Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Mandatory retirment for Senators is beginning to look a lot better Previous entry: How grumpypants denunciations of Rock Band makes you the least rock and roll person alive

Bamboo Reviews: Control

Perhaps the most pernicious myth you come across about Joy Division is the one overshadowed by Ian Curtis’ suicide in 1980—-which is the band was night to New Order’s day.  That Joy Division was dark and morose whereas New Order was sunny dance music.  This myth not only distracts from the darkness in New Order’s music, but also eclipses how much Joy Division was fundamentally about rocking out.  Actually putting a Joy Division album on and listening to it without thinking about Curtis’ unfortunate end reveals music influenced by the punk scene and by glam and art rock, music that’s incredibly danceable—-sort of a less overtly intelligent (and less funky,  more punky) kind of Talking Heads in some points. To n00bs, it’s inconceivable that Joy Division could have morphed into New Order with Curtis; to big fans, it’s evident that they already were.  “Love Will Tear Us Apart” has deeply sad lyrics, but a punchy, cheerful melody.  The fascination I have with music of both bands is the way they exploit these tensions.

I say this, because I finally sat down and watched “Control”, a film made by Anton Corbijn (who did some famous photographs of the band during their rise to fame), with Tony Wilson (label manager, and the focus of the movie “24 Hour Party People”) and Deborah Curtis (Ian’s widow) as co-producers.  I’ve been wanting to see it for a long time, but always procrastinated because I thought it would be so depressing.  Well, it was just as the critics said—-a revelatory film, and one that can be, unlike “24 Hour Party People”, enjoyed by people who aren’t as interested in the culture and industry of rock music, or the lives of musicians.  You don’t even really have to know Joy Division’s music to find this movie fascinating.  It’s because this movie is an honestly drawn portrayal of a young man eaten up by his mental illness as it is a rock biography; it’s one of the most complex, interesting portrayals of this that I’ve ever seen.  Plus, it’s one of the coolest movies to look at in forever.  It’s hard not to continually marvel at how Corbijn translates his photographic skills to the screen, and the breathtaking black and white cinematography. 

It’s also interesting from a feminist perspective, believe it or not.  The movie is based on Deborah Curtis’ memoir of her marriage, titled Touching from a Distance.  Deborah, played by Samantha Morton in this film, was in the unfortunate position of being, at the time of Ian’s death, both in the periphery of his life and central in his suicide—-she was the last person to see him alive, and she was the one who found him dead.  He’d come over to the house to pick a fight with her after she kicked him out and demanded a divorce, and the fight got ugly and (according to her), he ran her off.  When she returned in the morning, she found he’d hung himself and Iggy Pop’s Idiot was on the turntable.  It’s all the events leading up to this that really lend themselves to a feminist understanding.  Despite being on the cutting edge of fashion and pop music, Ian was still stuck in the past when it came to how he treated his wife.  They married excruciatingly young (19 and 18), and by the time Debbie was pregnant, Ian was already shoving her out of sight into the kitchen, trying to create completely separate spheres between his super-cool rock star life and his domestic life.  There’s a painful scene in the film where Debbie shows up hugely pregnant at a show, and all Ian’s bandmates are surprised to see that she’s pregnant; he hadn’t found time in the past 9 months to mention it to his closest friends.

Unlike other rock biographies, which painfully exaggerate their heroes’ misbehavior, in a misplaced attempt to make things interesting, “Control” manages to get its point across with subtlety and complexity.  Lesser films would have tried to drive the point across about how dreadfully Ian treated Debbie through shouting matches or overt abuse, but this movie portrays a man more willing to lean on passive aggressive behavior and self-pity.  Ian tries to justify his own cheating by telling Debbie she can sleep with other men; when she laughs it off like crazy talk, he quietly says he doesn’t think he loves her anymore.  She doesn’t know what to do; the discovery of the cheating ends up being a relief, because now it can all come out.  It feels more like real life, including the subtle ways the movie shows how Ian’s bandmates were complicit in his betrayal, due to a combination of minding their own business and male privilege.  (Peter Hook has been insistent that this movie is accurate.) 


The movie also does one of the most bang-up jobs I’ve ever seen of portraying a descent into depression with accuracy.  The image of Ian Curtis as a morbid, morose, gothic figure isn’t accurate in the slightest; as the movie opens, we instead see that he’s a glam rock aficionado who wears eyeliner and worships Lou Reed and David Bowie.  He’s got a lot of life and energy and joy (even if he’s not a wordy person), and he absolutely loves rock and roll, but he’s also decent and patient at his day job of helping mentally disabled people find employment.  (“She’s Lost Control” is a song purportedly inspired by an epileptic client of Ian’s.)  You can see why Debbie fell for him, and why they fell into getting married and having a daughter so young, just due to giddy romanticism.  And then it all starts to turn to shit.  The movie doesn’t pull its punches in portraying Ian as too immature to handle what happened to him in very short order, but it’s also a lot for anyone to handle: the diagnosis of epilepsy (and the tons of pills taken in an attempt to control it), the birth of his daughter (and the crushing realization that he should have decided “rock star or family life?” before his kid was born, knowing as he does that he’s picking “rock star”), the financial strain as he gives up his job for his band in the hopes the band pays out, falling for his new girlfriend while not wanting to let go of his wife, and of course the band’s rise to stardom. 

The actor Sam Riley does a remarkable job of showing how the depression ate away at Ian, turning him from an arrogant punk who blows smoke in Tony Wilson’s face and calls him a “twat” in order to get on TV, to a guy who simply gives up before a big show, unable to go on stage and basically causing a riot with his inaction.  It’s really no coincidence the suicide happened right before the band was supposed to go on tour in America; Ian is getting increasingly obsessed with perceived lack of control over his life (and if you’re prone to random seizures, this is an understandable obsession), and he is mortified at the knowledge that blowing up big means losing even more control.

I’ve rarely seen a movie that manages to capture the complexity of depression so well, both demonstrating how fucking annoying Ian was towards the end, and how hard he was to get along with, but also retaining sympathy for his situation, and understanding for why someone might resort to passive aggressive behavior (including suicide) when feeling so overwhelmed.  You keep getting frustrated that Ian has so many people in his life, but no one to help him, but then you see how helping him seemed impossible to people, because he pushed away everyone who tried to help him in the slightest.  His immaturity is frustrating, but then you’re reminded that he’s immature because he’s so young, and your heart goes out to him.  By the end, you’re both devastated at what a waste his suicide was, but also you have a lot more understanding of how these things can just feel like an oncoming train.

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 10:52 AM • (26) Comments

I’ll add that this movie pops off some fine jokes (“Cheer up! You could be the singer for The Fall.”), but most of them, I suspect, require some rock music geekiness to get.

Comment #1: Amanda Marcotte  on  01/09  at  12:33 PM

“To n00bs, it’s inconceivable that Joy Division could have morphed into New Order with Curtis; to big fans, it’s evident that they already were.  “Love Will Tear Us Apart” has deeply sad lyrics, but a punchy, cheerful melody.  The fascination I have with music of both bands is the way they exploit these tensions.”

Couldn’t agree w/this statement more, or your review of film I own & have watched literally dozens of times. A visually beautiful film. I found it more enlightening than the JD documentary by Grant Gee (since it focuses more on the band than just Ian Curtis).

Now I think I’ll go watch it again.  smile

Comment #2: Mark  on  01/09  at  01:27 PM

I pretty much bought into the Ian Curtis myth, until I bought a Joy Division BBC collection that included an interview with the band.  They did not sound like tortured artists, and even took the time to puncture the pomposity of Gary Numan.  Anyone who thinks that Joy Division and New Order were two bands with nothing in common musically should give another listen to “Power, Corruption and Lies,” which effectively looks back to the Joy Division days while looking forward to what New Order would become.  Finally, I love how “Love Will Tear Us Apart” is an answer song to “Love Will Keep Us Together.”  I wonder if Daryl Dragon ever heard it.

Comment #3: Russell60  on  01/09  at  01:32 PM

I’d have to assume so, since “Love Will Tear Us Apart” is a really famous song.  Though I suppose it’s as far from “adult contemporary” as music gets.

Comment #4: Amanda Marcotte  on  01/09  at  01:42 PM

I just watched Control the other day. I wasn’t familiar with Joy Division, but was thoroughly moved by the film.

Thanks for writing this, Amanda.

Comment #5: tesseral  on  01/09  at  02:50 PM

Huh…Thanks for this review, Amanda. Joy Division are one of my favorite bands but I had heard mixed things about this movie. After your review I will make sure to see it.
I agree that Joy Division would have slowly morphed into something like New Order musically if Curtis had stayed alive. Although from “Power, Corruption and Lies” on Bernard Sumner offered a totally new persona to the band, esp. lyrically.  Bernard is fond of Pop-y simplistic lyrics that are often overly sentimental (in terms of the music New Order made I don’t think this is a bad thing)
I think New Order’s “Technique” is their finest hour, as well as being one of the great British lps of the 80s that does still not get its due in the US. I think its the perfect culmination of their indie/dance fusions. Its also a very fun, and sometimes downright silly album.

Comment #6: AdamN  on  01/09  at  04:57 PM

Wow. I avoided this movie because I feared it would be… well, all the things you said it wasn’t. Now I want to rent it.

Comment #7: Cavity Lee  on  01/09  at  05:39 PM

Ian’s bandmates were complicit in his betrayal, due to a combination of minding their own business and male privilege.

It isn’t JUST male privilege, it’s “BAND PRIVILEGE”, too. As a former rocker who played in mixed male/female bands, the bandmembers form a group, an “In” group, which could be described as “the people who matter”, and the other bandmembers privilege one another over all other people.

Not unlike a family, in a way, or a Scottish Clan.

Anyway, my point is, if there had been female bandmembers, they are very likely to have been complicit as well.

Comment #8: KMTBERRY  on  01/09  at  07:26 PM

I have no doubt about it, KMT.  It’s band privilege, and probably male privilege, too.  Women are just as likely as men to buy into the idea that certain men are entitled to cheat on long-suffering wives; after all, who is going to be the mistress?

Comment #9: Amanda Marcotte  on  01/09  at  08:12 PM

Of course, I say that with the full knowledge that I have no idea what I’d do if I was in that situation.  Part of me really doesn’t want to butt into other people’s business.  You don’t want to be the tattle tale.  But the cheater who recruits others to cover for him or her is being an asshole, too.

Comment #10: Amanda Marcotte  on  01/09  at  08:16 PM

Awesome fucking post, Amanda!!! Transmission is one of the best fucking tunes of all time!!!! When I was in college, we used to play that song over and over and over and over and over dancing around until we collapsed from exhaustion.

Comment #11: PhysioProf  on  01/09  at  09:22 PM

Watch out, Physio.  Someone is going to come along and suggest that you’re a nasty, bad person for enjoying an indie rock song so much.  Once pleasure has been derived from a rock song, especially one published on an independent label that has a whiff of artiness to it, you are excluding and hurting people who don’t get it or don’t want to get it.

Comment #12: Amanda Marcotte  on  01/09  at  10:32 PM

But yeah, I love that song so much.  I like it better than “Love Will Tear Us Apart”, which is saying something—-of course, now having expressed a preference, I’m an even worse snob than you, because I’ve naturally oppressed the millions of people who perhaps prefer “Love”, don’t like Joy Division, or are intimidated by post-punk as a genre.

Comment #13: Amanda Marcotte  on  01/09  at  10:34 PM

Or just hate that shite.

Comment #14: Eric_RoM  on  01/09  at  10:47 PM

i loved this movie. one of the things that impressed me was the way Ian Curtis falling in love with Annik was portrayed really sensitively and sympathetically, even when it’s showing him being an asshole to Deborah.

i think you’re right on about a sensitive, realistic portrayal of depression and the helplessness (and passive aggression, and ego) that can go with it, and how it makes a fairly typical situation (he’s not the first to cheat on his wife, nor to realize he shouldn’t have gotten married, much less the kid, nor to feel bad about it) coupled with his youth and all his other worries, seem unresolvable.

Comment #15: cedarcrane  on  01/09  at  10:56 PM

I wonder if Sam Riley ever worries about being type cast?

I can’t believe I haven’t seen this movie yet.  I loved “24 Hour Party People” but got the sense that this was the better of the two movies.

I think the thing that would have remained the major difference between the two bands is the quality of Curtis’s voice and personna—his voice is so dark and his presence so striking—compared to Bernard Sumner who has a very everyman kind of voice and limited stage presence.  I saw New Order many moons ago—on tour as the headliners with the Sugar Cubes and Public Image Ltd.  Sumner was the least compelling front person on the stage that day, although I do love the band.

I couldn’t resist this:

http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2008/06/you-kids-and-yo.html

Sumner was a pretty rocking guitar player with Joy Division.

Comment #16: Sir Charles  on  01/09  at  10:59 PM

I wouldn’t say this is the better of the two.  I still like “24 Hour Party People” more, and I think you will, too, because it’s more of a music movie.  It’s funnier, for sure.  It’s just not about what this movie is about, though it actually has a couple of the same scenes.  The contrast is fascinating, actually.  In both, you have Tony Wilson showing off that he prefers legends to reality, prefers controversy to smooth sailing.

Comment #17: Amanda Marcotte  on  01/09  at  11:27 PM

I’ve never really gotten hooked into either Joy Division or New Order, not for any specific animosity—they’re just bands that haven’t grabbed me when I’ve listened to their music.  In New Order’s case, it might be partly that I associate them with clubs, and I’ve never really liked going to dance clubs.  Might be time to try them out again and see if they click with me this time.  Or maybe Netflixing “Control” could be my way into the bands.

In any case, it sounds like a really good film, so thanks for the review, Amanda.  Just two disconnected points I thought of while reading it:

1) I’ve never thought of Joy Division and the Kinks as being particularly closely related, but your account of Ian Curtis reminds me of Ray Davies.  Ray was also the leader of a suddenly-successful band who got married at a very young age to a very young woman, and had a child with her while he was still simultaneously living the life of a touring rock star (though the Kinks hit it big a little before Ray and Rasa got married).  I think there were similar home/road conflicts, and some similarities with the band dynamic (though the Kinks had their own particular kinds of drama going on, as well).  The issue of touring America played a huge role in both men’s anxieties.  Unlike Ian, Ray survived, but only just barely—he had a couple of very public breakdowns, and there were times when it wouldn’t have been that shocking for him to have ended up as another casualty of Swingin’ London in the 60s.

2) Tony Wilson is the name of the character Rock Hudson plays in John Frankenheimer’s brilliant film Seconds.

Comment #18: Pesto  on  01/10  at  12:24 AM

John Lennon to some degree as well.

The culture of northern England was historically pretty macho—Morrisey notwithstanding—and I think women have often had a hard time in the boy’s club environment.

Comment #19: Sir Charles  on  01/10  at  12:48 AM

Add the 2007 Grant Gee documentary Joy Division (mentioned in passing above) to the films worth seeing about the band. It’s less good than either Control or 24 Hour Party People, but it’s a smart film that presents an interesting portrait of the band and, even more, of Manchester.

Like Pesto, I had never really gotten into either Joy Division or New Order, but after sitting through these films (I saw 24 Hour Party People first, followed by Closer and the Gee documentary), I found that I was kinda hooked…at least to Joy Division

I do think the Ray Davies comparison is instructive, in part because it highlights how much the Ian Curtis legend is dependent on the story ending badly early.  I don’t mean to take anything away from Ray Davies (especially musically), but he clearly doesn’t have the same cultural aura as an Ian Curtis (or a Kurt Cobain or a Jim Morrison….though perhaps the Morrison legend has worn a bit thin over the years).

Comment #20: Ben Alpers  on  01/10  at  01:31 AM

I saw “Control” when it came out last year. Great movie, made me pull out all my joy division cds/records…..AND do some looking around the web about related stuff. I learned that U2’s
“A Day without you” was about Ian, according to Bono. I did NOT know that…..now the lyrics have more meaning, for ME anyway.

Comment #21: kennymo98  on  01/10  at  02:08 AM

I like it better than “Love Will Tear Us Apart”, which is saying something

For me it has to be the extended version of “She’s Lost Control” from “Substance.”  The drums have a bit more stomp, the electronic effects in the background are eerie and it has a bridge the original version doesn’t where Curtis sounds utterly frantic singing what could be an epitaph for our era:

I could live a little better with the myths and the lies…

Nothing against “Love…”, but this and the bass line for “Digital” are what really set me to dancing like a bloody fool.

Comment #22: Sour Kraut  on  01/10  at  04:10 AM

As long as we’re dancing around snobbishly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MipUFnJH994

Comment #23: PhysioProf  on  01/10  at  06:30 AM

I’ve always believed the split with Martin Hannett was just as important a part of New Order’s evolution as the loss of Curtis (if not more so).  AFAIAC, Movement is a Joy Division album.

Comment #24: Thlayli  on  01/10  at  10:56 AM

@ Sir Charles:

I also saw New Order open for PIL; I was mostly there for NO. I was like 16, psyched to see one of my favorite bands, and was pretty disappointed by the lack of rapport. I thought it was maybe cus it wasn’t a great venue, or we were missing out on the ‘real’ energy cus it was an all-ages [dry] show.

Some 10-ish years later I watched a PBS [historical] thing on “new wave.” Sumner came across as a technician- a talented musician who likes to work with other talented musicians- and betrayed no hidden desire to be a rock star.

Yet another decade later, it seems to me the Sumner model is totally winning over the, say, Jagger model. AOR is gurgling thru a botched DIY decapitation while bands from all over the world are coming to my small remote town to dance nowhere near its grave.

They’ll duck if you throw your panties at them, and if you bring them home they’ll be up all night txting their SO’s, housemates and musical collaborators. And you will come home the next day to clean-ish dishes and a stack of CDR’s of bands you’ve never heard of. Ossumness. Go punk!

Comment #25: msdaphne  on  01/11  at  06:08 AM

I read that the actors playing the band picked up their instruments for the first time for this film.  Knowing this somehow serves to make the scene where they perform “Transmission” live on the air all that much more riveting for me.

Comment #26: Mistercat  on  01/11  at  01:16 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.