Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Uh… Previous entry: The True Story Of Blackazoid

Fox can’t guard the henhouse if the fox is extinct

Bush wants science where it really belongs: in the hands of the federal government.

The Bush administration wants federal agencies to decide for themselves whether highways, dams, mines and other construction projects might harm endangered animals and plants.

New regulations, which don’t require the approval of Congress, would reduce the mandatory, independent reviews government scientists have been performing for 35 years, according to a draft first obtained by The Associated Press.

I’ve always thought that the real problem with independent scientific reviews is that they’re too independent. And scientific:

Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne said late Monday the changes were needed to ensure that the Endangered Species Act would not be used as a “back door” to regulate the gases blamed for global warming.

Heaven forfend! We can’t have that; the only solution available to us is to ensure that any back-dooring is strictly one way*:

The Interior Department said [independent] consultations are no longer necessary because federal agencies have developed expertise to review their own construction and development projects, according to the 30-page draft obtained by the AP.

“We believe federal action agencies will err on the side of caution in making these determinations,” the proposal said…

Yes. I’m sure that will happen. I’m sure that a complete lack of accountability will lead to government efficiency and even-handedness.

I mean, fuck. It’s like Republicans spent so long accusing Democrats of opposing accountability that not only did they start to believe their own talking points, they started to see the “wisdom” behind the Democrats’ imaginary philosophy. It’s like reverse projection; normally they’re accusing us of what they already want but now they’ve started wanting what they’re accusing us of.

 

* Or something. I need to go lie down.

 

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Auguste on 10:33 AM • (11) Comments

According to the GOP, the only people who are responsible enough to run the federal government is the GOP.  Any insinuation that the GOP isn’t doing a stellar job or that GOP scientists or bureaucrats can’t “improve efficency” by getting rid of non-GOP scientists and bureaucrats is unpatriotic and anti-American.  It’s that simple.

“Just trust us, we’ve got this really nice bridge we want to sell you” is the first, last, and only policy position of the Republican Party.

Comment #1: Zifnab25  on  08/12  at  10:53 AM

I have a friend who thinks that there is no real difference between Republicans and Democrats (based on the “they are all in the pockets of big business” theory), and this topic seems to be one of the real, key differences. I just need to come up with a good way to explain it and provide decent evidence…

Comment #2: Dorothy  on  08/12  at  11:44 AM

I’ve been saying for years that the quality of government science would be improved by the creation of an entity solely empowered to make findings of fact, along the lines of the GAO’s authority over budgeting.  The potential for abuse is obvious (and indeed, under the Bushniks the GAO isn’t what it used to be), but I think it would be better than the current practice of letting just anybody (judges, Presidents, random bureaucrats) make “findings”.

As for the GOP, I think it’s time to answer the rote “Tax and Spend” mantra with something equally pithy and even more accurate.  I’m thinking, “Lie, Cheat and Steal”.

Comment #3: Dr. Psycho  on  08/12  at  11:47 AM

Nature is just too damn complicated.  Why do we need all those different kinds of animals and trees and stuff?  All it does is make it harder to learn in school.

The Republicans see a time in the near future where there’s just cows, pigs, chickens, daisies, grass, and white people.  Everything else will be gone, and frankly, good riddance…

Goddam polar bears anyway…

Comment #4: MikeEss  on  08/12  at  11:47 AM

I’m pretty sure this is an effort to short-circuit the last line of defense against new drilling. Many of the “new” sites are protected by endangered species concerns that would still be in the way after they wipe the NIMBY stuff away.

Comment #5: DaveInCarrboro  on  08/12  at  12:21 PM

Whaaat; Mesus’ first 100 day to-do list isn’t long enough ALREADY and they gotta add more?

Why don’t they just go around stuffing stale popcorn and old pizza crusts into all of the chairs in the White House, too? Maybe spill milk in the corners of the carpets to smell up the joint even more; pop a few million roaches and rodents in the closets and ducts…

Quick- someone create an emergency down in Crawford so Dubya’s gotta spend the rest of his 160 days on the ranch! Release gophers or something…

Comment #6: louise  on  08/12  at  12:42 PM

A lot of the problem is that these people honest-to-God don’t understand what a fact is. They think everything’s spinnable; by extension, any piece of information that doesn’t support their position is the expression of some enemy’s malice.

Naturally, that the whole point (arguably) of science is its unspinnability is just beyond them.

Comment #7: Molly, NYC  on  08/12  at  12:47 PM

Back in the days when the GAO was Absolutely Incorruptible (long time ago, I know), they often made findings of fact.  Not science as such, but you have to remember that accounting is not solely about money.

Comment #8: Older  on  08/12  at  12:59 PM

C’mon, it’s not like you’ve ever seen a Florida panther. What do you care if it goes extinct because they just had to put in a strip mine? You can rest easy knowing that the panther died proudly, knowing it wasn’t being used to backdoor regulations.

http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/

Comment #9: Matthew  on  08/12  at  01:17 PM

OK, I think this is the official moment where the Bush Administration has officially stuck its shit-caked little fingers in Every Single Important Part Of Our Entire Government.  Occasionally I will say in conversation with someone who isn’t as moonbatty as I am that the Bushies have literally fucked up EVERYTHING, left no stone unturned in their quest to fuck up the country as bad as they can before their time is up.  Said non-moonbat will scoff at this, even after I bring up No Child Left Behind and Bush’s veto of SCHIP.  I think this is the final stone, though.

Comment #10: The Opoponax  on  08/12  at  02:24 PM

So, they’re trying to weasel out of living up to NEPA. Drat that gol’ durn Nixon and his not completely sucking on policy issues (hey, sometimes being totally unprincipled works out okay).

National Environmental Policy Act. Requires three statements of decision: 1) do nothing 2) pave everything 3) something in between.

to reach 3, as is usually the case, requires an EIS, or environmental impact statement for a given range of plans. After this is completed, the agency will issue a ROD, or ruling of decision, at which point they’ve legally “done something” and various groups are eligible to sue. While this change in agency policy makes it more likely that the local Monica Goodling will shamble out into the parking lot of her office, scratch her ass, and send in a peice of paper reading “Durrrr… i din’nt see no turtles/plants/polar bears”, I am absolutely positive that the early NEPA case laws are chock- full of agencies getting the living fuck sued out of them over trying to half-ass an environmental impact statement.

So: the upshot is, people are going to waste a lot of time and money in court wrangling over issues that have been cut and dry for 20 years. Thanks, bushie.

Comment #11: Indy  on  08/12  at  06:54 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.