Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Manic Pixie Dream Governor Previous entry: I Think She’s A Muslim, Too

Full court anti-wingnut press

BooksConservativesNewsPandagon

And writers who don’t know about sports should probably avoid sports metaphors.  But like the belligerent bitch feminist of the “you so ugly” variety, I’ll push on like I have a right. 

The LA Times has asked me back to Dust-Up to write all week about Governor Palin and the death knell of the common sense definition of what a feminist is.  (Much of the mainstream media appears to think a feminist is any woman who have ever been paid to do work.  This is in contrast to what feminists think a feminist is, as well as the dictionary, which is someone—-male or female—-who supports women’s full equality.)  Last time, they put me up against Katha Pollitt, which meant two things: 1) I was outclassed* and 2) we agreed a lot. It was nice, but this time, it looks more like fireworks, because I’m up against Katherine Mangu-Ward, a libertarian and an editor for Reason.


This puts me in a weird spot, because I feel it’s probably unprofessional to ignore the questions and write about libertarianism’s roots in apartheid South Africa and point out that tax evasion is second only to child support evasion in childish responses to adult responsibilities disguised as political ideologies.  Plus, I’m sure Mangu-Ward is a very nice person, and occasionally Reason has some real reason to it.

But I don’t have to talk about libertarianism and South Africa, because I got Thomas Frank on the phone and made him talk about it!  He’s promoting a book I just zipped through, The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives RuleI put a sample of it on this week’s Reality Cast, but you can get access to the entire thing by subscribing to my feed on iTunes.  If you’re a weak punk who doesn’t want to subscribe to my podcast (this week, I also cover the Bristol Palin bonanza, the DNC, and the bashing of stay at home fathers—-all under 25 minutes!), I suppose I’ll let you download the Thomas Frank interview hereBut you should subscribe.  Because if you don’t, you might forget to listen to it next week, where I reveal that I just learned that the Kate Perry version of “I Kissed A Girl” is not actually a cover of a song by the same title that’s much better by Jill Sobule.

I was worried that the comments at the LA Times were going to be mindless pap, but by the 4th one in, someone has pointed out that if the Obamas belonged to a sessionist party, the country would be in an uproar.  But here we have an actual person who flirted with treachery being maudlin about a bag of flags. This country has lost its mind.

*But on the whole, I was really happy at how it went and think I managed not to look like an ass.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 07:40 PM • (12) Comments

Reason has some really interesting stuff in it even if you don’t consider yourself a libertarian. Particularly on police brutality/drug war stuff.

Comment #1: Ben D.  on  09/08  at  07:46 PM

I’m glad to know I wasn’t the only one who assumed that the Kate Perry song I’d only heard snippets of while walking around campus was a cover of the fondly-remembered Jill Sobule song.  When I finally heard the Kate Perry song in its entirety, I was quite disappointed—whereas Sobule’s song is a clever and sweet song about relationships between women (and the clueless “hairy behemoths” who don’t suspect a thing), the Perry version—with the “I hope my boyfriend don’t mind” phrase repeated throughout—seemed much more devoted to a sleazy, Girls Gone Wild-kinda understanding of girls kissing each other.

I’m probably far from the first person to make this observation.  But I’m old and out of the loop on such things, I suspect.

Comment #2: Bradley  on  09/08  at  07:50 PM

I was a little disappointed in the actual LAT article in that I assumed before clicking over that it would be more like the blogpost above. It seems to talk around things when it would have been more effective to just lay down

Much of the mainstream media appears to think a feminist is any woman who have ever been paid to do work.  This is in contrast to what feminists think a feminist is, as well as the dictionary, which is someone—-male or female—-who supports women’s full equality.

and go from there.

Also the article focuses too exclusively on abortion when Palin has so many other anti-woman views.

Comment #3: dan  on  09/08  at  08:25 PM

<blockquote>I’m glad to know I wasn’t the only one who assumed that the Kate Perry song I’d only heard snippets of while walking around campus was a cover </blockquoye>

ditto for me.  I also thought she was really Zooey Deschanel using a different name to cut a record.

Comment #4: ol cranky  on  09/08  at  08:29 PM

I thought the LAT piece was rock-solid, especially in terms of getting McCain’s issue positions out there.  The ending simultaneously set up what promises to be an interesting discussion, and established the Amanda Marcotte gun-toting country feminist brand smile

Comment #5: Neil the Ethical Werewolf  on  09/08  at  08:39 PM

Proud of you for your standing up and speaking truth and populism with clarity and strength.

Comment #6: You Rock (Intelligently), Amanda!  on  09/08  at  08:54 PM

Dan, maybe tomorrow.  We’re working within the topics given us, and I’m also working (today) on what Katherine gave me.

Comment #7: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/08  at  09:12 PM

I always thought the current “I Kissed a Girl” was a cover of that other one. Old one was cool and was on Beavis and Butthead, which made it cooler.

Comment #8: Bacopa  on  09/08  at  09:14 PM

No 1990s music video was complete until it got the Beavis and Butthead treatment.

Comment #9: Ben D.  on  09/08  at  09:52 PM

I can’t see libertarians getting too enthusiastic about Gamey Spice’s eternal “experience” in completely overstepping the boundaries and limits on executive privilege.

Comment #10: Ms Kate  on  09/08  at  11:23 PM

But here we have an actual person who flirted with treachery being maudlin about a bag of flags.

The word is “treason”, not “treachery”. No need to sugarcoat it by using the wrong form.

Comment #11: Picador  on  09/09  at  10:56 AM

This puts me in a weird spot, because I feel it’s probably unprofessional to ignore the questions and write about libertarianism’s roots in apartheid South Africa and point out that tax evasion is second only to child support evasion in childish responses to adult responsibilities disguised as political ideologies.

“libertarianism’s roots in apartheid South Africa”—Huh? Libertarianism’s roots are in the simple idea that one should own one’s own body and one’s own stuff.

As for tax evasion, LOL. Tax evasion is the moral equivalent of telling the mugger that all your money was in your wallet/handbag while you’re clenching a big wad of cash between your butt cheeks.

Comment #12: Mike  on  09/09  at  02:59 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.