Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Top ten wingnuttiest moments of 2010 Previous entry: A blow for consumers, an argument against libertarian wankery

Cipher Palin

CongressLGBT

Dave Weigel’s suggestion for a Palin tweet index is clever and sadly on target.  It is true that the number of words exhausted on every little tweet and flutter from her has gotten out of control.  I suppose you could say this post is an example.  But, what I realized his post was that while the main reason that Palin probably loves the brevity of Twitter is that coming up with more than 140 characters can take her all damn day, there’s also something else going on in her favor.  Either she stumbled upon this by accident and is working it (the likeliest explanation), or she’s an evil genius.  Either way, it’s working.  I realized that the brevity of Twitter makes it easier for Sarah Palin to be a cipher for the various strains of wingnut out there.

The example Dave whips out demonstrates this perfectly.  It all started when Tammy Bruce, whose racism outweighs her pro-gay concerns enough to drive her into the Republican party, tweeted:

But this hypocrisy is just truly too much. Enuf already—the more someone complains about the homos the more we should look under their bed.

It was in response to this scandal. I’d be curious to see if you guys can get to the tweet, since I’m not authorized to see it, which may mean it’s closed off to the public now or that Tammy Bruce blocked me from seeing it after I made fun of her for having shit for brains, the proof of which will become evident soon. 

Sarah Palin retweeted this, in an action that seemed incredibly mysterious to anyone not familiar with the Palin Corollary of Occam’s Razor, which is, “If stupidity is a plausible explanation for her choice, it’s the likeliest explanation.”  And indeed, you can see how Palin retweeted this out of sheer dumbheadedness. Without knowing that Bruce is a lesbian or much about the context, with a side dose of not reading it too closely, it’s possible that she just saw the word “homos”, thought it was a gay joke, and thought to retweet it. 

But Bruce has really worked her ass off to interpret this retweeting as some sort of evidence that Bible-thumping Sarah Palin is a secret Friend of the Gays.

When it comes to Sarah Palin’s position on DADT, I have never asked her about it and she has never spoken to me about it–but I assess her as a Conservative with Libertarian influence. Both her husband and son are Independents, with Mr. Palin serving as his wife’s primary adviser. I will remind people of things already in the public realm about the governor–she refused to veto partner benefits legislation as governor of Alaska and is a firm believer in fairness and “live and let live.” She is not a Culture Warrior, however. She is, which should be apparent by her Facebook postings and opinion pieces, a Policy Wonk. She is also, which is clearly evident, a charismatic leader who remains grounded by her character, faith and family.

I’m sorry, but someone who makes eating cookies vs. eating vegetables an occasion for culture war is a dyed-in-the-wool culture warrior, and have I mentioned the word “abortion” yet?  The only reason that Todd Palin isn’t a Republican is because he has aligned himself with parties that see the Republicans as too left wing, and he’s thrown in with the Alaska Independence Party, an offshoot of the Constitution Party that wishes to turn America into a theocracy.

This is how they feel about gay people:

The law of our Creator defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman. The marriage covenant is the foundation of the family, and the family is fundamental in the maintenance of a stable, healthy and prosperous social order. No government may legitimately authorize or define marriage or family relations contrary to what God has instituted. We are opposed to amending the U.S. Constitution for the purpose of defining marriage.

We reject the notion that sexual offenders are deserving of legal favor or special protection, and affirm the rights of states and localities to proscribe offensive sexual behavior. We oppose all efforts to impose a new sexual legal order through the federal court system. We stand against so-called “sexual orientation” and “hate crime” statutes that attempt to legitimize inappropriate sexual behavior and to stifle public resistance to its expression. We oppose government funding of “partner” benefits for unmarried individuals. Finally, we oppose any legal recognition of homosexual unions.

Basically, no gay marriage, and really, the fundamentalist Christian church should have all power to say who is and isn’t married.

Of course, Bruce also thinks Palin is a policy wonk, so she’s far off into fantasy land.  Palin also took a couple of swipes at gay people in her latest book “America by Heart”. 

Anyway, the point.  And that is Palin says something cryptic on Twitter, almost surely due to straight up dumbassery.  But because it’s cryptic, her fans can read whatever fool thing they want into it.  She’s all things to all wingnuts.  No wonder she’s so popular.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 06:52 PM • (61) Comments

For all of Tammy Bruce and the rest of GOProud’s flailing about hard-right reconstructionist Christian Palin not being exactly what she is, the saddest part of this is the amount of play that a fucking re-tween is getting.

WHY IN THE FUCK ARE PEOPLE PAYING ATTENTION TO WHAT SARAH PALIN HAS PEOPLE TWEET FOR HER?!?!?!?!?

This is so goddamned annoying. First, people pretend that the media people Palin has hired to tweet for her are actually the idiot herself. Then they pretend that she/they are knowledgeable about anything and that those tweets have a substantive value. Then there are the spin-queens like Bruce and GOProud trying to read the tea leaves coming from an idiot.

One of my good friends is a Pulitzer Prize winner, but in general I fucking hate the news media. Worthless, the lot of ‘em.

Comment #1: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  01/04  at  07:59 PM

Palin as a policy wonk? 

Shit for brains, indeed.

Comment #2: Iam138  on  01/04  at  07:59 PM

I bet Peter Sellers regarded “Being There” as a satire when he first made it…

Comment #3: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  01/04  at  08:04 PM

I clicked through and saw the Tweet, Amanda, so I guess you’ve been blocked.

Comment #4: Kristen from MA  on  01/04  at  08:07 PM

But because it’s cryptic, her fans can read whatever fool thing they want into it.  She’s all things to all wingnuts.  No wonder she’s so popular.

Curiously, this reminds me of a common criticism of us Obots: that we project our hopes onto him and see what we want, often in contradiction to what he actually says.  There’s basis for that, because Obama speaks about big ideas, often in sweeping terms short on detail, so a person can overlook his actual detailed statements (note to Tammy Bruce: this is what an actual policy wonk looks like) and imagine that his vision of America must be ours.

So as far as public perception is concerned, Sarah Palin is the Dark Side version of Barack Obama.  It’s just that he’s a person of substance whose admirers project their own desires on to him in spite of the facts; she’s a person of style whose admirers project their own desires on to her because there’s nothing there otherwise.

Comment #5: Cris  on  01/04  at  08:36 PM

I could see the tweet as well.

Comment #6: Bethynyc  on  01/04  at  08:49 PM

She is, which should be apparent by her Facebook postings and opinion pieces, a Policy Wonk.

I think the claim that Sarah Palin is a policy wonk is a pretty strong candidate for “dumbest thing ever written in the history of the Internet”. Hell, a case could be made that it’s the single dumbest thing ever written in the history of writing. After having read the above quote, I’m inclined to think that the sky might actually be orange if Tammy Bruce insists that it’s blue.

Comment #7: DTGslu2K  on  01/04  at  08:52 PM

Put another way, if Tammy Bruce is ever tried for murder, all her attorney has to do is put her on the stand, ask her if she believes that Sarah Palin is a “policy wonk”. When Bruce replies “yes”, go forward with an insanity defense. No sane and competent person could ever describe Sarah Palin as a “policy wonk” with a straight face. That’s just a completely unhinged, totally disconnected from reality, Beckian level of batshit crazy.

Comment #8: DTGslu2K  on  01/04  at  09:04 PM

WHY IN THE FUCK ARE PEOPLE PAYING ATTENTION TO WHAT SARAH PALIN HAS PEOPLE TWEET FOR HER?!?!?!?!?

Exactly. She’s by far the most unpopular politician in the country. Even in her home state her approval ratings are the toilet. She’s not a politician anymore she’s just a reality TV star. She will never hold elected office again.

Comment #9: Ben D.  on  01/04  at  09:32 PM

I can’t believe that even Tammy Bruce is dumb enough to actually think that Palin is a “policy wonk.” But evidently she’s dumb enough to think that if she makes this claim, someone out there will be dumb enough to believe it. The only people that dumb are already Palin fans.

Comment #10: manboobz  on  01/04  at  10:20 PM

As Jerome B. demonstrates, the primary motivation for conservatives in this country is harming other Americans.

Comment #11: Punditus Maximus  on  01/04  at  11:21 PM

so jerome, since that’s all you’ve alleged, i’m guessing she has no other good points. surely you’d have mentioned them otherwise. thank you for proving that your wingnut sort is not about substance, but about being ill-mannered children who have no reason for doing anything except to annoy people. congratulations. you’re five.

Comment #12: chibi  on  01/04  at  11:22 PM

You know what makes liberals mad, Jerome?

When you go into your bathroom, seal all the vents off, seal any windows, then proceed to plug the bathtub drain and fill it up with equal parts bleach and ammonia.

Don’t let the liberal elite nanny state stop you! Nothing makes us sooooo pissed off!. Really.

Comment #13: Ben D.  on  01/04  at  11:25 PM

Or if you REALLY went to make us mad, get someone to tie you down to some railroad tracks. Maybe your brave resistance could stop one of those Communist Amtrak trains!

Comment #14: Ben D.  on  01/04  at  11:27 PM

True enough, there are people living in this country (and leaving unwanted comments on Pandagon) who would happily live in a post apocalyptic, scorched, barren, radioactive wasteland as long as they could cackle to each other about upset libruls. 

Pulling their own (dead) hair out in clumps while barfing up their innards would be worth it to them — as long as they could wank off to Snowmobile Snookie and dream of how pissed we are about it.  Awesome!

I can’t possibly imagine why the USA is going down the tubes…

Comment #15: MikeEss  on  01/04  at  11:33 PM

And Jerome B provides the perfect example of the contentless politics of ressentiment.  That’s all the fuckwits have. If it drives the liberals crazy it’s good! Thus, the nonsensical Palinite “Defense of cookies” or the asswipe’s letter in my local paper that record snowfalls are “God making a fool of Al Gore.”

The defense of Palin is conservative politics at it’s most basic level:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DheXU13NneI

Comment #16: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  01/04  at  11:46 PM

Old liberal ploy , fill in the blank, is stoopid we can’t have him/her in the oval office BLAH BLAH BLAH.

Which would make the conservative game-plan “[fill in teh blank] is so stoopid he/she would be perfect for teh Oval Office”?

Comment #17: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  01/04  at  11:48 PM

“Which would make the conservative game-plan “[fill in teh blank] is so stoopid he/she would be perfect for teh Oval Office”?”

...which is apparently how we got stuck with the last three Republican presidents…

Comment #18: MikeEss  on  01/04  at  11:55 PM

I can’t possibly imagine why the USA is going down the tubes…

Again, she’s the most unpopular politician in the country. Please don’t cede to them the title of “real Americans” because it’s a fucking lie.

Comment #19: Ben D.  on  01/05  at  12:07 AM

On that note, everyone go to http://www.primariesforpalin.com

Comment #20: Ben D.  on  01/05  at  12:08 AM

Oh, and she’s even (especially?) hated even in uber-right wing Alaska:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/sarah-palin-alaska-poll

Comment #21: Ben D.  on  01/05  at  12:13 AM

Ben D., please don’t harm the engineers. ;-;

Comment #22: Crissa  on  01/05  at  12:21 AM

Love how she drives liberals nuts.

Love you’re too dumb to tell the difference between driving someone nuts and driving someone to point and laugh.

Comment #23: Amanda Marcotte  on  01/05  at  12:34 AM

Policy wonk?  Policy wonk?

Bruce owes me a keyboard.

Comment #24: bomberE  on  01/05  at  01:04 AM

So…nothing about her horrible poll numbers or that Even-the-Liberal (snark) state of Alaska hates Sarah Palin.

Dear Ben I’m sure any man going to the bathroom without you is upsetting.

This doesn’t even make any sense.

Comment #25: Ben D.  on  01/05  at  01:24 AM

It really is fascinating to watch the whole, shes too stupid routine played out fot the umpteenth time.

The thing is, Sarah Palin has truly cemented her place in GOP lore as the dumbest national politician in the history of the Republican Party. And the GOP has had more than a few total dumbasses in my lifetime, including a crappy Hollywood B-movie actor, a “potatoe” expert, and a dipshit pretend Texan in a flightsuit.

Bible Spice takes the cake, and on some level, I have to think Dan Quayle is relieved to know that he’s no longer the dumbest and most unqualified vice-presidential nominee in American history.

Comment #26: DTGslu2K  on  01/05  at  01:29 AM

Reagan was at least a two-term Governor of a state that has an economy bigger than some European countries, and nearly unseated a sitting President in a primary before he won in 1980.

While Palin is a half-term Governor of a state that has half the number of people as Fairfax County, VA, before she found that too hard and quit.

Comment #27: Ben D.  on  01/05  at  01:48 AM

So what you’re saying, ben, is that wingnut standards are slipping?

Comment #28: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  01/05  at  02:08 AM

So what you’re saying, ben, is that wingnut standards are slipping?

The only thing I can say is that they haven’t slipped quite that low. Even REPUBLICANS think she’s unqualified and have a negative opinion of the woman, and it keeps going downward.

Comment #29: Ben D.  on  01/05  at  02:26 AM

Sure, Jerome, until you notice that when it comes to her personal behavior, it’s a direct contradiction of what she tells everyone else to do.

No earmarks - bridge to nowhere, Alaska getting mucho federal dollars?

No government sponsored health"Obamacare” - except when it is her husband, kids and grandkids getting same from the IHS.

NO quitting midstream - except when she did so

No hacking - except when she did so with both Wooten (troopergate) and her time at the gas reg post

No choice fro women - except when she was free to make it with HER pregnancy

Comment #30: phylosopher  on  01/05  at  04:04 AM

Did I skim over the part where Jerome answered chibi at #13 asking (indirectly) if Sarah Palin had any other good points, or is Jerome just gonna keep going “u maaaaad, bro!” at everyone without actually discussing anything?

Comment #31: Becky  on  01/05  at  08:05 AM

That’s three threads this schmoe has spread his manure over.  Yo, speaking as a non-American woman, we don’t want you.  Any chance he can just be banned as an offensive spam=-bot?

Comment #32: Katherine  on  01/05  at  10:33 AM

Dear Ben I’m sure any man going to the bathroom without you is upsetting.  Palin has a bunch of great points but why go over them here?

In the reality based community, we call that “supporting your case.”

No one would convert from the altar of the dead baby so why try? [ad hominem] She certainly <strike>doesn’t need to</strike> can’t be defended.  Either you buy what shes selling or you don’t.  <blockquote>
Fixed.

<blockquote>The point being she’s effective in pointing out the harms of liberal policies.

Good. Name 5.

How do I know shes effective?

By naming 5 policies she actually understands and can make a counter agrument against?

Because of the way the left continues to ridicule her from her appearance, to the way she talks, to her not attending an ivy league school.

Damn youlinruls for asking for substance over style!
Wharglegarbble!

It’s all old hat.  Seen it many, many times before and its a solid indicator that she threatens liberals and their view of the way the country should be run.

Fucking living in caves was good enough for my ancestors, it’s damned good enough for me!
Wharglegarbble!

I can tell the difference between driving someone batty or to the point of laughing sweetheart but to liberals its the same.

 
Have some projection!
Wharglegarbble!

Ridicule the conservative messenger so as to change the discussion from what really matters.

I’ll conviently ignore the hundreds of times she’s been debunked, proved wrong or just plain inarticulate!!!

It’s playground tactic that most grownups find offensive.  The operative word being most.

Comment #26: Jerome B.

Have some more projection!!
Wharglegarbble!

Comment #33: cynickal  on  01/05  at  01:23 PM

Comment #12: Punditus Maximus: As Jerome B. demonstrates, the primary motivation for conservatives in this country is harming other Americans.

Good way of expressing it.  This raises another contrast: Barack Obama drives wingnuts positively around the bend, but I really don’t see liberals taking much pleasure in that fact.  I don’t see them saying “I just love how crazy Obama makes these conservatives!” I react with pity, with sorrow for our nation, but I get absolutely no glee out of the wingnut freakout over this man.

Comment #34: Cris  on  01/05  at  02:02 PM

I really don’t see liberals taking much pleasure in that fact.

Oh, I’ll admit to taking a little pleasure in it. Counterproductive, I know—same as my rooting for Cardinal Arinze during the last Pope-a-thon. I know he’s probably more right-wing than even Ratzi, but I really wanted to see how the Donohue, O’Reilly, and the rest of the lace-curtain crowd would have reacted to having a black guy sitting on the Throne of Peter.

Sooner or later, the sham ends and the bigots return to their true natures. Only someone as bone-headed as Michael Steele couldn’t have forseen what would have happened to him over the past 6 months. Heck, one viewing of Trading Places would tell you what was going to happen:

Randolph Duke: [chuckling] We took a perfectly useless psychopath like Valentine, and turned him into a successful executive. And during the same time, we turned an honest, hard-working man into a violently, deranged, would-be killer!

[laughs]

Randolph Duke: Now, what are we going to do about taking
Winthorpe back and returning Valentine to the ghetto?

Mortimer Duke: I don’t want Winthorpe back, after what he’s done.

Randolph Duke: You mean, keep Valentine on as managing director?

Mortimer Duke: Do you really believe I would have a n*gger run our family business, Randolph?

To a degree it’s the same with Palin. I’d enjoy the spectacle of a rabid misogynist like Jerome B. rooting for a female POTUS after years of jokes about menstruation and hysteria. Cognitive dissonance is just entertaining, especially when Palin has no real chance of winning.

The difference, I think, is that liberals don’t make pissing off their fellow citizens a central and deliberate feature of their political approach. It’s sometimes a happy side effect, but that’s about it.

Comment #35: Gracchus.  on  01/05  at  02:48 PM

By the way, Tammy Bruce might do well to keep my point in mind. Unless, of course, she aspires to be the Ernst Rohm of the American conservative movement. Whether it’s Palin or Jerome B., their long knives are sharpened for Teh Gayz.

Comment #36: Gracchus.  on  01/05  at  02:55 PM

Jerome B, forget about the politics. Palin CANNOT use her own language in the most simplest terms under the most controlled circumstances. I see this as an undiagnosed neurological problem. This woman has no place on the national stage and the fact that she is allowed a national presence by the corporate media indicates that we have corrupted our political dialogue, left or right.

As Jon Stewart said when interviewed by Rachel Maddow: “It’s not the right or left, it’s the corruption or not corruption.”

Stop embarrassing yourself with your support of a substandard individual being exploited by corrupt elements in our society.

Comment #37: LCforevah  on  01/05  at  03:12 PM

...which is apparently how we got stuck with the last three Republican presidents…

Hey, Bush Sr. is a pretty smart guy.

...and was enormously unpopular with the voters in his own party, so, yeah, the GOP’s policy since then has been to dig up pseudo-folksy half-wits and try to sell them as the second coming of Reagan.  I don’t know what’s sadder: that it works for them, or that it’s the only thing that works for them.

Comment #38: Shaenon  on  01/05  at  03:16 PM

and was enormously unpopular with the voters in his own party, so, yeah, the GOP’s policy since then has been to dig up pseudo-folksy half-wits and try to sell them as the second coming of Reagan.

Well, Dole wasn’t stupid or folksy.

Comment #39: Ben D.  on  01/05  at  03:49 PM

Well, Dole wasn’t stupid or folksy.

They were trying to channel another aspect of Reagan with Dole—nostalgia for a Greatest Generation daddy figure (and Dole had actually seen combat). Given that the Boomers loathe their parents’ generation, it was a foolish strategy.

When McCain started whinging “My turn, my turn!” in 2007, the GOP reluctantly tried to combine the daddy figure with the pseudo-folksy appeal to the Know-Nothings (“finish that durned fence, dagnabbit!”). That fell flat as well.

Comment #40: Gracchus.  on  01/05  at  04:02 PM

I always thought that twitter was a good way for her to communicate because it’s common in tweets to not be careful about spelling, grammar and punctuation.

Comment #41: The Bobs  on  01/05  at  05:45 PM

One can also make the argument that Dole was offered up as a sacrifice: They knew Clinton was probably going to continue as President, so if their candidate was going to lose anyway, then why not give a turn to one of their more useless moth-eaten has-beens who’d been patiently waiting his turn for a shot at the White House for years by that point? Since Clinton was basically doing everything they wanted, that little set-up was win/win for the Rethugs. (They then went on to show their gratitude to Clinton for implementing their policies by trying to impeach him, of course.)

I got much the same impression from McCain’s turn at the bat. After Bush was through wrecking the country, and the Dems had a more-than-credible chance of snatching the Presidency back, why not hand the opportunity for a humiliating loss to a candidate the GOP members weren’t all that fond of to begin with?  If they’re going to lose anyway, what the fuck, right?

Comment #42: John D.  on  01/05  at  05:52 PM

Speaking of wingnuts, the local news here just reported that Michele Bachmann is going to run for president. This will be entertaining.

Comment #43: Planet of the Blue Monkeys  on  01/05  at  08:41 PM

John D:

I always thought Dole lost because he wasn’t very different from Clinton at all. In that situation, just stay the course, right?

Anyway, I’d love to know if this kind of obstructionism goes back to the Carter administration. I remember quite vividly the batshit crazy that marked the opposition in the Clinton administration, and it’s exactly the same—even the same people—now.

But at the end of the day… what can we do? The Democrats are unresponsive, the Greens are irrelevant, and the deck is stacked against us monetarily. What the hell do we do? Do we even have an inkling of what a proper answer would look like?

Comment #44: BrianX  on  01/05  at  10:07 PM

There is a profound difference in the way Obama and Palin piss off/irritate the opposition.

Palin aims to, the snark, the snipe, etc.  If she had done what many on the conservative side had counseled, lay low, spend some time learning global politics and policy, as well as economics and realities of the lower 48 and ALL Americans etc.  and no, that couldn’t be done in a weekend cram session, but some serious reading, focus and low key globe trotting - she might have earned some respect, certainly from conservatives and even grudgingly from a few liberals.  But she didn’t.  As long as she remains young and pretty - and as many have pointed out, her shelf-life with a large part of her fanbase is rapidly approaching expiration - the snark works.  But when it starts coming from a “well-preserved” but clearly fiftyish woman, it won’t work to keep her base interested. (Pre-empting attacks - I’m pointing out the values her base has, these are not phylosopher’s values.) 

Obama, could pray daily to a statue of Ronnie Raygun and he’d still piss off the conservatives because of his skin color.

Comment #45: phylosopher  on  01/05  at  11:16 PM

Gotta love another instance of Palin hypocrisy - Coulter just used the “r’ word at a person.  Palin?  crickets.

Comment #46: phylosopher  on  01/05  at  11:20 PM

Palin= “Policy Wonk” is the most outlandish Palin thing I’ve seen since Amanda had her meeting with Cobra Commander. Actually, Bruce’s idea is the less crazy than the existence of Cobra Commander would be. Hey, maybe she’s carefully crafted a persona of being aggressively uninformed as part of her clever plan to mumble, mumble, mumble. But, if I was someone ID’d as a “gay conservative activist” I’d probably be hoping for friends in unlikely places too. I seem to remember first half of the aughts vintage Andrew Sullivan trying very hard to take Thumper’s mom’s advice in regard to various Republican figures on gay rights.

@Roscoe at 28
And I remember someone at Pandagon a long time ago pointing out that Churchy Spice was more apropos than Bible Spice. If Palin’s read major portions of the bible, I’m an angora goat standing on a old tractor tire.

Comment #47: witless chum  on  01/06  at  10:39 AM

...so what you’re saying, Jerome B Asshole, is the Republican strrategy for playing chess (or politics) is to dump the board on the ground after your opponent makes the first move, right?

“Brilliant” only if your goal is making a spectacle, not actually winning the competition.

More evidence for why this nation is in deep shit as long as people like Palin, Beck, Limbaugh are treated any way other than shunned.

Fortunately, after a hypocritical impeachment, stolen elections, Darth Cheney, failed (but never-ending) wars, Bush Jr. with his thumb stuck into “my pet goat”, unbelievable debt cause by the “shrink government until we can drown it in the bathtub” con-men, several billion repetitions of “9/11!”, etc., it looks like enough Americans have become fed up with the lunacy to prevent the worst of the Republican “I’ll prove government is bad by exercising bad governing” crowd from gaining national office, even if the New Old Confederate Party continues to fool wide swaths of “America’s Heartland” (where the vast majority of Americans don’t live, thank yew Jesus).

Your time is ending, and the existence of Palin as anything other than a forgotten former beauty queen and answer to a trivia question about Alaskan governors (sorry, make that half-term Alaskan governors) proves it. 

So keep wanking, while dreaming of a 1000-year Republican Reich, until the skin peels off your dick, ‘cause that’s about the only thing left Sarah Palin (and Michelle Bachmann, and Haley Barbour, and Newt Gingrich, and Jim DeMint, etc.) has to offer you…

Comment #48: MikeEss  on  01/06  at  10:57 AM

Jerome B, every time Palin’s name is mentioned in Obama’s presence, he smiles. He and his administration know what a boon her clownishness is. Fear her? Pity her is more likely.

Comment #49: LCforevah  on  01/06  at  12:56 PM

<blockquote>


Mmmmm…. I love the smell of Troll reading miscomprehension in the morning.
Smells like…. Brawndo!

Comment #50: cynickal  on  01/06  at  01:06 PM

And now we observe the conservatroll at stage three. Having failed to successfully troll a forum that is now by and large immune to his attacks, the troll resorts to flinging discredited talking points and making vaguely harassing comments to the forum poster who has aroused his ire the most. There is some risk here if the troll-baiting should continue though—although stage four is traditionally when the frustrated troll is at his most entertaining, it is also often associated with obsessive harassment of specific forum posters and, on very rare occasions, threats of job harassment, identity theft, or even physical violence. Alternately, the stage four troll might engage in flouncing behavior and come back at a later date, reverted to stage one or two.

WARNING: Stage three and four trolls do not respond particularly well to counterargument, and are best dealt with through a barrage of deflationary tactics, including mockery and facetious analysis.

Comment #51: BrianX  on  01/07  at  04:06 AM

*snerk*

Comment #52: BrianX  on  01/07  at  12:49 PM

Gunnery Sergeant Hartman (R. Lee Ermey) in Full Metal Jacket (no doubt thinking of Jerome B Conservatroll):
“It looks to me like the best part of you ran down the crack of your mama’s ass and ended up as a brown stain on the mattress.”
...

Comment #53: MikeEss  on  01/07  at  03:45 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.