Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Netroots Nation Eve Previous entry: Maureen Dowd’s Gears Are Clicking

Elizabeth Dole proposes naming AIDS bill after homophobe Jesse Helms

Good god, this is disgusting. Perhaps all that work on Sen. Liddy Dole has caused something to snap. Out of all the people to try to honor in an Act dedicated to fighting AIDS, Elizabeth Dole spits in the face of LGBTs by proposing the now-dead Jesse Helms be added to the “Tom Lantos and Henry J. Hyde United States Global Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Reauthorization Act of 2008.” Here’s the Congressional Record:

SA 5074. Mrs. DOLE submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the bill S. 2731, to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2009 through 2013 to provide assistance to foreign countries to combat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: On page 1, line 5, strike ‘‘and Henry J. Hyde’’ and insert ‘’, Henry J. Hyde, and Jesse Helms’‘.

Thousands died because of Helms’s bigotry. There are so many reasons why Liddy needs to be defeated, and this only adds to the pile. James @ BlueNC:

The way I see Liddy Dole is simple: She’s a three time loser. First she drove the American Red Cross into the ground. Then she displayed extraordinary fundraising incompetence as Queen of the National Republican Senatorial Committee. And now, working with the Decider, she has gotten the US mired in never-ending debt, never-ending war, and a full-fledged economic meltdown.

And yet, Dole’s challenger, Kay Hagan, is still trailing my useless senator in the polls (54% to 42%) and Dole has more than twice as much in the bank as Hagan, though the latter has pulled in quite a bit in the last quarter. It would be great to see Hagan take Dole on regarding this issue, but unfortunately Kay Hagan has a habit of avoiding responses to basic questions about pro-LGBT legislation, apparently fearing that taking a pro-equality position of any kind will drive away NC voters. I can’t see her taking any lead on this one. Surprise me Kay, and come out of the closet on these matters. Dole handed this one to you on a platter.

Anyway, it looks like it’s going to come down to turnout; there has been a massive increase in registration thanks to Barack Obama’s nationwide effort to bring in new voters, but it’s not clear that they’ll cast a ballot for Hagan when in the booth. Certainly there’s zero incentive to vote for Dole—unlike the man whose name she wants to attach to that AIDS bill, she’s got a horrible reputation for constituent services.

Joe Jervis of Joe.My.God says it all:

Jesse Helms, the man who in 1987 described AIDS prevention literature as “so obscene, so revolting, I may throw up.”

Jesse Helms, the man who in 1988 vigorously opposed the Kennedy-Hatch AIDS research bill, saying, “There is not one single case of AIDS in this country that cannot be traced in origin to sodomy.”

Jesse Helms, the man who in 1995 said (in opposition to refunding the Ryan White Act) that the government should spend less on people with AIDS because they got sick due to their “deliberate, disgusting, revolting conduct.”

...Many people hold Ronald Reagan responsible for adding to the early AIDS death toll by his inaction on the pandemic, but it was Helms’

actions in thwarting early research that inarguably hastened the demise of many thousands of Americans.  How many of my friends, of your friends, would be alive today if the life-saving medications had arrived just one fucking year earlier?

Hat tip, Atomic Gay Wonk.

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 10:08 AM • (24) Comments

Dear god, for one reporter—ONE REPORTER—to throw this in her face and demand an answer…

Comment #1: Scott  on  07/16  at  10:32 AM

Helms has been dead for more than 24 hours now, so any sense that we have to be nice to him is gone, in my mind.

The man needs to be remembered as one of America’s great villains, up there with John Wilkes Booth, Jefferson Davis, and Benedict Arnold.

Comment #2: Mikey  on  07/16  at  10:36 AM

This is just fucking obscene.  I can’t help but think that if St. Ronnie, Helms, et al., had spoken up about AIDS when it first came to light, and had allowed others in the government to speak up, my sister would still be alive. She was infected long before anybody had ever heard of AIDS/HIV and - obviously - long before there was any talk of precautions that could be taken.

I’ll never be convinced they didn’t have a major role in her death.  Black-souled Fuckers.

Comment #3: kac90b  on  07/16  at  10:36 AM

This story reminds me of one particular example of a phenomenon I have noticed since the beginning of the GWB administration/Republican Congress partnership—the naming of bills for propaganda effect.  Of course, that has always been the case to some extent, but ever since the “USAPatriot” Act it strikes me that the Republican Party, in particular, has gone nuts with this technique.  I have always been a bit surprised that this technique has not been the subject of more commentary.

Comment #4: Jibril  on  07/16  at  10:43 AM

Are we sure this isn’t just failed satire, a la the New Yorker cover?  That would make a lot more sense. (Yes, I know we’re sure.)

Comment #5: Wroth  on  07/16  at  10:51 AM

On the plus side, the thought of being on an AIDS bill would probably set his corpse spinning in his grave…probably enough to power the eastern seaboard.

Comment #6: madmatt  on  07/16  at  11:05 AM

It makes some sense, due to an additional perverse twist: Helms later in his career did turn to favoring anti-AIDS funding for Africa, because he saw it as affecting heterosexuals more than homosexuals there.

Comment #7: Jonathan  on  07/16  at  11:17 AM

Like Wroth and madmatt, I can see it as a post-mortem thumb in Jesse’s eye—perhaps the Jesse Helms Memorial National Same-Sex Marriage Recognition Act will be next.

Comment #8: Hector B.  on  07/16  at  11:18 AM

That is the most disgusting combination I’ve heard in a long time. Do-nothing Ron did more for AIDS victims than Helms. Name it after Dr. Koop if you need someone.

Comment #9: histrogeek  on  07/16  at  11:30 AM

This is the true face of the republican party…

Comment #10: paul  on  07/16  at  11:39 AM

Oh, c’mon, a good hearty “Fuck you, Jesse!” is long overdue, isn’t it?  We all know the man’s record on the issues; everyone does.  He wasn’t exactly subtle about it.  Take this as spit in his eye.

Comment #11: Mike  on  07/16  at  11:48 AM

Naming anything better than a toxic waste dump after Helms is an insult to humanity…

Comment #12: MikeEss  on  07/16  at  12:09 PM

Try to think of it as HILARIOUS irony.  Helms would be furious.  But he is dead.  And the bill is otherwise good.

Comment #13: lymie  on  07/16  at  12:30 PM

How about naming it the “Jesse Helms Save the Sodomites Act”?

Comment #14: Lymis  on  07/16  at  12:40 PM

And people say Republicants have no sense of humor…

Comment #15: jvill  on  07/16  at  12:43 PM

But we know it’s not intended as irony or insult.  It’s intended as as a tribute to this disgusting pile of trash.

Comment #16: libdevil  on  07/16  at  12:45 PM

Whether it’s irony or insult lies not so much in how it’s intended, as in how it’s taken. I would love to see the American left endorse this whole-heartedly—then the Republicans either have to withdraw it, or implicitly accept our framing.

Comment #17: ChrisV  on  07/16  at  12:57 PM

Maybe Liddy’s just figured out irony and sarcasm. She meant it as a total burn on Helms but it just got taken out of context. She’ll need to remember to say it in a reaaaaaaaal sarcastic tone next time so everyone gets that it’s a complete and utter joke.

http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/

Comment #18: Matthew  on  07/16  at  01:00 PM

Thanks Pam. Just visited Dole’s official site to share my thoughts:

“According to the Congressional Record, you are proposing an amendment to S. 2731 to the effect that (deceased) Senator Jesse Helms’ name should be added as sponsor to an AIDS bill.

“As the father of an HIV-positive daughter, I find this proposal obscene. Helms was one of the great obstructions in the way of doing anything about the AIDS epidemic. This transparently Orwellian attempt to sanitize that legacy only proves how ashamed you apparently are of the actual facts of his record. As one whose life has been directly harmed by this disease, I can only try to express to you the extreme revulsion I feel for what you are attempting to do here. I realize that you are a Republican of a certain stripe. But that is no excuse for undertaking something as absolutely bloody-minded as this. Please understand that what you are doing is hurtful, utterly inexcusable and morally wrong. You should be ashamed.”

Comment #19: DrBB  on  07/16  at  01:01 PM

It’s not irony on Dole’s part, though, for the reason Jonathan cited. In her sick Republican-propaganda-poisoned mind, Helms is one of the heroes of global AIDS prevention, and this is a global AIDS prevention bill.

A Republican who manages to help someone despite hating them with a frothing passion is superior to a Democrat who does it because he or she cares.

Comment #20: Auguste  on  07/16  at  01:26 PM

Of course if it were a really useful piece of legislation that actually, you know, ensured easy access to medications or some other radical notion like that, they could slap Jesse Helms’ old bigoted smiling face on each of my prescription bottles and I wouldn’t care.

The real shame here doesn’t have anything to do with the name of a piece of legislation. The real shame is that this one, like every one before it, doesn’t come close to going far enough. Anyone who thinks it’s a “good step” or that we’ve “come a long way with care and funding” hasn’t spent much time around people with HIV. “Steps” and “coming along” don’t mean shit when you can’t get meds reliably.

Comment #21: seventwentyfour  on  07/16  at  01:51 PM

Helms had a fairly good bipartisan reputation for engineering military appropriations.  Couldn’t they put his name on a minesweeper or a new model of helicopter or something?

It’s not irony on Dole’s part, though, for the reason Jonathan cited. In her sick Republican-propaganda-poisoned mind, Helms is one of the heroes of global AIDS prevention, and this is a global AIDS prevention bill.

Just like last week when Jeff Jacoby wrote an article declaring Jesse Helms a leader and hero of the move toward racial equality.

There is nothing over which they will feel shame, and there is nothing about which they won’t lie.

Comment #23: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  07/16  at  04:40 PM

I’m with MikeEss: Jesse Helms should only have a nuclear waste-management facility named after him.  And maybe not even the whole facility: just the men’s room.

Comment #24: hbsweet, empress of ice cream  on  07/17  at  01:22 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.