Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: This post is not about who you’re not voting for Previous entry: Bare naked TSA travel, part two

Bamboo Review: Incredible Hulk

imageOf all of Marvel’s core canon superheroes, the Hulk has always been my least favorite, if for no other reason than few writers have ever done anything convincingly interesting with Bruce Banner, the Hulk’s alter ego.  For the most part, he’s simply a milquetoast afraid of the beast that lies within, filling up panel space and providing a deus ex machina for the Big Green Machine to get from point of destruction A to point of destruction B.  He also lacks the villains’ gallery to be a particularly interesting hero - most of those are either stolen from other characters’ castoffs or else entirely uninspiring.  Bi-Beast, for instance, once had a showdown with Squirrel Girl.  Squirrel Girl, for God’s sake.

But still, there’s always hope for the guy.  Peter David managed to put together a thoroughly interesting run with the character in the 90s by going to the core of the character - Banner’s fractured psyche.  It was a long, grueling ride that took years to get through, but it was most definitely worth it.  2003’s Hulk, the not-really-predecessor of this movie - Incredible Hulk picks up where the former left off, but does so with only tangential references and none of the same cast - took part of the David ethos (an intensive character study), and then sucked all the joy out of it, taking two and a half hours to tell one of the simplest origins in comics: guy gets hit by radiation, guy becomes uncontrollable rampaging green monster.

Incredible is thankfully less ponderous than its predecessor, coming in 24 minutes shorter, and the better for it.  It’s leaner, faster, and more logical.  And yes, it’s better…but the original was awful, so that bit of faint praise shouldn’t tell you much.
The part of Incredible that’s the hardest to get past is just how much the makers of the movie are trying to do with it.  From the previews, you know Tony Stark (Robert Downey, Jr.) is in the movie, introducing the Avengers team-up concept.  (Yes, this movie constitutes the first official big-screen superhero crossover.)  The movie also has allusions to 2011’s Captain America - again subtitled “The First Avenger” - and is spending most of its time with the knowledge that it has to make up for the first movie and set up the hopeful sequel. 

It’s better not to think about all that.

The fundamental plot of the movie is threadbare and predictable - Banner’s on the run, Banner gets found, Banner Hulks out, things get destroyed.  But there are flashes where you realize that the people making this actually seemed to have fun, where they gave up the ghost, took the film’s embedded conflicts and relationships, and just said, “Okay, we’re doing this.”  It’s not deep, but it doesn’t need to be

The movie’s shining strength is in its climax, a massive battle between the Hulk and the Abomination (the monstrous CGI alter ego of Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth), given an origin that screams, “Fuck it, it’s a comic book movie”) in the streets of Harlem.  The first reason?  Michael K. Williams (Omar from The Wire) makes a completely unexpected appearance for all of five seconds.  It almost makes you wish they’d given him a brief scene to whistle “Farmer in the Dell”.  The second reason is that it’s a climax that not only makes sense from a storyline perspective, but the action is clear and comprehensible, relying on the fludity of (CGI) motion and the clear portrayal of contact and reaction in the context of a fight.  It’s a welcome break from the normal action movie trope of action-by-cut, where you get the sense things are happening because people are flying and the angle is changing every second.  Even though the scenes are, at best, half real and half computer-generated, it still feels more intimate and more real than 95% of movie slugfests out there. 

Incredible Hulk features a lot of very good actors (Edward Norton, William Hurt, Liv Tyler, Roth) not doing very much.  Bruce Banner is no Tony Stark, Liz Ross is no Pepper Potts.  There’s a tentativeness to a lot of the movie that’s reflected in every aspect of it, a lack of confidence that comes through.  Everything it’s being asked to do is done, at the very least, competently, but you get the sense that if Ang Lee hadn’t made a two and a half hour epic that ended up in the middle of the desert with a giant Nick Nolte blob face screaming to the heavens above, this would be a much lighter and much better movie. 

If you have interest in the character or movie, there’s nothing in it that should make you shy away from seeing it.  But be prepared to see a lot more Hulk Smash and a lot less Banner Emote.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 11:33 AM • (15) Comments

Of all of Marvel’s core canon superheroes, the Hulk has always been my least favorite, if for no other reason than few writers have ever done anything convincingly interesting with Bruce Banner
I’m a fan of Bruce Jones’s run on the hulk; for the first 12 issues he didn’t even feature the Hulk (or at least he was never seen in a panel), instead opting to concentrate on a freewheeling adventure across America featuring Banner using his intelligence and guilting over (apparently) being responsible for killing a small child.

Comment #1: Jonathan Hohensee  on  06/14  at  01:02 PM

If being beaten by Squirrel Girl disqualifies a villain, isn’t that pretty much the end of any Marvel-based moves at all? I mean, SG’s beaten both Doom and MODOK, among others…

Comment #2: Llelldorin  on  06/14  at  01:06 PM

I, personally, pity anyone fool enough to go up against any member of The Great Lakes Avengers.

Comment #3: Jonathan Hohensee  on  06/14  at  01:11 PM

You dissin’ Squirrel Girl? She and Monkey Joe need a movie too.

Comment #4: Sirkowski  on  06/14  at  01:32 PM

You will believe that Scarlett Johansson is… SQUIRREL GIRL.  Coming 2010.

Comment #5: NBarnes  on  06/14  at  02:25 PM

At least you didn’t see The Happening.  That made me want to rip out my own eyes and ears and grab some brain bleach.

Comment #6: themann1086  on  06/14  at  02:37 PM

sQUIRREL gIRL IS tEH hOT!!!!111!!

Okay, she’s my second adolescent fanboy obsession.  Joss Whedon just knocked off my first, damn him.

Comment #7: idiosynchronic  on  06/14  at  02:47 PM

I’m not sure I’d say the new Hulk movie is necessarily better than Ang Lee’s—if it is more entertaining, it’s only because it’s less ambitious—more focused on being a traditional action-adventure movie than Lee’s, which seemed to me to be a grand experiment to see if it was possible to make a CGI art film that looks like a comic book.  It turns out you probably can’t, but it’s fascinating and beautiful to watch—up until the end, which seems more like a grand experiment to see if CGI effects can be interesting without any sense of narrative (again, probably not).

The one thing I did like about the new movie is that Edward Norton actually looks like an academic—wiry frame, glasses perched on his nose while he’s reading.  As an academic, I appreciate that two of this summer’s big action superheroes—The Hulk and Indiana Jones—are just normal college professors when they’re not smashing tanks or running from flesh-devouring ants.  It makes me feel like my own investment in a jet pack, laser gauntlets, and utility belt was a wise purchase.

Comment #8: Bradley  on  06/14  at  03:02 PM

Yeah, you can’t use being beaten by Squirrel Girl as an insult.  The character is specifically written as a gag where she beats the worst villains.  She’s beaten Thanos, for crying out loud.  One issue of Deadpool had Deadpool being defeated by her for the second time…and he’s proud of it, because he figures that given her track record, if the greatest Marvel powerhouse villains get beaten by her once, being taken out by her twice puts him at least on par with the A-listers like Thor.

Comment #9: KeithM  on  06/14  at  03:08 PM

It’s kind of sad that among all of her victories, the one thing the she could never defeat is her own alcoholism

Comment #10: Jonathan Hohensee  on  06/14  at  07:12 PM

I never saw the 2003 Hulk, so that may be why I enjoyed this one so much! (just saw it today)

Comment #11: Lisa KS  on  06/14  at  08:22 PM

...Liz Ross is no Pepper Potts…

They call her Liz? Did someone think “Betty” sounded too gay? (In which case, they should’ve changed her name to David.)

Bradley: “Lee’s… seemed to me to be a grand experiment to see if it was possible to make a CGI art film that looks like a comic book.  It turns out you probably can’t…”

Perhaps you still can, provided you don’t use an existing property that brings certain expectations. If Lee wanted to tell the story about a man’s inner rage that takes physical form, he should’ve invented a new character. Like the new Will Smith movie; they didn’t turn Superman into a drunk, they made up their own.

Comment #12: Grumpy  on  06/14  at  11:32 PM

Nope, they called her “Betty” in the movie.

Comment #13: Lisa KS  on  06/14  at  11:55 PM

As long as it’s not on par with the I-can’t-believe-this-wasn’t-straight-to-video Fantastic Four series, I won’t complain much.

Comment #14: MH  on  06/15  at  02:09 AM

A Great Lakes Avengers movie would be to superhero movies what Blazing Saddles was to Westerns.  And not at all a bad thing at that.

Comment #15: Ginger Mayerson  on  06/15  at  01:37 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.