Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Women’s shoes: an under-discussed feminist issue Previous entry: Scared?

Extra…Extra…Bush Campaign Chief and Former RNC Chair Ken Mehlman: “I’m gay”

Ken Mehlman is not gay,” Steve Schmidt, a senior official of the Bush campaign and a friend of Mehlman’s told Jake Tapper, an ABC News correspondent who wrote the piece for the magazine.

...One staffer tells Tapper a fact known inside the beltway but not widely reported-that some members of Congress posture as being more anti-gay than they actually are to please constituents. “We’re a representative democracy,” the staffer told GQ. “And while members may not have personal problems with having gay staff, they vote the way their constituents want them to.”
—GQ Magazine, 2005

How quaint that quote is! This the worst kept secret in DC. I’ve been blogging about Ken Mehlman being gay for several years now. That he’s just “coming to the conclusion fairly recently” is, to put it mildly, challenging.

Ken Mehlman, President Bush’s campaign manager in 2004 and a former chairman of the Republican National Committee, has told family and associates that he is gay.

Mehlman arrived at this conclusion about his identity fairly recently, he said in an interview. He agreed to answer a reporter’s questions, he said, because, now in private life, he wants to become an advocate for gay marriage and anticipated that questions would arise about his participation in a late-September fundraiser for the American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER), the group that supported the legal challenge to California’s ballot initiative against gay marriage, Proposition 8.

“It’s taken me 43 years to get comfortable with this part of my life,” said Mehlman, now an executive vice-president with the New York City-based private equity firm, KKR. “Everybody has their own path to travel, their own journey, and for me, over the past few months, I’ve told my family, friends, former colleagues, and current colleagues, and they’ve been wonderful and supportive. The process has been something that’s made me a happier and better person. It’s something I wish I had done years ago.”

While it’s nice that Ken has finally come out of the closet as an advocate, it’s really hard to forgive him for the damage he did to the community by working actively against it for pay for years. That he can coast on the gains for our community by supporting AFER’s stellar work on Prop 8 on the backs of many during his tenure at the RNC who bore the brunt of homophobia, those who died as a result of hate crimes, the activists who were assailed professionally is unbelievable. Yet here we are in 2010 watching it unfold.

As a human being Mehlman owes the community a serious apology for fomenting homophobia for political gain. This is how he addressed that point:

Mehlman acknowledges that if he had publicly declared his sexuality sooner, he might have played a role in keeping the party from pushing an anti-gay agenda.

“It’s a legitimate question and one I understand,” Mehlman said. “I can’t change the fact that I wasn’t in this place personally when I was in politics, and I genuinely regret that. It was very hard, personally.” He asks of those who doubt his sincerity: “If they can’t offer support, at least offer understanding.”

Mike Rogers hasn’t forgotten; he has awarded the former head of the RNC the Roy Cohn Award.

If I had to say what one thing really moved me to create this site it would be the 2004 reelection campaign of George W. Bush, the most homophobic national campaign in history. That campaign was run by one of the nation’s worst closeted individuals, Ken Mehlman.

It’s always nice to know that my reporting is validated as correct, even if the media has been hiding it for six years.

...The three people most responsible for the anti-gay actions of the Bush reelection campaign are Mehlman, Karl Rove and Bush. In addition to his role at the RNC, Mehlman served in the first Bush Administration as White House Political Director. In 2004 he was the general chairman of the Bush reelection campaign.

...In 2006, Mehlman told the New York Daily News, “I am not gay, but those stories did a number on my dating life for six months.”

It’s so nice to be proven right, me that is, not Ken.

If this move doesn’t call for a Roy Cohn Award, I don’t know what does. Ken Mehlman is horridly homophobic and no matter how orchestrated his coming out is, our community should hold him accountable for his past.

Mehlman, as is typical for quite a few gay Republicans, attempts to focus on the fact that he is not a single issue voter or activist. I find this view, particularly by someone who worked every day to make life for LGBTs in this country intolerable on so many levels, a position that is hard to defend.

He said that he plans to be an advocate for gay rights within the GOP, that he remains proud to be a Republican, and that his political identity is not defined by any one issue.

“What I will try to do is to persuade people, when I have conversations with them, that it is consistent with our party’s philosophy, whether it’s the principle of individual freedom, or limited government, or encouraging adults who love each other and who want to make a lifelong committment to each other to get married.”

“I hope that we, as a party, would welcome gay and lesbian supporters. I also think there needs to be, in the gay community, robust and bipartisan support [for] marriage rights.”

I’m willing to move forward and appreciate that change can come, no matter whether personally or politically motivated. We need both parties to be strongly pro-LGBT. Witness the ineffective, lame-ass, slow-mo “support” for LGBT rights shown by the Dems in charge (in the WH and on the Hill). The power of Mehlman’s coming out and the recent desire by prominent conservatives to move away from gay-bashing in the wake of the Prop 8 ruling should concern the DNC about keeping a slice of LGBTs in the fold over the long haul.

Only time will tell if and when Mehlman and the rest of the pro-equality conservatives can truly boot the hardline anti-gay leadership—as well as show willingness to jeopardize losing the base that mans the phone banks, responds to direct mail appeals re: social issues, and uses the church to get out the vote.

I’m not certain they can do this anytime soon; we know we are going to win this fight, it’s another thing for a party to turn itself around to attract the very demographic it sh*t on for years based on a few powerful homos and conservatives with little to lose and the legal wind behind their backs deciding to come out for marriage equality.

NOTE - My pad was cited by the swamps of the Free Republic today in its reactions to Ken’s coming out.

<

NOTE 2: Look at this shite, the twisting of history begins. The media is running from the truth - it covered for Mehlman and is trying to whitewash his record. Word’s getting around on Twitter:

RT @msignorile: It’s clear: Media will downplay Mehlman’s role in antigay efforts to cover for their own refusal to expose his hypocrisy for years. NYT already puffing up Mehlman, claiming he “avoid[ed]” social issues (!!!), is now “working his thick Rolodex” for gays http://nyti.ms/9T85Du

The quote in question:

Mr. Mehlman was in Mr. Bush’s inner circle in both presidential campaigns, and ran his campaign in 2004. But Mr. Mehlman, in his work as chairman of the Republican National Committee and as head of Mr. Bush’s campaign, tended to avoid social issues, arguing that they would undercut the Republican Party’s efforts to expand its appeal.

NOTE #3: From Change.org—Mehlman, as he says, is not a one-issue voter. And he proves it by supporting anti-gay Republican candidates for office. To truly show he’s for equality, he’s going to have to make some changes in his donation targets.

Look him up on opensecrets.org, and you’ll see that Kenneth Mehlman has given money to a wide range of politicians working to take away rights for LGBT Americans.

There’s $2,400 to Missouri Republican Roy Blunt, who has voted to add a marriage amendment to the U.S. Constitution banning gay marriage, as well as to ban gay adoption.

There’s $2,400 to Sen. John McCain, who wants to keep gay servicemembers out of the military.

There’s $1,000 to Ben Quayle, who is running for Congress in Arizona and who just labeled Barack Obama the worst President in history, and who just sent out a mailer to voters touting his opposition to marriage equality.

There’s $2,400 to Illinois Republican Mark Kirk, who voted to keep “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in place (and who himself is subject to lots of rumors about his sexual orientation).

There’s $2,400 to Utah Republican Sen. Robert Bennett, who tried to stop marriage equality from becoming a reality in Washington, D.C.

And the list goes on and on and includes Republicans like Rob Portman, Kelly Ayotte, Bob Corker, Richard Shelby, and Johnny Isakson, all of whom have taken positions completely contrary to full equality for LGBT Americans.

Flashbacks - The “Best” of Ken Mehlman:
* Ken Mehlman has no fear—he’s gay-baiting Harry Reid
* Closeted Heterosexual Deputy Chief of Staff Ken Mehlman?
* Ken Mehlman speaks: on “Realignment” of U.S. Politics
* Have you visited Blogactive today? (Missing Person Alert! Where is Ken Mehlman? He’s been MIA since Foleygate broke. Hmmmmm.)

Ken Mehlman, practicing some ‘hot moves’

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

You may want to put whatever you are drinking down before you click this link to a series of pix on Capitol Buzz, where the RNC head is showing the ladies his groovy hetero vibe in a DC bar/club called the Guards.

Reactions, including that of National Organization for Marriage’s pathetic Brian Brown, are below the fold.
From the Log Cabin Republicans:

“Log Cabin Republicans is very supportive and appreciative of Ken’s coming out. Being gay and being conservative are not mutually exclusive,” said Log Cabin Republicans Executive Director R. Clarke Cooper. “As a fellow Bush alumnus, I look forward to Ken helping me and our colleagues build a stronger and more inclusive Republican Party. Nothing presents a better argument for the equality of gay and lesbian citizens than the reality of our lives as responsible members of society. I am happy that Ken has come to a place where he can take a stand with integrity, and I welcome him as yet another conservative, common-sense voice to join with Log Cabin Republicans and all Americans in this important dialogue.”

“The process of coming out, and certainly coming out in the public eye, is never an easy one, but I am glad that Ken has decided to take this step and am glad that he is doing so on behalf of the fight for equality,” said former Republican Congressman Jim Kolbe. “As somebody who took my own journey and came out later in life, I have a great deal of respect for him doing this on his own terms. Ken joins a chorus that includes Laura Bush, Dick Cheney, Ted Olson, and countless others advocating for the American value of inclusion. This is not a time for playing politics; it is a time for us all to join together—Republicans and Democrats—to repeal the failed ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy, to pass workplace non-discrimination, and to recognize all committed relationships. The responsibility for making this happen lies with the Democratic leadership in Congress and in the White House who set the legislative agenda.”

Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund:

Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund President and CEO Chuck Wolfe issued the following statement tonight regarding an announcement by the former chair of the Republican National Committee, Ken Mehlman, that he is gay:

“Coming out is a personal decision, and it can have a profound impact on families, friends, colleagues and constituents. We hope the fact that Ken Mehlman has reached this level of honesty will now encourage other political leaders to reject divisive anti-gay campaign tactics which, as Mr. Mehlman now admits, are purely cynical attempts to manipulate the American public,” Wolfe said. ”We look forward to the day when all political leaders, regardless of party, are able to be honest about themselves and their families, and still rise to positions where they can lead by example

GOProud:

“Poll after poll shows the most powerful thing we can do to change hearts and minds about gay issues is to come out. I applaud Ken for having the courage to take this important step. I think everyone should remember that each of us has our own personal journey as it relates to coming to terms with our own sexuality and coming out,” - GOProud’s Board Chairman, Christopher R Barron

National Stonewall Dems:

National Stonewall Democrats’ Statement on Former RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman’s Coming Out

“It is a start illustration of how damaging the closet can be when one puts ideology over personal integrity.”

National Stonewall Democrats Executive Director, Michael Mitchell released this statement on the news of Ken Mehlman’s coming out earlier today, “The coming out process is a very personal and sacred one, regardless of one’s party, class or position of power and we’re glad that Mehlman has taken the opportunity to live his life openly and authentically. It is a stark illustration, however, of how damaging the closet can be when one puts ideology over personal integrity. Mehlman presided over the Republican Party at a time when the lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans were used to ill ends – marriage amendments in dozens of states, vitriolic attacks on our families, our soldiers, our very lives – all for political expediency, votes at the ballot box, and power. Imagine what a different America it would be if Mehlman had drawn a line in the sand and said, “No. The lives of fellow Americans – an American like me – should not be used in this bigoted way.”

“Ultimately, Mehlman’s story is a cautionary tale of the damage that can be visited on literally millions of people at the intersection of power and the closet. We recognize that this might have been a difficult decision for Mehlman. It’s ironic that he had to make this decision in an environment that is even more difficult and painful because of the policies and politics overseen and sanctioned by him.”

“The next chapter of Mehlman’s life could be about the good that someone can accomplish when authenticity and integrity wins out.  We look forward to working with Mr. Mehlman now on issues that many of us have been working on for decades.”

And now…

I guess it’s all a matter of how you define “core,” Brian. He’s desperately trying to spin former RNC head and Bush campaign honcho Ken Mehlman’s coming out as both insignificant and minimizing the history of the GOP in fomenting anti-gay efforts in past political cycles. (The Advocate):

Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage, told The Advocate that Mehlman was “abdicating core Republican beliefs” in his support for AFER’s legal effort in challenging Prop. 8. “But it’s never been about the leaders. It’s always been about the people, based on an overwhelming majority of Republican voters—85, 86 percent—who support marriage as a union between a man and a woman,” he said. “That a few folks within the Republican Party are questioning a party platform and have personal positions on same-sex marriage is a reality of political parties. [Mehlman] is no longer a major party leader, so I don’t know how influential he is, to be honest with you.”

Marriage equality advocates, Brown said, are using high-profile conservatives now supporting marriage equality—from Ted Olson to vice president Dick Cheney—in order to “create an impression that there is an inevitability to same-sex marriage. The facts strongly go against that idea.”

Brown asserted that the RNC played a limited role in rallying the anti-gay marriage vote during the 2004 presidential elections, when Mehlman served as Bush-Cheney campaign manager. Eleven states passed constitutional amendments banning marriage rights for same-sex couples that year, including Ohio, which gave Bush a margin of victory over Democratic Sen. John Kerry.

“These [amendments] were pushed by people on the state level,” Brown said. “The whole notion that it was some top-down, Machiavellian ploy by the Republican Party is a farce.”

Come on, Brian, you need Maggie to help you out with a better line of spin. As Mike Signorile pointed out to WorldNetDaily’s unraveling Joseph Farah on the air, those polls on marriage equality are basically 50/50 and moving in the wrong direction from the fundie POV, so using that as the fig leaf for continuing the “save marriage” movement isn’t going to last much longer.

And as Jesus’ General Tweeted to me this evening:

@msignorile, @Pam_Spaulding, I have a feeling NOM’s Brian Brown will be “abdicating core Republican beliefs” at some point.

BTW, whatever you think about Mehlman’s pain-inducing past, the fundraiser for AFER is drawing big buck in for equality in the present:

Indeed, Mehlman’s first act as an out gay man will be hosting an AFER fundraiser next month to help support the case, which likely carries a price tag in the millions of dollars (the group has declined to disclose exactly how much).

Although the invitations have yet to be mailed, Mehlman told The Advocate Wednesday evening that just through pre-selling the event, they had already helped to raise about $750,000.

***

Some additional thoughts on Mehlman’s little coming out party…

* What does this mean for those of you out there who are still gagging about Mehlman officially “now on the team?” We are now moving into unchartered political territory, where strange political bedfellows have to decide what is in each other’s best interest.

As I’ve noted elsewhere, I’m a fan of GOProud’s positioning it needs to receive credit for making aggressive moves to point out the hypocrisy of the religious right and to take out the fakers and players like Joe Farah, who cannot stand up to real scrutiny. The fact is that LCR was working “on the inside” and never had a strong impact says more about the org than the GOP. Jimmy LaSalvia and GOProud put the org out there early and often to challenge the right wing bible beaters, and it brought on board prominent conservatives to take the lead to show you can be pro-equality and Republican.

Seeing how little the LCR accomplished when it was the only game in town and GOProud pushing in the door to break the logjam so quickly is good news for us all, despite the differences we may have on non-LGBT policy. To acknowledge that is to simply state the obvious - our rights shouldn’t be a partisan endeavor; we’ve only had to see it that way because only one party was even making an attempt to move in the right direction. We need both parties doing so

* Does this change how you view AFER? Its success is due precisely because it addressed Prop 8 as a non-partisan issue with a conservative case for marriage to be opened to gay and lesbian couples. It’s only natural that marriage equality supporters of all political stripes should be welcome to support its work.

* Accountability: Just holding a coming out PR event and raising cash for AFER does not let Mehlman off of the hook. As I mentioned in an earlier post, he has, in 2009/2010, not changed his donation pattern, still giving generously to anti-gay Republicans, ostensibly because he’s “not a single issue voter.”

There’s $2,400 to Missouri Republican Roy Blunt, who has voted to add a marriage amendment to the U.S. Constitution banning gay marriage, as well as to ban gay adoption.

There’s $2,400 to Sen. John McCain, who wants to keep gay servicemembers out of the military.

There’s $1,000 to Ben Quayle, who is running for Congress in Arizona and who just labeled Barack Obama the worst President in history, and who just sent out a mailer to voters touting his opposition to marriage equality.

There’s $2,400 to Illinois Republican Mark Kirk, who voted to keep “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in place (and who himself is subject to lots of rumors about his sexual orientation).

There’s $2,400 to Utah Republican Sen. Robert Bennett, who tried to stop marriage equality from becoming a reality in Washington, D.C.

And the list goes on and on and includes Republicans like Rob Portman, Kelly Ayotte, Bob Corker, Richard Shelby, and Johnny Isakson, all of whom have taken positions completely contrary to full equality for LGBT Americans.

WTF?

That’s got to stop pronto, Ken

. As we’ve learned with the Dems, the only thing they respond to is withholding the dough. But perhaps this will be a slow lesson for him to learn. Use your power to support and cajole candidates who are not personally anti-equality but are not yet willing to step out from behind their curtain of anti-gay positions. That’s how you can be effective. Will you take that role?

* Where do you think Ken stands on ENDA? Will he be speaking out on other issues?

* How will groups like the Human Rights Campaign, which has been tied to the Democrat booty call for years, adapt to a diversifying political landscape? What about the DNC? I’m no clairvoyant, but at some point in the not-so-distant political future, you may see a significant number of wealthy LGBT donors breaking off and going GOP if it goes socially libertarian fiscal conservative. We already have a class divide in the LGBT community that largely goes undiscussed because it’s a third rail topic, but it does profoundly affectss what issues are given priority and the literal complexion of the faces of leadership. What will this mean for the movement?

No answers here, of course, just random thoughts I had as news trickled in. What are your thoughts?

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 02:12 AM • (27) Comments

Call me a cockeyed optimist, but it seems like a wall’s come crumbling down. Limbaugh’s okay with civil unions, Glen Beck’s unconcerned with gay marriage, Ann Coulter’s appearing at HomoCon — it’s not game over, but the end is suddenly looking very near. Wow.

No, Mehlman doesn’t deserve forgiveness, but his continued acceptance by his former allies is pretty amazing.

Comment #1: bad Jim  on  08/26  at  03:01 AM

Fuck!

Comment #2: draeton  on  08/26  at  04:18 AM

Penitence is due.  Massively.

Comment #3: natural cynic  on  08/26  at  04:48 AM

Call me a cockeyed optimist, but it seems like a wall’s come crumbling down. Limbaugh’s okay with civil unions, Glen Beck’s unconcerned with gay marriage, Ann Coulter’s appearing at HomoCon — it’s not game over, but the end is suddenly looking very near. Wow.

I’m sorry, but they need to have their noses rubbed in their “OMG Teh Gay Buttsecks - THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END!!!EleventyOne!” rhetoric from now until they admit they were wrong, or the heat death of the universe, whichever comes first.

Because, you know, now it’s the “OMG Teh Muslim ViictoryMosquers - THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END!!!EleventyOne!”, and the best way to deal with it is to keep reminding people that these idiots have a track record of being wrong, wrong, wrong, wronger than the time Long Dong Wrong opened the Beijing McWrong Burger Chain featuring slugburgers and maggot-flavoured ice cream.

Comment #4: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  08/26  at  06:30 AM

I’m not gay and I don’t know how to feel about Mehlman.  I was pretty disgusted by that clip from the Larry King show showing Maher stating that Mehlman was gay and everybody knows it, with King acting as if he had never heard anything so crazy.  THe fucking media make me ill.

I think that this is an important take on Mehlman:

http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/67471

I suspect that if I were gay I would be all Dixie Chicks about this - totally not ready to make nice.  However, it’s possible i’d take the pragamatic road and decide that what matters is what can he do for full civil rights going forward. As a straight person I continue to think that Ken Mehlman is a huge asshole.  Same as he ever was.  But i do wonder what he can do for full civil rights going forward and i take pleasure in seeing the walls of bigotry crumbling down - soon enough the haters will have no natural home.

Comment #5: JennyLI  on  08/26  at  07:11 AM

The most ridiculous thing has been Dustin Lance Black’s “OOOH, Melhman’s a catch for AFER because he knows how to mobilize people.”  Mehlman did so, and as we can see with his “why aren’t the gays joining us anti-Muslim Republicans” line, continues to do so my mobilizing fear and hatred.  The lovely dinner will also have Mary Cheney up on stage.  Black seems to be impressed by shiny things.  Mehlman’s the same scum he’s always been.

Comment #6: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  08/26  at  07:56 AM

Mehlman’s coming out isn’t that surprising now that he’s in the private sector raking in the wealth “due him” according to the Republican mentality. He’s rich, he’s powerful, he’s white and he’s male—so publicly owning “out gay” isn’t as dangerous to him as it is to many other average GBLTQ folk. Of course, this very much relates to Amanda’s recent expose of the Koch’s and the sociopathy of Libertarianism and Market-Worshipping political orientations. I think that you are right to wonder what will happen in the GBLTQ community when marriage equality and ENDA legislation is passed and supported—yes, some GBLTQ folks may migrate due to market rhetoric, but don’t forget, 90% of African Americans and 80% of Jews vote Democrat because they have long collective memories about how the Republicans love to use them as boogeymen—this will probably be true among LGBTQ, although perhaps less so after a generation since obviously new gay folks come out of straight families, etc.

Now, here’s a moral query which I’ve solved for myself, but the media doesn’t support: outing hypocrits. Mitch McConnell is well known in the Kentucky gay community to be gay himself—as a matter of rumor his lover was his chief of staff, Hunter Bates and McConnell was dishonorably discharged from the Army for “homosexual activity” though he’s had his records conveniently “lost.” The producers of “Outrage” scared off their source on McConnell. Even if they did get someone on the record, the MSM isn’t interested. I support outing people like Mehlman and especially people like McConnell, but even when something is “common knowledge” its not common knowledge because protecting privacy of the powerful (even those crusading to take away privacy rights among we peasants) is revered in Washington, every news room and boardroom. Perhaps all we have is the promise to besmirch after-death, like Roy Cohn?

Comment #7: Thealogian  on  08/26  at  08:44 AM

Who had August 2010 in the pool?

Comment #8: libdevil  on  08/26  at  10:31 AM

The problem is you actually. You seem to be a single issue voter. I commend Mehlman for not being one.

And Pam, you say its “our community” but its every much as Mehlman’s as it’s yours.

Liberals have this weird fantasy that you can’t be conservative if you’re: gay, black, Hispanic, a woman, etc.

Comment #9: whiskeytangofoxtrot  on  08/26  at  01:27 PM

So, there’s no problem with a “community member” the bulk of whose career was spent working to harm that community. Nope, it’s those who say, “fuck you for fucking us over” that are the real problem. WTF is certainly apropos.

Comment #10: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  08/26  at  01:33 PM

@WTF: you can be conservative if you’re anything; being a sadist with daddy issues doesn’t require membership in any given ethnicity or belief system.

It’s just harder for some folks than for others.

Comment #11: Punditus Maximus  on  08/26  at  01:48 PM

There’s nothing sadistic about it. Some people may hold economic issues or national defense higher on the totem pole than social issues.

All that matters is that he’s going to fight for same sex marriage and equal rights for LGBT persons.

Comment #12: whiskeytangofoxtrot  on  08/26  at  01:58 PM

“The problem is you actually. You seem to be a single issue voter. I commend Mehlman for not being one.”

...says the troll who obviously doesn’t know anything about Pam at all, except maybe that she’s a lesbian. 

Sure, LGBT issues are important to Pam, understandably so, but come on — there’s so much more to Pam than a single-minded obsession with all things gay.  The same is true of other members of the LGBT communities. 

You aren’t solely defined by your sexual orientation, why should Pam only be defined by hers?  Get a clue…

“All that matters is that he’s going to fight for same sex marriage and equal rights for LGBT persons.”

When it counted, when he could have had genuine influence, Mr. Mehlman was quiet.  In fact, he was kapo.

If he wants to try to atone for his sins, great.  Let the results speak for themselves.  Just claiming you’re going to do something good should earn him no credit from anyone, especially after his history…

Comment #13: MikeEss  on  08/26  at  02:13 PM

And Pam, you say its “our community” but its every much as Mehlman’s as it’s yours.

Nope. It is just as much his demographic as it is hers. And ours.

He had direct, personal, conscious and deliberate input in to political strategies that ended up putting anti-gay amendments into place in at least 11 states, formally opposed adding LGBT people to hate crimes, anti-bullying, and anti-discrimination laws and policies nationwide.

He helped mobilize people specifically to go to the polls to vote Republican based on explicitly crafted anti-gay language, and in the process helped normalize using anti-gay language and sentiments as just another way of doing day-to-day politics in America, which trickles down to local school boards and businesses.

He wasn’t alone in doing it, not by a long shot, but he was right in there with them, and took the top RNC spot to do it.

Kids have killed themselves because of this. Families have been ruined, bankrupted, lost their homes. Parents have lost the rights to participate in raising their own kids. Millions of LGBT people have, at very least, been forced to spend more money and be more afraid than straight people in similar situations just to try to live our lives.

He worked tirelessly to put politicians in place that voted in lockstep to oppose every single advancement for the dignity and humanity of gay people in this country, many of whom will continue to affect our lives for years to come.

Don’t you DARE claim he has as much right to be part of this community as people like Pam. Don’t you DARE.  He may - may - do something in the future to atone and prove that we are his community. Others have, and others will. But he sure as hell hasn’t done anything resembling that yet.

Tell that to the parents and friends of the dead kids. This isn’t some fucking game. This is our lives.

Comment #14: Lymis  on  08/26  at  06:22 PM

Nope. It is just as much his demographic as it is hers. And ours.

This. The word “community” has been stripped of all meaning, particularly when it gets used as a synonym for “population.”  I’ve actually come to see “community” as a fairly useless term.

Comment #15: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  08/26  at  06:30 PM

Wait, Pam’s a lesbian?

MikeEss, you’ve missed my point. Mehlman didn’t let his homosexuality define him. That’s why he’s a Republican.

So, since he’s a Republican, he doesn’t belong to the “gay community?” I thought being part of the demographic was an automatic bid for being a part of said community.

Also, lets be absolutely clear about the guy’s role. He managed a campaign and helped organize the RNC. He’s not the person proposing laws or anything. He’s not a political actor. If you look at the head of the RNC, nowadays, they seem to hold little political influence.

Comment #16: whiskeytangofoxtrot  on  08/26  at  06:57 PM

Mehlman didn’t let his homosexuality define him. That’s why he’s a Republican.

He let his hatred, bigotry, and stupidity define him.  That’s why he’s a Republican.

He’s not a political actor.

No, of course he’s not.  He’s just a person who acted in politics.

Comment #17: Atheist, A Feminist  on  08/26  at  07:00 PM

Um, I didn’t know any of that stuff about Mitch McConnell.  I’m amazed.  These people have no shame.  By these people I mean conservatives!  I ALWAYS mean conservatives when I say “these people”.  Or “you people”.  Always.

Comment #18: JennyLI  on  08/26  at  07:17 PM

“Mehlman didn’t let his homosexuality define him. That’s why he’s a Republican.”

No, Mehlman let his Republican party membership define him.  It was far more important than anything else.  That’s why his homosexuality had to remain in the closet until he was no longer the head of the RNC.  It was inconvenient.  And he didn’t just keep it hidden (although not very well, since he’d been rumored to be gay for years), he actively participated in efforts to ruin other gay people’s lives.

If unable to influence Republican election strategy (isn’t that one of the things the head of the RNC is supposed to do, influence election strategy?), he could at least have refused to go along with the hate, and resigned if necessary.

But Kenny couldn’t be bothered. 

As ye sow, so shall ye reap.  And Mr. Mehlman actively helped to sow some pretty nasty stuff.  I’m glad he came out.  But that doesn’t excuse the harm he’s done to his brothers and sisters. 

I don’y bear him ill for being gay, just for being far more concerned with his political affiliation and connections when they came in conflict with his orientation…

Comment #19: MikeEss  on  08/26  at  07:56 PM

“Mehlman didn’t let his homosexuality define him. That’s why he’s a Republican.”

I always love the win-win for the anti-gay folks.

When they define us as evil homosexuals, the fault is ours for being gay.

When we band together as actual communities and movements to resist their oppressive actions, the fault is ours for defining ourselves according to our homosexuality….and the ones who hide in the closet and actively fuck us over are the principled ones.

Comment #20: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  08/26  at  08:17 PM

MAJeff that’s their idea of being “tolerant”.  As long as you don’t talk about it or bring your bf to any of their dinner parties, then it’s okay.  If you can bring a girl as a beard, even better! 

But they don’t hate gays.  It’s a whole don’t ask don’t tell thing.

They’re out of their fucking minds.

Comment #21: JennyLI  on  08/26  at  08:45 PM

I completely understand why people demand Mehlman make amends for his role in anti-gay politics during his leadership in the Republican Party. The anger and intolerance for hatred is perfectly understandable, and I don’t mean to deny anyone their right to it, especially since my willingness to forgive may be partially due to the fact that I was a little too young to remember the worst of the Republican tactics in 2004 (I was a clueless 10-year-old Bush supporter in 2000 and a only-slightly-less-clueless 14-year-old newly minted Democrat in 2004).

However, I know how hard it is to be a closeted person in a conservative family, and I’m only 20. I can only imagine how much harder it would be if I were born several decades earlier, especially if I shared the Republicans’ (albeit equally lacking in compassion) opinions on economic and foreign policy. I can imagine with each passing year Mehlman lived a lie, and sunk deeper into the conservative community, it became harder to tell the truth. Lying to yourself is one of the easiest/only ways to pull off that charade, and it is deeply personally damaging. I don’t know that I could be honest about my identity if I wanted to run for office, although I certainly would pose as the most ardent LGBT ally in Congress rather than as the jerkoff homophobic closet case…but y’know, there’s a reason closet cases are often homophobes, and it’s because they’re scared to death of anyone finding out. I would almost say most homophobes secretly harbor some same-sex desire, otherwise why else would they worry so much about looking totally straight? I’m certain Mehlman’s telling the truth about how reconciling his identity with his beliefs and role in society was a long and difficult process.

Now, Mehlman has a lot of work to do before he gets to be a member of the LGBT community rather than simply a gay person, because the whole point of being in a community is that you support one another. But I’m willing to give him a chance, because if anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt it’s a gay person who’s been so oppressed they didn’t feel safe enough to come out until their public life was basically already over. So, I’ll say it: Mehlman has my sympathy, my solidarity, and my well-wishes. But we better start seeing some good works, because outing yourself is only the first step in reconciling with the community. And his continued affiliations with nauseating Republican and corporate hacks are definitely troubling.

Comment #22: reverie  on  08/27  at  03:18 AM

@reverie

I was a clueless 10-year-old Bush supporter in 2000

When I was slightly younger than that (and no less clueless), I cried when the elder Bush lost the election to Clinton.

I hope this doesn’t come off as (too?) condescending, but I would recommend reading as much as you can about politics during the Bush years.  Learning more about politics under Clinton really helped me understand what was going on, how I had been shaped by what when on, and my own political beliefs once I realized I was a Democrat.  It might change what you think about Mehlman (and it might not), but you’ll have a better understanding of what he needs to atone for.

IMO, there is a world of difference between understandable and forgivable.

Comment #23: Atheist, A Feminist  on  08/27  at  06:02 AM

No matter how open minded we are, gay is still a sensitive topic in our society.

Comment #24: atkinsdieter  on  08/29  at  09:58 PM

Cheap and new jerseys provided for you online. There are kinds of nba jerseys,nfl jerseys,mlb jerseys,nhl jerseys,and so on.Now, go to have a look.
http://www.nfljerseyonline.com/

Comment #25: jerseys  on  08/29  at  11:25 PM

The difference between a demographic (or population…or group of people with a shared trait) and a community is fairly obvious.  WTF gets that difference, but there is little he or she can do to counter the very solid arguments presented, so acting like he or she doesn’t know the difference is all WTF can do with that.

Comment #26: DBK  on  08/30  at  10:19 AM

They came first for the homosexuals,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a homosexual.

OR WAS I?!?

Comment #27: ttintagel  on  08/30  at  11:22 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.