Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Rich Lowry buffs his banana for Sarah Palin - and shares Previous entry: Ten things Amanda can do without

Gone Huntin’ With Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin spoke truth to power today.  And by truth to power, I mean utter gibberish to whoever was around.

As we send our young men and women overseas in a war zone to fight for democracy and freedoms, including freedom of the press, we’ve really got to have a mutually beneficial relationship here with those fighting the freedom of the press, and then the press, though not taking advantage and exploiting a situation, perhaps they would want to capture and abuse the privilege. We just want truth, we want fairness, we want balance.

Like the Gettysburg Address, this is a deeply complex exegesis on the very relation of one part of our nation to another. 

Unlike the Gettysburg Address, it’s fucking stupid.

First, Palin creates an overarching theme - that those fighting for democracy and freedoms are the same as those fighting the freedom of the press.  This works because it’s been scientifically proven that no standing army can fight for more than 26 amendments to a written constitution at any one time, and it makes sense to knock off the oldest - and therefore crappiest - one first.

We then establish that the press, as an enemy of the state, seeks not to take advantage or exploit a situation, but wants to “capture” and “abuse” the privilege.  Incidentally, when standing militaries reject constitutional rights, they actually become privileges.  Little known fact, but there was actually another first amendment to the constitution that guaranteed the right to creamy milkshakes and/or malts.  Sadly, it was done away with in order to lower the voting age to 18.  Summers just haven’t been the same since.

It’s not really clear what the difference is between “taking advantage”/“exploiting” and “capturing”/“abusing” something is - in fact, the latter sounds far worse than the former.  Given that the military (and therefore all good Americans) appear to be opposed to the press’ abuse of its own privilege to exist, the obvious solution involves arresting them all at gunpoint, putting them against the wall and pulling the trigger.  You know, Constitution-style.

At the end of the day all we want is truth, fairness and balance.  And, preferably, a bullet through some journalists’ heads heralded by a disturbingly folksy, “Are you gonna die?  You betcha!”

More of Palin’s fascist whining is available here.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 09:26 PM • (17) Comments

What was she trying to say there?

Comment #1: libdevil  on  10/03  at  10:36 PM

I think she just wants the media to stop being mean to her.

Comment #2: Jesse Taylor  on  10/03  at  10:40 PM

You know, it’s awesome how she knew _Kelo_ and _Kennedy_ off the top of her head.  I might have remembered _Kelo_ on the spot, but I’d have to describe _Kennedy_ in terms of the decision rather than having the case name right at hand.

I think I really underestimated Palin’s knowledge of recent Supreme Court cases, since she knew those the whole time and just didn’t mention them to Katie Couric out of annoyance.

Unless she was prepped before Cameron interviewed her, but I doubt that’s what happened.  She’s just a mavericky legal ace, and if Couric hadn’t been so mean she’d have shown it during their interview too.

Comment #3: Ferox  on  10/03  at  10:42 PM

Heh.  Observe my note-taking case name style, since I can’t edit comments.

Comment #4: Ferox  on  10/03  at  10:44 PM

She also said, in brief, that questions aren’t fair because she doesn’t have the “right” answer, and she just wants to tell everyone what she has to say without having to deal with or know anything.

In other words, she isn’t interested in what real people have to say, what real facts have to say, etc. - it has to always be all about HER.

How anti-American, anti-people can this twitmobile get?

Comment #5: Ms Kate  on  10/03  at  10:58 PM

She also says she just wants to dis Barack Obama and tell lies about him hating babies and wanting to tax the middle class.  Why would she want to reveal anything about herself or policies she likes?  Why do they think she was using private emails instead of government ones?

Only Sarah and her high school clique that she hired to run things are allowed to know the details.  Anyone else should get out of her way and just do what she wants when she wants it.

That Katie Couric, bless her heart, just didn’t understand that and thought she was entitled to answers about Sarah instead of doing a hit job on Barack, which is what the media should be doing.  God told her so.

Comment #6: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  10/03  at  11:18 PM

So…instead of believing she’s ignorant, she wants us all to believe she’s a spoiled brat.  Does she know whose campaign gets hurt when she “flippantly” refuses to answer questions out of “annoyance”?

As for “she was really dissing Alaska by asking what newspapers I read”, give me a fucking break.

Comment #7: killjoy  on  10/03  at  11:44 PM

“We just want truth…” — defined as what we were (or should have been) taught in Sunday School.  Anything else and we stick our fingers in our ears and say loudly, “la la la la la”...

“we want fairness…” — as defined by Rush, BillO, Michelle “The Unhinged One” Malkin, etc…

“we want balance.” — Hey! Having everything on one side is a kind of balance.  And rejecting all attachment to reality makes being unbalanced look the same to them…

Soon, maybe the Reichwing will be confident enough to say out loud what they really believe:
“We want a strong, powerful leader to stop lawlessness, end immorality, rid us of traitors and liberals, and bring order and discipline to America.  We can’t allow ‘freedom of the press’, “liberty”, and ‘civil rights’ to get in the way.  And when are we going to do something about those <strike>Jews</strike> Mexicans?...”

Comment #8: MikeEss  on  10/03  at  11:55 PM

Remember when people though Katie Couric was fluffy and inexperienced? Palin made Katie seem positively statesmanlike (or stateswomanlike).

The debate showed a superficially more competent Palin, until you realize that what she says doesn’t make any sense, and when it does, it’s terrifying.

It also isn’t just that what she says doesn’t make any sense, it’s also how she says it.

She talks in ALLCAPSWITHOUTANYPUNCTUATIONLIKETHIS.

We wanted neurosurgeons to examine Terri Schiavo. I suspect that if the Democrats sneak an MRI scanner into McCain campaign headquarters, they’ll find a bunch o’ chips and wires in the woman’s head.

Comment #9: sara  on  10/04  at  12:04 AM

Ugh. Sarah Palin is proof that stupid people shouldn’t be allowed to have jobs.

Comment #10: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  10/04  at  01:02 AM

thinking magically

Comment #11: jennifer cascadia  on  10/04  at  01:47 AM

we’ve really got to have a mutually beneficial relationship here with those fighting the freedom of the press

Wow.  She did NOT just say that.

Then again, doesn’t she have one already?

Comment #12: Damian  on  10/04  at  03:44 AM

the press, though not taking advantage and exploiting a situation, perhaps they would want to capture and abuse the privilege.

My decoder ring says:

the press = Bush/Cheney

the privilege = detainees

Comment #13: mir  on  10/04  at  04:28 AM

Good to know that the current ginormous Economist ad spend is working. I blame that improbable weekend she spent in Philadelphia.

Comment #14: Roxanne  on  10/04  at  05:35 AM

Shorter the entire republican 2008 campaign by Jesse Taylor:

“______ ________ spoke truth to power today.  And by truth to power, I mean utter gibberish to whoever was around.”

Comment #15: ice weasel  on  10/04  at  10:58 AM

those fighting the freedom of the press,

Freudian slip, or simple incompetence? We report, you decide! ^_^

Comment #16: hf  on  10/04  at  04:06 PM

I gotta say freudian slip. It makes much more sense, in a slimy and dishonest way, if it means something like “Here all of us patriots are protecting you from those evil brown people, and you ungrateful so-and-so’s repay us by asking gotcha questions, and we’re not going to stand for that, you betcha.”

Comment #17: paul  on  10/04  at  11:44 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.