Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Faith Basis Previous entry: What part of rape isn’t rape?

Concern Trolling For Jesus

Religion

imageYou know one the main reasons that I and many others had no idea for years that evangelical and fundamentalist meant different things?

Open dishonesty about the terms coming from politically powerful conservatives like CBN “journalist” David Brody.

Barack Obama may be talking up his Christian faith like he’s doing today in Ohio and trying his best to appeal to Evangelicals with a “new kind of politics,” but he’s got a problem. Many of his positions are the same liberal positions that have turned off Evangelicals for years.

Obama delivered another speech about faith Tuesday. He’s done a few of these concerning his faith and how it shapes his public policy. But Sunday his campaign and the Democratic Party were handing out pro-gay rights flyers at the Pride Festival in St. Louis. How is that going to play in the heartland?

First, St. Louis is in the heartland.  So, apparently, it plays as well as it does in Ohio, with its several pride festivals, and Utah, with Salt Lake City’s yearly pride festival, and Kansas, where they even round up Christians in big homosexual police-state rodeos/martini nights

It would perhaps be helpful for religious debate in our country, particularly for the oh-so-concerned Christian Right, if they could stop lying about our country and their faith in pursuit of a narrow-minded political agenda.  They might even realize that there are gay evangelicals and even gay fundamentalists, and a whole wide world of Christians who are neither evangelical nor fundamentalist who don’t appreciate being spoken for like some monolithic entity.  There’s even Christians who don’t shield their crotches when guys with waxed eyebrows walk by - didja hear?

I, personally, wonder about the character of a religious movement that requires false claims on the allegiances of others in order to make itself a more viable force in society.  But I’m also the person who tries to find out who the dropped $20 bill belongs to, as well.  If only I had the insight into moral character that comes with being a member of a fundamentalist- what?  What do you mean I already am? 

Ah, fuck.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 06:09 PM • (8) Comments

“It would perhaps be helpful for religious debate in our country, particularly for the oh-so-concerned Christian Right, if they could stop lying about our country and their faith in pursuit of a narrow-minded political agenda.”

Jesse, Jesse, Jesse.  It’s not about a “narrow-minded political agenda”, it’s about souls.  Lots and lots of souls.

They’re just following that verse in the bible where Jesus says that lying, cheating, stealing, etc., are all okay as long as you’re bringing those souls to god…

...there is a verse like that, isn’t there?...

...I swear it’s right there in the book of…

...just because I don’t remember doesn’t mean it not there…

...god said it, I believe it, and that’s that, you heretic!...

Comment #1: MikeEss  on  07/01  at  07:47 PM

A powerful conservative religious figure is dishonest about something? Bring me my fainting couch!

Maybe he’s just been reading that “with Jesus all things are possible” bit as “with Jesus all things are fine if it’s being done to give you greater personal power.”

Comment #2: Incertus, Nacho Daddy  on  07/01  at  07:53 PM

Amen - preach it, Brother Jesse.

One small thing, though.  “I, personally, wonder about the character of a religious movement that requires false claims on the allegiances of others in order to make itself a more viable force in society….”  It’s not the religious movement that’s dishonest, it’s those who would use a religious movement to further their political/secular agenda.

The wingnut fundies don’t speak for this particular liberal Christian, but it occurs to me that when we (I mean enlightened, progressive/liberal Christians) sit on the sidelines and don’t speak up, we shouldn’t be surprised when the fundies take over the discussion and we all get tarred with the same brush.

Okay, hopping off my soapbox to go in search of the nearest wingnut to fight with…..

Comment #3: NobleExperiments  on  07/01  at  07:53 PM

One thing that has always confused me about evangelical vs. fundamentalist is that in addition to the “fundamentalism” that spans specific religions (i.e. ultra-orthodoxy), Christian Fundamentalism is also a particular branch or movement within Evangelical Christianity—both of which are theological terms that don’t necessarily imply a small-f fundamentalist or right-wing outlook.

Comment #4: The Opoponax  on  07/01  at  08:02 PM

I think the bigger reason for confusion is that their real term for themselves is “Christians”—as in, anyone who isn’t an evangelical/fundamentalist/political conservative/would-be theocrat is something other than a Christian. And far too many in our media have swallowed this without comment; you can almost hear the furrowed brows: “Hmm, I know lots of people who go to church, but if you say so…”

Comment #5: Redshift  on  07/01  at  08:02 PM

The wingnut fundies don’t speak for this particular liberal Christian, but it occurs to me that when we (I mean enlightened, progressive/liberal Christians) sit on the sidelines and don’t speak up, we shouldn’t be surprised when the fundies take over the discussion and we all get tarred with the same brush.

Thank you.

If there’s one thing that pisses me off almost as much as religious folks who want to tread on the rest of us, it’s religious folks who get all self-righteous because of the bad reputation the first religious folks gave them.

Comment #6: pepito  on  07/01  at  08:39 PM

“I think the bigger reason for confusion is that their real term for themselves is “Christians”—as in, anyone who isn’t an evangelical/fundamentalist/political conservative/would-be theocrat is something other than a Christian.”

That is spot on.  By their reckoning, probably only 5-10% of Christians are “Real Christians”.  In their minds, you start by slicing out the entire Catholic Church, and cut it down from there.

But then again, what’s the point of being something if anybody can join too?...

Comment #7: MikeEss  on  07/01  at  09:22 PM

I think the bigger reason for confusion is that their real term for themselves is “Christians”

Second this. I never even HEARD the terms “evangelical” and “fundamentalist” until I left the church at approx age 20. We were Christians, pure and simple. And our interpretation was the most correct one (probably other denominations got into heaven, but that was because God was really nice and let them slide in). Except the Catholics - MikeEss hit that on the head, too. Catholics were nice people, but totally wrong.

I still don’t know how to class my old church. It makes my head hurt.

Comment #8: Faye  on  07/01  at  09:59 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.