserve it more.  Why?  Because you’re white and first in line. 

You could probably go for hours on why it’s a sign of the times that we’re supposed to be jealous of politicians, who live, by objective standards, under serious duress and have their freedom of movement, association, and even opinion severely restrained by ambition.  Especially Democrats.  But they’re famous, and apparently in America 2008, being famous is the most important thing in the world.  And so people envy it. 

I assume, good liberal that I am, that there’s a shelf life for winning elections through fear-mongering and stoking people’s resentments and envy.  That when things get bad enough, we look to someone like Barack Obama and see a leader and not an object of resentful backlash.  The McCain campaign seems to think this will be a walk, though, to the point where they’re openly mocking the idea of running a decent campaign.  They think that the public’s capacity throwing the blue turtle shell will never empty out.  That we will continue to be content as losers, so long as we can enjoy tearing others down.  That we will never start voting instead because we want to be winners and want a better life for ourselves instead of just a worse one for our neighbors.  Maybe the McCain campaign is right.  Nothing to do but wait and see.

Well, and blog about it in the meantime.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 01:05 PM • (61) Comments

I assume, good liberal that I am, that there’s a shelf life for winning elections through fear-mongering and stoking people’s resentments and envy.  That when things get bad enough, we look to someone like Barack Obama and see a leader and not an object of resentful backlash.

Either that or the people final elect the apotheosis of their fears, and the country turns into a xenophobic totalitarian regime.  Then the rest of the world gangs up on them, kills a third of their population and bombs all their cities flat.

Comment #1: ummeli  on  09/04  at  01:15 PM

I was pretty surprised to get to the bottom and see Amanda wrote this one; “Mario Kart Politics” sounded like Jesse all the way.

Comment #2: dan  on  09/04  at  01:22 PM

“Middle class”, 2008: A prole with credit.

Comment #3: wapsie  on  09/04  at  01:24 PM

So would the Republican Blue Shell be like a blue shell that seeks out the people in last place and blows them up, or does it seek out people who haven’t even been allowed onto the track yet?

Tangentially, the Mario Kart Wii version of the Blue Shell is a little bit nicer because it has a large blast radius, so when you see it coming and you’re in first, you can slam on the brake/reverse and try to bring the people in second and third down with you. Which is immensely satisfying.

Comment #4: LittleMac  on  09/04  at  01:29 PM

The argument is the same as the Helms’ “Hands” ad: The black person has something you don’t have.  Clearly, you deserve it more.  Why?  Because you’re white and first in line.

It even goes beyond that—they’ve convinced a large portion of the population that the people who are ahead of them in line cheated to get there.  Listen to them sneer about Obama being where he is because of “affirmative action.”  It’s not that he worked his ass off to get scholarships to great college prep schools and universities.  It’s not that he campaigned hard and smart.  Nope, everything was handed to him on a silver platter because he’s black, and you know that those people get all the breaks.

I can understand how the Republicans can get that resentment working, because they’ve basically been blocking working-class and middle-class people from advancing themselves for decades and then pointing to minorities and women and saying, “See, you could have gotten ahead if it weren’t for them!”

For all of our many, many other faults, I do think that Americans prize fairness, and that’s how Republicans manage to game things:  by convincing some people that other people are getting more than they are, and they’re getting it unfairly.  That’s why you hear complaints about welfare and unemployment from people who are struggling financially—they really do think that other people are being handed free money by the government with no strings attached while they’re having to fight to hang onto every penny.  And who led them to believe that?  Republicans working the politics of resentment.

Comment #5: Mnemosyne  on  09/04  at  01:38 PM

I did derive some entertainment with the Mario Kart dynamics of the Republican primary. McCain only emerged victorious because all the previous frontrunners—Giuliani, Huckabee, Romney, in roughly that order—collapsed.  They can’t even resist using the blue shell on themselves.

Comment #6: Cris  on  09/04  at  01:41 PM

For some reason, being in the perverse situation where our financial fortunes have picked up rather than tanked makes me all the more enraged about the collapse of the middle class illusion.  I can’t explain why, other than my own privilege accrues from being able to get an education - something that is very much threatened for others who have my talent and intellect.

I think Joe Bageant’s keen inside observations about the mind set of people who consistently vote against their own interests holds sway - and how they get used time and again.

Comment #7: Ms Kate  on  09/04  at  01:44 PM

Ten nerd points for use of a popular video game in a political forum.

Comment #8: Zifnab25  on  09/04  at  01:49 PM

I do think that Americans prize fairness, and that’s how Republicans manage to game things

Excellent observation.  That’s also why Americans can repeatedly be conned into believing that the richest 1% shouldn’t be taxed at a significantly higher level than the bottom 20%.  We don’t like the appearance of a double standard, even when one is called for.

Comment #9: Cris  on  09/04  at  01:51 PM

Great post, but to me you overlook one very important factor - this is the path they choose because they literally have absolutely nothing else to offer to the middle class.  The current Republican party has nothing positive to offer the middle class, so all they can do is mount a fear campaign.  Vote for McCain, because if you don’t, bad things will happen.

Comment #10: Dweeze  on  09/04  at  01:57 PM

>>“Middle class”, 2008: A prole with credit.

That made me LOL. It’s funny because it’s true.

It used to be that to be ‘middle class’, it meant you were a small capitalist. You owned maybe a small neighborhood shop, you worked for yourself, maybe you had a couple employees that weren’t direct family. Or you were a professional: a lawyer, doctor, someone with a private practice.

Nowadays it seems as long as you have a degree, you’re middle class, even if your work is at a call center, as an IP technician, or any of the other myriad of ‘white collar’ proletarized employment that make up the bulk of the post-industrial Western world.

Comment #11: BlackBloc  on  09/04  at  02:01 PM

I think that fear goes up all the way to the top ranks of wealthy republicans. Complaining about taxes (especially when you see people’s estimates what what percentage they pay versus the actuality) is just fear that some impersonal government (as opposed to chance or some impersonal corporation) is going to take it all away from you. Look at the estate tax in particular, where the campaign against it is based entirely on the (likely justified) fears of billionaire offspring that they wouldn’t be able to maintain the lives they enjoy if the government took a fair cut. When you’ve done your best to turn society into a winner-take-all contest, you have to be haunted by the fear of what would happen if you lost your place at the top.

The idea that a liberal administration would not be so vengeful and grasping is hard to comprehend for people who have never really known anything else.

Comment #12: paul  on  09/04  at  02:02 PM

Nowadays it seems as long as you have a degree, you’re middle class, even if your work is at a call center, as an IP technician, or any of the other myriad of ‘white collar’ proletarized employment that make up the bulk of the post-industrial Western world.

“Middle class” has been defined way down in the past few years. Now, it means “Living anywhere above the poverty line.”

Comment #13: Scott  on  09/04  at  02:15 PM

I assume, good liberal that I am, that there’s a shelf life for winning elections through fear-mongering and stoking people’s resentments and envy.

As long as it continues to be a successful way for the Republicans to win elections, I see it continuing.

From what I remember of the 1992 election, (I was 13) GHWB’s campaign pretty much melted down, and in 1996 I really don’t remember Dole/Kemp running on such a bitter culture war platform.

What needs to happen is that the modern GOP needs to be beaten in a presidential election, an election in which they use those tactics and they backfire. Thinking of the years in which a Dem was elected president since the start of Nixonland, they’ve all been in years in which the amount of GOP culture war drumming was noticeably silent (or, in 1992, confined more to the convention than GHWB’s actual campaign).

Comment #14: Amanda in San Jose  on  09/04  at  02:19 PM

Eek, I forgot to quote that section from Amanda M!

Comment #15: Amanda in San Jose  on  09/04  at  02:20 PM

I was always a chain-chomp democrat, myself. :p

I have noticed the middle class’s tendency to be ruled by fear of losing whatever gains they have. It used to be that as a middle class person, you could look forward to “upward mobility” and someday becoming upper-middle class or even upper-class. Now, middle class people know that their only mobility is down. With rising gas prices, the health care debacle, and a slouching economy that devours their jobs, there’s a very real sense of “I could lose everything I’ve worked for.”

Republican’s only hope is to divert that fear to a bigger and scarier fear. Jobs being lost? Don’t blame the Bush tax cuts which have caused captains of industry everywhere to throw up their hands and make an end-run for liquidating their assets—blame the mexican immigrants! Unpopular war? Don’t blame the asshole who lied to rush us into it, blame the muslims for being so… not Christian! Gas at $4/gallon? Don’t blame the administration at the helm which destabilized the region supplying us with a good deal of our oil and categorically pissing off other oil-providing nations, blame the people who drive hummers… because they don’t need their hummers, whereas you so clearly do!

Comment #16: Mighty Ponygirl  on  09/04  at  02:25 PM

paul:

The idea that a liberal administration would not be so vengeful and grasping is hard to comprehend for people who have never really known anything else.

It’s even harder for people who can’t imagine themselves running an administration that wouldn’t be so vengeful and grasping. It all comes back to projection, with the complete lack of empathy (and the resulting resentment of people who don’t think or behave according to their pre-designated “place” in society) that is so painfully common to right-wingers at its core.

Comment #17: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  09/04  at  02:29 PM

The high-minded ideals espoused here are great and I agree. But they don’t resonate with the average American who reads and thinks at the 3rd-5th grade level (the reading comprehension level of the NY Daily News and most local papers). They do however, understand the simplistic tomes of the repugs. Now, when you consider 40% of the country is going to vote for McCain and 40% for Obama, you are left with the middle 20%. Right now, Obama has a decent lead in the electoral college, but that doesn’t account for the 1-5% I’ll-say-I-will-vote-for-the-black-guy-but-really-won’t-in-the-booth crew. So how to you appeal to the that 20%? Standing by your principles is great but the vast majority of these voters cannot even spell principle if you spotted them the princip…And if they did, most would use-al .

You have to, almost by default, play the crappy repug game. Otherwise when they win and ROE is gone and birth control is gone and equal pay is gone…you get the picture.

I wish I had more faith in the American voter. I don’t. If that means taking some of the low road, so be it. We can’t afford to lose this one.
Oh, and I disagree with the Obaama ad analysis: it was clearly a ‘where the white women at? ad….aimed at people who watch-not listen - to tv. They see 2 white women and a black guy and hoa- it is Mandingo time…

Comment #18: tom  on  09/04  at  02:29 PM

Zif, it’s actually a habit of mine.  I’ve also compared the “fling shit at the wall and see what sticks” political style to Katamari Damacy.  BTW, got Beautiful Katamari for my birthday.  My thumbs already hurt.

Comment #19: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/04  at  02:32 PM

“Middle class” has been defined way down in the past few years. Now, it means “Living anywhere above the poverty line.”

Yep.  To live nowadays as middle class by 1950s standards, you have to make $75,000 a year or more.

Comment #20: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/04  at  02:34 PM

For this extended video game metaphor, I say: I love you.

Red shells rule.

Comment #21: Terry  on  09/04  at  02:34 PM

And on a slight tangent, here’s something I was thinking about last night. How much would we have to raise the tax rate in the highest tax bracket in order to fund an across-the-board tax cut (a progressive one, if I had my druthers) for all the tax brackets below the top one? I’d love to see the math on that.

Comment #22: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  09/04  at  02:34 PM

Tom, it sounds very good and self-serving to say that the “average” American reads at a 5th grade level.  But actually not quite accurate.  Newspapers are written at an 8th grade level.  And so is this blog, actually.  By the time you’re in the 12th grade, you should be able to read James Joyce.  The fact of the matter is the 12th grade level is a struggle for most people—-it’s reading you have to do in a deep, thoughtful way for maximum comprehension.

But it’s true that our wingnut trolls have comprehension levels topping out at the 3rd grade.

Comment #23: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/04  at  02:38 PM

“...people who read books…”

Coloring books and the emergency toilet paper that is your book don’t count, hayseed.

Comment #24: RO  on  09/04  at  02:43 PM

Yep.  To live nowadays as middle class by 1950s standards, you have to make $75,000 a year or more.

Possibly even more than that, depending on how one looks at it. If the 1950s standard includes a single income that could finance a house, a car, and four people, then 75k wouldn’t cut it.

Comment #25: Juan Stoppable  on  09/04  at  02:44 PM

Nonsense. The reason that middle class voters vote R out of fear is because they fear any little amount of the little they have being taken away from them. They don’t *try* to fuck others up so they can feel better about themselves, they just don’t *care* about others, whom they hardly even realize exist. They *want* to feel like they’re charitable and caring about the needs/rights/aspirations of people different from themselves and less advantaged, but not enough to risk anything.

When it’s pointed out that voting their self-interest hurts others, they weasel and waffle and whine about how it doesn’t really, it’s really good for the whole community, all that self-reliance will make those others get their acts together etc. Or else they put fingers in ears and hum and ignore the fact that those other people who aren’t in their neighborhoods/schools/workplace exist at all, again. They are only concerned with protecting themselves from losing any ground, since they have so little, and the Republicans have successfully convinced them that any gains for others WILL come at the cost of the already-thin margins of the middle class. Thus the dread of a national healthcare system: my Republican middle-class relatives have been propagandized to believe that they will be unable to go to the doctors’ or take their children and get timely/quality health care in an emergency, if one is put in place here. They think it will go from bad to worse - for *them.*

This is the big problem that you get when you try to write about strangers when you don’t have any empathy or understanding for what it’s like to be someone not yourself - you write stuff that is totally out of touch with reality.

Comment #26: bellatrys  on  09/04  at  02:45 PM

RO, if you bought her book, even for “emergency toilet paper”, you do understand that you actually paid her some money, no?

Good luck with that septic system hayseed, if that is what you use books for.

Comment #27: Ms Kate  on  09/04  at  02:54 PM

“RO, if you bought her book, even for “emergency toilet paper”, you do understand that you actually paid her some money, no?

Good luck with that septic system hayseed, if that is what you use books for.”

I didn’t buy her book dimbulb. Also, the books I have in my library would make your head a-splode.

Comment #28: RO  on  09/04  at  02:58 PM

Depends on the part of the country, Juan.  If you had that much money a year here, it’s technically possible to have 2 kids and a housewife to look after them in a small home.  Hmmm…..well, insurance costs might kill you, actually.  I honestly think if you took rising insurance costs out of the equation somehow, a lot more people would get by fine on $75,000/family and be middle class.  Not well off middle class.  Maybe the kids have to share a bedroom middle class. 

But on the East Coast?  Forget about it.

Thanks, bell.  You forget that I’m like the sole liberal in a family of middle class conservatives.  So yeah, there’s no reason to think I understand them at all.  Because I know nothing about “those people” and certainly don’t talk to them on the phone on a regular basis or go to holidays with them or anything like that.

Comment #29: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/04  at  03:03 PM

When it’s pointed out [to middle-class voters] that voting their self-interest hurts others, they weasel and waffle and whine about how it doesn’t really, it’s really good for the whole community, all that self-reliance will make those others get their acts together etc. Or else they put fingers in ears and hum and ignore the fact that those other people who aren’t in their neighborhoods/schools/workplace exist at all, again.

I believe I understand the emotion behind this statement and I agree with the emotion (if that makes any sense) without agreeing with the statement itself.  If only middle-class voters could be persuaded reliably to vote their own interests we’d all be out of the woods, because the interests of middle-class people and working-class people can be proven to co-incide at least nine times out of ten. 

Unfortunately middle-class people don’t vote their interests; they vote (so far as I can tell) what they feel they believe ought to be their loyalties.  The people who make up the upper tiers of society will habitually vote their own interests, as will those who make up society’s base.  Only the people who make up society’s middle ranks can be suckered into casting a vote for “decency” or “sanity” or for a regimen of law and order which actually conduces to disorder.  Whereas upper-class and working-class people are a damn sight harder to fool. 

Me, I wish I knew what to do about this, but I sure don’t.

Comment #30: bekabot  on  09/04  at  03:04 PM

“I didn’t buy her book dimbulb. Also, the books I have in my library would make your head a-splode.”

I don’t believe that for a second. Archie comics just aren’t deep enough to make anyone’s head “a-splode” except yours.

Comment #31: Mark  on  09/04  at  03:56 PM

Well, there is another problem here that no one has mentioned: what exactly is the “middle class”, anyway?  Almost everyone I know considers themselves “middle class” - people with household incomes of $25,000 and people with household incomes of over $1 million. 

“Middle Class” is the only “class” in America that is free of any negative moral undertones - if you are “Rich” than you are a greedy elitist; if you are “poor” than you are lazy and stupid.  But the “Middle Class” built this country, baby - these are the people who work for a living and bring home the bacon.  Who wouldn’t want to be considered “middle class”? 

Add to that the fact that most people don’t have to look very hard to find someone who is richer than them and someone who is poorer than them - hey, if there are people above me and people below me, I must be in the “middle”!  And since most people live in a neighborhood where everyone else is in a similar economic position, they just assume theirs to be the norm.

The reality is that the “middle quintile” for household income in America is in the neighborhood of $35,000 - $55,000 or so.  But in a world where both millionaires and assistant managers at McDonald’s both commonly think of themselves as “middle class”, it is really easy to scare the whole lot of them with ominous warnings about “the others” taking what is yours.

Comment #32: General Woundwort  on  09/04  at  04:08 PM

Newspapers are written at an 8th grade level.

I was taught they were written at a 6th grade level.  This standard being left over from a time when you couldn’t assume everyone had completed even through 8th grade, much less high school.  It’s not a policy designed to make people dumber as much as keep news accessible even to the under-educated.  Which, we’ll remember, is kind of key for a functioning democracy.

Comment #33: Kyso K  on  09/04  at  04:15 PM

And on a slight tangent, here’s something I was thinking about last night. How much would we have to raise the tax rate in the highest tax bracket in order to fund an across-the-board tax cut (a progressive one, if I had my druthers) for all the tax brackets below the top one? I’d love to see the math on that.

Dan, take a look at Obama’s tax plan.  That’s essentially what he’s doing: if your family makes less than $250,000 a year, you get a sizeable tax cut.  The cuts are paid for by a substantial increase on the top 2%.

He’s compromised progressive positions in many areas, but I’m delighted to point out that tax policy is not one of them.

Comment #34: Robert M.  on  09/04  at  04:17 PM

Also, the books I have in my library would make your head a-splode.

I have exactly zero doubt that you have a bookshelf laden with leather bound books that the salesman told you are impressive classics, their pages pristine and fingerprint-free.  It’s like reading them, except better!

Comment #35: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/04  at  05:10 PM

Amanda, have you been reading Shirley Jackson’s The Seven Types of Ambiguity lately? smile

Of course, as I say this, I realize that I have one more collected works of hers that’s been sitting untouched on my bookshelf through several moves. I feel humbled.

Comment #36: Mighty Ponygirl  on  09/04  at  05:14 PM

Katamari Democracy is when we roll down the street, grabbing people and bringing them into liberal democratic politics, forming an unstoppable mass that picks up mail boxes, and stoplights, trucks, houses, sea monsters, rolling onwards in an unstoppable mass, untill we crush Nov. 2. and collapse the universe under our weight.

Comment #37: Indy  on  09/04  at  05:16 PM

One of the reasons that “middle class” has become so broadly defined is that “working class” has become a dirty epithet in most people’s vocabularies, along with “liberal”. So there has to be another term to fill the gap.

Comment #38: paul  on  09/04  at  05:35 PM

And here’s a good article from NYT magazine on his plan and its origin. 

(So sorry to be link inept.  I can follow instructions if someone offers.)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/magazine/24Obamanomics-t.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=obamanomics&st=cse&oref=slogin

Comment #39: Ann  on  09/04  at  05:37 PM

*******Well, there is another problem here that no one has mentioned: what exactly is the “middle class”, anyway?  Almost everyone I know considers themselves “middle class” - people with household incomes of $25,000 and people with household incomes of over $1 million. ******

I think a lot of people who call themselves middle class are engaging in wishful thinking.  I know it took me a while to realize I am not in the middle class,but in the working class.

There are very few places where I would consider anyone with a household income under $50,000 to be middle class (Defined for purposes of this discussion to be the ability to own a house, and have a reasonably modern car in the driveway if single, and to have a 3-bedroom house and 2 reasonably modern cars with 2.5 kids if married)(and this doesn’t even account for the apartment-dwelling culture in the east coast big cities like New York)

In St. Louis, you can’t be a middle class family without a household income of at least $75,000.  In some areas of the country, I don’t think you are middle class until you make at least $200,000

Comment #40: Bruce from Missouri  on  09/04  at  05:45 PM

I was taught at Oberlin that the NY Times and The Washington Post were written at an eight grade level; the NY Daily News/Cleveland Plain Dealer at 3-5, and papers of the ilk of the NY Post was for those who can’t read. Seriously. I agree, Amanda, that the ideal is to be able to read Joyce in 12th grade. I don’t think that is achieved by many 12th graders; if my experience teaching college and high school in Massachusetts (a state that ranks among the highest in various education studies) is any indication.

Every semester in college, teaching sophs and higher, I had to start my course with how to write a sentence. I think in the years I was there, only 2 students out of several hundred knew that you need a subject and a verb to have a complete sentence. From there, we went to a paragraph and so forth.

And I will not bore you with their inability to read simple texts and to argue therefrom. These are/were the best and brightest; so I can only imagine what goes on elsewhere. My experiences with the business world are no better. The sad truth is that most Americans cannot write a sentence; much less a paragraph; nor can they assimilate a thoughtful paragraph or a thoughtful essay. What I see Americans responding to are visual stimuli save words; they love pictures/symbols.

I think the sooner the Dems realize that, the better.

Comment #41: tom  on  09/04  at  05:53 PM

“The sad truth is that most Americans cannot write a sentence; much less a paragraph; nor can they assimilate a thoughtful paragraph or a thoughtful essay. What I see Americans responding to are visual stimuli save words; they love pictures/symbols.”

We’re doing our damnedest to make Idiocracy into a reality, aren’t we?...

Comment #42: MikeEss  on  09/04  at  05:59 PM

I was taught they were written at a 6th grade level.  This standard being left over from a time when you couldn’t assume everyone had completed even through 8th grade, much less high school.  It’s not a policy designed to make people dumber as much as keep news accessible even to the under-educated.  Which, we’ll remember, is kind of key for a functioning democracy.

During my journalism career I was usually instructed by the editors or producers to write for an 8th grade comprehension level. I never much liked the policy. The problem is that, like the public K-12 education system it complements, this MSM policy is an outmoded relic of Gilded Age America. It’s preserved these days mainly to benefit the owners of corporations and their officers and executive managers (who, like other well-educated folks, get their news from other sources).

You may be correct that, outside a handful of major national newspapers (and high-brow magazines that can barely be called mainstream anymore), things have indeed devolved to a 6th-grade level. I usually use the example of Time magazine, which contains less substantive written content than a typical Reagan-era People magazine. Not that People magazine and its imitators haven’t kept up with the dumbing down—they’re 90% photos and perhaps 10% copy. Clearly something is happening—not a conspiracy, but a general and gradual and deliberate lowering of standards in the MSM. And when we observe such a phenomenon, we’re justified in fighting it and, in the process, asking cui bono?

The answer has a lot to do with what Amanda is discussing: the desire of a certain group for a return to that Gilded Age America mentioned above, with more than a soupçon of cutting-edge surveillance-state control technologies and caudillismo thrown in for flavour. In that vision, social mobility once again becomes static and dependent on accident of birth, the current large middle class becomes a much smaller and far more fearful intelligensiya, and the 90% of the citizenry who are “proles with credit” (great term, wapsie!) and techno-peasants consume content-free education and media without question—especially the kind that re-assures them they’re still “middle class.”

The policy isn’t designed to make people dumber, but it doesn’t keep them particularly well informed or challenge them to actually think critically about a given issue, either. And in a functioning democracy, the empty illusion of an informed citizenry is just as, if not more, dangerous than the stark reality of an un-informed one.

Comment #43: Gracchus  on  09/04  at  06:02 PM

Seriously. I agree, Amanda, that the ideal is to be able to read Joyce in 12th grade.

Able is good.  However, it naturally brings up the question of whether one wants to read Joyce at all.  (Waits for the killer leprechauns to strike me dead.)

Comment #44: seeker6079  on  09/04  at  06:04 PM

I just finished a Communication degree last year and there they told us to speak/ write to a third grade level.

I agree we have to get as much information to everyone.  That being said, some information actually requires work to understand it.

Comment #45: Antigone  on  09/04  at  06:04 PM

And I will not bore you with their inability to read simple texts and to argue therefrom. These are/were the best and brightest; so I can only imagine what goes on elsewhere. My experiences with the business world are no better. The sad truth is that most Americans cannot write a sentence; much less a paragraph; nor can they assimilate a thoughtful paragraph or a thoughtful essay. What I see Americans responding to are visual stimuli save words; they love pictures/symbols.

I think the sooner the Dems realize that, the better.

I agree with and have observed the things you mention, but I take strong exception to the last sentence.

Most of the bad intellectual habits you describe are inculcated in our public K-12 schools, and of the two parties and two executive tickets it’s clear which really values a fundamental improvement in that policy area.

The Dems can lead by example here: voters of both parties constantly rank education as a top priority, and whether that’s “for the chilllldddrennn” BS or not the Dems can take the opportunity to call the bluff or engage those who are genuinely interested.

And that means leading by example: challenging simplistic MSM narratives, pointing out the built-in flaws of NCLB, addressing voters as adults rather than adolescents. One of the things that impresses me about Obama is that, for all the accusations of superficiality and flash, he’s not ashamed of speaking in public like an educated grown-up with sophisticated and nuanced views.

To be sure, there’s a risk inherent in this approach. But there’s also an equal risk in the Dems further lowering themselves to the level of schoolyard discourse we saw on-stage at the RNC last night.

Comment #46: Gracchus  on  09/04  at  06:20 PM

The difference (IMO) between working-class and middle-class is not just about income but about security.

I figure it this way: 

the genuinely poor are those who struggle to get by on a day to day, week to week basis. The keyword here is Survival.

the working class (where I see myself) are those who get by but can’t really get ahead - able to pay the rent but not save up enough for a down payment, perhaps, or employed but uninsured, for instance.  The keyword here is Security.

Real middle-class status, to me, implies a certain basic level of security:  you know you’ve got enough to take a hit and keep rolling in a “One down three engines good” sort of way.  You own your home (or have a mortgage that you can easily keep up with); you have health insurance and savings and a 401K or a government pension and you can reasonably expect that things are going to be Okay - maybe not fabulous, maybe you won’t make that trip to DisneyVille this summer, but you’ll eat regularly and go straight to the ER when you injure yourself instead of waiting a few days to see if it gets better on its own.  The keyword here is Stability.

(In this paradigm I’d use “Savings” as the keyword for the upper class - being those who have money left over to save or invest after their material needs and comforts are assured for the foreseeable future - and “Surfeit” as the keyword for the genuinely wealthy, the people who have more money than I can figure out what to do with.  And I am capable of finding good homes for absurdly large dollar figures, I work in a state government accounting office. At the moment.)

By this measure I believe there are a whole lot of people in this country who are not middle class but call themselves by that name because they don’t want to admit the economy’s broken.

Comment #47: Thena, Sultana of Stale Raisin Bread  on  09/04  at  06:29 PM

The Republican party right now is more like some asshat in Team Fortress 2 who is screaming “n*gger n*gger n*gger” because he ran over a bunch of sticky bombs and got blown to bits by the black Demoman. Who has a really nasty grin on his face when he does such things.

All right, they aren’t exactly shouting “n*gger” yet, but they have gotten to “uppity.” I give two weeks before someone completes the phrase in public.

Comment #48: sunsin  on  09/04  at  06:56 PM

bellatrys writes, ¨They don’t *try* to fuck others up so they can feel better about themselves, they just don’t *care* about others, whom they hardly even realize exist.¨¨

No, I think many Republican voters do want to fuck up women, gays, and racial and ethnic minorities, to feel better about themselves. Amanda was exactly right, when she wrote, ¨You get to fuck shit up by voting Republican, but only by putting people deemed “uppity” in their place.¨ This is how Republicans demonize gay rights, abortion rights, etc.: Freedom from discrimination. for them, is a special privilege rather than ensuring people´s equal opportunity (to exercise self-determination, have a career, form relationships, whatever). So when minorities make a claim that they are equally entitled to the respect that straight white men already command, the GOP characterizes it as a demand to be treated specially, or acting ¨uppity.¨

Comment #49: Luke  on  09/04  at  07:01 PM

I do think it’s about fucking shit up.  That’s the final fallback position for many Republicans.  You get them to admit that it’s wrong for the rich to run this country or admit that people should have equal rights.  And the fallback position is that liberals are uppity and it’s pleasureable to take them down a notch.  In fact, a thread above, we have a commenter who claims to be libertarian.  So, is he going to vote for Democrats, the only party that has half a chance of restoring some semblance of constitutionally protected civil rights?  What do you think?  He wants to enjoy watching liberals suffer, so no.

Comment #50: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/04  at  07:27 PM

Katamari Democracy is when we roll down the street, grabbing people and bringing them into liberal democratic politics, forming an unstoppable mass that picks up mail boxes, and stoplights, trucks, houses, sea monsters, rolling onwards in an unstoppable mass, untill we crush Nov. 2. and collapse the universe under our weight.

Indy

THIS!
FTW!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment #51: Danica Lefse Queen  on  09/04  at  08:45 PM

I do think it’s about fucking shit up.  That’s the final fallback position for many Republicans.

A classic on the topic from 2004:

Spite the Vote by Mark Ames.

The good news is, I think that Obama/Biden will be vicious enough to attract a certain kind of spite voter: the type who appreciates it when some clever and well-spoken fellow offers up that “who, me?” smile at the same time he twists the knife into his opponent’s gut.

It would be an approach we haven’t seen in a while, but it has worked as a tactic in the past (think Bill Clinton or Lloyd Bentsen). If Obama and Biden do this right over the next 3 months, they’re going to gain the respect and perhaps even the votes of some truly spiteful and frustrated educated white males.

Comment #52: Gracchus  on  09/04  at  09:24 PM

Associating her with Obama is saying he’s undeserving, an argument that’s mainly made on unspoken racism, because Obama’s actual experience would be considered more than enough if he were white.  The argument is the same as the Helms’ “Hands” ad: The black person has something you don’t have.  Clearly, you deserve it more.  Why?  Because you’re white and first in line.

Shorter Entire Post-Nixon Republican Party: “The DemonRATS want the scaryblackman to hit you with the blue turtle shell! Vote GOP!”

Comment #53: J. A. Baker  on  09/04  at  10:14 PM

Thena, I think your analysis is brilliant.  I was trying to get there, but my writing skills just weren’t up to it.

Security is exactly what I don’t have, and exactly why I gave up calling myself middle class.

Comment #54: Bruce from Missouri  on  09/04  at  11:19 PM

Amanda, this is gold. Thank you for the laughs, and the apt analogy.

Thena, could I possibly quote your class analysis? (with attribution, naturally) I thought it was a great breakdown of the differing challenges.

Comment #55: QuietStorm  on  09/04  at  11:52 PM

It’s posts and comment threads like these that make me love this place.

First, Indy’s Katamari Democracy metaphor is absloute win.

Second, I have some small issues with the post, but they’re mostly nerdy, longtime-Nintendo-fanboy bullshit.  To quote:

The blue turtle shell is the most asshole of all weapons.  Most weapons confer some strategic advantage on the bearer.  Other colored turtle shells tend to take out people in your immediate vicinity, so that you can pull some places ahead.  Mushrooms give you a boost of speed.  Banana peels keep those behind you from catching up and passing you.  But the blue turtle shell?  All that does is fuck up the guy in the front, without conferring advantage to anyone but maybe the guy right behind him.  It doesn’t help you.

First off, they’re Koopa shells.  Taken from Koopas.  They’re distinct from turtles, in that they can occasionally fly, they move somewhat quickly, and those shells don’t have bloody spines attached to them on the inside - real turtles have their shells fused to their spines.  Ugly thought, huh?  Second, the blue shell, in its more recent incarnations (Mario Kart: Double Dash!! and later, I believe), blows up when it hits its target.  This means that anyone nearby can be hit by it without being the guy in first.  Useful if you’re the guy in first, to be sure, but if you’re the one who threw it and you get hit, it’s not so fun.  That, honestly, seems to be even more apt given some of the backlash we see against the noise machine when it fucks up.  Third, if you think it’s mean to be the one watching the shameless blue shell throwing, try being the one getting it.  Take it from a Mario Kart vet - that shit HURTS.  Even if you’re so comfortably out in front that even cheating, douchebaggy rubberband AI can’t touch your ass, it still hurts.  Hell, maybe I should spin my thoughts on this off into my own post.

Thirds, sunsin’s TF2 comment brings two ideas to light: First, note that the teams are RED and BLU.  Is that an analogy in a can or what?  Second, that’s an apt comparison, except they don’t wait to get fragged before they start spamming the comms channels - they’re screaming obscenities from the start to the moment they lose the last control point.  (And, if you notice, they’re all offensive players, while we’ve got a well-rounded team.)

Finally, I was unaware you were a roller, Amanda.  Beautiful Katamari is a real time-eater, isn’t it?  (Especially when you get screwed over like I usually do.)

Comment #56: Damian  on  09/05  at  03:43 AM

Middle class has been defined down as long as I can remember. My family went through poverty when I was a kid. We fed ourselves and heated our house partly because my parents had friends in rural areas who let us harvest grapevine cuttings for fuel, cherries ripening before the main harvest, and other goods that were too expensive in labor for the owners to care about and yet were free for our labor. We grew crops and even raised animals on land belonging to my mother’s friend, and shared half of it with them. My folks applied for food stamps and were told they couldn’t be homeowners and be eligible. A neighbor gave us part of her ration of government dairy surplus she was given as a disabled senior. Government cheese seemed like damn good cheese to a child who had to work a farm on weekends.

We “weren’t poor”—I asked a few times, and was told we were “lower middle class”. Frankly, with my scanty wardrobe almost all of aunt’s hand-me-downs, the kids at school could tell I was poor. But some people act like admitting poverty is a sin.

Mom ended up getting a full time job as a school teacher a year or two later, and then, indeed, we were back in the middle class range. But I haven’t been left with much patience for the damn silly pride that keeps people from admitting they can’t make ends meet by normal economic means, and rely on a social network, freebies, etc to help them through. When we treat poverty as a synonym for uneducated, free-loading, addicted, and criminal, we only make it a hundred times harder to convince people of the importance of a social safety net.

Comment #57: Samantha Vimes  on  09/05  at  05:22 AM

Ehrenreich got it.  Amanda gets it.  Humans are more reluctant to admit they feel threatened than they are to strike out at mistargeted threats.  Crowds do not think.  Liberal commenters think. 

I have fears but I do not feel threatened or precarious.  I have got to a point where the banks owe me money and I seem to be healthy….but a lot of folks can’t say that. 

What fears???  I fear that we, who allegedly populate a middle-class country and claim entitlement to upward mobility are going to have to get screwed even worse and see our fortunes decline even more dramatically than the last 7 years before we collectively break through the sleepwalking and the pandering “security” politics.

Comment #58: greensmile  on  09/05  at  09:50 AM

What Thena said, and said well.

Comment #59: seeker6079  on  09/05  at  10:25 AM

I am by no means trying to make excuses for the Republicans, but I think their biggest problem is that they are REMARKABLY out of touch.  Every time something has come out of a Republican’s mouth this political season, one of two things has registered in my mind…“Yeah, if you’re rich” and “BULLSHIT”.  The middle class ends at $5,000,000/year?  Yeah…if you make $5 million a year.  (The average man that worked full time, year-round made approximately $44,000 between 2006 & 2007…it was even less for women). 

One of the foundational precepts of the Republican party is the political philosophy of conservatism.  Conservatives favor tradition.  If honor can be considered a traditional concept, then the ad hominem attacks that McCain and Palin are unleashing on Barack and Joe are evidence of a failure to adhere to their conservative principles.  To diminish Barack’s experience as community leader and organizer, is to diminish their own experience.

I can’t help but laugh when people refer to McCain as a “maverick”.  I don’t think that has ever been a term that I’ve had positive associations with.  To me, it sounds like someone who is willing to worm his or her way into a position that is more favorable to themselves.  But I’ve digressed.

Watching the GOP convention this week proved to me that the Republican Party really doesn’t have anyone’s interests in mind besides people who are like them.  Not only that, but they don’t have any new ideas for governing this country.  If you watched any of the speeches, one will see there was a noticeable lack of concrete policy points or specifics about McCain’s plans for America (sounds like the problem people were having Obama).  It was rehashed stories about McCain as Vietnam War veteran.  Don’t get me wrong, McCain deserves to be lauded for his military service, but being a soldier does not automatically qualify someone to be the President of the United States.  Neither does being the Governor of Alaska, or any other state for that matter.

McCain is now attempting to STEAL Barack Obama’s message of change.  He obfuscates and calls it by a different name, “reform” or a “shake up”.  By making the blatantly cynical and transparent selection of a woman for his V.P. who is arguably more conservative than he is, his selection could be considered political posturing at best, and a nod to female “PUMAs” who McCain belives will vote with their vaginas at worst.  Because no one but hardcore conservatives and Alaskan voters had ever heard of Palin before he picked her, it appears that she is a “maverick” choice and a breath of fresh air.

I could go on, but my eyes are getting heavy.  I worked a 12 hour shift last night so I could afford to pay the rent on my single apartment and my car note.

Comment #60: Chaos Logic  on  09/05  at  03:46 PM

I really love it when I’m rudely reminded of your natural (and unapologetic) nerdiness, Amanda!

Comment #61: MH  on  09/07  at  02:48 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.