Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Friday Random Ten “Sometimes You Just Gotta Do Yard Work” Edition Previous entry: No Imaginable Way In Which This Goes Wrong

‘Black Republican PAC’ fronts for direct mail wingnut welfare

I received a direct mail piece from a reader that is unbelievable. It is from an entity called the “Black Republican PAC,” headed up by Edward Cousar. Here is a taste of what’s in the mailing:

“Because what we conservatives need right now more than anything else is someone and some group who can speak the truth about Obama without being intimidated by the “racist” label.

  I am that man and Black Republican PAC is that group.

  I’m dedicated to exposing Barack Obama’s liberalism before it’s too late for America.

It goes on for four pages of garbage. I decided to surf around and see who Cousar was and what this organization was about. What I found was revealing; a strategy that not only uses black Republicans as a cover for the above, but is at its base a group white GOP operatives using funds raised by this and other web of PACs to line their incestuous direct mail companies’ coffers.


I began writing this post as another observation of the really self-loathing slices of the GOP. At the Blend we often discuss how deluded some of the Log Cabin Republicans are. You know, the ones who have convinced themselves to not only personally vote for John McCain, but to go out and proclaim that he’s the right option for the country (and LGBTs) despite his anti-gay record.

Well, the LCRs have nothing on the folks at the “Black Republican PAC,” which sent out a direct mail piece to Blender Orion45 (who sent me the hard copy) that I’ve scanned for your perusal.

Remember, nearly 25% of LGBTs cast a vote for Bush, that’s hard to swallow, but think about black Republicans like Edward Cousar who are using misleading statements and outright lies about Barack Obama in support of their man McCain (whose record on civil rights is abominable). Look at

this sham Cousar’s spiel as he readily admits he’s a tool to provide cover for the GOP base:

Because what we conservatives need right now more than anything else is someone and some group who can speak the truth about Obama without being intimidated by the “racist” label.

I am that man and Black Republican PAC is that group.

I’m dedicated to exposing Barack Obama’s liberalism before it’s too late for America.

...I oppose Barack’s radical leftist plans for America and I guarantee you I’m no racist!

It goes on for four pages of garbage. I decided to surf around and see who Cousar was and what this organization was about. What I found was revealing; a strategy that not only uses black Republicans as a cover for the above, but is at its base a group of white GOP operatives using funds raised by this and other web of PACs to line their incestuous direct mail companies’ coffers.

So who is Cousar and what is this “Black Republican PAC?” 

Orion45 wasn’t the only one who thought this mailer was absurd—this PAC seems like some lame McCain-generated or GOP think-tank propaganda. Here’s Hal from one of the Barack Obama community blogs:

Well, my father in law got a mailing from “Black Republican PAC”. It was full of mis-statements and bald faced lies. It was so preposterous, full of mis-spellings and grammatical errors, that I believe it was created by an 8th grader. Anyway, the point of the mailing was to ask for money to defeat Obama.

The letter started me thinking. Is there a list somewhere of PAC’s who are anti-Obama. Not only a list, but something more, like background information on the organizers, the financiers, that kind of information that would act as truth in advertising.

I found next to nothing on Black Republican PAC or Edward Cousar when I googled them, so more information might be helpful.

Googling brought up a Facebook profile and this cryptic description of Cousar:

Cousar lives in Rock Hill, and graduated from the University of South Carolina in 1990 with a B.A. in Political Science.  He was State Chairman of the College Republicans from 1988-1990.  He has worked on numerous Republican campaigns.

If you look up “Black Republican PAC” on OpenSecrets, you get some idea of who’s behind this effort. Here are the

suckers

contributors to the PAC. The only two candidates to benefit from it this year were Robin Hayes (R-NC), and Erwin Roberts (R-KY). They received $1000 each.

The largest recipient of the largesse of the DC-based Black Republican PAC was an outfit called Patriot Partners to the tune of $111,126, and BMW Direct received $44,171. Both of these are direct mail/list management services known for their work with conservative pols, and other recipients of Black Republican PAC funds show you the true meaning of wingnut welfare—they are all passing the money amongst themselves. The campaign of Deborah Travis Honeycutt, who unsuccessfully ran for Congress in Georgia in 2006 (she lost by 38 points) and is running again this year, is a beneficiary of the wingnut welfare Ponzi scheme, but it certainly didn’t result in much for boots-on-the-ground support for the candidate. From TPM Muckraker’s “Conservative Fundraising Firm Takes Hefty Cut From Other Candidate’s Haul

For the most recent quarter, the campaign raised $620,016.72 in mostly small donations from across the country, according to her most recent FEC filing. And she spent $537,622.68 during the first quarter, most of which was to cover the costs of the direct mail campaign.

Only a small fraction of the money went to pay for a campaign on the ground. The total money spent in Georgia was $16,695. That covered expenses listed as political field work, public relations and media.

However, more than $314,000 went to BMW Direct and its affiliates who all work in the same downtown Washington office building.

...For example, Honeycutt’s FEC report shows a payment to BMW Direct affiliate Century Data Systems Corp. for $7,430.85 for “data processing” on Feb. 4, 2008. The campaign cut a $23,569 check to the affiliate Legacy List Marketing for “list rentals” on Feb. 21, 2008. And a $19,544 check on March 7 for “direct mail fundraising” went to a company called Patriot Partners, which shares an office address with Legacy List Marketing.

Honeycutt has pulled in four times as much cash as Dem incumbent Rep. David Scott but most of dough recycles into the cash flow of related direct mail operations… 

The treasurer of this “Black Republican PAC” is Scott B. McKenzie, a long-time DC insider and head of Client Accounting and FEC compliance for BMW Direct. Would it surprise you that McKenzie is treasurer of Honeycutt‘s campaign as well as current treasurer of another PAC, Freedom’s Defense Fund? Lo and behold, FDF states as its address in its FEC filings is 1155 15th Street NW, Suite 614 in Washington, DC. This is the same address for BMW Direct, Inc. Here are FDF’s contributions—it did better in spreading the wealth…

House
Davis, Geoff (R-KY) $1,000
Hayes, Robin (R-NC) $3,500
Jenkins, Woody (R-LA) $2,500
Roberts, Erwin (R-KY) $2,500
Rohrabacher, Dana (R-CA) $600
Ryun, Jim (R-KS) $4,993

Senate
Gilmore, Jim (R-VA) $5,000
Schaffer, Bob (R-CO) $1,000

However, Patriot Partners, Inc. billed FDF for services of $333,072. BMW Direct nabbed $47,610. You get the idea; it’s a cesspool of financial incest. The funds raised by efforts like Cousar’s Black Republican PAC are nothing more than a cash generation scheme since candidates like Honeycutt are unlikely to pull off a win despite all the money brought in. Cousar and his crew are being used as tokens for the old bait-and-switch. What is the price for selling out? Pretty darn cheap in the grand scheme of things. I’m sure Courson sleeps like a baby at night.

Look at the FEC documents for the PAC here.

Honeycutt may in fact be a great candidate; that’s not the issue, nor is being black and a Republican (or gay and Republican) in itself ridiculous. It may not be palatable at all to be in a party that is currently run by the far right extremists; one can choose not to support those in your party who work against your interests within that already hostile environment. You don’t have to advocate for the election of John McCain by putting out garbage like that mailer.

What we’re seeing here are the worst aspects of that GOP machinery at work, using some of the black members of its party to hide behind as it launches an attack on Barack Obama. The GOP is able to toss race into the picture from behind the “safe” visage of Cousar’s representation.

I will end with another nugget of wisdom from

puppet

mouthpiece Cousar in that “Black Republican PAC” direct mail letter, as he again touts his race cred:

And frankly, unlike many other conservatives who aren’t black, I will not be intimidated by the Liberal Media and their fraudulent cries of “racism.”

I will have more credibility to spread our message because there’s no doubt that I oppose Barack for his wrong-headed liberal ideas.

Opposing his failed liberal policies doesn’t make you “racist”—no matter thow hysterically the Liberal Media repeats the charge.

I would love to see the membership list of this PAC, and see all of the administrators in this effort. I would be surprised if there are many, if any other black Republicans behind this organization.

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 11:47 AM • (13) Comments

Thanks for digging this stuff up Pam.  This kind of thing just confirms for me that Obama is the man of the hour…

Comment #1: MikeEss  on  08/01  at  12:57 PM

Isn’t Obama polling something like 90%+ among black voters?  I can’t imagine what this bullshit hopes to accomplish in terms of politics.  It reeks of bullshit and it’s not exactly targeted at the black community.  Probably more a push back in the white community.  The GOP equivalent of “Hey, look!  We’ve got a black friend.”

That said, LGBT voters go for Bush because he cuts their taxes.  That’s more or less the end of it.  If someone paid you $60,000 in tax breaks for your vote, you’d be damned temped too, I’m sure.  Besides, there’s a long history of gay men in the GOP.  Larry Craig, Charlie Crist, Mark Foley… I think I can count the number of gay elected Republicans on more than one hand.  Black elected Republicans, not so much.

Comment #2: Zifnab25  on  08/01  at  01:00 PM

Probably more a push back in the white community.  The GOP equivalent of “Hey, look!  We’ve got a black friend.”

Bingo. It lets them say “Well a black guy said it, so it can’t be racist!” and feel better about themselves.

I love the part about “exposing Obama’s liberalism”...um, he’s not the furthest left candidate I could imagine, but isn’t he pretty open about being “liberal”? What with the whole “get out of Iraq” and “universal healthcare” and “no more corporate tax breaks” and stuff?

What are they planning to “expose” about him?

Comment #3: Dorothy  on  08/01  at  01:50 PM

I’m dedicated to exposing Barack Obama’s liberalism before it’s too late for America

Brilliant. I wonder what other blindingly obvious things this boob plans to “expose” (in real ‘ficial-looking Courier New font) before it’s too late for America.

When the Republicans recruit African-American stooges for Cabinet level posts, the primary criterion seems to be pliability. But for positions like Cousar’s, pliability clearly takes a second place to rank stupidity and incompetence.

It’s almost as if the GOP is trying to perpetuate certain stereotypes held near and dear by its bigot base.

Comment #4: Gracchus  on  08/01  at  02:03 PM

*snort* a “long history” (of the last year or two? ancient!) of closeted, self-hating gay men, you mean. not a ringing endorsement, zifnab.

Comment #5: chibi  on  08/01  at  02:14 PM

He gives Black Republicans the bad name they deserve.

Comment #6: Gozer  on  08/01  at  02:46 PM

Also, zifnab, remember that saying 25% of lgbts voted for Bush means 25% of out of the closet lgbts voted for Bush. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be counted as part of the lgbt vote. Theoretically speaking, b/c lgbt people occur in all walks of life about equally, they should be split 50-50 between two more or less equal parties. But when the out—i.e., self-aware—lgbt individual votes republican, they vote against their own rights.

Comment #7: Erl  on  08/01  at  03:57 PM

*snort* a “long history” (of the last year or two? ancient!) of closeted, self-hating gay men, you mean. not a ringing endorsement, zifnab.

Well, I’m just saying… you know… by comparison…

Also, zifnab, remember that saying 25% of lgbts voted for Bush means 25% of out of the closet lgbts voted for Bush. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be counted as part of the lgbt vote. Theoretically speaking, b/c lgbt people occur in all walks of life about equally, they should be split 50-50 between two more or less equal parties. But when the out—i.e., self-aware—lgbt individual votes republican, they vote against their own rights.

Two things to note.  Firstly, an outed LGBT individual probably has more economic stability than his closeted counterpart.  Being rich gives you more freedom because you don’t need to worry about getting fired or discriminated against as easily.  Compare, for instance, Dick Cheney’s daughter to your average lesbian.  Ms Cheney has the golden ticket to any life she can imagine.  She should be a huge political liability and yet she remains virtually untouched.  Why is she still GOP?  Why not?  She’d suffer much more as a straight Democrat than a gay Republican.

Secondly, you’re thinking from a very single issue basis.  I know environmentalists who regularly vote Republican.  I know anti-abortionists who regularly vote Democrat.  A pro-gun ACLU libertarian will never get the candidate he or she absolutely wants.  And more than a few gays have felt repeatedly betrayed by the Democratic Party because so many in Congress run away from the LGBT community for political reasons.  If you had a choice between a Ron Paul GOoPer and a Steney Hoyer Democrat, why pull the trigger for a Dem who stomps as hard on gays as any Rethug?

Comment #8: Zifnab25  on  08/01  at  05:38 PM

Well, sure, Black Republican PAC is a black, Republican PAC… but are they black, Republican enough?

Comment #9: Matt  on  08/02  at  01:50 PM

Meh, like the Democrats don’t have their own PACs mailing out garbage. Nothing new here.

Comment #10: jed  on  08/02  at  05:15 PM

So Republicans are embezzling money from each other.  Are you surprised?  I’d be surprised if they didn’t.

You can always console yourself with the thought that every dollar siphoned into some crook’s offshore savings account is one less dollar that’ll be spent electing some Republican somewhere.

Comment #11: Johnny Pez  on  08/03  at  02:27 AM

It’s endlessly frustrating to want to be a moral person when the asshole MFers have no compunction about lying and cheating their way to victory.

Comment #12: banisteriopsis  on  08/03  at  05:50 AM

That’s more or less the end of it.  If someone paid you $60,000 in tax breaks for your vote, you’d be damned temped too, I’m sure.  Besides, there’s a long history of gay men in the GOP.

Closeted, self-hating people aren’t really a ringing endorsement, Fizban.

Comment #13: banisteriopsis  on  08/03  at  05:58 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.