Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Oh, Hey, Look At That! Previous entry: God Spoke, or The Acceptance (Without Jokes)

Ann Coulter: Baninated!

imageMatt Drudge claims that NBC has instituted a ban on Ann Coulter in favor of America’s Second Worst Public Figure, Perez Hilton. 

The most damning quote comes from this obviously very, very real Today Show insider who I’m very sure said exactly this, which is entirely reflective of the mindset of the show’s producers:

One network insider claims it was the book’s theme—a brutal examination of liberal bias in the new era—that got executives to dis-invite the controversialist.

“We are just not interested in anyone so highly critical of President-elect Obama, right now,” a TODAY insider reveals. “It’s such a downer. It’s just not the time, and it’s not what our audience wants, either.”

Others inside the peacock network strongly deny the book’s theme is at issue.

I’m pretty sure that’s been the theme of everything she’s ever written.  Now, one has to wonder how there’s a person at NBC who says, in a perfect capsule, the exact thing that summarizes every conservative complaint about the librul MSM.  One should probably instead wonder how much I have to pay a gopher to anonymously say whatever I want about whomever I want.  For twenty bucks, I got the coffee guy for TV’s Extreme Makeover: Home Edition to tell me, “We keep putting these growhouses in the new homes we build, right over the asbestos mounds.  Everyone here hates black people.  Fuck damn bitch.”

Now, I don’t mind Ann Coulter being cut from Today, not out of any sense of righteous indignation at her opposition to the New Nubian Fascism, but because she’s roughly akin to a novelty act that you keep inviting back on because maybe the novelty will get slightly bigger or slightly more dangerous.  She’s like the guy who can eat a hamburger in one bite - oddly fascinating the first couple of time times, but when his act gets down to putting extra mayo on the thing, it’s sort of run its course.  It would be more entertaining to have the Swift Kids for Truth reenact an Ann Coulter interview than to actually have her on.  Simply put, she sucks.  She’s boring.  She’s stupid.  I don’t think there’s a politically aware person in America who can’t make predictable fag and woman jokes about Democrats to their heart’s content without giving this idiot more play. 

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 08:03 AM • (40) Comments

But… but… Jesse… she’s hot! How will I, sitting here in my parent’s basement, make fag and woman jokes about Democrats while convincing myself that doing so has the possibility of getting me laid without actually having to shower or go outside without Ann Coulter to stare at longingly on the television?

I’ve already re-read “Atlas Shrugged” picturing Angelina Jolie as the protagonist THREE times, and Sarah… oh Sarah… how we miss you…

Comment #1: Andrew  on  01/06  at  10:21 AM

Now I’ve heard that she WILL be on the Today Show (a/k/a The Ruin My Coffee Programme) tomorrow, Wednesday.  Sigh…if it wasn’t for The Weather Channel, I’d have nothing to watch while I wake.

Comment #2: Sir Winston Thriller  on  01/06  at  10:25 AM

1) Now, one has to wonder how there’s a person at NBC who says, in a perfect capsule, the exact thing that summarizes every conservative complaint about the librul MSM.

That is the power of accurate critiques.  Amazing, isn’t it?  If you’re going to start complaining about anonymous sources, then your linking is going to be considerably curtailed—the NY Times constantly cites unnamed sources who are critical of republicans.


2) Yeah, they hand out University of Michigan law degrees to stupid people all the time.

Comment #3: Al  on  01/06  at  10:27 AM

“controversialist”

Huh.

So that’s their euphemism for fact-free hate-spewage?

I’m encouraged that she was dropped, b/c perhaps that means her 15 minutes are finally up.  Not that there are dozens of fact-free hate mongers out there ready to replace her at the drop of a hat, and not that Matt Lauer won’t gleefully engage them, but perhaps Coulter can go away now.

I’m agreeing with a previous poster that the only place left for Ann to go is the n-word.  She’s going to continue to get traction with MRA types with her latest attacking divorced women and their children, but too many ‘real’ people have lived through divorced or know people who divorced to buy the MRA line that all divorced women suck.

Comment #4: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  01/06  at  10:33 AM

Caren beat me to it with “controversialist,” though I think that’s an accurate term for her, if a bit too nice.

That NBC dropped her is a fairly big deal, because even though Coulter doesn’t really sell books—the wingnut welfare brigade buys them up and inflates the numbers—she does (or did) get a lot of face time, and kept the psycho wing happy and therefore contributing to their various foundations. If she can’t get on tv anymore, she’s of no use to them. Hope she saved some of that money, because she might find it hard to get her next book published.

Comment #5: Incertus, Nacho Daddy  on  01/06  at  10:56 AM

That is the power of accurate critiques.  Amazing, isn’t it?  If you’re going to start complaining about anonymous sources, then your linking is going to be considerably curtailed—the NY Times constantly cites unnamed sources who are critical of republicans.

Actually, I’ll be complaining about obviously fabricated anonymous sources saying things that only make sense in an ideological fantasy world.

As much as I’d love an anonymous GOP source pointing out that the conservative aversion to gays and lesbians probably has a lot to do with all the closeted and self-loathing people in the party, I highly doubt anyone’s going to find a source who’s just willing to toss that out there.

Comment #6: Jesse Taylor  on  01/06  at  11:04 AM

1) I love that you gloss over that you demeaned a woman with a law degree from a prestigious university because she disagrees with you.

2) Shorter Jesse: Anonymous sources are accurate when I say they are.  Stay tuned for further updates.

Comment #7: Al  on  01/06  at  11:20 AM

“Yeah, they hand out University of Michigan law degrees to stupid people all the time. “

There’s more than one way to get into law school.  IF you know what I mean.

Comment #8: Notorious P.A.T.  on  01/06  at  11:21 AM

Well, I can see this will end up being a useful thread. And yet it had such promise…

Comment #9: norbizness  on  01/06  at  11:26 AM

Yeah, they hand out University of Michigan law degrees to stupid people all the time.

Well, I don’t know.  Harvard gave Bush an MBA.  Why can’t the University of Michigan give academic degrees to idiots too?

Comment #10: Jennifer  on  01/06  at  11:44 AM

I possess several graduate degrees. Mostly they are a test of endurance and determination. If you have a damned desire to get a degree, you’ll get one. If you decide that you want to stop thinking afterwards, no one is going to stop you. Defending someone against charges of being “stupid” based on an academic accomplishment they made 20 years ago isn’t really much of a defense.

Comment #11: Tyro  on  01/06  at  11:48 AM

Al, if you so smarty pants n stuff, wy don u hab one ub dem jobby thingy’s?????

Comment #12: Ms Kate  on  01/06  at  11:53 AM

Put a sock in it Al.  Coulter is perfectly intelligent.  I think what Jesse meant is that her schtick is stupid and predictable.

There’s plenty of very bright people who are total pieces of shit.  Do I even have to cite any examples?

Comment #13: ummeli  on  01/06  at  12:12 PM

I think that Al is demonstrating the conservative problem whereby they judge people by some gestalt of who that person “is”. Ann Coulter is considered to be a “smart person,” so they defend her against charges of being stupid. Jesse, being a bit more liberal-minded, looks at what Coulter does and how she acts, and says, “these are the actions of the stupid.” Such reasoning has no currency with Al because Al believes that Coulter’s status as “smart” means that she is invulnerable to charges of stupidity, regardless of Coulter’s actual actions.

A similar mindset is at work in decreeing Bush to be a good and/or virtuous person, despite his behavior and actions which are the acts of a bad person.

Comment #14: Tyro  on  01/06  at  12:15 PM

1) I love that you gloss over that you demeaned a woman with a law degree from a prestigious university because she disagrees with you.

And I love:

1) How right-wingers all become more feminist than Andrea Dworkin as long as they’re using it as a tool to attack progressives and defend their own Token Female mouthpieces.  Of course, as Sarah Palin discovered and Ann Coulter will, that protection dissolves as soon as they stop being useful and pretty, but in the meantime…

2) That you either truly consider something as mild as “She’s stupid” to be “demeaning”, or you’re just pretending to so you can abuse the lingo of feminism still further. 

3) That you either genuinely believe that a law degree automatically places someone above accusations of stupidity, regardless of their actions, for the rest of their lives, or you’re using it as a cheap “gotcha” because it’s actually the fact that she agrees with you that insulates her from all criticism forever.

Comment #15: Seraph  on  01/06  at  01:02 PM

Al,

Clearly you don’t understand how anonymous sourcing works, or have a very simplistic view of it. I’ll explain: in serious journalism, anonymous sourcing of any sort (there are several levels—background, deep background, etc.) is discouraged by editors. It’s reserved for cases where the source can expect serious retaliation from his organisation or supervisor (e.g. for whistle-blowing or taking sides in an internal dispute), or where the organisation where the source works has a blanket policy that non-designated staff can’t talk to the press. Even then, editors usually insist that the source be identified as specifically as possible without blowing his identity in order to demonstrate that the source has some authority on the topic at hand (e.g. “senior White House aide,” “a vice president at the company’s widget division,” “a veteran producer,” etc.). “Deep Throat” type sources, who remain a mystery for decades, are very rare, and for good reason (Nixon was powerful, corrupt and vindictive).

When a writer uses terms like “one network insider” to describe his source, he’s entered the realm of gossip. There, the anonymous sources are generally PR reps shilling a client, jilted lovers, ex friends, and others who either stand to gain financially or fulfill on a personal vendetta. This is the stuff of “Page Six” and the National Enquirer—they don’t exactly aspire to serious journalism as the NYT does.

Since Drudge chooses to be deliberately vague (it could be anyone from Jeff Zucker to the night janitor), the reader is left open to speculate on who this “insider” is. I wouldn’t attach much credibility to a drunk and self-important junior Today Show booker that Drudge was trying to pick up at a gay spa on New Year’s Eve, but that’s my opinion.

Drudge has built his career, such as it is, on conflating gossip with serious journalism. And it’s no co-incidence that he chooses to pander to bedwetting conservatives like yourself—you lot aren’t exactly known for critical thinking or questioning of (false) authority, but you’re right up there when it comes to prurient interest in gossip and seeking even the slimmest confirmation for your biases.

As for attending U. Mich Law School, it doesn’t mean that one is stupid, but it definitely doesn’t mean that one is smart—especially in one’s current actions. I’ve met a lot of moronic lawyers and MBAs in my time, but perhaps you’re one of those readers of The Wizard of Oz who really believed that being handed a diploma gave the scarecrow brains.

Comment #16: Gracchus  on  01/06  at  01:05 PM

There’s more than one way to get into law school.  IF you know what I mean.

Careful, P.A.T.  That’s awful close to all the jokes about how ugly/unfuckable/mannish Coulter is - attacking Coulter for her femininity instead of her character.  There are plenty of evil, stupid male conservative lawyers, and you wouldn’t automatically accuse one of them of getting into Law School by blowing the admissions panel, no matter how many of them turn out to be closeted.

Comment #17: Seraph  on  01/06  at  01:16 PM

Unless you were accusing her of bribery, in which case I apologize.

Comment #18: Seraph  on  01/06  at  01:17 PM

I don’t think there’s a politically aware person in America who can’t make predictable fag and woman jokes about Democrats to their heart’s content without giving this idiot more play.

There is so much fun to be had with her, and that’s the way you deal with the phenomenon. She’s a live-action troll, and troll-baiting is at its best when it’s absurdist. Punk Ann Coulter, or ignore her.

Comment #19: pseudonymous in nc  on  01/06  at  02:05 PM

I wonder how many people know who the luchadore is supposed to be and why he would relate to the term Banniated.

Comment #20: tootiredoftheright  on  01/06  at  02:20 PM

I wonder how many people know who the luchadore is supposed to be and why he would relate to the term Banniated.

I know who he is, but it’s been a long time since I’ve visited Homestar Runner and the gang so I don’t quite get the “Banniated” reference. Did he move from answering audience e-mails to running his own Web forum?

Comment #21: Gracchus  on  01/06  at  02:50 PM

Not to belabor the obvious, but “controversy” is one of the easiest things to aspire to as a commentator. If you keep attacking and slandering people long enough, you will ipso facto be controversial.

Comment #22: Bitter Scribe  on  01/06  at  03:09 PM

It’s a referance to Trogdor the Burninator.  Who became one of the most popular things on the homestar franchise with an extended version of the song in the email going onto be in Guitar Hero 2, on a t-shirt and clothing line as well as people dressing up as him. http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail58.html is the email that introduces him.

Strongbad by the way has a game out on the wiiware service. It’s a five episode game series. Episode 5 has Trogdor escaping his game and Strong Bad has to put him back into the arcade cabinet and restore reality. There is also a trogdor game on the homestarruner.com website.

Comment #23: tootiredoftheright  on  01/06  at  03:11 PM

Having just seen the documentary “The Aristocrats”, I’m wondering if Coulter is kind of a living performance art piece of the same type.

Someday, someone’s going to ask her “and what do you call the act?” and she’ll answer “The Aristocrats! Thank god, now I can stop this bullshit game!” and become someone normal.

Nah; she’s just squeezing the tit of Conservativism until money comes out, and will keep on squeezing even if the money goes away, sure enough that if she tweaks it hard enough, they’ll keep paying her to shit on America and its values. Because that’s what free market capitalism is all about, after all.

Comment #24: LongHairedWeirdo  on  01/06  at  03:59 PM

I love that you gloss over that you demeaned a woman with a law degree from a prestigious university because she disagrees with you.

And yet Ann Coulter has no problem demeaning Michelle Obama, a woman who went to an even better law school than Coulter did.  (U of M is #9; Harvard Law is either #1 or #2 depending on whose rankings you look at). 

So why is it bad for Jesse to criticize Coulter but it’s perfectly fine for Coulter to criticize Obama, who’s clearly her academic superior?

Of course, even Coulter knows she can’t claim to be smarter than Michelle Obama, which is why she can only criticize the way Obama dresses for being too sophisticated and Jackie Kennedy-like.

Comment #25: Mnemosyne  on  01/06  at  04:05 PM

Careful, P.A.T.  That’s awful close to all the jokes about how ugly/unfuckable/mannish Coulter is - attacking Coulter for her femininity instead of her character.  There are plenty of evil, stupid male conservative lawyers, and you wouldn’t automatically accuse one of them of getting into Law School by blowing the admissions panel, no matter how many of them turn out to be closeted.

I don’t think that was where P.A.T. was going with that.  If you seem like a “good fit” for a college/university because your background is like that of most of the student body…you will have an easier time of gaining admission than if you didn’t…..even if your academic record is marginal at best. 

The fact a more extreme version of this…..legacy admissions is still practiced at many topflight public and private Ivy/Ivy-level undergrad/grad schools shows that not everyone who went to [name your Ivy/Ivy-level school] got in on their academic/intellectual merits.  Our current outgoing esteemed president is one such case who managed to get into Harvard Business School despite graduating from Yale College with an overall average in the C- range and having practically no meaningful working experience at the time.

I’m betting there are plenty of people on this blog and elsewhere who personally know/know of someone who got into a topflight college/grad school with similarly subpar academic records.

Comment #26: exholt  on  01/06  at  05:12 PM

Coulter’s pretty much all the righties have got these days, since “Conservatism” is now nothing more than “Things That Piss Off Liberals”.

Let’s hope that people don’t rubberneck this time, since we’ve all seen this wreck before.

Comment #27: Big Bad Bald Bastard  on  01/06  at  05:31 PM

I caught the act on CBS this morning. She spent most of the time being defensive, since the host had rather obvious contempt for her. I predict she’ll get her NBC spot and get similar treatment. Then Al will emerge from his rubber bondage suit (the one with the strategically placed built-in 747 dildo) and whine that poor old Adam’s Apple Annie didn’t get a fair shake from that awful liberal media.

Comment #28: winfernal  on  01/06  at  05:40 PM

“I’m betting there are plenty of people on this blog and elsewhere who personally know/know of someone who got into a topflight college/grad school with similarly subpar academic records. “

Said subpar academic holder having family or friends who contributed heavily to the school or were alumni. It’s affirimitive action for people of privelage.

Comment #29: tootiredoftheright  on  01/06  at  06:22 PM

I saw the YouTube of her CBS Morning Show appearance at Jezebel.

God, I love Harry Smith: “Take a breath. Take a breath! Take. A. BREATH!”

Comment #30: hamletta  on  01/06  at  06:37 PM

They changed their minds:

Coulter booked for ‘Today’ show

Conservative author Ann Coulter will appear on Wednesday’s “Today” show, according to an NBC spokesperson.

Coulter has been talking up being bumped by NBC for the past two days, both on other networks and the radio. A controversy erupted when Drudge splashed that she’d been “banned for life,” leading NBC to deny that she was banned, and later offering her a new segment.

On her website, Coulter writes that “Drudge gets results: Today show changes mind.” She’ll be appearing during both the 7 a.m. and 10 a.m. hours.

So in the end, NBC will probably get more viewers and Coulter will sell more books—or at least further convince those in her camp that the MSM isn’t on her side. Either way, it should be entertaining.

Comment #31: Dana  on  01/06  at  08:46 PM

>>>|I love that you gloss over that you demeaned a woman with a law degree from a prestigious university because she disagrees with you.

Apparently, Michigan’s law school doesn’t care if their grads can research their way out of a paper bag, much less frame an argument with all the skill and finesse of a Sunday morning boozehound.

Thus, we have Ann.

Comment #32: CHV  on  01/06  at  09:17 PM

Said subpar academic holder having family or friends who contributed heavily to the school or were alumni. It’s affirimitive action for people of privelage.

High school classmates who attended classes with such legacies and college classmates/Profs who TAed/taught such courses at Ivy/Ivy-level schools have all mentioned that with few exceptions, they tend to be the most mediocre students they’ve ever encountered in their undergrad/grad school/academic careers.

Comment #33: exholt  on  01/06  at  09:42 PM

This issue is not whether Coulter is smart (she clearly is) but whether she is a hateful, bigoted liar who calls for fully half of her fellow citizens to be sent to concentration camps (she also clearly is).  Any man who said exactly the same things would have been (rightly or wrongly) banned from the major networks a long time ago.  If they gave her half the vetting that they give to Michael Moore, we probably wouldn’t even be having this conversation.

That is the scandalous part: the media’s failure to hold her accountable for the shit she spews because she a “hot” chick (and therefore not to be taken too seriously) and a Republican (and therefore to be given deference).

Comment #34: Captain Bathrobe  on  01/06  at  09:47 PM

They changed their minds.

Of course they did.  Coulter went around and whined about how she’s a victim and the MSM is so mean to her and don’t they know she’s an entertainer and she got them to back down.

Whining about the mean ol’ liberals always works for conservatives.

Comment #35: Mnemosyne  on  01/06  at  10:25 PM

Of course they did.  Coulter went around and whined about how she’s a victim and the MSM is so mean to her and don’t they know she’s an entertainer and she got them to back down.

Well, she said herself that “that is how you get ahead in America, by being a victim.” She’s just following her own advice. Or being monstrously hypocritical. One or the other.

Comment #36: Lauren O  on  01/06  at  11:03 PM

I hate to get off topic.  But is that really a picture of Strongbad being attached by a bear wielding a shark??

Comment #37: ShortWoman  on  01/07  at  01:44 AM

Yes, and that looks like a really machoized version of Strongbad, maybe to make him more distinguishable from Senor Cardgage.

Comment #38: Dr. Squid  on  01/07  at  02:17 PM

“really machoized version of “

Play 8-bit is Enough to see how Strongbad views himself he has far more muscles then that Deviantart looking version does.

Comment #39: tootiredoftheright  on  01/07  at  02:56 PM

I don’t know, maybe the NBC producers thought she had nothing much of interest to say after yet another book of probably little perceptible difference from any of her previous books, or indeed any other wingnut book that’s been published since the Clinton administration.

Shame on them for allowing themselves to be shamed into letting her on.

Comment #40: Brian X  on  01/08  at  04:21 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.