Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: New Shocking Breitbart Video Previous entry: Andrew Breitbart’s epic lack of self-awareness

Foot, Meet Bullet.  I Shot It At You.

imageI really don’t understand how multiple Republican Senators saying that people are voluntarily unemployed because of unemployment benefits isn’t blaring from every cable pundit’s mouth and every Democrat’s press office as the worst thing anyone’s ever said (seeing as how it kind of, er, is).

Politico, of course, has the Republican response to Jim Bunning’s comments as a feature story, because what really matters is how Republicans position themselves on this issue rather than, say, the single Senator assuring that millions of people don’t have money to eat this week. 

The Humble Libertarian asks why the rest of the Senate doesn’t just capitulate to Bunning’s demands, which is sort of like asking why the person whose bed is getting shit all over by the crazy man doesn’t run out and get some plastic sheets at the hardware store.  Bunning claims that his unilateral stoppage of unemployment benefits (among a myriad of other programs) is designed to stop deficit spending, which would make sense except that dude is all about Bush’s deficit-expanding tax cuts

And what’s funny is that conservatives still don’t get it.  From Rick Moran:

By the reaction, you would think that Bunning was trying to throw poor people out into the street, force grandma and grandpa to eat Meow Mix, strip soldiers naked and send them into battle, while singlehandedly increasing his carbon footprint to the point that the ocean drowns Los Angeles in a wave of melting arctic ice due to global warming.

Well, actually, when you indefinitely suspend the only source of income for people who can’t find jobs, you’re doing exactly what one and two mockingly refer to.  In general, when you have no more rent money, you do get thrown out on the street and have to eat the lowest-cost food you can (which might not be Meow Mix, but instead the dollar menu at Burger King…so, yeah, Meow Mix).  When you can’t even accept the fact that unemployment benefits aren’t just something tossed on the luxurious existence that is not having to drive to the office every morning, you render yourself morally and intellectually incapable of discussing this. 

Of course, pointing this out to the public at large requires a more robust PR effort than Congressional Democrats seem willing to mount.  How hard is it to say, “Look at this, and look at the fact that Susan Collins is the only Republican willing to go on the record and support continuing unemployment benefits in a recession.  If Republicans are too partisan to support keeping unemployed people off the streets in a recession, how are we ever supposed to work with them anything that requires the least bit of foresight, sympathy or rationality?  We can’t.  Ergo, these people are assholes.  I yield my time.”

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 03:03 PM • (49) Comments

Withold Bunning’s paycheck till he releases his hold, duh.

Comment #1: Hector B.  on  03/02  at  04:00 PM

Especially sickening considering the 10.7 unemployment rate in Kentucky right now.  He can’t even claim to have his constituents’ best interests at heart here.

Comment #2: GeekGirlsRule  on  03/02  at  04:01 PM

They would do better to stop penalizing people who work short-term jobs and then end up getting messed over for it.

Comment #3: Ms Kate  on  03/02  at  04:27 PM

Who doesn’t like to see their income cut by 50 percent (or more, if they earn more than $48,000/year)?  I tell ya, last time I was unemployed, I was living high on the hog with $200 per week.

Comment #4: keshmeshi  on  03/02  at  04:31 PM

Other than that whole waking in a cold pool of sweat every morning wondering how the bills would get paid and when they will repossess my house, the last time I was laid off was a big partay every single day…

If you want to be a good Republican, it helps if you’re a sociopath…

Comment #5: MikeEss  on  03/02  at  04:41 PM

People don’t even say that shit in a strong economy, when it might be true. You do see plenty of middle-class folks who don’t jump on the first job they can get, because they actually are better off on unemployment than taking that job flipping burgers. Folks in the lower classes don’t have that option, of course.

Comment #6: Karmakin  on  03/02  at  04:44 PM

Bunning is probably responsible for the full employment of his security staff. If I were him, I’d damn sure want to make sure there was someone keeping angry constituents from kicking the shit out of me…

Comment #7: Scott  on  03/02  at  04:47 PM

I’m understanding more and more why the French Revolution occurred.

Versailles-on-the-Potomac is really awesome, ain’t it?...

Comment #8: MikeEss  on  03/02  at  04:51 PM

In a sane world, we’d be able to try and convict Bunning for grand larceny, because he’s literally stealing food out of peoples’ mouths. This is straight up robber-baron feudalist shit.

Of course, if this were the Middle Ages, we’d just pull him off his throne and stab him to death with his own pointy shoes. You know things are fucked up when I find myself pining for the days when cold-blooded assassination was the only real tool the people had available to them.

Comment #9: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  03/02  at  04:51 PM

Marie-Antoinette got guillotined and she at least thought the poor deserved to eat some cake…

Comment #10: BlackBloc  on  03/02  at  04:58 PM

Just a personal anecdote:  My office let one of our employees go at the end of last week.  She had been hoping for that to happen so that she could go on unemployment and spend more time with her kids.  Her husband is employed, so no income insecurity (or less, anyway). 

I guess that her decision wasn’t based only on the unemployment benefits, but they definitely entered into it. 

ps:  For what it’s worth, my father visited family in Tennessee and reported that many of the people that his brothers and sisters know (including the brothers and sisters) are voluntarily on disability and work odd jobs for extra cash.  I don’t know if this is because times are tough or if it is like that all the time….

Comment #11: anoNY  on  03/02  at  04:58 PM

anoNY—I’ll tell you right now, times are tough in TN.  And they have been for a while and they don’t look to be getting much easier in the near future.  Having moved here from places in the US where the economy is managed in different manners, it appears to me that the state has fundamental flaws in its economy (like the absence of a state income tax and a non-trivial tax on groceries).  Maybe it’s that I look at it from a North-easterner’s eyes, or that I haven’t been here long, but….  It is damn near impossible to get a job here right now, and while other parts of the country are seeing some economic recovery, it’s not happening here.

Comment #12: rowmyboat  on  03/02  at  05:15 PM

ps:  For what it’s worth, my father visited family in Tennessee and reported that many of the people that his brothers and sisters know (including the brothers and sisters) are voluntarily on disability and work odd jobs for extra cash.  I don’t know if this is because times are tough or if it is like that all the time….

I don’t know why you think reporting on illegal activities has any bearing on this discussion. Taking cash under the table for work you are able to do while simultaneously reporting to an insurance corporation or the government that you are disabled and incapable of earning a living is fraud and should not be part of a discussion of actual benefits being stopped to the vast majority of people who are not trying to defraud the system.

(also, how does one get on disability “voluntarily”? the mind boggles)

Comment #13: kodiak  on  03/02  at  05:18 PM

Cutting unemployment benefits is just a pretext for transferring funds to the prison-industrial complex and law enforcement agencies.  DUH.

What are a bunch of unemployed people going to do if they can’t pay their rent and feed themselves?  Turn to crime and the black market.  DUH.

The idea of saving money on unemployment benefits is a complete red herring, considering that payouts cost only $200 per week per recipient.  I guess the conservatives would feel better if their cronies who operate corporate prisons (to the tune of incredible profits leeched directly from taxpayer coffers) could just round up all those poor people instead.  So what if the majority of the prison population is in for non-violent offenses like narcotics possession or low-volume drug trafficking? 

Like MikeEss said, the Revolution is getting closer and closer by the moment, and I’m seriously inclined to get on the front lines with the Revolutionaries when the time comes.  The only thing these spoiled rich pigs seen to understand is force or the threat thereof, so it’s really not going to bother me a whit to see them all dragged out to detention and all their personal property nationalized and returned to the state as reparations for these blatant frauds and thefts of public funds.

Comment #14: Mezosub  on  03/02  at  05:20 PM

It’s interesting that Bunning is doing this now that he’s not running for re-election. Makes you wonder how assholish other Republican officeholders would be if they were similarly free.

Comment #15: Bitter Scribe  on  03/02  at  05:34 PM

Does anyone else find it ironic that it is a Republican (Susan Collins) being the voice of reason here?  On the other hand, I know people who live in Maine.  Many of them own guns.

Comment #16: helen w. h.  on  03/02  at  05:36 PM

The thing is, the argument that people won’t work because there are unemployment benefits doesn’t even make “evil” sense. I mean factually, the benefits aren’t any better than they were two years ago or twenty years ago… but two years ago and twenty years ago the same people had jobs. How come they were industrious then but lazy now?

Then consider the very high proportion of people who’ve been out of work so long their benefits have run out. How does it make any sense at all, even evil sense, that they’re slacking off work for the benefits that they know don’t exit?

I swear, the right wingers will say anything, no matter how blatantly stupid, to make what seems to them like a point.

Comment #17: catfood  on  03/02  at  05:44 PM

Does this say to anyone else that these Senators hate their work?  I was laid off 9 months ago, and besides worrying about money, my biggest stress has been missing going to work.  I miss having tasks and deadlines, and most of all I miss having something challenging to do.  Hell, I miss interacting with people and having a reason to leave the house!

Comment #18: Emaloo  on  03/02  at  05:49 PM

(also, how does one get on disability “voluntarily”? the mind boggles)

I’m more curious about how one winds up on disability involuntarily.  Maybe if they’re brain dead?

It’s worth noting that the U.S. has quite possibly the worst unemployment benefits in the developed world.  It’s insulting that we have to wait for Congress to extend benefits from the ridiculously short six-month allotment.  At the very least, could we have longer benefits automatically kick in when the economy hits some measure of contraction or non-growth?  Oh wait.  That actually makes some sense, something that’s far beyond the grasp of our elected representatives.

Comment #19: keshmeshi  on  03/02  at  05:55 PM

After 17 years at the same company, my brother was laid off recently.

In Florida, in his bracket that means $270 a week, so they get to worry about paying the mortgage, and his Cobra payments, and the car payment…

Oh, it’s just party, party, party for the 56 year old, who previously had worked for another company for over a decade.

As for those part-time jobs in Tennessee, well, it’s a bit long to commute, but maybe our writer with the fraudulent cousins could clue us in: my brother would love not to lose his house.

Comment #20: judybrowni  on  03/02  at  06:02 PM

Um, if you have a bunch of poor, unemployed people, they won’t be good consumers.  If they have no money, they can’t spend their money to support business.  This means that even more people will become unemployed and desperately poor and it will spiral down like a toilet flushing.  That’s basically the definition of a recession.  It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that having a bunch of desperately poor people doesn’t really help anybody.  Of course, I support unemployment benefits because I think it’s wrong to let another human go without food, shelter, and medical care.  Now I know Republicans have a real problem with helping anyone, but if they could just look past that unsavory aspect, they would realize that helping these people helps them too by keeping the economy going.  Taking away benefits from those people also takes away from rich Republicans.  But they’d rather see “unworthy” people suffer than see themselves benefit.

Comment #21: bananacat  on  03/02  at  06:02 PM

@keshmeshi

I totally agree!  It took me 5 months to get an interview somewhere, another 2 months for them to decide to hire me, and I still haven’t started working again because my visa paperwork isn’t finished yet.  I’m on month 8 of unemployment, and without the “emergency” extension, I wouldn’t have been able to pay my mortgage this month.  I’m very privileged relative to others who have been laid off, because my husband has a full-time job still and I have a lot of job search options, and I got the first job I interviewed for.  I have friends who were laid off at the same time who are still trying to get interviews.

Comment #22: Emaloo  on  03/02  at  06:08 PM

Well, I’m pretty sure that people can’t get unemployment benefits if they voluntarily quite their job, so the idea that it would make people choose not to work is a little silly.  In fact, I don’t think people can even get benefits if they’re fired; only laid off.

I think I know what this douche is talking about though.  During this recession, some managers will take the opportunity to lay off employees that they don’t like but can’t actually fire.  I think a lot of people realize this and maybe some feel like the need to suck up or grovel to keep their jobs.  If they know they’ll have unemployment and they’ve done some other preparation, they might be less inclined to grovel, and that’s what Bunning really cares about.  He wants us to live in a society where a few rich people hire a class of desperate peasants to do their bidding. 

I’ll give you an example.  My previous boss wanted to dispose of lab waste in a way that was unethical and possibly illegal, because it was cheaper.  I did not agree with him on this issue, but of course he knew he couldn’t fire me because he had no legitimate reason.  There were also several other ethics issues where we disagreed.  If there were no unemployment benefits, I might not have been as willing to go against him.  I or others might be less willing to ask for a raise or complain about unpaid overtime or anything else that might rock the boat.  But we can more easily demand good working conditions if this under-handed method of getting rid of people isn’t as much of a risk to us.  And empowered employees are probably the real fear that Bunning has.

Comment #23: bananacat  on  03/02  at  06:11 PM

Rich Republicans can just sell their shit elsewhere. Of course everybody is going to be in the same boat eventually due to globalized markets, but since when has the GOP thought of a sustainable strategy? Most of them will only care when millionaires start falling on hard times and have to get welfare, but by then the billionaires will tell them to suck it up and that they should have worked harder in order to be part of the billionaires club. Ad nauseam.

For a while they’ll just rack up more cash by investing in prisons or Blackwater and they’ll still think everything is rosy because they’re getting 30% ROI.

Comment #24: BlackBloc  on  03/02  at  06:16 PM

Tar and Feathers: the new look for spring.

Comment #25: Ms Kate  on  03/02  at  06:17 PM

In my state, max unemployment benefits right now are $390 per week.  It is less than that if your previous job paid less, say below $40K (not sure about that figures).  Yes, Sen Bunning, tell me why I would prefer to support my family on $390 per week instead of work at a job that pays more if I can find it.

Comment #26: Olivia  on  03/02  at  06:19 PM

Taking away benefits from those people also takes away from rich Republicans.  But they’d rather see “unworthy” people suffer than see themselves benefit.

Absolutely.  I’ve long held that they would be perfectly content to get by with a pile of human excrement and a rock, as long as nobody else was allowed to have either of those things.

Comment #27: stogoe  on  03/02  at  06:24 PM

I don’t know why you think reporting on illegal activities has any bearing on this discussion.

Because in conservaworld the entire system is based in illegal fraud.  All those unemployed folks—ALL OF THEM—are out there being lazy and defrauding the government. There are plenty of jobs….always. By definition the unemployed are lazy and shiftless and looking to rip everyone off.

It’s worth noting that the U.S. has quite possibly the worst unemployment benefits in the developed world.

Nuh-uh. Ronald Reagan told me those black girls were having babies in order to buy Cadillacs and vodka and retire in the Bahamas.

Comment #28: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  03/02  at  06:35 PM

I can’t wait until they decide to suspend veteran’s benefits ‘cause of the EVIL DEFICIT DEFICIT DEFICIT DEFICIT RED FLAG DEFICIT ELEVENTY!!11.

After all, it’s shit like that which got the Roman Republic turned into the Roman Empire.  Hell, even then the most despotic sons-of-bitches like Nero or Commodus had enough brains to keep the plebs in line with bread and Circuses.

Comment #29: tannenburg  on  03/02  at  06:56 PM

also, how does one get on disability “voluntarily”? the mind boggles

Oh, I know how you do it.

You have an “invisible” disability, or one that comes and goes (a chronic illness, perhaps, or certain types of mental illness), or one where, if you have the appropriate training and adaptive equipment, you can still work. Then you run into a situation where there are no jobs being offered that you can do which will give you health insurance. You *could* work part time, but then you won’t have insurance to cover your chronic illness. And your chronic illness won’t let you work full time. So you voluntarily go on disability in order to get on Medicaid because if you worked, you couldn’t possibly get insurance.

Or, you are disabled, but with adaptive equipment and flexible bosses, you can work. However, there’s an economic downturn and no one wants to provide you the equipment or the flexibility you need. So you go on disability because unlike unemployment, it will cover health insurance, and I think it pays better than unemployment in many cases.

These are not really “voluntary” in the sense of “I could work, but instead I’m going to eat bon-bons on the government dole!”, more like “All my choices are crappy, going on disability is slightly less crappy because it gets me health insurance/reduces the pressure to go find a job when I’m really not quite up to it, I guess I’ll go on disability.” You do actually have to be disabled to get on disability, but lots of disabled people *can* work, they just can’t work 40 hours a week (or, like my husband, they can work 80 hours a week if they feel like it but they can’t drive to work, so they’re limited in where they can go to get a job. My husband’s legally blind.) So there is sometimes some flexibility in whether the specific disabled person can afford to get a job or not.

Comment #30: Alara J Rogers  on  03/02  at  07:05 PM

I really don’t understand how multiple Republican Senators saying that people are voluntarily unemployed because of unemployment benefits isn’t blaring from every cable pundit’s mouth and every Democrat’s press office as the worst thing anyone’s ever said (seeing as how it kind of, er, is).

They say all politics is local, and when the hundreds of thousands of people getting unemployment checks suddenly find themselves bouncing checks, it’ll get really local really fast.

Truly amazing, in a way.  It’s like the Democrats have been acting like incompetent, irresponsible, spineless losers for the last year, aiming to completely doom themselves to another turn in the minority come 2010, and then Jim Bunning comes swooping in with a balls-to-the-wall boneheaded fuck you to America, in a desperate attempt to sink the GOP’s own efforts.

The wingnuts aren’t even playing sympathetic “We’d love to pass unemployment, but we just need to be fiscally responsible first” card.  They’re actively calling out the unemployed.  10% of the population (how many independent voters do you think are in that mix?) and just tearing into them.  Completely unapologetic.

Comment #31: Zifnab  on  03/02  at  07:18 PM

In fact, I don’t think people can even get benefits if they’re fired; only laid off.

It depends.  If you quit due to a hostile work environment or are fired for less than kosher reasons, you’re technically eligible for unemployment, but, of course, both those things can be difficult to prove.

Comment #32: keshmeshi  on  03/02  at  07:19 PM

10% of the population (how many independent voters do you think are in that mix?)

And a lot of them are men.  White men are (were?) a very reliable Republican voting bloc.  We’ll see how long that lasts.

Comment #33: keshmeshi  on  03/02  at  07:20 PM

A cynical analysis could lead to this conclusion: an extreme loonball like Bunning will just make other Republicans who tsk-tsk him look sane (no matter how loonball THEY are) so when said Republicans “do the right thing” and “look out for the common man” they’ll be slathered with praise and re-elected because they aren’t as much of complete assholes as Bunning and his fellow extreme loonballs.

Comment #34: tannenburg  on  03/02  at  07:26 PM

Yes, Sen Bunning, tell me why I would prefer to support my family on $390 per week instead of work at a job that pays more if I can find it.


Ah but thats the point - he wants you to take a job earning less than that: after all, if it’s OK to pay waitresses $2.19 an hour, why should you get any more than that? It’s not like you are providing valuable services, like a Senator does.

Comment #35: firefall  on  03/02  at  07:41 PM

A cynical analysis could lead to this conclusion: an extreme loonball like Bunning will just make other Republicans who tsk-tsk him look sane (no matter how loonball THEY are) so when said Republicans “do the right thing” and “look out for the common man” they’ll be slathered with praise and re-elected because they aren’t as much of complete assholes as Bunning and his fellow extreme loonballs.

And in a world containing only Republicans and more Republicans (aka Cable News and Sunday Morning Punditry) I’m sure that’s exactly what would happen.  However, there’s two flaws in this.  First, the Republics are lining up behind their man.  Kyl’s already come out with verbal support for Bunning.  Limbaugh’s already weighed in as pro-Bunning.  Senator Graham has already stated his defense of Bunning.  I’m sure McConnell has said something by now.  The Republicans have picked up the mic and rallied in defense of the Bunning “Fuck the Poor” filibuster.

If a bunch of saner Republicans decided to play Good Cop / Bad Cop, they might have been able to leverage unemployment into a cut in the EPA or money sucked out of the stimulus or the urban renewal budget or as a method for defunding AmeriaCorps.  And then they could run home claiming they’d killed an evil liberal titan while saving the unemployed in one fell swoop.

They’re not interested in that at all, though.  They’re just going full blown tea bagger on this one.  I can’t believe anyone who just lost their unemployment yesterday can be genuinely pleased at this.  I guess we’ll see where this goes, but I can’t quite see this as good news for John McCain.

Comment #36: Zifnab  on  03/02  at  08:05 PM

It appears that the Democrats may actually find their spines and force this decrepit asshole to actually filibuster all night to keep his obstruction in play.

Via Roll Call:

Although no final decisions have been made, Democrats confirmed it is increasingly likely that Democrats will force Bunning into an actual filibuster of unemployment insurance extension Tuesday night by repeatedly offering up unanimous consent agreements to bring the bill to a vote.

Although Members often threaten actual filibusters, they rarely materialize. Instead, lawmakers tend to rely on “Cadillac filibusters,” essentially stalling procedures that can be used to block legislation without having to actually stay put on the Senate floor.

Democrats on Tuesday signaled they have the resolve to remain in session throughout the night to force Bunning to abandon his cause. The American people “want an end to these games. And I hope that today we’ll see the end. If we don’t, we’re going to have to have a long, long night ahead of us to make the point that it’s wrong for one Senator to stop our people, our American people, from getting the help they deserve,” Environment and Public Works Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said Tuesday.

I hope they follow through.  Make that geriatric fuckstick shit and piss his pants on CSPAN live, for all the world to see what a greedy Scroogelike asshole he really is.

Comment #37: DTG in STL  on  03/02  at  08:09 PM

TPM has a list of the state’s hit by this Senatorial Teabaggery:

http://bit.ly/9gepiC

Here in North Dakota—with the lowest unemployment rate in the country—500 people will lose their unemployment insurance.  That’s a lot of people in this state.

Comment #38: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  03/02  at  08:27 PM

I hope they follow through.  Make that geriatric fuckstick shit and piss his pants on CSPAN live, for all the world to see what a greedy Scroogelike asshole he really is.

I’ll second that.

Comment #39: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  03/02  at  08:27 PM

Pleae oh Pleaaaaase make this asshole stand up all night and read the phone book.

Comment #40: Ben D.  on  03/02  at  08:54 PM

Ed Schultz just announced that the Senate standoff with Bunning has ended, details to come momentarily.  I presume this means the Senator from Kentucky has withdrawn his hold.

Comment #41: DTG in STL  on  03/02  at  08:54 PM

Um, if you have a bunch of poor, unemployed people, they won’t be good consumers.  If they have no money, they can’t spend their money to support business.  This means that even more people will become unemployed and desperately poor and it will spiral down like a toilet flushing.  That’s basically the definition of a recession.

Look on the bright side - banker’s bonuses are enough to keep vital industries like the luxury yacht builders in production.

Comment #42: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  03/02  at  09:00 PM

If the rich of society have declared war against the poor of society to the point that the spectre of the possibility of death has made its very real entrance, then take up arms.

Comment #43: scratchy888  on  03/02  at  10:49 PM

“Truly amazing, in a way.  It’s like the Democrats have been acting like incompetent, irresponsible, spineless losers for the last year, aiming to completely doom themselves to another turn in the minority come 2010, and then Jim Bunning comes swooping in with a balls-to-the-wall boneheaded fuck you to America, in a desperate attempt to sink the GOP’s own efforts.”

FSM damn them to the dustyiest corner of the basement forever for not immediately seizing upon this and killing the filibuster. Why aren’t shouting “Majority rule now!” from the rooftops? It looks to me like they’re going to get clobbered if they continue to allow the Republicans to obstruct the platform they were voted in on. Maybe they get clobbered either way, but why not go down swinging?

Comment #44: witless chum  on  03/03  at  12:13 PM

Why aren’t shouting “Majority rule now!” from the rooftops?

It would give David Broder a sad and he’d have to sigh in print about how uncivil Democrats have become, and pine for the halcyon days of Reagan and Howard Baker and Tip O’Neill.

Also, they’re afraid; just like they were when the “nuclear option” was being discussed.  They don’t really want to lose the ability to do the same obstructionism thing when they’re in the minority.  Even though they never follow through and actually obstruct…

Comment #45: liberalrob  on  03/03  at  02:57 PM

I agree with Alara. A lot of people occasionally will have to go to say, the mental hospital for a week. Now, many jobs will fire you for not being there, but odd jobs will not. It’s not so much that they are going AHAHAHAH, I’M LIVING GREAT ON DISABILITY! it’s that our employment system doesn’t have enough flexibility for people living with disabilities both mental, physical, etc.

Comment #46: shannon  on  03/03  at  09:56 PM

If they know they’ll have unemployment and they’ve done some other preparation, they might be less inclined to grovel, and that’s what Bunning really cares about.  He wants us to live in a society where a few rich people hire a class of desperate peasants to do their bidding.

That’s also why they don’t want non-employment-based health insurance.

Like they told my dad in the ‘80s at management meetings, hire the most desperate people you can: people with kids, mortgages, debt; people who’ll grovel to keep their jobs.

Why more people don’t figure this all out, I’ll never understand.

Comment #47: annejumps  on  03/03  at  11:17 PM

annejumps, that’s the same reasoning behind this quote”

“A married man will do anything for money.”

Talleyrand

Comment #48: Dark Avenger Guardian Chow Mein  on  03/04  at  01:37 PM

If you want to be a good Republican, it helps if you’re a sociopath…

That is so good I just made it my Facebook status. I credited you, MikeEss.

Comment #49: mikelz  on  03/07  at  07:49 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.