Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: What’s worse: A two second shot or cervical cancer? Previous entry: Alan Keyes takes on Daddy D, McCain in WND Op-Ed

Always Striving, Improving

imageFirst there was Islamism, which was defined as belief in Islam as a political system.

Then there was Islamofascism, which was defined as the belief in Islam as a violent system of repression which, despite having nothing to do with fascism, was a fun little concatenation. 

Now, several years later, the people who keep renaming Islamic terrorism other things that are harder to understand have come up with the ultimate name for some jumbled idea of Islam being really bad.

And that name is…”Fascislamism”. 

Even if you can say it, you’re still only five percent of the way towards understanding what it actually means.

It’s Bernard-Henri Levy’s word for that segment of the Muslim world that defines itself through support for political violence and oppression. In his forthcoming book Left in Dark Times: A Stand Against the New Barbarism, he has also unearthed a great quote from the journal of the writer Paul Claudel. From May 21, 1935: “Hitler’s speech: a kind of Islamism is being created at the center of Europe . . . “

The comparison is apt: There is a universal dynamic at work, whenever a fetishization of the collective is allowed to gather steam.

So, it’s actually the same word as Islamofascism, only more Hitlerized for public consumption.  It’s an understandable impulse - after all, our attention spans are so corroded by television that by the time you get to the “o”, your audience’s attention is on the next episode of Shear Genius.  Tossing in fascism up from lets everyone know you’re serious.  May I also recommend the word “fascislamoslamism” should you be in front of an academic audience?  No need to thank me.

—-

Illustration by August J. Pollack, originally appeared in Campus Progress.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 01:08 PM • (23) Comments

Islamism came before Islamofascism?  I was thinking it’d go the other way around, in an attempt to gradually condense things towards simply saying Islam was the problem.

Comment #1: calvinhobbes  on  08/12  at  01:32 PM

To finish completely draining the words “Fascism” and “Islam” of all meaning, they must be combined with “Liberal”. 

Or maybe they can just skip ahead and acknowledge their ultimate goal is to add a word to the language that refers everyone who who is not “conservative”, since in the end that’s what all this is leading to. 

I suggest “Human”...

Comment #2: MikeEss  on  08/12  at  01:54 PM

“Fascislamism” is never going to catch on.  For one thing, it starts out sounding like “Fo’ shizzle.”  Fa-shiz, la-miz!  Um.

Comment #3: FlipYrWhig  on  08/12  at  02:01 PM

‘May I also recommend the word “fascislamoslamism” should you be in front of an academic audience?’

Actually, I believe the technical term is “tripe”.

Comment #4: bekabot  on  08/12  at  02:06 PM

whenever a fetishization of the collective is allowed to gather steam

Hmm, let’s see ... like, when neocon Christians try to legislate their own version of “morality”? Or maybe when a questioning of the war in Iraq becomes “unpatriotic”? I don’t know ...

Comment #5: Stephen  on  08/12  at  02:14 PM

The Islamistic Fasco-Eastern Middle Llama Muslo-philes have been out pacing us in the vocabulary arms race for years.  It’s time to close the connotation gap.  We need a term that can adequately describe exactly what it is about our enemies that we don’t like.  Has “ScaryBrownPeople” been taken?

Comment #6: Zifnab25  on  08/12  at  02:14 PM

All the historical illiteracy of “Islamofascist” combined with all the etymological ugliness of “ebonics,” rendered irreproducibly from a drunkard’s mush-mouth.

The surprising part is that it was coined by Bernard-Henri Levy rather than Christopher Hitchens.

Comment #7: Gracchus  on  08/12  at  02:16 PM

It’s too hard to say!  I’m trying over here, and I get it sounding okay and then I lose it again.

How can I ever save my bahbeez if I can’t even warn them of the Evul Doers?!11/1!?


It reminds me of when we were naming the offspring and I had to explain to the spouse that you can’t use names that sound too much like the surname.  As Niles Crane said, you have to watch out for the dreaded glottal stop, and, I dare to add, too many ishishshshshshshishsihseses.

It’s too hard.  Man, who knew it was so hard to be rightwing.

Comment #8: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  08/12  at  02:32 PM

If I give you guys my mailing address, will you send me some of those “Islam Rocks!!” tee-shirts you’re planning to market? Are you going to follow through on those plans to have “It Really Is a Religion of Peace!” stencilled on the backsides?

Comment #9: Douglas, Friend of Osho  on  08/12  at  02:53 PM

May I also recommend the word “fascislamoslamism” should you be in front of an academic audience? 

Don’t you want to get “Hussein” in there somewhere?

Comment #10: Steve M.  on  08/12  at  03:12 PM

No wonder that Bernard-Henri Levy loves the US so much, it’s the only country that hasn’t yet wised up to the fact he’s a complete hack. Ah, the aura of French intellectuals…

Comment #11: Marie  on  08/12  at  03:47 PM

And that name is…”Fascislamism”.

Say that three times, fast. Good gods and monsters.

Comment #12: broce  on  08/12  at  04:14 PM

I was going to suggest “Nazislamist” as a neologism by way of mocking the idiots who come up with this crap.  A quick google shows that it’s in regular circulation over at Free Republic.  You cannot caricature those people.

Comment #13: togolosh  on  08/12  at  04:30 PM

One nice thing about “fascislamism” is that when you say it, it makes Mr. Mxyzptlk go back to his home dimension.

Comment #14: FlipYrWhig  on  08/12  at  04:33 PM

The Neo-Cons are taking their cues from the French now? They shall now be known as “Nouveaux-Cons”.
 
Hon! Hon! Hon!

Comment #15: Sirkowski  on  08/12  at  06:06 PM

Speaking as a eurosocioatheist environationalist I feel that Americanojudeochristocapitalists are just as scary as Islamoquedaberlusconiists. You’re not called The Great Satan for nothing. (That’s my visa fucked).

Comment #16: Vex  on  08/12  at  07:09 PM

“Fascislamism”


Gesundheit. Hanky?

Comment #17: Matt T.  on  08/12  at  07:10 PM

.”Fascislamism”.

Noun - a flesh-eating bacterial disease affecting Tibetan Buddhist priests, thought to be spread by infected mandala sand.

Comment #18: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  08/12  at  07:22 PM

I agree, very stupid word. We should call them what they are…simply “TERRORISTS”. that sounds much better than Fascislamism and it’s easier to say and more accurate.

Comment #19: Jason  on  08/12  at  07:57 PM

Yeah, this is pretty stupid. Could we get a more pronounceable word for the religious fanatics that want to murder me, please?

Comment #20: Chet  on  08/12  at  09:05 PM

“Could we get a more pronounceable word for the religious fanatics that want to murder me, please?”

“Inlaws”...?

Comment #21: MikeEss  on  08/12  at  09:12 PM

islamofascismleftwingcafelattearabthosethatdidntliketheshahpositivefreedomsabortioninternationalistsscienceamnestyinternationalhabeascorpusprogressivetaxationfeminismmohammedmossadeqcoherentarguments.

Comment #22: pär  on  08/12  at  10:16 PM

Hmm. Fascionistas? Feminazislamists? Jihedonists? Gollyjihab? Yomamasofatwa?

Comment #23: bad Jim  on  08/13  at  12:20 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.