Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Bishop Harry Jackson lowers boom on McCain over gay chief of staff Previous entry: I Did Not Have Spatial Relations With That Man…Mr. Ayers

And now for the end of that story

When we last left the saga of Jamie’s Big Trip to Vegas, I had offered to tell the story of how I almost ruined the entire trip at the last moment.  You’ll recall (if you have a very good memory) that we went to Vegas so that Jamie could see the Cirque du Soleil show, “Love,” based on the music of the Beatles, and that Jamie had been looking forward to this trip for well over six months. 

OK, so when we got to our room in Planet Hollywood, conscientious dad that I am, I checked the in-room magazines to see what else would be going on in Vegas—besides the usual vices—while we were there.
And lo!  It just so happened that on that very weekend, something called the Fest for Beatles Fans would be meeting in Vegas.  My initial reaction was something like “meh,” but then I saw that there would be a Beatles cover band, “Liverpool,” who, in honor of the fortieth anniversary of the release of the White Album, would play the record in its entirety (almost) during their shows.  (I’m guessing that “Revolution # 9” accounted for the “almost” in this promise.)  “Hey, Jamie, check this out,” I said, pointing him to the magazine’s promotional article about the band.  “We could go and see these guys before we go to ‘Love’—they’re in the same hotel and everything.”

“Cool!” Jamie replied, snatching the magazine out of my hands and devoting his attention to a picture of the early Beatles in the studio, whose captions was something like “Liverpool recreates the sound of the four lads from Liverpool.”

Tickets to the thing would be $60 each, which I considered a bit much, but hell—we’d come all the way to Vegas, and it didn’t seem to make much sense to back off from a Beatles fans’ convention if it was just down the street.  So I told Jamie we’d try to get there around 8, catch the band, and then head over to “Love” for the 10 pm show.

For much of the rest of the day, Jamie chattered about the “four lads.”  At first I didn’t understand him, but after a few patient repetitions on his part (“Michael, the four lads from Liverpool”), I got the idea, and I assured him that yes, we would be seeing the four lads.  Since Jamie has seen the cast of Beatlemania four or five times (they come out to State College every summer), I imagined that he thought Liverpool would be something similar.  I was a bit taken aback when Jamie, upon his arrival at the Mirage Hotel, went up and asked the concierge if the “four lads” would be in the hotel that evening, but I winked at the concierge and explained that Jamie was going to the Fest, whereupon he assured Jamie, with a wink to me, that the four lads would be here shortly.

But when we finally got to this Fest, we had some bad news: the band wouldn’t be going on until 9:30, too late for us to catch them.  Jamie took the news hard; I suggested that we could come back the next night for the band’s last show (despite the fact that we had to catch a 7 am flight the morning thereafter), but Jamie was crushed that the four lads weren’t there right that moment

“Where are they?” he asked, slumped on a couch in the lobby.

“Well, they don’t go on until 9:30, sweetie, just like the man said. . . .”

“No,” he replied abruptly.  “Where are the Beatles?  Why aren’t they here?”

And then a horrible thought came to me: somehow, between the Fest and Beatlemania and that picture in the in-room magazine, Jamie had gotten the idea that the Beatles themselves would be coming to Las Vegas.

“Jamie,” I said, slowly and incredulously.  “Are you talking about John and Paul and George and Ringo?”

“Yes,” he said. “Where are they?”

I took a breath.  Gently, I put my hand on his shoulder and said, “Jamie, you do know that John and George are dead.  You know that.”

He nodded, but a little reluctantly, it seemed.  Perhaps he had managed to convince himself that a Beatles convention would undo all that, that the four lads would all be here, in their twenties, playing the White Album (almost) in its entirety.  I didn’t know how to begin to deal with this.

“Where are Paul and Ringo?” he said, scaling back his hopes.

“They’re probably with their families, sweetie.  They’re not coming to Las Vegas—but there will be a band playing their music.”

“But why are they not coming?”

“It’s not that kind of thing, Jamie.  It’s a meeting for all these Beatles fans, and the band will be like Beatlemania, you know, playing Beatles songs.  But no, Paul and Ringo aren’t coming out here tonight.”

Jamie practically curled into himself, so crushed with disappointment was he.  And for my part, I felt hideously awful: I’d taken our big trip, our extravagant Vegas Vacation to see an amazing Beatles show, and I’d somehow managed to do the one thing that could possibly have eclipsed Cirque du Soleil in Jamie’s eyes.  I’d somehow led him to believe that the four lads themselves would be joining us that evening.

“Come on, good kid,” I said, trying to rally.  “I’ll buy you a soda at the Revolution lounge.” 

“Okay,” Jamie said in the most disconsolate manner imaginable.  But the soda didn’t cheer him up.  And now what we were going to do to kill an hour before the “Love” show? We walked around the lobby a bit, I showed Jamie how to blow a quick five bucks in a slot machine, and we got another soda.  But after half an hour Jamie had had enough.  “Michael,” he said dejectedly, “let’s just go back to our hotel.”

“Oh, no, Jamie,” I replied.  “You don’t really want to go back, do you?”

“Yes I do.”

“And miss the ‘Love’ show?  We can’t do that.”

“I don’t want to go.  Let’s go back.”

Well, now I was at the point of complete despair.  I pointed out to Jamie that we’d spent six months planning and talking about and looking forward to this trip, and that the show was only thirty minutes away, and that he would absolutely, positively love it and would never forget it for years and years.  I gave him the biggest hug he would tolerate (he is a teenager, after all) and told him how very, very sorry I was about the four lads and how very, very sorry I was that I didn’t explain about the Fest earlier, and that I never thought for a moment that he would think the Beatles themselves would be here (but then I dropped that part, because it seemed that Jamie was beginning to feel a secondary remorse about having thought such an unlikely thing).  And after another ten minutes of trying to cheer him up and salvage the whole dang trip, I got him to the point where he was at least willing to get in line with the crowd of people already milling around the “Love” theater and buzzing excitedly about what was going to be the highlight of the evening for everyone who hadn’t imagined that the four lads themselves would magically appear at the Mirage.

As I promised long ago, the story ends well.  Jamie gradually came back from the abyss, and warmed to the spectacle of everyone milling around the “Love” theater.  He was thrilled, and rightly so, that we had fourth-row seats (which is why we were at the 10 pm show in the first place—Jamie has a fear of heights, and there were no orchestra seats available for any of the 7 pm shows that week).  And he absolutely, positively loved the show itself, which was stunning (except for the “Lady Madonna” sequence, which was just weird) and will never forget it for years and years.  Even though his father almost ruined the whole trip at the last moment.

We went back the next morning to shop in the Love store and give Jamie some time to cavort in the lobby with the four lads.  (The first one of those pix is now my screen saver.)

Oh, and one last thing.  Yeah, I know this post has nothing to do with the election.  I apologize for being so self-indulgent—it’s just my life and all.  But I’ve gotta say I’ve been getting a wee bit annoyed lately whenever the pro-life folk get to thinking that they have some proprietary relation to Down syndrome.  Why, sometimes the MSM buys into this as well, as when Time magazine described Sarah Palin as “pro-life in practice as well as in theory” because “she recently gave birth to a son that she knew would have Down Syndrome.”  Yes, I know everyone has moved on to other things with Gov. Palin, like all of that under the umbrella of job creation.  But guess what?  Janet and I are pro-choice in theory and practice.  And if you choose to have a child with Down syndrome, we’ll support all the educational, medical, and vocational programs you and your kid will ever need.  Though you have to take your kid to Vegas on your own dime.  You know, in order to preserve the integrity of our free market system.  Try to get a good package deal.

Oh, and one last last thing.  It has occurred to me over the past year that I might just be the worst co-blogger ever to besmirch the internets. “Sporadic” and “desultory” doesn’t even begin to get at it.  So I’ve decided to re-open the old blog for, oh, I dunno, a little while at least.  Maybe I’ll even keep it up til the end of the year.  You can find the thing here, if you’re so inclined.  Amanda, Jesse, Pam, and Auguste, thanks again for the trip to Pandagonia, and best wishes to you all!

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Michael Bérubé on 02:14 PM • (14) Comments

Job requirements for the best co-blogger ever to besmirch the internets:

(1) Doesn’t monopolize the bandwidth.

(2) May not say much, but always of interest when he or she posts.

Comment #1: rea  on  09/29  at  02:37 PM

Glad Jamie had a good time.  smile

I remember watching Beatlemania! in Hollywood, way back in the day.  Fun stuff…

Comment #2: MikeEss  on  09/29  at  02:47 PM

I was there! In that same room!  But back in December! The drinks were ludicrously expensive! I’m glad Jamie enjoyed it! What was his favorite part of the show?

Comment #3: MH  on  09/29  at  03:01 PM

I’m right with you.

My brother also has Down Syndrome, and I get royally pissed at people acting like it’s the greatest sacrifice in the world to carry a person with DS to term, and that no one except pro-lifers would ever do so by choice.

That said, I wish so many with DS weren’t aborted, but that’s more a case of needing to educate the masses about the reality of the syndrome and not hiding people with disabilities away.

Only the woman carrying the child knows what she can handle, and I’ll always trust her to know best.

Palin…I don’t trust as far as I could toss a moose.  But I do think Trig might be able to teach her the true meaning of unconditional love.

Thanks for finishing the story.

Comment #4: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  09/29  at  03:15 PM

CS-bCAP, I’m right there with you on your being right there with me.  I just left it implicit for this here post, but what’s really galling about the “Down syndrome = pro-life” assumption is the underlying assumption—shared by people across the political spectrum—that Down syndrome is so horrible that no one would choose to bear such a child unless compelled to do so.  And I post these Jamie stories partly because I completely agree with your third graf, too.  And the fourth, and the fifth. . . .

And yes, those drinks were ludicrously expensive.  But hey, we saved $120 by not going to the Fest That Cannot For Legal Reasons Be Called BeatleFest, so it’s all good.  And lately I’ve found that you can’t ask Jamie a “what was your favorite” question, because, ecumenical thinker that he is, he replies, “all of it / them.”  But I think the flying-skateboarding sequence that accompanied “Help!” was one of the high points for him.

rea, thanks for the gracious reply.  It’s always been fun posting here—I just got tired of chiding myself for being so sporadic and desultory and all.

Comment #5: Michael Bérubé  on  09/29  at  03:40 PM

What’s really galling about the “Down syndrome = pro-life” assumption is the underlying assumption—shared by people across the political spectrum—that Down syndrome is so horrible that no one would choose to bear such a child unless compelled to do so.

Too revelatory and significant a point not to be reiterated.

Comment #6: Ranylt  on  09/29  at  03:58 PM

“Sporadic” and “desultory” doesn’t even begin to get at it.

On the contrary, those provide an excellent start.

So I’ve decided to re-open the old blog for, oh, I dunno, a little while at least.

...Oh.  Well, then.

SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

[Throws virtual panties on virtual stage]

Comment #7: mds  on  09/29  at  04:32 PM

Mr. Pennell surprised me with tickets to Love when we were in Vegas getting married. It was an amazing show and by far the second best thing about the trip. I’m glad Jamie enjoyed the show.

Comment #8: DarcyPennell  on  09/29  at  06:10 PM

I’m glad that it was a memorable and positive time for you.

But, as a person, I don’t have the capacity to read Flowers for Algernon as anything but a tragedy, and my aspirations as a potential parent aren’t to produce a human being who will be a child his or her entire life.

That said, I wish so many with DS weren’t aborted, but that’s more a case of needing to educate the masses about the reality of the syndrome and not hiding people with disabilities away.

If you say so. The more contact my wife and I have with that “education”, the more certain we become that we would abort such a fetus. I think, in fact, that most people are very much aware of the reality of the syndrome, and of other forms of mental handicap, and that is why they choose to abort.

But look, I don’t judge Michael or anybody who made a different choice. I don’t think any less (or more) of him and his family for their choices. I don’t even think less of his son, though obviously I have sympathy for his condition. It’s not my place to judge. But I know in my heart that he could never be the son or daughter I would hope to raise.

Which is why, I guess, he’s lucky to have Michael as a father.

Comment #9: Chet  on  09/29  at  06:34 PM

Thanks for the comment about the nonsensical pro-life/Downs link.  When we were expecting our middle child there was a moment when the doctors thought there might be a genetic disorder (turns out that, no, they were seeing stuff on the sonogram that they didn’t know how to interpret in the primitive days of the late 20th century), most likely Downs.  The more we learned, the clearer it became that we could not see aborting a Downs baby, but that some of the other, life-threatening possibilities meant we couldn’t see carrying the baby to term.  That was when I became, in a practical sense, pro-choice.

Comment #10: klk  on  09/30  at  12:15 PM

I also hate the assumption on the part of many that Sarah Palin is some sort of saint for choosing to carry a baby with Down’s to term.  It’s like they think that Trig is going to grow up to be some kind of monster who will need to be chained up in the basement.

Comment #11: keshmeshi  on  09/30  at  04:29 PM

That was when I became, in a practical sense, pro-choice.

And in a theoretical sense too!  For me, it was upon reading Rayna Rapp’s Testing Women, Testing the Fetus that I confronted the vast range of factors that go into people’s decisionmaking about abortion and disability.  It’s a pretty sobering read.

Best wishes to all your family from all of mine—

Comment #12: Michael Bérubé  on  09/30  at  05:20 PM

“Sporadic”? “Desultory”? While that scumbag DHo continues to consume oxygen he isn’t entitled to, without you smacking him down? Come on, man! And while you’re taking Jamie around to Beatles shows, you should watch for a Fab Faux appearance. Or maybe you already have. You’re too sporadic and desultory for me to be sure.

Comment #13: Steve  on  09/30  at  07:34 PM

What’s really galling about the “Down syndrome = pro-life” assumption is the underlying assumption—shared by people across the political spectrum—that Down syndrome is so horrible that no one would choose to bear such a child unless compelled to do so.

This bugs the crap out of me, too. So much so that I wrote a post on it at Shakesville a couple weeks ago: Disability, Parental Martyrdom, and Reproductive Choice.

Welcome back to the blogosphere, Professor! As an aspiring dangeral studies scholar, I’m delighted to see you back—and to hear the end of this story.

Comment #14: Sweet Machine  on  10/01  at  12:03 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.