Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Denver Archdiocese bars child from school: lesbian moms ‘not living in accord w/Catholic teaching’ Previous entry: Yep, their plan is for you to work until you keel over

Breaking(?!): Still anti-gay CA State Sen. Roy Ashburn comes out of the closet on radio show

“I am gay.  Those are the words that have been so difficult for me for so long.  It is something that is personal, and I don’t believe I felt with my heart that being gay would affect how I do my job.”

—California State Sen. Roy Ashburn (R-Bakersfield)

This is the funniest and most pathetic story of the day. I think Roy forgot that the news broke last week, and a whole lot of people already knew.

That said, his official coming out on a Bakersfield radio show reveals that he’s still unapologetically politically homophobic, reassuring his Bakersfield constituents he’s not like those radical nasty gays who want civil rights, I presume. (GayPolitics):

Radio talk show host Inga Barks wanted assurances that Ashburn would continue to vote in a conservative manner on LGBT rights issues.  Ashburn responded, “I believe firmly that my responsibility is to my constituents.  I will take a careful look at each measure and apply that standard.  How would they vote on this?  How would they want me to vote on this,” adding that most people understood what that means.

“I don’t know how else to ask this, but are you going to live this lifestyle now in the district?” Barks asked.  Ashburn, who announced he is not running for public office again, said, “I pray to God I can find peace.  I want to go back to the senate and work hard for the people of my district…Now you know everything about me.”

This, my friends, is the definition of a self-loathing man. I suppose if his constituents wanted to round up TEH HOMOSEXUALS, he’d vote for that too. Sick.

Related:
* Republican Sexual Hypocrites, 2010 edition: add anti-gay California State Senator Roy Ashburn
* Delusional Collusion - Roy Ashburn’s closet was protected by newspapers, local gays

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 03:38 PM • (8) Comments

I have a weird mixture of pity and contempt going on here…

Comment #1: JilliefromChile  on  03/08  at  03:49 PM

So I guess this means he should commit suicide or check into a mental institution now because his constituents want him dead or think he’s mentally ill, right?  I honestly wonder how he can justify being gay and voting down his own rights continuously.  He’s already elected, his odds of re-election are slim to none.  Why not go for broke and vote up the rights?

Comment #2: Xeranar  on  03/08  at  04:06 PM

Why were people protecting this scumbag?  If gays won’t fight when ashforth GAVE YOU the means to defeat him politically, why should the rest of us give a damn about the plight of gays?  Stand up and fight.

Comment #3: madmatt  on  03/08  at  04:11 PM

We shouldn’t be assholes to the oppressed because their livelihood might depend on sucking up to oppressors, madmatt.

Comment #4: Yawgmoth  on  03/08  at  04:16 PM

Really? ashforth gets a pass on being a hypocritical douchebag and keeping thousands of gays as second class citizens BECAUSE rethugs won’t vote for a gay?  How is his “livelihood” impacted, and why should gay citizens care about him when he so obviously hates them and himself??

Comment #5: madmatt  on  03/08  at  05:07 PM

What exactly is a gay right?

Comment #6: Casp  on  03/08  at  08:31 PM

His livelihood isn’t being a State Senator.  It’s not like there’s another position for him to go to when his term is up.

His livelihood is lying and being bigoted.

Comment #7: Crissa  on  03/09  at  01:43 AM

Casp, it’s also known as a human right (or a civil right), but possessed by someone who many people believe shouldn’t have human or civil rights.

Comment #8: Samantha Vimes  on  03/09  at  06:38 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.