Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Hate Crime followup Previous entry: She Just Doesn’t See That “Race” Thing

Busted - Elaine Donnelly’s secret, desperate meeting to preserve DADT

The economy’s in a meltdown, the troops are still fighting with no end in sight, but Elaine Donnelly and the The Center for Military Readiness have a laser focus on important matters. She is well aware that Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is likely to go by the wayside, particularly if Obama is elected, and because the polling shows that most Americans in and out of the military see no good reason why gays and lesbians cannot openly serve.

The handwriting is on the wall for CMR, so what to do? Well, the doyenne of discrimination has decided to do a little Black Ops meeting with veterans service organizations (VSOs) to figure out how to turn up the Homosexual Terror Alert. Fortunately Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) received the secret memorandum on this briefing, and

you’ve got to read

the cloak and dagger BS. I’ve obtained a scan of the memo and transcribed it for your reading pleasure.

Because I admire your organization’s work in support of our nation’s armed forces, I am writing to ask you a question. The determined campaign to repeal the 1993 law stating that homosexuals are not eligible to serve in the military is gaining ground. In this critical battle over the culture of our military—the only one we have—do you care who wins?

Homosexual activists are pushing hard to impose their agenda on our military, regardless of the impact on morale and discipline. They are pleased that pro-defense and veterans organizations, which helped to pass the law in 1993, appear to be missing from the field this time. Organizations such as the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network and the ACLU are well-funded and politically powerful, even though they have no arguments that withstand scrutiny.

Given your organization’s long-standing commitment to military readiness and the high standards and sound policy that promotes it, I hope I can count on you in joining CMR to defend the law regarding homosexual conduct in the military. We need to talk about what can be done, and why, face to face.

I am writing to invite you and other concerned organizations’ leaders to a private, off-the-record briefing to discuss this critically important national security issue. Please join us at the CMR office in Washington DC:

Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008
Where: CMR Conference Room, 1615 L Street,  NW, Suite 650
Time: 12:00-2:30 PM (Light lunch will be served)
RSVP: Executive Director Tommy Sears, 202/347/5333, tommy@cmrlink.org

Due to this issue’s urgency, this invitation is not transferrable to casual observers, interns or other non-executive support staff. This PowerPoint briefing, which includes short video excerpts of the July 23 House Armed Services Committee hearing on gays in the military, will cover everything you need to know to provide the type of principled, engaged leadership that only you can give. I would welcome new ideas and commitment that could turn the situation around.

We are not without advantages. On our side we have the 1993 law, several court decisions declaring the law constitutional (the most recent in June, 2008), credible facts, common sense, and, I believe, majority support among men and women in uniform.

There are so many outlandish things about this memo and Donnelly’s bluster, considering the sitcom-worthy performance she gave earlier this year at the House hearings on Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.  More below the fold.
Elaine, who has no military background and zero qualifications of any kind to speak with authority on the subject, went on live TV and gave bigoted, fact-challenged testimony that was ridiculed not only by the people in the hearing room, but on The Daily Show, and in the mainstream media. Dana Milbank of the WaPo:

Donnelly treated the panel to an extraordinary exhibition of rage. She warned of “transgenders in the military.” She warned that lesbians would take pictures of people in the shower. She spoke ominously of gays spreading “HIV positivity” through the ranks.

“We’re talking about real consequences for real people,” Donnelly proclaimed. Her written statement added warnings about “inappropriate passive/aggressive actions common in the homosexual community,” the prospects of “forcible sodomy” and “exotic forms of sexual expression,” and the case of “a group of black lesbians who decided to gang-assault” a fellow soldier.

At the witness table with Donnelly, retired Navy Capt. Joan Darrah, a lesbian, rolled her eyes in disbelief. Retired Marine Staff Sgt. Eric Alva, a gay man who was wounded in Iraq, looked as if he would explode.

As Steve Ralls of PFLAG notes, she’s desperate to restore what imaginary credibility she believes she had prior to her homo-obsessed C-SPAN meltdown.

It has long been a high-priority of Donnelly and other extremists to organize veterans services organizations to counter momentum in Congress, which has shifted to pro-repeal advocates over the past few years. As more and more veterans - such as retired Joint Chiefs Chairman John Shalikashvili and Lieutenant General Claudia Kennedy - have joined efforts to topple the law, Donnelly has become increasingly desperate to find allies who will join her in advocating for the continued exclusion of lesbian and gay Americans from the armed forces.

Those efforts have failed miserably. In addition to the support of more than five dozen high-ranking military veterans, the effort to repeal the law is also supported by 148 lawmakers in the House of Representatives.

...And if July’s hearings in Congress are any indication, Thursday afternoon should be the last, sad show that brings down the curtain on Donnelly’s already-lost crusade.

Unfortunately for her movement, she’s not finding friends in the military willing to give her the time of day - or even answer her phone calls at this point. It’s all downhill for Elaine and the CMR. She even launched an online campaign to try to drum up support (does this woman have a real J-O-B?), with this ridiculous video:

“Our nation’s military should not be used as a tool to advance the goals of gay activist groups. Forcing a sexual agenda on the armed forces would hurt discipline and morale.”

When you think about issues that really affect boots on the ground—adequate body armor, guaranteed health care when they return home, adequate counseling—a laundry list of more important things, Elaine Donnelly’s obsession with persecuting and root out gays in the military looks petty, cruel and quite frankly, unbalanced. So many service members have come forward to say that they have served openly with their COs aware, and colleagues not giving a rip about sexual orientation.

What on earth is this woman going to do when DADT is repealed?

Related:
* Elaine ‘forcible sodomy’ Donnelly scorched by WaPo for ludicrous DADT testimony
* Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell supporter Donnelly provides comic relief during House hearing
* Elaine Donnelly honored on The Daily Show

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 12:57 PM • (16) Comments

The code words encased within this screed could be limited to “ACLU” (those JOOS and fags, don’t you know).  That acronym sends shivers up the righties collective spines and causes the flow of contributions and voters to line up in droves to stop this insidious affront to Western Civilization.

Comment #1: rorycalhoun  on  10/01  at  01:20 PM

“hort video excerpts of the July 23 House Armed Services Committee hearing on gays in the military”

Isn’t that the one where she got her ass handed to her in public by the Dem Congressman / Iraq vet who showed that she clearly didn’t know a damned thing about the military and was running purely on “gays are bad for the military because we say gays are bad and that’s all you need to know”?

Comment #2: seeker6079  on  10/01  at  01:34 PM

Sorry.  Posted before reading below the fold.

Comment #3: seeker6079  on  10/01  at  01:34 PM

even though they have no arguments that withstand scrutiny.

uh…like the ones you made at that committee hearing?  I’ll just BET those are short video clips.

Comment #4: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  10/01  at  01:58 PM

“Inappropriate passive/aggressive actions” and “the prospects of ‘forcible” anything aren’t things I think about when I think “GLBT”.  Hell, even “in your face” (if not exotic) sexual expression isn’t exactly a “tranny” thing.  I think many straight-identifying men have pretty much gifted the rest of the population with that—in and out of institutions—since time immem.  How can Donnelly et al dissonate their cogs like that and not die of irony poisoning?  And didn’t the military make adjustments/decide to deal with those possibilities when women started serving, anyway? 

That’s some damned impressive transparant hate.

Comment #5: Ranylt  on  10/01  at  03:35 PM

Who exactly is this woman? How and why does her organization exist? Why does anyone listen to her?

Comment #6: Bitter Scribe  on  10/01  at  04:00 PM

If you want to help fight DADT, go to www.sldn.org. You don’t need to donate money, you can sign a petition (they won’t give your info out) or write your congresspeople.

As for Elaine Donnelly, she never served and has no degree related to the military or government. Ignore her.

Comment #7: anna  on  10/01  at  04:21 PM

As a servicemember working at the moment with one mostly out gay, and having worked with several others in the past, I can say that most of us are perfectly fine with people serving openly. Those few who have a problem are seen as jerks who need to get over it and are often ridiculed for their close-mindedness.

I personally would love to see my gay friends able to stand beside me, out and proud. I want to be able to share in all parts of their lives without worrying about some random idiot finding out that John Doe’s boyfriend came to someone’s birthday party and throwing a fit.

Comment #8: Trepkos  on  10/01  at  04:43 PM

@Trepkos - thank you for your service.

Comment #9: CParis  on  10/01  at  05:02 PM

Love to leave my name, rank and serial number but My S.O. is deployed in Iraq as I write and I don’t want to put any unwanted light on her. Thank you Pam for the great, informative post. Almost all of our friends are active duty, straight and don’t give a shit that we aren’t. This particular topic really pisses me off.  We are supporters of SLDN and I’m grateful they are there.

The only problem with DADT activism as an issue is the people most interested in its repeal for the most part, can’t say much. Gay activists groups hold it as a low priority and straight people are unaffected. I’m painting with a broad brush here but the essence of what I say is true. Again, Pam, thanks for caring enough to post on this important topic.

Comment #10: F16Chick  on  10/01  at  05:41 PM

“Gay activists groups hold it as a low priority and straight people are unaffected. “

A number of people are concerned that the repeal of DADT will cause witchhunts for gays and lesbians forcing them out of the military in huge numbers.

The fundies fear the repeal for opposite reasons. They feel hordes of gays and lesbians will enter the military.

Group 1 seems to have the more logic based rationale.

Comment #11: tootiredoftheright  on  10/01  at  05:44 PM

First, a bit of nitpicking: you left off the last sentence of the first paragraph of the memo. It reads, “I assume that you do — but right now the other side appears poised to win.”

Secondly, you’re right about the cloak and dagger BS. Requesting an “off-the-record” meeting like that smacks of desperation.

Thirdly, is there any way we can sabotage the petition drive in that YouTube video? I’ve been itching to sign some wingnut petitions as “Dick Pinch,” if you know what I mean.

Comment #12: J. A. Baker  on  10/01  at  07:13 PM

A number of people are concerned that the repeal of DADT will cause witchhunts for gays and lesbians forcing them out of the military in huge numbers.

Huh?  I thought the whole point of repealing DADT was to make being gay no longer an automatic firing offense.  Unless you think the plan is for them to come up with trumped-up charges for everything but being gay to drive them out.

Comment #13: Mnemosyne  on  10/01  at  08:22 PM

It’s amazing. If it’s true that you can catch ‘gay’ by being close to them then the military will eventually run out of people that are ‘fit’ to serve.

What we need is to have a ‘large number’ of serving military personnel to claim that they are ‘gay’ and be tossed out of the military so that the idea of being ‘gay’ eliminates you is as silly as it is.

BUT, like women in the services, you really have to be prepared for the ‘blowback’ of having these ‘hetero-Hitlers’ sending ‘gay’ troops on suicide missions to rid the service of them. You know that wil happen in hopefully small and isolated incidents.

The military is really only good at wasting taxpayer money and pissing off the world towards America… The military hasn’t ‘won’ a battle since the trumped up beach rescue of the medical students on Grenada. I actually met someone who was there, in med school, during the ‘rescue. He joked that they ‘rescued tehm’ from running out of rum and sunburns. Yeah. what I said earlier. A great way to waste massive amounts of money…

Comment #14: PinkyLeftBrain  on  10/02  at  12:11 AM

“Huh?  I thought the whole point of repealing DADT was to make being gay no longer an automatic firing offense.  Unless you think the plan is for them to come up with trumped-up charges for everything but being gay to drive them out.”

The only way it makes sense to me is if the idea is that if it looks like Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is going to be repealed, some higher ups will hurry up and try to throw out all the gays and lesbians they can find before the change actually takes effect. It sounds like, from people posting above that there are a lot people who serve somewhat openly and would be easy for such an effort to find.

Comment #15: witless chum  on  10/02  at  09:33 AM

The thing about Don’t Ask Don’t Tell it was a way to let gays and lesbians serve as long as they didn’t tell their commanders and if asked by their commanders they were supposed to refuse to answer. Then report the commanders who asked would then be reprimanded and possibly be removed. Offical policy till Don’t Ask Don’t Tell was to indeed ask and if found out the gay or lesbian was immediatly removed from military service sometimes with criminal charges applied.  DADT was strongly opposed by conservatives and other fundies since they screamed that it would let hordes of gays and lesbians into the miltiary since they couldn’t be ejected if they kept quiet. Also since the ones who would be violating DADT by asking would likely be their fellow fundies they were outraged their numbers in the military would be drastically reduced since we all fundies don’t understand subtley or logic.

The fear is with the repeal of DADT the offical prior military policy will come back in force and tens of thousands of people will be expelled from the military.

Comment #16: tootiredoftheright  on  10/02  at  02:55 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.