Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: I Eagerly Await Sarah Palin’s Spell-Checked Exhortations On This Matter Previous entry: Girls, Girls, Girls!

Anti-choice bottom feeders feign outrage

So here’s another one of those fun anti-choice legends that are forming as we speak: Mechelle Hall of Minnesota was rolling up to a women’s health clinic in order to get an abortion back in November, when a mother/daughter duo of fetus worshippers confronted her.  And she pulled a knife on them.  She just got sentenced to probation—-it seems like it’s possibly contingent on pleasing the victims in this case by not having an abortion, though it’s hard to tell from the report—-and now she’s bleating about how her victims “converted” her and she’s going to have the baby now.

For conservatives, this is a heart-warming tale of a bad woman transformed by the power of Baby into a sweet, submissive woman that does her duty to god and country.  (Which is one reason you should approach this with a big grain of salt—-anti-choicers always pick the better story over the true story.)  For people whose access to reality isn’t completely warped by sexist ideology, this story is fucking alarming.  There are three possibilities here, in the real world:

1) Hall genuinely felt threatened by these women and acted out of character.
  We can probably dismiss this.  People who act violently out of character aren’t usually armed like Hall was, plus her willingness to listen to her supposed assailants would discredit this reading.  On the off chance they did actually threaten her, then all this tells us is that someone is lying about this story.  Or that anti-choicers are bragging about how they wield the fear of violence in order to scare women out of abortions, but I don’t think they’re trying to do that.

2) Hall is the sort of person who flies off the handle at the slightest provocation.  A much likelier possibility.  Thousands of women parade past anti-choice nuts to get into clinics for abortions every month, and they may yell at them or taunt them on the way out, but they pretty much never pull a knife on them.  For rational people who care about actual born children, the fact that a would-be mother has such a short temper is troubling.  For anti-choicers, real children are irrelevant; making sure women are constantly producing offspring that society can then neglect is their priority.  Hot Air is trumpeting this story, for instanceAnd their overwhelming indifferent to the well-being of actual children is well-documented.

3) Hall has serious mental health issues.
  If so, then the willingness of the anti-choice movement to exploit a woman’s mental illness in order to produce a baby they “saved”, but not getting the mother or the child any help at all, is fucking gross and despicable. 

I tweeted this incident over the weekend, writing, “Convincing unstable, violent women to have children, one crazy incident at a time. Good work, antis!”  Naturally, conservative bloggers, a group that delights in their ability to avoid ever arguing in good faith, pretended to be outraged.  For instance, at Hot Air.

And what is Amanda Marcotte’s point, anyway? That certain people shouldn’t be allowed to have children and should have mandated abortions if they get pregnant? Does that really sound like someone who is fighting for choice?


Nowhere in my tweet did I say Hall should be forced to have an abortion, and to suggest otherwise is fundamentally dishonest.  But since they asked, here’s my answer:

My point is that anti-choicers are the bottom feeders of our political system.  They never met a troubled person they weren’t willing to exploit.  If they were determined to fill their ranks honestly, recruiting stable people through rational arguments, they’d have no movement.  They encourage troubled, vulnerable people to avoid seeking real help and instead blame all their problems on abortion’s legality.  They target people who are in personal crisis in order to exploit them, and offer them little to no help, and the help they offer is contingent on using those people for “heart-warming” stories. 

Let’s think about this story, from a more rational perspective, shall we?  Most women who go to clinics walk by the protesters and see their bullying bullshit for what it is, and everyone knows it.  But one woman freaked out and behaved in a highly irrational way, pulling a knife out instead of just ducking her head down and going in.  That sent a signal to the antis that there’s probably something wrong with her—-either she’s a violent person who probably would like to join up with the bully corps, or she’s a troubled person that is easy to exploit.  Either way, they saw her as a mark and zeroed in.  I hope for Hall’s sake and that of her child that whatever help she actually needs, she gets.  But I hope she realizes her newfound fetus loving friends won’t be providing that, and goes elsewhere. 

Hope that clarifies what I meant by that tweet!

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 05:32 PM • (48) Comments

Ironic that such an -apparently- righteous, honorable “cause” should promoted by such ignorant-and-proud-of-it, yet manipulative, assholes.

Comment #1: Kwillow  on  02/22  at  06:02 PM

A fourth possibility: this is all a big hoax perpetrated by the antis.  That wouldn’t surprise me at all.

Comment #2: JoanofArc  on  02/22  at  06:05 PM

“Nowhere in my tweet did I say Hall should be forced to have an abortion, and to suggest otherwise is fundamentally dishonest.”

Surely it might just be an outgrowth of a view that cannot conceive of a movement whose ultimate goal isn’t forcing others to do what they believe is best.

Comment #3: preying mantis  on  02/22  at  06:06 PM

Definitely going with hoax on this one.  Mechelle looks eerily similar to the girl with the backwards B.

Comment #4: drachonfire  on  02/22  at  06:14 PM

I was just about to comment what Joan says. This smells eerily like a little too much on the nose occurrences.

Comment #5: Ross Lincoln  on  02/22  at  06:18 PM

But she actually did get arrested and got probation….that’s a lot for a hoax.  Your average wingnut is way too much of a coward.  Hell, most of us are.

Comment #6: Amanda Marcotte  on  02/22  at  06:43 PM

How about option 4?

Mechelle Hall is an anti-choice plant that never really intended to have an abortion, and this entire incident was staged to make pro-choice women look mentally unstable, but they can be redeemed by simply “agreeing” that women’s reproductive rights should be forfeited?

Comment #7: DTG in STL  on  02/22  at  06:45 PM

I’m a libertarian who just so happens to be pro choice.  How, you ask, is that possible?  Simple, my brand of libertarianism is not influenced by my religious beliefs.  To pretend to be a conservative and therefore against expansive government yet turn around and say that the body of 51% of the population is a ward of the state is hypocritical.  In order to outlaw abortion you must, by definition and implication, exponentially increase government police powers.  This is a contradiction to a true conservative idology, much in the same way same-sex marriage opponents are forwarding an equally hypocritical position.  A libertarian can be a proponent of a woman’s reproductive autonomy and same-sex marriage only if your brand of conservativism is not steeped in religious ideology.  On this issue and same-sex marriage, you have a staunch ally in this chubby libertarian.

Comment #8: Prankaplegic  on  02/22  at  07:08 PM

No surprise there.  Assuming it’s not just a rhetorical trick, it just proves that Anti-choicers, like most authoritarians, only seem to understand two options: if it isn’t forbidden, it’s mandatory.

Comment #9: Seraph  on  02/22  at  07:19 PM

IDK, I’d be tempted to pull a knife (or shotgun) on these women hating shitstains. They’re nothing but bullies.

Comment #10: pitbullgirl65  on  02/22  at  07:38 PM

Good for you, Prank.  I do fail to see why your self-congratulation is relevant to the post, though.

Comment #11: Amanda Marcotte  on  02/22  at  07:59 PM

Good point Amanda. I would point out that lots and lots and lots and lots of people have risked far worse for political theater, both legitimate and illegitimate varieties. She got probation. Probation doesn’t really follow you like a real sentence does.

Really, it’s just hitting so many pro forced pregnancy narrative notes that I can’t believe it. Something doesn’t add up. Maybe it’s because she cray cray, however. Cray cray doesn’t have to add up.

Comment #12: Ross Lincoln  on  02/22  at  08:12 PM

Oh and also, Prankaplegic is an Author. Dreamweaver. Visionary. Plus actor.

Comment #13: Ross Lincoln  on  02/22  at  08:14 PM

A libertarian can be a proponent of a woman’s reproductive autonomy and same-sex marriage only if your brand of conservativism is not steeped in religious ideology.

Very true…

It’s funny, I’ve always wondered why the socialist Swedes became enamored of eugenics, but until Amanda’s little Freudian slip here, I never understood the connection.

But when you believe in nebulous concepts like the public good and collective responsibility, it’s not so much of stretch of the imagination to veer off into the public regulation of formerly personal decisions.  Maybe smokers shouldn’t be allowed to have publicly funded heart surgery.  Or maybe smoking should be banned? 

Both of the above don’t sound THAT unreasonable, do they?  So….

Since mental illnesses have a strong genetic component, maybe women with mental issues shouldn’t have babies, if it’ll put an undue burden on everyone else.  Or maybe people with genetically-linked diseases should forfeit the right of their children to publicly funded treatment?  After all, many on this blog have commented on how selfish the decision to have children is; clearly having children with the potential to develop a mental illness is even more selfish. 

Imposing collective responsibilities on people inevitably erodes personal freedom.  Mock libertarians if you wish, but without at least some people committed to the ideal of pure personal freedom, even a dream socialist Tony Blair Third Way paradise becomes a nightmarish British Police State mighty fast.

Comment #14: PeterZeroOne  on  02/22  at  08:18 PM

Something definitely doesn’t add up.  But they’ve managed to “convert” a few women, invariably by targeting those in crisis, like Abby Johnson or the woman who was “Roe” in Roe v. Wade.

Comment #15: Amanda Marcotte  on  02/22  at  08:20 PM

I might be tempted to carry something for self-defense if I had to run that gauntlet. Although pepper spray or mace would be more sensible.
If it was a Swiss army knife type knife, she could have simply had it for legit reasons.

However, I think that a woman with the confidence and determination to show she’s willing to defend herself, wouldn’t be likely to be swayed by those she considered enemies.

So, either unstable or Option 4. Given the fakes the conservatives have committed before, I think Option 4 is very likely. and going so far as to be arrested and put on probation? Either she’s got no problem with that because of a past arrest record, or she’s too protected to really suffer for it, or (most likely), the actors in this little Kabuki were too fucking stupid to realize that reporting a knife threat would result in actual fucking consequences. Consequences are only for *bad* people, dontcha know?

Comment #16: Samantha Vimes  on  02/22  at  08:20 PM

Good for you, Prank.  I do fail to see why your self-congratulation is relevant to the post, though.

Just letting y’all know not every conservative is unaware of how religion can muddle up ideology and that a libertarian can be covetous of both a woman’s right to choose and the ability of same-sex couples to wed.  The market place of political ideology should be as free from religion, irrationality, and ignorance as possible.

Comment #17: Prankaplegic  on  02/22  at  08:30 PM

“But when you believe in nebulous concepts like the public good and collective responsibility, it’s not so much of stretch of the imagination to veer off into the public regulation of formerly personal decisions.”

My god, man, the next thing you know we won’t be able to beat our illiterate children and drive our cars on sidewalks while completely wasted!

Comment #18: preying mantis  on  02/22  at  08:33 PM

I was really digging the story until she turned anti-choice.  Like, HELL YEAH, pull a knife on them.

Comment #19: leedevious  on  02/22  at  08:36 PM

It’s funny, I’ve always wondered why the socialist Swedes became enamored of eugenics, but until Amanda’s little Freudian slip here, I never understood the connection.

Name a Western country that did not become enamored of eugenics at some point.  Right here in California, it was legal to involuntarily sterilize people until the 1970s, and most of the other 50 states had similar laws.

Sorry, but you don’t get to sneer about Sweden when your countrymen were doing the exact same thing.

Comment #20: Mnemosyne  on  02/22  at  08:37 PM

Pepper spray might get in they eyes of clinic escorts, who probably wouldn’t appreciate it.  Mace is better; a friend of mine has a 14th or 15th century German mace that would do nicely.  It may be old, but I’m sure it would still function properly, especially given the dearth of armor worn by most anti-choice fanatics.

Comment #21: libdevil  on  02/22  at  08:48 PM

“Right here in California, it was legal to involuntarily sterilize people until the 1970s, and most of the other 50 states had similar laws.”

There’s also a mistake in conflating eugenics with the extremes of it like involuntary sterilization.  Given that the anti-choice movement is not just in bed with but spooning with the same party that’s all about punishing reproduction in the “unfit” in less extreme ways while trying to force the “fit” to reproduce whether they want to or not, there’s enough irony here to get the wrinkles out of a shirt the size of Texas.

Comment #22: preying mantis  on  02/22  at  08:52 PM

Sorry, but you don’t get to sneer about Sweden when your countrymen were doing the exact same thing.

I’m pretty sure he was sneering at liberals. Slippery slope and all.

Comment #23: bay of arizona  on  02/22  at  08:57 PM

“Just letting y’all know not every conservative is unaware of how religion can muddle up ideology and that a libertarian can be covetous of both a woman’s right to choose and the ability of same-sex couples to wed.  The market place of political ideology should be as free from religion, irrationality, and ignorance as possible. “

Please Prank, Please. Just. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. Your self-congratulatory masturbation is getting old faster than I am. And that’s saying a lot.

Honestly, I feel like any minute now you’re going to sternly let us know that you are aware of all internet traditions.

Comment #24: Ross Lincoln  on  02/22  at  09:41 PM

I’m going with mental issues. We see this all the time at my clinic—it’s not too far from a hospital with a large outpatient psychiatric program. A person with some form of disorder, often one accompanied by attention-seeking behavior, begins speaking with the antis and within minutes, has been given: a rosary, a baby jesus, and permission to assault and harass everyone within a 50 yard radius.

Often they will try to encourage the person to enter the clinic and pretend to want an abortion, so as to access our waiting room and verbally abuse actual patients.

The antis have no shame, no ethics whatsoever. The protesters I deal with regularly are, without a bit of hyperbole, some of the worst people I’ve ever met.

Comment #25: Well, what?  on  02/22  at  10:08 PM

Regarding the roots of Planned Parenthood: Having to raise, feed, and clothe unwanted children on a limited income back in the Teens was no joke. The alternative to birth control was abortion, which was often fatal.

Check out the fascinating database of Chicago homicides from 1870 to 1930, at homicide.northwestern.edu Of the 11,400 entries, 333 were the result of abortion, with another dozen or so resulting from “illegal” or “crimina"l operations. Abortions performed by an unknown person in an unknown place often resulted in a hospital death.

The comprehensive history of three centuries of abortion in America can be found at http://books.google.com/books?id=lIaHNI0QrBEC Wh,en Abortion Was a Crime.

Comment #26: Hector B.  on  02/22  at  10:50 PM

People who act violently out of character aren’t usually armed like Hall was, plus her willingness to listen to her supposed assailants would discredit this reading.

When I was younger and took the bus to work, I was followed by a man in a car to my workplace in a way that made it obvious he knew my route, appearing twice at the far endpoints of pedestrian-only areas.  The next day, I got a knife, learned how to flip it open quickly one-handed, and carried it with me everywhere.  I don’t think I would have pulled it on someone who tried to stop me from getting an abortion, but I can’t promise it. 

Not everyone comes from or lives in a pleasant nonviolent environment.  Mine wasn’t even particularly bad.  I was influenced by my environment to be ready to inflict damage if necessary.

A victim of violence, or attempted violence, or rape, might act uncharacteristically violent because of PTSD.  What if she was carrying a rapist’s child, or the child of an abusive husband or boyfriend?

She listened to them later.  PTSD can also put you in a passive follower mode.  They promise everything will be wonderful if she “says yes to life.”  Maybe life’s been shit up to now.  There are a million teen moms (not all teen moms fit this description) who think the answer to a shitty life is to have a pretty, pretty baby to call their own and love them forever and ever.

In short, this woman may have been stressed, but not instantaneously.  And the antis preyed on her.

Comment #27: oldfeminist  on  02/22  at  11:14 PM

nightmarish British Police State?

REALLY?

I mean REALLY?

Oh the HORROR of being able to get medical care when it is needed, the NIGHTMARE of being supplied with food and shelter when industry can’t use your labor!!!!  In a civilized country with practically NO crime, where people are POLITE!!!!

Comment #28: KMTBERRY  on  02/22  at  11:24 PM

KMTBERRY, you don’t know the half of it:

Cake or Death!

Comment #29: Dark Avenger Guardian Chow Mein  on  02/22  at  11:39 PM

Please Prank, Please. Just. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. Your self-congratulatory masturbation is getting old faster than I am. And that’s saying a lot.

Honestly, I feel like any minute now you’re going to sternly let us know that you are aware of all internet traditions.

Traditions be damned…along with your screde.  Is it because of my professed ideology or the over self-indulgence?  Either way, eat shit fuckstick.  BTW, there’s nothing wrong with fervent masturbation.  My gf tells me sleeping in the same bed with me is like sleeping next to a paint shaker.  She’s spankerific.

Comment #30: Prankaplegic  on  02/22  at  11:44 PM

Mental-health issues, almost certainly. But do we know that she was let out on bail? Because if not the window for an uncomplicated abortion pretty much closed while she was awaiting trial.

Comment #31: paul  on  02/23  at  12:19 AM

Oh the HORROR of being able to get medical care when it is needed, the NIGHTMARE of being supplied with food and shelter when industry can’t use your labor!!!!  In a civilized country with practically NO crime, where people are POLITE!!!!

Also a country where you get obsessively watched, the government is obsessed with gathering information on the populace, and the police have some vast formal powers.  He’s not too far wrong about Britain, alas.

Comment #32: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  02/23  at  01:02 AM

PIATOR @33 -

I don’t know about Britain, or how much freer things might be in NZ, but you just described the situation in the USA pretty well.  Libertarians accomplished neither jack nor shit in terms of preventing the USA from becoming a police state.  It’s funny how many right-wingers - and remember, Libertarians are nothing more than right-wingers who want to smoke pot - supported the Patriot Act, but now scream that health care reform is the harbinger of a police state.

Comment #33: Seraph  on  02/23  at  01:51 AM

Prankster: Apparently you haven’t thought out libertarianism too much, but the principle of libertarianism seems to be non-gender specific.  At I haven’t read any screeds (yes its spelled screed) that say “Libertarianism for the Male World”.  I realize that most libertarians seem to think that such “liberties” extend only to men and seemed surprised that anyone suggest that women folks might want somma them liberties too, but then again, that just kind of takes away from their street cred, so to speak.

And making the claim that you possess some sort of higher awareness or maybe generosity (?) toward the female gendered and the gay folks pining for legal marriages, isn’t help you gain any respect, nor helping support your libertarian doctrine either.

Now go lick yourself or something.

Comment #34: kate  on  02/23  at  02:24 AM

These anti-choicers remind me when the schools in the south got unsegregated, they had to call in the national guard and assist the students through seas of angry protesters.  Unlike the racist pro-segregationists of the past, the misogynist anti-choicers outside of the clinics won’t go away eventually.

Comment #35: Albert Cirrus  on  02/23  at  02:49 AM

Word to kate.  A Libertarian saying he supports abortion rights is, or should be, just like a clergyman saying he supports people’s right to believe in God.  Forced birth is the most fundamental violation of liberty that anyone can imagine.  But Libertarians think it’s okay for members of their movement to swing either way on this issue. 

In other words, most of those dudes you hang with, Prankaplegic, feel that the state can force a person to go through pregnancy, and then labor, and then parenthood, even if this person didn’t consent to the sex that caused the pregnancy; but it had damn well better not force anyone to wear a motorcycle helmet when he roams the taxpayer-funded highways.  Regulation = violation of liberty.

Forcing a person to endure what might be an extraordinarily intimate, painful, and life-changing torment when she has done nothing wrong?  Meh.  The Libertarian movement doesn’t care.

Comment #36: Unree  on  02/23  at  03:08 AM

@Amanda Marcotte’s comment #6:

That it seems like a lot to be indicted and charged doesn’t seem like such a hurdle to leap for this to be a setup.  The vast majority of people wouldn’t shoot a doctor or plant a bomb either, yet it happens. 

If someone is unstable in the first place and wholeheartedly committed to stopping what she sees as a holocaust, then faking a crime and subsequent conversion, with plenty of positive attention afterwards, could seem a perfectly reasonable plan.  Quite a bit easier than shooting someone, after all. 

She could probably pretty easily convince herself, or be convinced by others, that going to jail for the cause was a kind of civil disobedience; after all, what are the odds she’s actually read Thoreau or King?

After the theater that got ACORN discredited, I wouldn’t trust any right-wing publicity not to be the result of a cheap stunt.

Comment #37: Chocolate Covered Cotton  on  02/23  at  06:29 AM

“planned parenthood was founded on mandating abortions for undesirables.”

[citation needed].

Of course, we can just make shit up and pretend it’s true too.  Like, “Knuterockne is a misogynist who beats up diabetic old women for their sugarless candy!”

Hey, that’s kinda fun.  No wonder you dishonest misogynistic fucks lie so much.

Comment #38: Gypsy Lee  on  02/23  at  11:18 AM

I realize this is a little late to the party, but…

A libertarian can be a proponent of a woman’s reproductive autonomy and same-sex marriage only if your brand of conservativism is not steeped in religious ideology.

That’s a lovely sentiment, except that it’s completely unrealistic, if not from a rational perspective of how the world is actually set up to work, then at least from a political perspective.

Let’s be realistic and not pretend that the libertarian party is going to have the ability to pull enough votes to impact national elections. Also, let’s acknowledge the fact that the most famous libertarian candidate in the last election was anti-choice.

Let’s discuss this political beast called “caucusing.” Because voting libertarian is basically a waste of your vote, most libertarians still have to cast their vote for one of the two major parties. And what this comes down to is a choice between Democrats, whose platform generally favors personal freedoms (like bodily autonomy and not being thrown in jail or killed by a mob if you happen to be attracted to the same sex), or the Republicans, who (in theory) favors material freedoms (lower taxes, even though this is a canard, and the ability to own guns, even though the Dems have pretty much abandoned the gun control platform). So the freedoms break down to either BEING, or OWNING. And you would think that, as far as primacy goes, that the libertarians would be much more invested in protecting the liberties of the very self as a primary goal before worrying about the freedoms of protecting material possessions.

And yet libertarians, time and again, throw in with Republicans. Republicans know they can count on the libertarian vote, even though they doggedly pursue government controls over the most private and fundamental aspects of people’s lives.

And why is this ok? Because the overwhelming majority of Libertarians are straight white males who will never have to worry about the government forcing them to carry a child they don’t want to term, and they will never have to worry about being arrested for having sex with their partners because their partners are opposite sex. Their personal autonomy is never under threat, so they can feel good about protecting their guns from imaginary threats and complaining that taxation is theft. So the libertarian “ideal” is basically “I GOT MINE, FUCK Y’ALL.”

Comment #39: Mighty Ponygirl  on  02/23  at  12:08 PM

BTW, there’s nothing wrong with fervent masturbation.  My gf tells me sleeping in the same bed with me is like sleeping next to a paint shaker.  She’s spankerific.

OK, who made the sockpuppet “libertarian” parody? It was pretty funny and clever, and I was buying it up until that comment.

Comment #40: junk science  on  02/23  at  12:39 PM

I think it’s time for the left to retake the term “libertarian” from the right.  Libertarian is suppose to maximize freedom for everyone, but the right only cares about increasing freedom for a few wealthy white people, large corporations, and a few assholes who want to blow cigarette smoke in your face. 

I forgot who said it if someone wants to help me out, it was something like “a needy man is not a free man.”  That is so true, a true libertarian would care about inequality and poverty and try to use the government to solve these problems.  The so-called libertarian right wants to actually use the government to give more power to large corporations and they act as their own kind of government.  Accept of course that corporations are essentially authoritarian entities, so the “libertarian” right is by proxy authoritarian.

Comment #41: Albert Cirrus  on  02/23  at  01:09 PM

That is so true, a true libertarian would care about inequality and poverty and try to use the government to solve these problems.

Well, the left-libertarian line is that the government “breaks legs and then hands out crutches”, and that this is in its very nature. 

This is an example of the argument.  I’m not sure to what extent I buy it, but I do think it’s worthwhile to be skeptical about how much our current systems of government will ever support this kind of objective.

Comment #42: killjoy  on  02/23  at  09:54 PM

I didn’t read all of the article, but it sounds like the typical right-wing bullshit we hear about how government causes poverty.  There’s no doubt that government anti-poverty programs are incomplete (ironically due to right-wing meddling), but I think they have been successful in keeping the poor out of third-world poverty levels to the point where they can work their way to the middle class.

Comment #43: Albert Cirrus  on  02/25  at  02:15 AM

I found the quote, it was “A hungry man is not a free man” by Adlai Stevenson.

Comment #44: Albert Cirrus  on  02/25  at  02:37 AM

Late to the party on this one, but this happened in the city I live in, and it is endlessly annoying to have this story on the front page of the news for the last week.

Here’s another perspective - perhaps instead of “changing her mind” about having an abortion, she was forced into her choice due to the abortion restrictions that we have in Minnesota.  The clinic that she was going to provides abortions 1 day a week (the doctor is flown in from out of town), we have a 24 hour waiting period which requires a phone call/visit with a medical professional, and the clinic only performs first trimester abortions.  Hence, she most likely was nearing the end of her first trimester, got arrested, and probably timed herself out of being able to access an abortion in this city.  The next closest facility is at least 2 1/2 hours away, making it inaccessibly for many, many women in my city.

Perhaps this was the best way she could spin the whole sad situation.

Comment #45: Annabel  on  02/25  at  05:01 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.