Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: SXSW Music, Day Four: Spring Break For The Cool Kids Previous entry: Are You Actually The Dumbest Motherfucker Alive?

Federal Rule Of Blogging Procedure 56: Summary Judgment That Ann Althouse Is A Moron

imagePer my post last night, I must call a technical violation on the thread.  The dumbest motherfucker alive is now (and will likely be for the foreseeable future) Ann Althouse. 

Althouse put up a thread on Journolist (disclaimer: I’m a member), the comments of which largely focused on the fact that Ezra was a Jew and Jewy Jew Jew Jew.  Ezra put up a Tweet about it. 

Ann Althouse, of course, went fucking apeshit about it, including posts alleging a massive retributionist conspiracy of

Jews

liberals, and accusing the Jew Ezra Klein of creating the anti-Semitism he says was directed at him what on account of the sneaky Jewness and all.  (Conspiracy Annie also thinks that Obama scripted his “Special Olympics” comment, because ohmygodshe’sfuckingcrazy.)

Her obsession is remarkable - she’s actually stopped posting her own travel porn long enough to demand a proper apology in a proper way, because the secret to being Ann Althouse is that she’s never actually not offended, but she has to do enough promo work during her perpetual offense to let everyone know how offended and important she is.  Althouse even asks why liberals hate her, which is a.) mistaking the belief that she’s a shambling joke of a human being for hatred and b.) answered by the fact that she’s better at life, blogging and a conceptual understanding of the universe than all of her “haters”. 

Incidentally, Althouse is so terrible because she points out the underlying dynamic of many conservative bloggers (at least the ones who allow comments).  The community almost invariably becomes a heavily edited paean to the greatness of the moderator (and their undeniable embodiment of everything that’s right with civilization), where the most offensive and terrible shit about anyone who’s not them is allowed to slide so long as it doesn’t harm their psyche.  Althouse is a horrific communicator - garbled, oversensitive and inconsistent all at once, and insanely defensive about any criticism of the incredibly stupid things she says on a routine basis. 

Are there any former students of hers (she’s a law professor, which I know seems like a cruel infliction of inhumane punishment on her students) with any information about just how terrible she is as a professor?  I’ve thought about how bad a professor would have to be to make me want Althouse to replace them, and the answer always tends to involve the professor downing a pint of mash liquor and coming into class with a loaded shotgun.  Other than that, I think I could deal.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 12:18 PM • (40) Comments

Frighteningly enough, Althouse reminds me of a woman that I dated many moons ago.  The degree of her rage and her willingness to take the offensive wasn’t necessarily linked to how badly I had acted, it was more directly linked to how wrong she was.  If she knew she was on poor ground emotionally or factually her anger at my being “wrong” and her willingness to verbally and psychologically attack went off the scale.  In essence, it was a psych mind game aimed at making me think that “hey, if you’re that angry, that offended, that hurt (etc) then I must have REALLY fucked up.. I’m sorry!”. 

If you want to see that Althouse characteristic in action, go to the video debate with Franke-Ruta debate.  Althouse knows that she is on shitty, hateful ground with her comments on Jessica Valenti and knows that Franke-Ruta is going to mention it, however obliquely.  Her subsequent rude, nasty attack on almost zero provocation, which stunned Franke-Ruta (who obviously made the mistake of expecting civilized discourse) is well known.

Comment #1: seeker6079  on  03/22  at  01:15 PM

Nothing really to add, just wanted to say how much I love:

she’s a shambling joke of a human being

It’s Lovecraftian.

Can anyone explain to me the accompanying pic? Someone holding a gun to a scotch/rocks?

Comment #2: pablo  on  03/22  at  01:18 PM

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=594762

There ya go, Jesse.

Comment #3: phylosopher  on  03/22  at  01:25 PM

I don’t know about rate my professor - hotness rating doesn’t exactly inspire a sense of validity here.  Most profs I know hate it because it is a scattershot designed for academic communities where classes are massively huge, not places where there is a small number of students in each class.

Comment #4: Ms Kate  on  03/22  at  01:39 PM

Could we please just talk about how FAT she is? ;D

Comment #5: Magis  on  03/22  at  01:42 PM

I think my favorite thing about Ann Althouse* is how she and her loyal groupies insist she’s a “real feminist”. With this logic, apparently “real feminists” loathe other women, adore the people who vote against women’s rights, and every so often feel the need to condescend to and insult anyone who disagrees with them, then run away screaming that dammit, they’re the victim here.

I think I’m okay with being a fake feminist, then.

*For “favorite” read: “one of the most terrifying”.

Comment #6: Princess Sparkles McUnicorn  on  03/22  at  01:52 PM

Okay, if I’m conversing with “Princess Sparkles McUnicorn” then one of two things is possible.  Either it’s well past time for me to go back on my meds, or it’s just a really cool handle.  I choose to believe the latter.

That whole condescension / insult thing is key to understanding Althouse.  In a way she’s an ambulatory version of Mel Brook’s definition of comedy: comedy is when you fall into a sewer and die; tragedy is when she cuts her finger.

She once showed up on a thread here (or at least somebody claiming to be her and writing exactly like her did!).  She berated people on the thread for being rude to her and demanded apologies, but felt free to be twice or thrice as rude and intemperate as the folks she demanded apologies from.  Manners, hurt, etc., these are all one-way streets as far as she is concerned.

Comment #7: seeker6079  on  03/22  at  01:58 PM

Althouse and her commentors showed up on Ezra’s blog saying, among many other things, that Ezra made up the whole “anti-Semitic” charge to deflect attention from the real issue here, that he (Ezra) is issuing the marching orders to the entire Washington media establishment.

Hilarity ensues.

Comment #8: Thlayli  on  03/22  at  02:19 PM

Ms Kate & phylosopher -
Much as I loath La Althouse, Rate My Professor is really first quality bullshit.  Look at the number of ratings Althouse has there.  That is less than you would expect to enroll in a small class and, from my understanding of law schools, con law is usually a huge lecture section with over a hundred students each term.  This hardly qualifies as representative.  My own entry has, last time I looked, about 10-20 entries (covering at least half a dozen years) out of the 600-900 students a year I have taught at my current institution over the past 10 years.

Comment #9: DrDick  on  03/22  at  02:20 PM

Seems to me I’ve read comments from people claiming to have been in her classes before.  They seem pissed that her tests are on material not covered in the class.

Comment #10: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  03/22  at  02:51 PM

I can’t speak to the meds issue, seeker, but I’m a fan of the handle myself. So let’s stick with the latter. ;P

Yeah, I’m getting that sense with her. I was reading through the comments on Ezra’s post, and she showed a remarkable lack of self awareness. And class, but that’s another frustration for another day.

Maybe I just have too much faith in people, but I just can’t believe people actually don’t see what’s wrong with deflecting someone’s very rational frustration with anti-Semitic remarks by going NEVER MIND ABOUT THAT, LET’S GET BACK TO WHY YOU EXPOSING PREJUDICE IS A DEFLECTION OF THE REAL ISSUE—THE LIBRUL JEWISH MEDIA CABAL. (Which, by the way, I happen to know is untrue. The bisexual English major girl gamers run the media, and we’re just letting the Jews take the fall. As everyone knows, we don’t exist, and we’re putting our ninja skillz to running the Librul Media. Best watch yourselves, etc etc etc.)

I just don’t understand the brain process it takes to get from anti-Semitism is bad—————> anti-Semitism is a-okay because the real issue is a made-up group of journalists out to ~*~run the world~*~ or some such nonsense. I just do not understand how someone takes that leap of logic.

Comment #11: Princess Sparkles McUnicorn  on  03/22  at  02:52 PM

Incidentally, Althouse is so terrible because she points out the underlying dynamic of many conservative bloggers (at least the ones who allow comments).  The community almost invariably becomes a heavily edited paean to the greatness of the moderator (and their undeniable embodiment of everything that’s right with civilization), where the most offensive and terrible shit about anyone who’s not them is allowed to slide so long as it doesn’t harm their psyche.

A tendancy present in every commentating community.  It just tends to become pathological much much sooner in conservative (wingnut) blogs because one of their defining characteristics is a lack of perspective and self-reflection (cf “Christians - most oppressed minority EVA” and “Obama’s minor marginal tax rise - Communism or merely Socialism?”).

Comment #12: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  03/22  at  03:36 PM

“I don’t know about rate my professor - hotness rating doesn’t exactly inspire a sense of validity here.  Most profs I know hate it because it is a scattershot designed for academic communities where classes are massively huge, not places where there is a small number of students in each class. “

Ms Kate on 03/22 at 11:39 AM

“also to Dr. Dick:”

That post was mostly in jest;  obviously any cite that allows anonymous posts is going to have questionable validity.  (For fun, look at Obama’s posts - nothing until after he was elected! and yet his entry is still there).  As far as I know, there is no check to make sure that the student ever actually attended the course. 

But I did find it interesting that some students said exactly what Jesse did and they predated his analysis:

“Althouse is a horrific communicator - garbled, oversensitive and inconsistent all at once, and insanely defensive about any criticism of the incredibly stupid things she says on a routine basis.” 

Oh, and not to take personal offense or demand apology as Althouse does, but it seems a teensy bit insensitive of Jesse to post about loaded guns in classrooms after V.Tech, NIU and Columbine, Germany, not just to any readers who were actually touched personally by those tragedies but also to the rest of the academidc community that’s a bit jumpy after .

Comment #13: phylosopher  on  03/22  at  03:56 PM

Damn, Princess Sparkles, I knew I should have declared English rather than Anthro…  Who knew that and my inability to get past the first level of Mario is all that’s keeping me from world domination.  I pretty much pwn at Sim City, Civilization, and those kind of games, though.  What can I do to get initiated into the Mysteries of the Bisexual English Major Girl Gamers?

Comment #14: The Opoponax  on  03/22  at  04:00 PM

@ PIATOR 1:36 - there’s also the authoritarian streak.  That probably helps with the cult of personality thing.

Then again, confession time:  last night I dreamed that Obama invited me to a state dinner and I was sitting across from Amanda.  I was wildly stuffing my face and she kept accusing me of being pregnant.

Comment #15: The Opoponax  on  03/22  at  04:04 PM

Then again, confession time:  last night I dreamed that Obama invited me to a state dinner and I was sitting across from Amanda.  I was wildly stuffing my face and she kept accusing me of being pregnant.

My God - you had that dream *too*?

(“No… no… no… I’m just big-boned!  Leave me aloooooone…”)

Comment #16: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  03/22  at  04:09 PM

The bisexual English major girl gamers run the media, and we’re just letting the Jews take the fall. As everyone knows, we don’t exist…

heh heh heh heh heh…..

Comment #17: seeker6079  on  03/22  at  04:45 PM

And I note from that link that Ezra has apologized for mixing up comments and commenters.  Sorry, but that’s such DLC liberal thing to do: apologize when you’ve done nothing wrong.  It’s also very bad tactics to apologize to someone who isn’t arguing in good faith.  Screw ‘em.  Manners are reserved for people who show them; act like they don’t matter except when you’re at issue (as Althouse does) and you ain’t entitled to be treated politely.

Comment #18: seeker6079  on  03/22  at  04:56 PM

Damn, Princess Sparkles, I knew I should have declared English rather than Anthro… Who knew that and my inability to get past the first level of Mario is all that’s keeping me from world domination.  I pretty much pwn at Sim City, Civilization, and those kind of games, though.  What can I do to get initiated into the Mysteries of the Bisexual English Major Girl Gamers?

I would tell you, but then I’d have to kill you. We are a powerful and mysterious bunch, and our mystery is only exceeded by our power! (Evil laugh here.)

Also, awesome link, seeker. I love that comic. I would link to TVTropes to compliment it, but I’m not that cruel before… oh, at least three pm.

Comment #19: Princess Sparkles McUnicorn  on  03/22  at  05:08 PM

cruel me anyways!  link!

Comment #20: seeker6079  on  03/22  at  05:36 PM

All right, but when you waste three or four hours obsessively clicking links, remember I warned you.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/NoBisexuals

(I am entirely blanking on how to code links on Pandagon. Shoot.)

Comment #21: Princess Sparkles McUnicorn  on  03/22  at  05:44 PM

Some queer theorists call this phenonemon Bisexual Erasure

Bisexual Erasure? I was around in the late 80s; that seems pretty redundant to me.

Comment #22: Auguste  on  03/22  at  06:12 PM

I actually never crossed paths with her during my time at UW (of course, I wasn’t a law school student, so that makes sense). Still, the fact that she is a professor at that institution is one of the craziest paradoxes I’ve known of.

Comment #23: Ben F.  on  03/22  at  06:13 PM

Opop:

Then again, confession time:  last night I dreamed that Obama invited me to a state dinner and I was sitting across from Amanda. I was wildly stuffing my face and she kept accusing me of being pregnant.

Heh. Before I ever met Amanda, I had a dream that I saw her in a park in downtown Austin, where she was laughing maniacally and aggressively taking pictures of a serious photojournalist. The photojournalist had no idea what to do, so she just started taking pictures of Amanda taking pictures of her.

Comment #24: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  03/22  at  06:14 PM

I dunno, Jesse. I went over expecting some kind of new frontier in Althouse crazy, but here’s how I read it:

1. Althouse makes a post about the stupid Journolist BS and makes a stupid vast-right-wing-conspiracy joke.

2. She gets a couple noxious commenters whom, to her readership’s credit, get called out for being racists.

3. Ezra overstates something on Twitter (which is easy to do on Twitter)

4. Althouse freaks out, the most unsurprising thing ever

5. Ezra posts about it, then genteely corrects the record close to what it originally was in the first place, but not before he pisses off Althouse’s minions.

Nothing to see here, move along.

Comment #26: whetstone  on  03/22  at  07:02 PM

My take is basically whetstone’s….with one thing to add:

Is there any sadder fate (within the blogosphere or without) than being a regular commenter on Althouse’s blog?  I’m sure someone can come up with a less valuable use of one’s time, but I honestly cannot.

Comment #27: Ben Alpers  on  03/22  at  08:10 PM

Heh.  A former close friend of mine was, at least until recently, a regular (almost resident) commenter there, and while that wasn’t the cause of the “former” descriptor, it certainly didn’t make me mourn.

Comment #28: Auguste  on  03/22  at  08:23 PM

Then again, confession time:  last night I dreamed that Obama invited me to a state dinner and I was sitting across from Amanda.  I was wildly stuffing my face and she kept accusing me of being pregnant.

my mom keeps dreaming shes friends with michelle obama. my dream involved me being nanny to the first daughters, there was some sort of concert on the whitehouse lawn and i let the girls pig out on junkfood and we played with fireworks. i woke up feeling guilty for being such a crap nanny.

ive had two dreams where i meet amanda, the most recent was a few nights ago where she drove to chicago and picked me and some guy up then drove us back to austin to hang out for the afternoon. we rode wonderful public transportation, a sleek train with alot of windows that ran the perimeter of a sparkly lake. then she drove us back to chicago and i climbed in a random apartment window where the girls inside invited me to a party.

Comment #29: jessilikewhoa  on  03/22  at  08:28 PM

Bisexual Erasure? I was around in the late 80s; that seems pretty redundant to me.

Uhh… Auguste? A little respect, please?

Comment #30: RacyT  on  03/22  at  08:37 PM

ROTFL

Comment #31: RacyT  on  03/22  at  08:37 PM

Is there any sadder fate (within the blogosphere or without) than being a regular commenter on Althouse’s blog?  I’m sure someone can come up with a less valuable use of one’s time, but I honestly cannot.

Business manager for Pajamas Media…

Comment #32: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  03/22  at  08:38 PM

Well, I don’t get it. Twitter, that is. Ann is sitting somewhere in Ohio twittering to her twitter fans that she’s somewhere in Ohio. Eating toast or something. OK. I’ll play. I had my usual cup of yogurt this morning - scratch that, I’m not up until afternoon. What I mean is it was my version of breakfast and…lost you yet? I should hope so.

As for Ann, I see her as Inferiority Complex exponential. She’s haunted by feeling unattractive. Since no one is sensitive or kind or perceptive enough to say, Ann, you’re pretty, she overcompensates with the smartness routine. Smarter, that is, than virtually everyone. Not working? That’s where crabby and defensive enter the scene. No, it’s not a feminist sensibility and she’s no feminist.

Someone who feels unattractive and is a feminist, like Erica Jong, writes books in which she’s the fantasy protagonist. No harm, and she arguably has insight. Ann, well, she keeps a blog, the political version of nothing clever or interesting, just eating toast in Ohio.

Comment #33: daphne  on  03/22  at  09:20 PM

damnit seeker!
damnit Sparklie!

i will never get those two hours back!

(on the plus side, only losing 2 hours to a new webcomic and TCTropes is a new record)

just be happy finals are over and i’m on spring break, or it would be YOUR fault if i failed!


(i’m just being silly. i’d never read CTR+ALT+DEL before, and was really surprised at how much i liked it. and, of course, i am already hooked in TVTropes)

Comment #34: denelian  on  03/22  at  10:16 PM

Some comments from students on Althouse’s teaching, posted by a commenter at Sadly No:

Ann Althouse’s student ratings:

She is like an emu. She writes and talks like a flightless bird who does not understand copyright laws. Also, Gloria Steinem called and she said she wants her to get a self-esteem already! She is a mockery to the paper her law degree was written on.

Her final Con Law exam did not test the material of the course and there was no semblance of fairness in the way she graded. Althouse gave no comments or feedback when questioned about the exam/grade. She is a compeltely unfair and ineffective prof, not to mention a Scalia nut. Bleh. AVOID AT ALL COSTS!!

She is horrible. Avoid her like the plague. Her exams do not test the material well at all. Worst prof. ever.

A dissenting view:

Professor Althouse is my favorite lecturer of all time. And easy on the eyes as well!
http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=594762&page=1

“She is like an emu”!  Wow!

Comment #35: Older  on  03/22  at  11:35 PM

Hey, now I know where my student got the idea of opening an essay with “The dictionary definition of an emu is ‘A flightless bird who does not understand copyright laws.’”  Cool.  I’ll keep an eye on that student for further plagiarism.  Thanks, Older.

Comment #36: Josh  on  03/22  at  11:56 PM

She is like an emu. She writes and talks like a flightless bird who does not understand copyright laws. Also, Gloria Steinem called and she said she wants her to get a self-esteem already! She is a mockery to the paper her law degree was written on…

Hey, now I know where my student got the idea of opening an essay with “The dictionary definition of an emu is ‘A flightless bird who does not understand copyright laws.’” Cool.  I’ll keep an eye on that student for further plagiarism.  Thanks, Older.

I can’t tell if you’re kidding, Josh, but please tell me you’re not and that a student of yours really did write that.

Comment #37: Auguste  on  03/23  at  12:03 AM

Wow. I just watched Althouse losing it when asked about the Valenti thing - that’s here for anyone who, like me until a few minutes ago, hasn’t seen it:

http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/202?in=00:45:47&out=00:56:23

(relevant bit begins around 50/51 mins in)

I say “asked about” - in fact, the controversy is only referred to in passing, as an example of something where Althouse and the progressive blogosphere have disagreed. What I found bizarre about it is the way she smiles (snarkily) for quite some time before abruptly launching into a rant about how insulting it is that the other person even raised the issue - and, moreover, that the whole time Althouse is ranting, her body language and facial expression give completely the opposite message. It really looks like she’s conjuring up her outrage for the hell of it. And when she doesn’t get any sort of rise out of the other person, Althouse keep repeating the same phrases, while trying to make it more personal.

I’ve never seen a clearer case of someone spoiling for a fight without cause.

Hilarious. And yet creepy.

Comment #38: Nic_C  on  03/23  at  11:44 AM

House, Winehouse, Althouse; is there some curse about having the word “House” in your name and being completely functionally inept socially?

Comment #39: cynickal  on  03/23  at  04:09 PM

Nic C:
i had not seen it either.

and wow.
i’ve tried to avoid all the Althouse issues, because i always thought it was just a serious of rupture (really bad communication, where what one person says and means is NOT how how the other person hears it. like me saying “cat” and you picturing Snoopy. only ugly)

but… today, it looks like you are much closer to the truth than i am. she really does seem to be spoiling for a fight, doesn’t she?

Jesse makes a comment about how something to do with Dame Althouse is really amusing to him. he is not insulting (although i haven’t read the comments) but DAMN are people willing to call people names over at her blog.
and i get that that is a side effect of this sort of blogging. polarization of populace/audience happens at every blog.
but Jesse went out of his way to not insult HER looks. why the hell does she make it a point to bring up his? a lot of the Althouse stuff just doesn’t make sense to me. this made less sense.

why does she want to fight so badly?

Comment #40: denelian  on  03/23  at  10:19 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.