Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: I’m Still Not Buying A Pontiac Previous entry: Pretty good reflexes, actually

Bill Donahue: no religious inclusion during Christmas

Wow. All of the wars against Christmas usually revolve around some fundie haranguing about Christianity and the baby Jesus being supplanted by “Happy Holidays.”

Not Bill Donohue of The Catholic League. He’s for bigotry during his holy season.

In Armonk, NY, the town’s supervisors voted to display a menorah and a star and crescent at its Christmas tree lighting ceremony at the town’s gazebo, opting for inclusion rather than battle over whether there should be a tree there.

“We’ve decided to go in the direction of being all-inclusive,” Supervisor Reese Berman told Associated Press.

...According to the board’s guidelines, any group interested in displaying a privately-funded symbol through the Christmas season must submit a formal application. The board makes no determination as to whether a symbol is secular or religious. The process is open to all religions.

“Arab-Americans and Muslim Americans are Americans and respect other religions,” said Laila Al-Qatami, spokeswoman for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee in Washington. “They know that Christmas is a big holiday and they’re glad to be included.”

That’s a sentiment that feels right to Catholic-raised Judy Wesley, director of the Armonk Chamber of Commerce.

“In my opinion there’s nothing wrong with having a spirit of inclusion,” she said. “Jesus Christ himself would have gathered everyone around him.”

Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Civil and Religious Rights, disagrees, saying the town has chosen to display Jewish and Islamic religious symbols while leaving out the Christian religious symbol of the season, a Nativity scene. He does not believe the Christmas tree is a religious symbol.

Further, he says, the inclusive display “shows tremendous sympathy for Jews and Muslims at the expense of the majority Christians.”

Note: Donohue will be on the Mike Signorile show on Friday to discuss that ridiculous anti-gay ad put out last week by The Becket Fund

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 05:40 PM • (32) Comments

They just want to bitch about something, anything, don’t they?

BTW, does he realize that several denominations of Protestants don’t have a thing for nativity scenes?

Comment #1: Ben D.  on  12/14  at  05:46 PM

Did anyone apply to put up a Nativity scene?  If Bill Donahue’s so upset about it, can’t he apply for one and pay for it?

Comment #2: Maureen  on  12/14  at  05:49 PM

Does this guy do anything other than whine about how “oppressed” his majority is?

Comment #3: Blue Field Damian  on  12/14  at  05:50 PM

Maureen, that’s the critical question.

I suppose the best answer to why there’s no Nativity scene would be that Mary and Joseph didn’t show up at the inn until the night before Christmas, not on friggin’ Halloween!

Comment #4: Lymis  on  12/14  at  05:58 PM

Perhaps we should submit all aspects of American culture for Donohue’s personal approval.  After all, we certainly wouldn’t want to hurt the delicate sensibilities of such an important figure in American life.

Or, we could just encourage everyone to tell this wingnut-blog-troll-made-corporeal to just fuck off and die.

Decisions, decisions…

Comment #5: MikeEss  on  12/14  at  05:58 PM

“shows tremendous sympathy for Jews and Muslims at the expense of the majority Christians.”

he keeps using that phrase. I do not think it means what he thinks it means.

There is nothing that is being not-done to show that inclusiveness. It is not the case that they are not putting up a nativity because there’s a menorah.

and just because he doesn’t believe a christmas tree is a religious symbol doesn’t make it not, as terminology and definitions are not set based on his personal word usage. It is a christmas tree, which means it is explicitly, by name, a religious symbol.

Comment #6: karpad  on  12/14  at  06:20 PM

He does not believe the Christmas tree is a religious symbol.

Oh really?  Try calling it a “Holiday Tree” and see what your fellow soldiers in the War on Christmas do.

Further, he says, the inclusive display “shows tremendous sympathy for Jews and Muslims at the expense of the majority Christians.”

B/c there is only so much tolerance.  Shift a little toward the Jews or the Muslims, and that means you have to be taking it away from somewhere else.  Light a menorah for Hanukkah, and you take away some of the darkness necessary for the nativity scene.  What?  You didn’t know it had to be dark for a nativity scene?  Only one star, preferably at the top of a Christmas tree should be in the area.  Any other Winter Solstice-timed display is an insult.

It’s very tricky figuring out how to include everyone, since by their very inclusion, they are oppressing the majority.  The majority only gets to be unoppressed if it can express itself without anyone else complaining or responding.

Minorities should really just stop existing and convert to Fundy Christian like the Founding Fathers intended.

What the hell would Bill Donohue do then?

Comment #7: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  12/14  at  06:27 PM

Caren: He’s whine that people weren’t following him - I mean, his personal choice of religion.  What else?

Comment #8: Blue Field Damian  on  12/14  at  06:32 PM

The thing is not a “Christmas tree”, nor a “Holiday tree”, nor a “Hanukkah bush”.  It is a Yule tree, once a symbol of a religion that is no longer widely practiced, now thoroughly secular.

Have you ever seen any of these ever-so-Christian families do anything to make their “Christas tree” distinctive?  Like, hang one little flippin’ cross on it amongst all the pretty ornaments and lights?

Actually, I’d like to see a Yule tree with a cross on it.  And a Mogen David.  And a crescent.  And a teeny chart marking the winter solstice.

Comment #9: Dr. Psycho  on  12/14  at  06:35 PM

If I may, I suggest we do a nativity scene just for Donohue, and see how bad he freaks.

Comment #10: Incertus, Nacho Daddy  on  12/14  at  07:24 PM

Keep the “X” in “Xmas,” folks.

Where “X” is the algebraic “x,” standing for whatever frame you want it to.

Because the season is the reason for the season—the Catholic church just arbitrarily declared Jesus’s birthday to fall in the middle of it to get onto the Yuletide bandwagon.

I kid you not—the only instance of a full-scale “War on Christmas” I know of that went so far as to totally ban the holiday was carried out by Christians—Scottish Calvinist Christians.

So the Scottish people invented a whole new Yuletide holiday, called “Hogmany.”

People who live in European-style climate zones just need a festive time in mid-winter, to buck up against cold and damp and short food supplies and solstice darkness.

As I understand it, Hogmany involves three straight days of drunken cheer.

So whatever “X” cheers you up, keep it! Wassail wassail!

Comment #11: Mark Foxwell  on  12/14  at  07:40 PM

“Have you ever seen any of these ever-so-Christian families do anything to make their “Christas tree” distinctive?”

To be fair, yes. It is long tradition in many families to top a tree with either an angel or a star (the latter an obvious allusion to the Star of Bethlehem). Ornaments are often representative of aspects of the Nativity story in the gospels. Lots of herald angels singing, some manger scenes, and so forth.

Yule decorations have been pretty well thoroughly co-opted by Christians; in central Europe for some centuries. (Though in Scandinavia “Jul” is only barely Christianized, and for all real purposes retains its pagan spirit.)

(I don’t keep a tree or really observe Christmas at home. My wife is Jewish and I am in personal revolt against the totalitarian character of the whole season; i.e., the bullshit that it’s an “American” holiday and not a religious one, and that you must love—or else you’re just a horrible person—a season that revolves around some heinous worship of Victorian domesticity.)


Foxwell: There’s a perfectly wonderful peri-Solstice observance that celebrates friendship, community, this blasted temporal life, and is open to everyone: New Year’s Eve. (Yes, technically, it’s the Christian calendar turning over, but still.) What you propose sounds like a kinder, gentler version of the nauseating but-it’s-really-for-everyone argument that defensive non-Jews like to make every December.

Comment #12: wapsie  on  12/14  at  07:53 PM

Because the season is the reason for the season-

And at this point, in the US, it’s the shopping season we’re talking about.

Comment #13: Incertus, Nacho Daddy  on  12/14  at  08:03 PM

And at this point, in the US, it’s the shopping season we’re talking about.
Incertus, Nacho Daddy on 12/14 at 06:03 PM

Someone else on here (I forget who) hit the nail on the head when he suggested that the “War on Christmas” is just a giant distraction for the fundies so they won’t realize just how secularized their religious holiday has become.

Comment #14: Ben D.  on  12/14  at  08:27 PM

Yet another example of how Christians are “oppressed” as soon as they don’t get to force their views on everyone else. Wa wa wa wa.

Comment #15: Luke  on  12/14  at  08:27 PM

Oh my God, I love it. I fucking love it. If they don’t put up a Christmas tree in the town square, they’re anti-Christian. If they do put a Christmas tree in the town square, they’re anti-Christian.

I think Ben D. phrases it perfectly in the first comment: “They just want to bitch about something, anything, don’t they?”

Comment #16: Lauren O  on  12/14  at  08:37 PM

Someone else on here (I forget who) hit the nail on the head when he suggested that the “War on Christmas” is just a giant distraction for the fundies so they won’t realize just how secularized their religious holiday has become.

That suggests that the fundies would realize it in the first place. There’s no group better able to live surrounded by cognitive dissonance than the types who believe that God put dinosaur bones in the ground to test their faith.

Comment #17: Incertus, Nacho Daddy  on  12/14  at  08:38 PM

Being from Oregon, where even the fundy-infested cow towns seem to manage to avoid the whole city owned nativity scene thing, I was always shocked at the displays I saw in MA and couldn’t believe they were legal. I’m always amazed at the lengths east coast catholic types will go to to enshrine their sacred manger scenes on the public dime.

If it means so goddamn much, do it at your CHURCH or at the KofC and have them pay for it.

Comment #18: Ms Kate  on  12/14  at  09:29 PM

I was always shocked at the displays I saw in MA and couldn’t believe they were legal. I’m always amazed at the lengths east coast catholic types will go to to enshrine their sacred manger scenes on the public dime.

Heh, and being from the rural (Baptist) south originally I can just imagine how the fundies from my hometown would be aghast at such “Papal idolatry"like a lavish nativity scene!

Comment #19: Ben D.  on  12/14  at  09:31 PM

Tolerance: it’s a zero-sum game.

Comment #20: annejumps  on  12/14  at  10:41 PM

I’m just glad the reporter bothered to get an opposing quote from a normal Catholic so readers don’t think Bill Donahue’s hatemongering represents typical Catholic thought.  The religion I was raised in has a lot of problems, but I hate seeing it associated with this showboating asshole.

Comment #21: Shaenon  on  12/14  at  10:58 PM

Good for Bill Donahue….don’t let these dirty SOBs get away with their Christian bashing. Tell them to find their own holiday instead of trying to undermine ours.

Comment #22: Robert  on  12/15  at  12:10 AM

Yeah, and those of us who celebrate Mithra’s birthday or Osiris’ birthday ( December 25th ) would like all of you to just leave our holiday alone.

Comment #23: OldDog  on  12/15  at  12:43 AM

Robert: Very funny.  Really.  But I know you’re not for real.  You must try harder before you can fool me.

Comment #24: Blue Field Damian  on  12/15  at  01:19 AM

Donohue’s priest needs to sit down with him and remind him that it’s not Christmas.  Christmas doesn’t begin until Dec. 25th, and it continues on until Jan. 6th with the Epiphany.

Before Dec. 25th, it’s Advent, not Christmas.  I’m becoming embarrassed at how few public “Christians” seem to understand their own religion.  I’m guessing Donohue doesn’t even remember in what order the candles on the Advent wreath are supposed to be lighted.

Speaking of creches, I’m getting all excited about the neighborhood Episcopal church’s Living Creche next week—or, as I like to call it, the Holy Petting Zoo.  I like to see what new animals they have—last year they had a very sweet burro who loved having his ears scratched—and G. likes to watch the crowd and figure out which 12-year-old boys have a crush on the 12-year-old girl playing Mary that year.  Fun for all, plus there’s now a Cuban restaurant down the street, so we can pet the animals and then go have a mojito, fulfilling the long-time Roman Catholic tradition of church followed by booze.

(Hey, I’m Italian and he’s Irish—I think we’re required by law to be Catholics, at least in Illinois.)

Comment #25: Mnemosyne  on  12/15  at  03:52 AM

Actually, I’d like to see a Yule tree with a cross on it.

That would make sense, DEMONcrap idjut, as J*sus was nailed to a Chr*stmas tree!!!!!

Comment #26: Rugged in Montana  on  12/15  at  06:17 AM

Ah the War on Christmas. It’s a great late-twentieth century holiday tradition. Like Charlie Brown and LSD-induced stop-motion animation. Except with warmth and entertainment value.

Comment #27: histrogeek  on  12/15  at  12:15 PM

Of course I meant without the warmth and entertainment value.
(must remember to read post before hitting send, not during…)

Comment #28: histrogeek  on  12/15  at  12:17 PM

Mnemosyne, you make a good point. For the past few weeks, our priest has been emphasizing the fact that Advent is a time of solemn preparation and that the exuberant extravagance starts Christmas Day. For Armonk to put up a big Christmas display would actually be a sacrilege and an assault on Donohue’s deeply-held beliefs.

Which would give him something else to bitch about. And I think I’ve answered my own question.

It’s a great late-twentieth century holiday tradition. Like Charlie Brown and LSD-induced stop-motion animation.

Do not fuck with my “Rudolph the Red-nosed Reindeer.”

Comment #29: ACG  on  12/15  at  02:06 PM

Beauty is not just about the hair and face, but also the nails and other parts of the body.

Comment #30: novatrek  on  12/19  at  12:14 PM

To find everything you need to know about hair extensions you’ve come to the best place.

Comment #31: cissiee37g  on  12/19  at  12:50 PM

Eyelash extensions are an entirely new method of enhancing the length and thickness of eyelashes.

Comment #32: aaronhyl  on  12/19  at  01:26 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.