Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: MassResistance’s ‘reporting’ on repeal of 1913 law Previous entry: Women: Not the ones being babies here

Bringing out my inner (small-l) libertarian

image
My favorite Netroots Nation booth
There’s not a single item in this article that doesn’t make me stuff-throwing, puppy-kicking angry.

Federal agents raided a Culver City medical marijuana dispensary and spent more than four hours there, making no arrests but leaving the shop in disarray, it was reported Friday.

Nice place you have here. Shame if anything were to happen to it…on the taxpayer’s dime.

Drug Enforcement Administration agents arrived about noon Thursday at Organica Collective in the 13400 block of Washington Boulevard, DEA spokeswoman Sarah Pullen told the Los Angeles Times.

“Marijuana remains a controlled substance, and it is illegal under federal law to possess, dispense or cultivate marijuana in any form,” she said.

Someone should probably teach DEA spokesperson Sarah Pullen a little bit about the timing of public statements:

The federal operation came on the day an appellate court in San Diego ruled that federal law does not preempt the state’s law allowing the use of medical marijuana—a ruling touted by supporters of California’s medical marijuana law as a significant win.

Unless Congress passed that one law making DEA spokespeople pope-like in their infallibility, this is a real black eye for the feds. Or it would be, if I thought any of them cared.
Doghouse Riley has a photo which suggests that DEA agents are big Blackwater fans, which is probably consistent with this whole authoritarian clusterfuck of an operation.
image

At the dispensary, agents left behind trash, counters strewn with open and empty glass jars, piles of receipts thrown on the ground, upturned couch cushions, bits of marijuana on the edges of counters and an ATM with its doors torn open and emptied, The Times reported.

Not only that but they ate all the damn Fritos! You know, ATM tampering is a federal crime. I’m sure once local police refer it up the chain, the FBI will want to know…about…

Culver City police assisted federal agents at the scene.

I’ve tried at least three times to find the words to describe how wrong this is. Local police cooperating with the DEA to enforce a law which contradicts local law may be the worst thing I’ve heard this weekend, and I heard a detailed story about medical waste.

As for the dumbass in the Blackwater t-shirt, one reporter wonders something which should have occurred to me instantly:

Is the Bush Administration Using Blackwater Mercenaries in the DEA?

Or more to the point, are we contracting with Blackwater to provide backup for the DEA? For that matter, whatever became of the Blackwater hearings?

But let’s assume for a moment that this was purely a DEA operation. Federal agents storm a private business, purportedly due to illegal activities, but make no arrests. They do it in contradiction of local laws, with the help of local law enforcement. They break shit, intimidate citizens, take a bunch of stuff and leave. And all this just happens to occur on a day when the courts are about to deliver a bit of a slap in the face? I hate to be the boy who cried fascism, but: Fascism, for fuck’s sake.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Auguste on 03:38 PM • (16) Comments

Since the Feds can’t always guarantee the loyalty of local law enforcement, they want mercenaries like Blackwater to be America’s Praetorian Guard.

As far as this raid goes, it’s a Red State/County winner all the way.  Now if this was a federal raid on a group of religious nuts in Waco, TX, or Ruby Ridge, ID, the wingnuts would be coming unglued.  But a bunch of DFH’s in Culver City (which is almost Hollyweird!) giving reefers to sick people?...

...nobody cares…

Comment #1: MikeEss  on  08/03  at  04:15 PM

urray for the creeping Mafiaization of our government.

Comment #2: dan  on  08/03  at  05:25 PM

I give 3 to 1 odds that someone corrects your misrepresentation of the pope’s infallibility.

Comment #3: Amanda Marcotte  on  08/03  at  05:48 PM

I hope the court decision stands. The harassing of the dispensaries of medical marijuana is disgusting.

Comment #4: Samantha Vimes  on  08/03  at  05:53 PM

there’s no way the guy in that picture is dope-free. Look at the hair and moustache. He’s a stoner for sure!

Comment #5: flashheart  on  08/03  at  06:00 PM

sorry, the goatee. He could be a satanist as well. But he’s definitely a stoner!

Comment #6: flashheart  on  08/03  at  06:00 PM

I give 3 to 1 odds that someone corrects your misrepresentation of the pope’s infallibility.

I hereby call on readers to provide me with a papal bull, and I’ll show them…

Comment #7: Auguste  on  08/03  at  06:46 PM

Federal laws always trump state and local ones.  The federal government does not recognize marijuana as a legitimate drug for medicinal purposes so it doesn’t matter what the local law is.  Unfortunately on this site “state’s rights” are only viewed as racial in motivation when here is an argument to allow states to write their own books.

Comment #8: Scooter  on  08/03  at  07:45 PM

I find it disturbing that prohibtionists conceded that we needed a constitutional amendment to outlaw alcohol, yet when they decided to outlaw marijuana they decided that wasn’t necessary.

Comment #9: Ben D.  on  08/03  at  07:54 PM

“Unfortunately on this site “state’s rights” are only viewed as racial in motivation when here is an argument to allow states to write their own books.”

“This site” did not work tirelessly over the last 50-years to make the phrase “state’s rights” into a dog whistle promoting the continuation of segregation and strict control over the civil rights of some citizens, so I’m not sure what your point is.

Institution and maintenance of drug laws has been a truly bipartisan effort for the last 100-years.  Marijuana has been so successfully demonized it’s political suicide to advocate legalization.  The Puritans may have faded as a distinct group, but their pinched POV toward the enjoyment of life is alive and well and living in America…

Comment #10: MikeEss  on  08/03  at  08:23 PM

Ben D., alcohol was in wide use and commonly accepted for many years.  It was the selling of prohibition as a political winner that allowed it to go so far.  It had to have a profile to be passed.

OTOH, marijuana was a non-mainstream drug, easily painted as only being used by “others” (Jazz musicians, Mexican farm workers, and other “low lives”) to it wasn’t necessary for the profile to be so high.  Plus it’s obvious the Feds learned a lot from the Prohibition debacle…

Comment #11: MikeEss  on  08/03  at  08:29 PM

I too wish the term “states rights” didn’t mean “racism”, because its a useful and good term in other circumstances. Another horrible legacy the racists left us—the ruining of a good phrase.

Comment #12: Ben D.  on  08/03  at  08:31 PM

Mike-

Yeah, the outlawing of marijuana was completely racist. In fact its the reason we spell it with a “j” instead of an “h” now, because the first drug warriors wanted to make it sound more “Mexican”.

We also outlawes cocaine because the government was convinced it caused “the good negroes” to be “uppity”. Google “Negro Cocaine Fiends”.

Comment #13: Ben D.  on  08/03  at  08:33 PM

Actually federal laws do not always trump local laws.  Current federal drug laws and their enforcement are based on the interstate commerce clause of the constitution.  Which in most cases is a rather flimsy excuse.

Comment #14: commissarjs  on  08/04  at  01:42 AM

I say legalize drugs, not just pot.
http://mikeb302000.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/legalize-drugs/

Comment #15: mikeb302000  on  08/04  at  08:27 AM

If there was actually marijuana around, and neither the feds nor the locals made any arrests, and didn’t seize it all, then they’re engaged in arbitrary and capricious enforcement of the federal statutes. Which leads directly to “unconstitutional as applied”. So they’re either not doing their jobs by being a bunch of thugs, or they’re not doing their jobs by politically deciding not to arrest people whom they witness committing crimes.

Comment #16: paul  on  08/05  at  09:28 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.