This guy has only served 10 years, eight months in prison, you greedy homosocialist. Fix your no-doubt intentional error before you lose respect in the eyes of a thieving con artist who has a rap sheet as long as your arm.

This paragon of civic virtue says he had sex with the President of the United States and, by golly, you should believe him! And when he mistakenly accuses you of misleading the public because you quoted a journalist who says he spent 16 years in prison, instead of the 10 years and eight months he actually spent in prison, then you should apologize right fucking now!

In fact, I’d say you owe this poor guy more than an apology: you should give him ad space on your website as compensation for the damage you did to his sterling reputation for quoting that he spent 16 years in prison for theft, forgery, and fraud as opposed to merely 10 years and eight months in three different states - because nobody deserves the benefit of the doubt more than Larry Sinclair.

He could try challenging you on the facts when it comes to being the “dumbest mo-‘fo’ ever”. I’d love to see the list of examples of people dumber than him (but they’d pretty much be taken from the Darwin Awards list).

I’m sure he’ll be invited to the tea party convention soon enough.  Him and the “No pubic option” sign people will get along very well.

Hilarious. It thinks it’s literate.

So on top of being a crook and a serial fabricator, he’s also a whiiiiiner.

He probably knows he’s got no shot at winning, so he’s casting around for someone to blame for his eventual loss. “I woulda won, but that mean blog lady was mean to me!” Then he’ll go hold up a liquor store.

Nah, I think that even if you’re quoting another account, you should correct the record if he can show that the report was mistaken. Newspapers and broadcasters can hide behind “we were just quoting our sources”, but bloggers should aspire to an factual standard. (And what I would figure is that he was sentenced to the longer term, actually spent the shorter one behind bars post conviction.)

Because someone who spent just short of 11 years in prison on multiple convictions is so much more credible than someone who pent 16. Can he even vote for himself in Florida?

So…

he’s a crook, but a nice one who gets time off for good behavior.  You should note that *while he’s a crook* he’s not quite the crook your source claimed he was. 

Perhaps he was just sentenced to 16 years?  BUT HE DIDN’T HAVE TO SERVE THEM B/C HE’S SUCH A NICE GUY!

Trustworthy, this crook is.

Seriously, he just whined that you were wrong about the time he served, while admitting that he served time for being a crook?  As if that actually makes a difference?

To crazy homophobic racists it must.  Thank you, Mr. Sinclair, for this fascinating look into the Teabagger mindset.  Hatred really is the only important family value.

I love the new breed of fags and dykes who thinks the world owes them everything.

Like seats in Congress?

i still don’t understand why him having “homo-sex” with obama would be condemning to obama but not to him. 

and doesn’t having “homo-sex” with obama make him one of those “fags and dykes” that he’s whining about?

am i missing something here?

i still don’t understand why him having “homo-sex” with obama would be condemning to obama but not to him.

“Why Do All These Homosexuals Keep Sucking My Cock?”

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/33540

Uhhh…don’t his multiple felonies make him ineligible for elective office (at least federal elective office)?

Let’s assume for a second that Obama is a closeted gay man…does anyone in the world see him having taste in men that horrendous?

Oh, so he actually served less than 11 years, rather than 16.  Well, this completely changes my opinion of him, and now he’s just so* credible.  He must be telling the truth about his homo-sex.

*I nearly injured my eyes from such a sarcastic eye-roll.  I advise others not try it.

good thing that cocaine is legal, otherwise he might spend even more time in prison for that

And then there’s this:

http://www.newser.com/story/75479/muslim-president-hates-charlie-brown-tenn-mayor.html?utm_source=syn&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=hom

I love the new breed of fags and dykes who thinks the world owes them everything.

The old school isn’t quite what I remember, apparently.

Let’s assume for a second that Obama is a closeted gay man…does anyone in the world see him having taste in men that horrendous?

Well, he does claim to be close friends with a man who is one of the driving forces behind a bill legalizing genocide. There’s no accounting for his taste.

Well, he does claim to be close friends with a man who is one of the driving forces behind a bill legalizing genocide. There’s no accounting for his taste.

Who?

the guy who devises an algorithm that filters out “dumbass” email is going to make a fortune. they can do it for spam.

Rick Warren, of course. The inaugural pastor, he of the Saddleback fame, who has declared Uganda “a purpose-driven nation.” That Rick Warren, the President’s BFF? Pals around with genocidal maniacs in Africa? ...Not ringing any bells, Devil’s Advocate?

Rick Warren, of course. The inaugural pastor, he of the Saddleback fame, who has declared Uganda “a purpose-driven nation.” That Rick Warren, the President’s BFF? Pals around with genocidal maniacs in Africa? ...Not ringing any bells, Devil’s Advocate?

Would you like a paper bag to hyperventilate in?

I know Obama sucked up to Rick Warren, but as I generally ignore that “Purpose Driven” moron, I didn’t know Warren was the friend of of a guy who promotes human rights abuses in Uganda. That’s why I asked.

I would like to know what happened to this mans Brain Tumor. The Globe Magazine had an article in the December 8, 2008 issue stating that Larry had a Brain tumor, with less than a year to live. So, If he were telling the truth, He would be dead. Also, I think that he was sentenced to 16 yrs, and he only served 11 of those years. Whatever the case the man is a lowlife welfare sponge nutcase.

Gozer (11):

Uhhh…don’t his multiple felonies make him ineligible for elective office (at least federal elective office)?

I don’t know that they do and frankly I don’t think they should.

Would you like a paper bag to hyperventilate in?

There’s no need to be a condescending asshole about it. And I have coffee, thanks, so the paper bag is quite unnecessary.

Folks over at “The Regulator” have been following Larry Sinclair since he arrived on the political scene two years ago.  One of “regulars,” Where’s the Proof Larry” posted the following comment today (12/7/09)

http://theregulator.net/?p=6541#comment-52470

Part 1

Where’s the proof, Larry? says:
December 7, 2009 at 9:33 am

Meesheemey says: December 6, 2009 at 10:02 am
quotes [Sinclair’s] post/email:
“As for Florida, I serve a total of 8 months!”

Here’s some facts as we understand them:

Case # 85-5875CF
Florida Department of Corrections Prisoner No. 098146.
Sentenced June 6th, 1985 to 1 year + 1 day.
62 days served as of June 6th, 1985 sentencing.

From Chapter 2, page 24 of Larry’s book:
“I was arrested in a motel by the Miami-Dade police and taken to Broward County, FT Lauderdale, Florida jail. Once again, I was guilty so I pled guilty and was sentenced to one year and a day in the Florida Department of Corrections. I served and discharged my entire sentence at the Brevard Correctional Institution in Coca, Florida”

Maybe it’s just me but that doesn’t sound like “8 months” to me.

However, not only that but he’s forgetting one:
see the link:

http://www.politico.com/static/PPM103_dn2.html

Case No. F-86-017266, State Case No: 13-1986-CF-017266-0001-XX
Florida Department of Corrections Prisoner No. 415180.
Uttering forged instrument (check) and grand theft second degree ($20,000 - $100,000). Both are apparently at least level 3 felonies according to my research notes. He was sentenced between Aug 13-Sep 8/86 to one year probation and 60 days already served after arrest), $7400 restitution. Avila-Adams was listed as an absconder and active probationer as of early 2008. He was in violation of his FL parole when he got nailed in Colorado in Nov ‘86.

By his own account and the above, [he’s] served 14 months in Florida - if he’s truly intersted in keeping his facts straight - which a career fraud felon like him obviously isn’t. Even if he only served 8 months for the first case, contrary to the wording in his own book, he also served a couple of more for the other felony case a year later in Florida.

So once again, he trying to call someone on the facts when his own facts that he presents to refute them are more obviously flawed.

Meesheemey says: December 6, 2009 at 10:02 am
quotes [Sinclairy’s] post/email:

“where he was disciplined 97 times for infractions including assault, threats, drug possession, intimidation, and verbal abuse.”

“97″ appears to have come from the Politico article on Sinclair’s criminal past:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11164.html

This link has 42 prison violations by him in Arizona (under one of his many names - in this case Silvas):
http://www.azcorrections.gov/inmate_datasearch/results.aspx?InmateNumber=041868&LastName=SILVAS&FNMI=L&SearchType=Search
but it appears to be missing history from 1980-1981 so there may well be more - the history doesn’t start until Jan ‘82.

He also had about 90 prison discipline violations in Colorado
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM103_dn9to18.htm

And we haven’t bothered to look up his Florida prison record which by all indications and testimony from those who guarded him in prison in the other states would be likely to have followed the above patterns.

cont’d below

Part 2

So Sinclair is sort of “correct” in that 97 prison discipline violations mentioned by the Politico article for prison assaults, threats, drugs, etc isn’t precise. It’s in fact [many] more. So far we only know of 132 of them officially. I’d look more but I felt that when one hits 132 prison violations in a couple of stretches, what’s the point? Would more proven prison violations really make that much of a difference in how his character should be assessed?

Meesheemey says: December 6, 2009 at 10:02 am
quotes [Sinclair’s] post/email:
“I have not served 16 years in prison with Colorado, Arizona & Florida combined, so why would you intentionally make such a blatantly false claim??”

Because the claim isn’t blatantly false.

Each state that’s convicted him of a felony (FL, AZ & CO) has noted [he] has used several aliases (14 in Colorado). That’s part of the reason it’s likely we don’t have them all.

Mitch also was onto some leads that indicated he had troubles in Mexico when he a running drugs and smuggling aliens. I’m not sure what he got conclusively on that. And there have been a number of civil suits over the years granting judgment against Sinclair for money he didn’t pay. But again, we don’t have the whole story and Sinclair has proven to be too chronic of a liar to rely heavily on anything that he’s told us.

Here’s my tally in the prison time he’s served that we know about.
Arizona, 1980-1984 - about 44 months due to parole violation for handgun possession.

Broward County, FL, 1985, about 8-12 months

Miami Dade, FL, 1986, 2 months

Colorado, 1986-1996, 132 months

Colorado, 1999, parole violation for AWOL, .25 month (1 week)

Colorado, 2000, arrest for current outstanding warrent, .5 month (2 weeks)

North Carolina, 2007, arrest for disorderly conduct, ? month

Delaware, 2008, arrest for passing forged money orders, .25 month (1 week)

That tallies between 187-191 months in prison which is between 15.58-15.91 years. In other words, I think Sinclair is trying to bicker about a fraction of a year while accusing some of their ability to get their facts straight. I think the above facts with those links are pretty darn close to the irrefutable truth that the original poster is very close to.

As we’ve said before, between all the institutions Sinclair was in as a juvenile (see his book), he’s spent the majority of his life violating the law, running from the law or serving time/parole for breaking the law. He is without question in my opinion, an unrepentant, unreformed career felon who has absolute no place in a position of public trust like congress.

This creep sounds like narcissistic sociopath pathological liar. I am sure that he gets a hard every time someone writes a post about him.

“If you wish to come after me, you would be better off getting your facts correct before you post this type of trash which makes you look really less that being in touch with reality”

I think this scumbag is the one who is out of touch with reality…What’cha going to do about it JailBird?
The last time you tried to sue bloggers that were telling the truth about you, YOU LOST.  Every time he files a lawsuit it’s dismissed..HAHAHAH Larry you are a loser and you have lost this Congress race too! Why don’t you crawl back into your trailer and STFU!

I would like to know what happened to this mans Brain Tumor.

For some reason, “I’ve got a brain tumor” is a popular lie for attention-seeking individuals to tell. I personally know of at least two people who’ve done this. One went to far as to shave his head.

Is he a Republican? He sounds like one. I’m also wondering if anyone has yet praised him for his authenticity and swooned they want to have a beer with him; he doesn’t sound that many levels down from George W. Bush or Sarah Palin.

There’s no need to be a condescending asshole about it. And I have coffee, thanks, so the paper bag is quite unnecessary.

You might want to re-read your initial response to my question.

yankeeclipper:

you had me, all the way up to that whole “congress, position of public trust” thing. lol

actually, i think “lounge lizard” larry would fit comfortably in with the majority of our representatives in congress. the primary difference, between he and they, is one of price.