Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Mafs Is Hard Previous entry: How anti-vaccination hysteria is about sex, accidentally helping Big Pharma—-anything but science

Fans of Fox’s tin-foil hatter Glenn Beck discuss the Pittsburgh shooter

What a tragedy it was in Pittsburgh - three police officers gunned down by an unemployed 22-year-old member of the Base of the GOP, the nutbag/freeper section. I think it’s safe to say that Richard Poplawski, who spent his time surfing the internet filling his disturbed mind with notions held by many of the fans of Glenn Beck and the WingNutDaily denizens, represents what happens when tin-foil hat conservative theories are taken seriously. (Raw Story):

According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Richard Poplawski was “convinced the nation was secretly controlled by a cabal that would eradicate freedom of speech, take away his guns and use the military to enslave the citizenry. ... He appeared to share a belief that the government was controlled from unseen forces, that troops were being shipped home from the Mideast to police the citizenry here, and that Jews secretly ran the country.”

Some of Poplawski’s beliefs are fairly commonplace among conservatives. For example, fears that the Obama administration intends to somehow ban gun ownership have recently become a staple on such relatively mainstream outlets as Glenn Beck’s program on Fox News.

It’s only a short leap from the wingnut fringe belief system that we saw during the 2008 campaign with the McCain/Palin rally mobs to eliminationist, neo-Nazi thinking—Poplawski makes this clear.

Poplawski had also posted pictures of himself at Stormfront, a white supremacist website whose slogan is “white pride worldwide.” The discussion of the shootings at Stormfront, which began with speculations that the gunman would turn out to be “some non-white” or “a jew,” then turned to suspicions that the recent rash of shootings is a “setup” to push through gun control legislation, has become oddly muted since the revelation that Poplawski appears to be one of theirs.

Just this week Stephen Colbert did a hilarious take down of Glenn Beck’s “9-12 Project to save the nation.” I wondered what Beck’s fans were going to do with the news that it was a member of the tin-foil hat brigade that killed these law-enforcement officers.

A sampling is below the fold.
From a post on the shooting...it appears that many of Beck’s fans just don’t get it and engage in more conspiracy-think (big surprise), though a couple realize the black and white mindset they love to revel in simply cannot apply:

Question for 9/12ers:
Is the following premise correct:
1)The 2nd amendment was created to protect the people from Unconstitutional and tyrannical government, by allowing violent revolution against the forces of the government.
2) The government is acting in an Unconstitutional/tyrannical manner under Obama.
3) The police are a part of government.

Ban handguns, allow long guns. Open carry allowed, concealed carry banned.
You guys get to keep your AR15s and AK47s.
We get rid of the guns that most criminals use for robberies.

All of the recent shootings and gun stories reported on the news seem to be set in a rapid progression towards what the current government might say is just cause to ban firearms. From the reports of firearms being mass transferred into mexico, to the shootings in Oakland, to the shootings at the civic center in New York, to this sad event. This event being the first I have seen in which the media has made comments directly related to a threat from the current administration in Washington. I feel as if this is a play in which the climax is soon to come and we are nearing the end which will sadly include a violation of our right to bear firearms. Our concern for this is justified but we must be sensible in how we act so that we dont throw fuel on the fire being used to burn the 2nd ammendment from the Constitution.

f the baseless anti-government rhetoric based on the belief they will “take our guns” keeps up… well, it will spawn much more violence by the real nutcases, and probably be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

This is a sad state of the times. When I was the shooter’s age I was in the Army. I left home immediately after graduation at the age of 17. Why was this slug still living with his mom? Why would you call 911 when a dog pees in the house? Unless there is more to the story then the mother should be held liable for the abuse of the 911 system. My heart goes out to the slain officer’s families. Too bad he wasn’t shot in the head instead of the legs.

If there ever was a case for more stringent gun laws, and more stringent application of current laws, this would be it. Even if you’re pro 2nd amendment like I am, you have to recognize this. I fear the paranoid rhetoric of many today, rhetoric that has very little real connection to legislative initiatives, does much more harm than good for the pro 2nd amendment cause. Nutcases like the guy in Pittsburgh, who take the rhetoric to the extreme, will undermine the arguments for why the rest of us should be allowed to keep guns if we so choose.

Did anyone else pay close attention to what happened with the release of the shooters reasoning for doing this heinous act? When the story first broke the media mentioned the shooter was also a drug addict. Now for the last 24 hours the media has just been saying the shooter was unemployed and afraid President Obama was going to take his guns? Why are they putting more emphasis on him unemployed and afraid Obama is taking his gun? You know! Here’s another one. When the media first released the story about Binghamton, they said the shooter had somekind of high powered rifle. Of course we now find out he had two handguns near his body. Sounds like a smear to me!

FIRST OF ALL ARE THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS SHOULD BE WITH THE FAMILIES OF THE FALLEN OFFICERS. SECONDLY LETS HOPE THE RESIDENTS OF PITTSBURG ARE CIVILIZED AND NOT LIKE THE SCUMBAGS IN OAKLAND WHO WENT OUT ON THE STREETS AND PRAISED THAT COP KILLER AS A HERO AFTER HE KILLED 4 OF THEIR FINE OFFICERS. THAT MADE ME SICK TO HEAR THAT THEY WOULD DO SUCH A THING WOULD AND HOW CAN ANYBODY JUST KILL A BUNCH OF COPS THESE ARE THE EVIL PEOPLE IN ARE COUNTRY. ANYBODY BE WILLING TO BET THAT EVERY ONE OF THOSE IDIOTS IN OAKLAND VOTED FOR OBAMA. AND AS A VETERAN I WOULD LIKE PRAY THAT ALL OF ARE POLICE, FIREFIGHTERS, AND SERVICE MEMBERS BE KEPT SAFE, AS THEY ARE KEEPING ALL OF US SAFE

This makes me sick. I for one am glad this guy is dead, for what he has done. I too have been laid off for a couple of months now, I too am scared of what is coming ahead because of the Obama administration, but I am not running around shooting the place up. He clearly had his own agenda, and I am convinced a mental case. Good Riddance you Shmuck.

I have long used the quote “More guns less crime”. If a criminal thought there would be a greater chance that whoever they were violating was armed they would be less inclined to commit the crime. Hell, in Iraq every household is permitted one AK-47 or below per male and two magazines for it. If we had a similar law, I almost guarantee home invasion, rape, car-jacking (at gun-point), muggings, and a multitude of other violent crimes would plummet. Quite simply, if you were hypothetically a criminal, which would you rather rob, a department store or a gun store? Obviously the dept. store, because you know not only are all the clerks armed, but a great deal of the patrons as well. Something to chew on.

Just another tragic and senseless loss of life. One that this administration will exploit in it’s effort to ban all guns from law abiding citizens. But the problem is not the guns the problem is that an individual intent on causing harm will do whatever with whatever means necessary. McVeigh used a van full of fertilizer and deisel fuel to kill. Al Quaeda used 3 commercial airliners to kill. How many people are stabbed to death? How many are killed with blunt trauma? Drunk drivers use automobiles as a weapon. New York City has the toughest gun control laws in the nation yet crimes with guns continue…..

It seems that every time that shootings like this happen the right to bear arms issue comes up. The anti-gun lobbyists have a field day trying to add a nail to the box that they think will ultimately take away the 2nd amendment. We the people have to stand firm and not let that happen. My heart and prayers goes out to the families who lost their loved ones. The mental case who took those lives had his own agenda and could have made more of a statement without taking innocent lives.

As the 912 project evolves it would be good to encorporate some element of active/direct support of our local police. These guys never know what’s behind the doors they knock on or what will happen when they pull someone over for a speeding ticket. This act was performed by a frustrated violent nutjob with guns…the fact that he was a frustrated, violent nutjob who decided to commit this act was the problem…NOT the fact that he owned “guns”. He could have just as easily been a nutjob with who killed 10 people in an alley with a lead pipe over a period of time. Banning “guns” would not have stopped this guy from being a violent nut any more than banning led pipes (or knives or large rocks) would stock another nut from crushing some innocent persons skull.

I fail to understand why, as this article indicates, a person would murder police officers because he was scared of this administration taking his guns away. Makes no sense and clearly this was a deranged individual!! Please keep peace officers in your prayers. Especially these that are now patroling the streets of heaven. GOD SAVE THE USA.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 09:42 PM • (33) Comments

But it takes talent and skill to kill ten people with a lead pipe over a period of time, and gun bunnies have neither: that’s why they’re gun bunnies.

Comment #1: felagund  on  04/05  at  10:45 PM

Barack Obama is one really powerful guy. 

He gets McCain to pick Palin and run a lousy campaign so Obama wins. 

He gets both parties to loosen banking regulations so the resulting economic collapse can be used as an excuse to make us Socialists.

He tricks a string of Republicans into attacking Limbaugh and then later having to apologize to Rush for their impudence, making Republicans look like idiot sycophants of Limbaugh The Rush.

He gets the Queen of England to interact with Michelle and cause an uproar over royal protocols.

And now he’s causing gun nuts to go crazy and shoot cops just so he can take all the guns away.

He’s probably been causing the whole Reichwing base to go slowly insane and drag the Republican Party down with them.

Obama is an awesome dude…

Comment #2: MikeEss  on  04/05  at  11:04 PM

Obama is an awesome dude…

Well, he is the Antichrist.

Comment #3: Seraph  on  04/05  at  11:24 PM

Don’t underestimate him. He ran the Weather Underground when he was only 8 years old.

Comment #4: asdf  on  04/05  at  11:39 PM

They’re really conflicted by this one.  It’s impressive - it’s a clear argument for stricter background checks on gun purchases, and they can’t entirely deny it.  A guy who’s clearly a right winger did it, and they can’t deny it.  Cops were on the target, and they can’t not support them.

It’s bizarre.  Luckily, they still have CAPS LOCK MAN to tell them that the real enemy is black people in Oakland who voted for Obama and praised a cop killer.

Comment #5: Billingham  on  04/05  at  11:46 PM

It strikes me as unlikely that he could have killed three police officers with a lead pipe, but what do I know?

Comment #6: Alex, FCD  on  04/05  at  11:57 PM

Poplawski had also posted pictures of himself at Stormfront, a white supremacist website whose slogan is “white pride worldwide.”

So the way to show White Pride is to act like a pathetic loser and complete crybaby? These White Supremacists are more like a White Shame.

Comment #7: Judge Moonbox  on  04/06  at  12:03 AM

Especially these that are now patroling the streets of heaven.

Heaven has a crime rate that needs requires beat policemen?

Comment #8: Billingham  on  04/06  at  12:09 AM

The idea that god makes you keep your day job in heaven makes me even less interested in taking up residence there.

Comment #9: semi_factual  on  04/06  at  12:41 AM

Hell, in Iraq every household is permitted one AK-47 or below per male and two magazines for it. If we had a similar law, I almost guarantee home invasion, rape, car-jacking (at gun-point), muggings, and a multitude of other violent crimes would plummet.

Quoted for OMFG.

I can think off-hand of a few places where AK-47s are a household fixture: Iraq, Afghanistan, the tribal areas of Pakistan.

Comment #10: pseudonymous in nc  on  04/06  at  12:52 AM

They’re really conflicted by this one.  It’s impressive - it’s a clear argument for stricter background checks on gun purchases, and they can’t entirely deny it.

? I’m not opposed to background checks, but in this case what would a background check have found that would preclude his gun purchases?

Comment #11: asdf  on  04/06  at  01:11 AM

From the CNN article, the dumbass thing that precipitated this tragedy takes the concept of “batsh*t crazy” to undreamt-of levels:

The complaint says Margaret Poplawski called 911 about 7 a.m. Saturday to report that her son was “giving her a hard time.”

She told police she awoke to discover that “the dog had urinated on the floor,” and awakened her son “to confront him about it.”

The two had an argument, and Margaret Poplawski told her son she was calling police to remove him from her home, according to the complaint. When officers Stephen Mayhle and Paul Sciullo III arrived, she opened the door and let them in.

Further from the story, addressing what would a background check have found that would preclude his gun purchases?

Margaret Poplawski told police her son had enlisted in the Marine Corps a few years ago, but was discharged for assaulting his drill sergeant in basic training, according to the complaint.

Assaulting an authority figure—casts doubts on one’s fitness to own firearms.

Comment #12: Hector B.  on  04/06  at  01:19 AM

Doesn’t this guy have a history of mental health issues, or am I confusing him with someone?

Comment #13: Billingham  on  04/06  at  01:20 AM

Assaulting an authority figure—casts doubts on one’s fitness to own firearms.

NO KIDDING.

Also… Glenn Beck is “relatively mainstream”? Then boy am I glad I don’t live in the USA.

Comment #14: RacyT  on  04/06  at  03:28 AM

Possible the mother knew her son’s violent history, knew him well enough to follow his moods, and knew that violence was likely given his behavior that morning. Don’t know, but it’s possible.

I always knew when my dad was about to blow his stack, and this is obviously much more extreme.

Comment #15: Dymphna  on  04/06  at  03:30 AM

“I have long used the quote “More guns less crime”. If a criminal thought there would be a greater chance that whoever they were violating was armed they would be less inclined to commit the crime. Hell, in Iraq every household is permitted one AK-47 or below per male and two magazines for it.”

Does this guy even have the first clue how breathtakingly stupid that paragraph is?  America should model itself on Iraq and would then be a calm and peaceful place?!  What parallel universe have I stumbled into?

I have to say it, Americans are really really f*cking weird about guns.

Comment #16: Katherine  on  04/06  at  05:28 AM

Katherine, I think it’s because there’s a part of our ethos that aggrandizes men with guns and turns them into heroes.

We see that in every Western movie, novel, TV show, or comic book.

We see that in every war movie, novel, TV show, or comic book.

Etc., etc., etc.

So a large portion of our populace believes the solution to all of life’s problems is a man armed with a gun. (Sometimes they allow as to how you womenfolk might could maybe use a .22 rifle to hunt varmints.)

For proof, I offer up practically every summer blockbuster movie Hollywood ever put out, from The Good, The Bad and the Ugly to Die Hard.

So some people in our country believe that what it takes to be a hero is the money to own and train with a gun, and the conviction needed to pull it out and escalate a situation such as an armed robbery or a domestic dispute.

Comment #17: Falconer  on  04/06  at  11:16 AM

Assaulting an authority figure—casts doubts on one’s fitness to own firearms.

“An authority figure”

What are we, wingnuts?

Authority figures do bad things. Sometimes assaulting them is a legitimate choice.

Drill sergeants, pretty much by definition, are assholes.

Comment #18: asdf  on  04/06  at  11:48 AM

One of the glaring loopholes in the background checks is that mental-health providers are refusing to disclose required information.  When you ask to purchase a gun and medical info release should be part of it.  The VaTech shooter is a perfect example. 

We had a lady in my area who had A) assaulted a police officer; and, B) been committed.  The first had been pled down from a felony to a misdemeanor and the second never reported.  She purchased a 9mm handgun and 500 rounds of ammo and shot up a local TV station.

Comment #19: Magis  on  04/06  at  12:01 PM

So the way to show White Pride is to act like a pathetic loser and complete crybaby? These White Supremacists are more like a White Shame.

Yeah, that’s why I’m a RACE TRAITOR and bred a buncha Stealth Mexicans.

As for the idiots who want to charge the mom for calling 911 over dog pee.  Christ.  The man killed several cops.  I think the mom was completely right in calling 911—she knew how violent he could get and she wanted him out of her house.

Comment #20: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  04/06  at  12:06 PM

One of the glaring loopholes in the background checks is that mental-health providers are refusing to disclose required information.

Mental health providers CANNOT provide information without a release.  HIPPA.

Comment #21: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  04/06  at  12:41 PM

Yeah, it’s not like she was calling about the dog peeing on the floor. She was calling the cops to get them to remove an adult (who happened to be her son) from her house, which is hardly the same thing.

Comment #22: rhiain  on  04/06  at  12:52 PM

Caren, sorry to be a spelling nazi, but that’s HIPAA:
Health Information Portability and Accountability Act

I get tested on it yearly as part of my job (where I could conceivably come into contact with Protected Patient Information)...

Comment #23: MikeEss  on  04/06  at  12:53 PM

One of the glaring loopholes in the background checks is that mental-health providers are refusing to disclose required information.  When you ask to purchase a gun and medical info release should be part of it.

I don’t exactly trust the government’s discretion when it comes to distinguishing between violent and nonviolent mentally ill people… if I wanted to buy a gun for some reason right now I wouldn’t want someone digging through my bout with depression in high school and using that as a reason to deny me. (Alternatively, if I’d wanted to buy a gun *while I was depressed in high school* it would have been REALLY good to have that stuff show up on a background check, so I genuinely don’t know… That’s how one of my classmates offed himself, after all; just waited ‘til he was old enough and bought a gun no problem despite years of off-and-on hospitalization.)

I guess that deals more with self-harm than killing sprees, but so many men lately don’t seem able to separate the two that it’s kinda relevant. Ideally someone who loses their job would just kill themselves, and not take out their wife and three children too. 9.9 (Sorry for the slow drift off-topic!)

Comment #24: Bagelsan  on  04/06  at  01:56 PM

Yeah, it’s not like she was calling about the dog peeing on the floor. She was calling the cops to get them to remove an adult (who happened to be her son) from her house, which is hardly the same thing.

We need to know the whole history here. Was this classic domestic violence, or just a parent-child spat that got out of control? From the article, an argument that started as Mom waking up her son to confront him about his dog’s puddle on the floor, and ended with mass murder, would be farcical if it wasn’t so tragic.

My perspective is tinged with my personal experience. My mother’s family was filled with hollerers—they relished drama and a good spat cleared the air. Only yelling, no hitting, no police needed to be called. Although after forty-some years of marriage my grandmother decided she “couldn’t take it any more” and stayed with my aunt for a couple of weeks—until her little grandsons’ battling got on her nerves and she moved back with my grandfather.

Comment #25: Hector B.  on  04/06  at  02:05 PM

“Quite simply, if you were hypothetically a criminal, which would you rather rob, a department store or a gun store? Obviously the dept. store, because you know not only are all the clerks armed, but a great deal of the patrons as well. Something to chew on.”

That reminds me of a song by my favorite Anarchist; Leslie Fish.
“They Were Having A Sale At The Gun Store” Lyrics:
http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/jukes.shtml

She’s not much for for Liberals, but is firmly in the corner of the weak and dispossessed. Kind of like a Libertarian who views the rich and powerful with suspicion.

Comment #26: KMac  on  04/06  at  02:20 PM

What I find interesting is that “they’ll take our guns away” is almost an end in itself. If I were a dictator, taking the guns away would be a precaution so that I could increase tyranny without any resistance. But they seem to think the government wants to take guns away so it can take guns away.

Comment #27: Seebach  on  04/06  at  03:53 PM

Bagelsan:

What I’m advocating is signing a medical release as part of the process.  Simple depression would not generally meet the criteria.  However, if you are currently under treatment and the provider thinks you might be a danger to yourself or others you should at least temporarily be unable to purchase a firearm. 

It’s just too important a state interest and gun ownership is too awesome a responsibility to allow unstable people to have unrestricted access.  Every right has limits including the right to privacy.

Comment #28: Magis  on  04/06  at  05:28 PM

Possible the mother knew her son’s violent history, knew him well enough to follow his moods, and knew that violence was likely given his behavior that morning.

That was exactly what I thought too. It went from the dog pee to an argument, after which she called the cops, so logically his behavior during the argument must have caused her to believe the cops were a good idea.

If she hadn’t killed the cops we probably wouldn’t be hearing nearly as much about it now because it would “only” be a case of one old lady murdered by her son instead of multiple cops being killed by a loony. (You know, kill your mother, wife, daughter or sister and you obviously were provoked, but kill cops and you’re obviously completely unfit for decent society.)

f I were a dictator, taking the guns away would be a precaution so that I could increase tyranny without any resistance. But they seem to think the government wants to take guns away so it can take guns away.

No, no, they want to take guns away so they can take away The Fruits Of Our Labors and give them to The Undeserving, dictate what jobs we should do, and shoot us up full of mercury with hypodermic needles.

Comment #29: kristin  on  04/06  at  05:59 PM

I have to say it, Americans are really really f*cking weird about guns

Or, the batshit crazy & wingnuts that the post describes, but thanks for summing up.

Comment #30: Danzig  on  04/06  at  06:15 PM

assaulting an authority figure—casts doubts on one’s fitness to own firearms. </l>

Actually, any dishonorable discharge will end your right to own a handgun, according the Brady Law form.

<i>I’m not opposed to background checks, but in this case what would a background check have found that would preclude his gun purchases?

Yes, see above.  Also, he was apparently a drug dealer, right?  Any felony conviction would do it. 

But see here’s the thing.  He was a drug dealer.  Drugs are illegal, yet here’s this guy making his living on the black market for them.  Why wouldn’t he have easy access to illega, unregistered, stolen handguns?

With or without any background check or Brady Law violation, it would likely be easier, cheaper, and more convenient for him to acquire his guns illegally.  Hell, he likely just traded a couple grams of coke for a stolen pistol or two.

Comment #31: Chocolate Covered Cotton  on  04/06  at  07:57 PM

Whoops, second sentence above is mine.

Comment #32: Chocolate Covered Cotton  on  04/06  at  08:00 PM

I think you guys are giving the mother too much credit for common sense; this woman enjoys a big dramatic gesture:

Margaret Poplawski was found guilty of spitting on her son’s former girlfriend Gladish in 2005 and paid a $238.50 fine, according to court filings.

I have a hard time believing that someone fearful of their son’s potential for violence would wake him up just to complain about the dog pee. Wouldn’t a fearful person simply blot it up and apply an enzymatic cleaner?

Comment #33: Hector B.  on  04/07  at  12:53 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.