Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: A Compromise Previous entry: The Bugs can HAVE us

Blackazoid: The Blackening

imageDavid Brooks has done yeoman’s work and given us the origin story of dear Blackazoid.

God, Republicans are saps. They think that they’re running against some academic liberal who wouldn’t wear flag pins on his lapel, whose wife isn’t proud of America and who went to some liberationist church where the pastor damned his own country. They think they’re running against some naïve university-town dreamer, the second coming of Adlai Stevenson.

But as recent weeks have made clear, Barack Obama is the most split-personality politician in the country today. On the one hand, there is Dr. Barack, the high-minded, Niebuhr-quoting speechifier who spent this past winter thrilling the Scarlett Johansson set and feeling the fierce urgency of now. But then on the other side, there’s Fast Eddie Obama, the promise-breaking, tough-minded Chicago pol who’d throw you under the truck for votes.

This guy is the whole Chicago package: an idealistic, lakefront liberal fronting a sharp-elbowed machine operator. He’s the only politician of our lifetime who is underestimated because he’s too intelligent. He speaks so calmly and polysyllabically that people fail to appreciate the Machiavellian ambition inside.

That Blackazoid - always foolin’ us by not screaming simple words.  It’s the secret to his power, not talking loudly and scaring white people.  Damn Brooks’ Luthoresque mind!

But he’s been giving us an education, for anybody who cares to pay attention. Just try to imagine Mister Rogers playing the agent Ari in “Entourage” and it all falls into place.

No.  I actually flat out fucking refuse to do that.
Brooks then goes on to talk about all the Hydeian ways that Fast Eddie Obama threw various things “under the truck”, sort of like how Goofus always convinced Gallant to ditch school and go do some chicks on the mat in the back of his El Camino, except without the chicks, the mat or the El Camino and Goofus never convinced Gallant to do any of that. 

It’s your laundry list of attacks on Obama, except, you know, put together in a way that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever and uses the same phrases over and over again, much like a five year old reviewing Balto.  He then wraps up with this utterly devastating attack:

But Thursday, at the first breath of political inconvenience, Fast Eddie Obama threw public financing under the truck. In so doing, he probably dealt a death-blow to the cause of campaign-finance reform. And the only thing that changed between Thursday and when he lauded the system is that Obama’s got more money now.

And Fast Eddie Obama didn’t just sell out the primary cause of his life. He did it with style. He did it with a video so risibly insincere that somewhere down in the shadow world, Lee Atwater is gaping and applauding. Obama blamed the (so far marginal) Republican 527s. He claimed that private donations are really public financing. He made a cut-throat political calculation seem like Mother Teresa’s final steps to sainthood.

The media and the activists won’t care (they were only interested in campaign-finance reform only when the Republicans had more money). Meanwhile, Obama’s money is forever. He’s got an army of small donors and a phalanx of big money bundlers, including, according to The Washington Post, Kenneth Griffin of the Citadel Investment Group; Kirk Wager, a Florida trial lawyer; James Crown, a director of General Dynamics; and Neil Bluhm, a hotel, office and casino developer.

Sweet Christmas!  Is Blackazoid really…a villain?  We were wrong about him?  Is David Brooks J. Jonah Jameson with a penchant for biscotti over cigars? 

All this and more…in the next issue!

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 06:24 PM • (24) Comments

Is David Brooks J. Jonah Jameson with a penchant for biscotti over cigars? 

We’ll know for sure when Obama turns into a white guy, and McCain gets a tan and starts talking in the plural.

Of course, this whole election is going to get wiped from existence when Quesada decides that Obama is more relatable as a single 20-something, so his marriage to Michelle gets retconned out in some deal with Rupert Murdock.

Comment #1: karpad  on  06/20  at  06:39 PM

whatsa matter, david?  someone crush your innocent, puerile view of american politics?  did the big, bad man act like a politician?  awwwww…

(can i now turn around and act surprised?)  david brooks, you are a first-class tool.

Comment #2: btbarnes  on  06/20  at  07:14 PM

Of course, this whole premise is based on the idea that we were supposed to see Obama as an innocent, naive milquetoast in the first place.

First, they wrote him off as inconsequential and unelectable, then they completely ignored him for way too long, focusing instead on their vision of an infinitely defeatable Hillary Clinton, well past the point that he was clearly a force in the primaries, not to mention the minds and attention of the electorate.

So, instead of even contemplating that the flaw was THEIR writing him off and completely miscategorizing him in the first place, now he’s a stealth villain whose true colors (pun noted) they can ferret out with their brilliant analysis. The sky, as they say, is falling.

The problem is, of course, that all the things that they are accusing him of hiding are the things that were out in plain sight all along but that they were overlooking. Now THAT’s real cunning on Obama’s part. You know, tell the truth and do stuff in plain sight and all. Guarantees that the spin machine won’t even see him. Slippery devil.

Comment #3: Lymis  on  06/20  at  07:34 PM

“david brooks, you are a first-class tool.”

...not even close.  He’s more like that rusted, chrome-peeling-off, congealed-grease-spotted, all-boogered-up pair of pliers that sits in a filthy corner of your tool box gets used whenever you have something nasty to work on and you don’t want to ruin one of your good pliers.

Now MoDo - she’s a first class tool.  You wouldn’t want to use her for anything…

Comment #4: MikeEss  on  06/20  at  07:41 PM

You know, there’s a parallel between this and the idea that, as everything turns to shit, Bush was actually a liberal all the time.

Comment #5: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  06/20  at  07:47 PM

Luke Cage! Plz tell me that the next time, you’ll illustrate a post with Iron Fist! and end up your post with…like unto a thing of iron.

David Brooks is beyond ridiculous. Is he seriously discovering that the guy who rose from community organiser to state senator to Senator to presidential candidate, and who just ran one of the more organised campaigns ever against the big name frontrunner who seemed to have the nomination in the pocket isn’t some wide-eyed idealist? It just occurred to him that the man is an accomplished politician?

And he thinks that an intelligent, center-left Democrat with an easygoing demeanour who suddenly—Actually no. Nothing sudden about this. Anyone who paid attention to the way he racked up big wins in the caucuses knows that this campaign knows how to maximise an advantage—who once again shows that he’s not a naïve fool has a split personality? Rly? No, he’s not just a pragmatic politician who wants to make sure the Democrats win this year? Sweet Christmas!

Comment #6: Rafi  on  06/20  at  08:08 PM

You just had to bring up One More Day, didn’t you karpad?

Comment #7: Dweeze  on  06/20  at  08:16 PM

Bitterness over One More Day should be kept alive, until Quesada or whoever succeeds him decides to undo that piece of crap. And then Michelle will go back to Obama, and tell him: “Face it, tiger, you just won the jackpot!” And…I’ll stop there.

As for David Brooks, I’m afraid he’s Sally Floyd.

Comment #8: Rafi  on  06/20  at  08:22 PM

“Hit the jackpot”, even. Not even six months, and already my memories are being altered.

Comment #9: Rafi  on  06/20  at  08:25 PM

Shorter David Brooks:

“Barack Obama has

1) street smarts, and
2) book smarts.

This indicates he’s untrustworthy, which is why you shouldn’t vote for him.”

[insert scoobydoo doubletake of hapless reader]

Comment #10: bekabot  on  06/20  at  08:45 PM

Dammit, now I have the Freakazoid theme song stuck in my head, but with the word “Blackazoid” instead of “Freakazoid” repeated throughout. Thanks Jesse.

Comment #11: The Cynic Sage  on  06/20  at  09:16 PM

One More Day actually makes me angrier than Obama, the rest of the Senate, and the House of Representatives’ sellout of the Constitution and enshrinement of a President-King who rules by divine right.

All things considered, I’m not actually sure I feel bad about that.

Comment #12: Dan  on  06/20  at  10:16 PM

On the one hand, there is Dr. Barack….who spent this past winter thrilling the Scarlett Johansson set and feeling the fierce urgency of now.

Oh, I get it.  It’s the old “black men are stealing our hot white women” line of attack.  And the “fierce urgency of now” is a subtle mockery of MLK.

Stay classy, David Brooks.

Comment #13: Cat Ion  on  06/20  at  10:50 PM

Interesting ... this is something I’ve been telling my husband all along when he’s voiced concerns about Obama being eaten alive.  Great orator and idealist, but watch the fuck out!  Chicago politics is known for nasty ruthlessness and he swam in it. 

What Brooks didn’t mention: Obama has a way of attracting money and competent team members, too.

Comment #14: Ms Kate  on  06/21  at  12:57 AM

You just had to bring up One More Day, didn’t you karpad?

It’s magic, I don’t have to explain it!

no, seriously, the worse thing EVER is that it wiped out pretty much every story of the last 20 years, EXCEPT Sins Past, which is possibly the worst story ever written by anyone in any medium ever.

Comment #15: karpad  on  06/21  at  01:12 AM

People still care about Marvel? Morrison just killed J’onn, you geeks!  Why didn’t Steny Hoyer stand up to him?  And hey, is Robertson still editing the Daily Bugle after Levon Helm exposed him for the creep he is?

Comment #16: Josh  on  06/21  at  02:56 AM

the Scarlett Johansson set

Err . . . what?

Comment #17: Dan S.  on  06/21  at  09:09 AM

Is David Brooks J. Jonah Jameson with a penchant for biscotti over cigars?

Gotta admit, the first time I read this I saw, “Jenna Jamison” and was very confused.

Comment #18: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  06/21  at  10:49 AM

I’ll give Brooks credit for one thing: he admits Lee Atwater is burning in hell.

Comment #19: ummeli  on  06/21  at  12:54 PM

Brooks and MoDo - paid to B.S.

These have to be the intellectual lightweights of the NYT. I’d rather hear from the ex-movie critic (Frank Rich), or the local crime beat reporter, the person who runs the classifieds department, or the phone-slave who takes classified ad calls.

Comment #20: NancyP  on  06/21  at  05:36 PM

Morrison just killed J’onn, you geeks!

HE WHAT?!

NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE

Comment #21: karpad  on  06/22  at  02:46 AM

“That Blackazoid - always foolin’ us by not screaming simple words.  It’s the secret to his power, not talking loudly and scaring white people.”

Not a single word towards race in the text you quoted (save the reference to the church controversy), yet you decided to inject racism into it.

Why?  How can that possible help your argument?

Tactically, this is impossibly foolish.  Most Americans do not believe themselves to be racists, and are sensitive to avoid even seeming so (with various levels of success).  Casually suggesting that someone is a racist because of the skin color of the person they are criticizing simply has zero upside.

And it absolutely destroys your credibility.  Just shreds it.

Comment #22: mere mortal  on  06/22  at  11:17 PM

...and then “mere mortal” comes waltzing in, proving the point Jesse’s making in the process of trying to counter it…

Bravo, thou troll…

“Most Americans do not believe themselves to be racists…”

...which proves they aren’t?  Are you that ignorant/naive?

”...and are sensitive to avoid even seeming so (with various levels of success).”

...because appearing to be a racist is considered far worse in this society than actually being one.  This says far more about our society than it does about any supposed lack of racism…

“And it absolutely destroys your credibility.  Just shreds it.”

Okay… 

Please back slowly away from the keyboard before somebody gets hurt…

Comment #23: MikeEss  on  06/22  at  11:36 PM

Can’t stand David Brooks or anything, but it would be not SUCH a bad idea to pay some attention to the point he is making. Though I will admit it’s buried in words and bad metaphor. So I’ll just say, Obama did sound like he was trying to tell us he was going to be a new kind of politician up until two weeks ago.  Three days after Hillary pulled out, he hired Bill Clinton’s economists and about a week after that, he put together a team of security advisors that were pretty Clintonesque. Now he’s onside with the FISA legislation. He’s sounding an awful lot like a regular politician to me. It might be a good idea if Democrats noticed this soon and did some pushing back because with guys like Brooks as their teachers, the Reps are bound to catch on in a few months’ time.

Comment #24: hysperia  on  06/23  at  12:50 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.