Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: How on earth could someone make you feel bad for Christine O’Donnell? Previous entry: Racism still a winning strategy in Nevada

How Republican politicians see their base

This round-up of Republican race-baiting ads by Alex Pareene at Salon is at turns hilarious and frightening.  But it also gives us an excellent glimpse of what Republican politicians think of their base—-how they feel they need to speak to them to get a message across.  Conservatives are always accusing liberals of stereotyping them and ascribing to them ugly motivations they don’t actually have.  But what do Republican politicians that conservatives vote for, give money to, and sometimes hero worship think of them?  If anything, their opinion seems to be lower than liberals’ opinion of conservatives. 

*Republicans believe the base is stupid.  By far, the most hilarious part of these ads is how over the top they are.  Like I said on Twitter, the ideal Republican ad would be: “Mexicans. Mosques. Abortions. Butt Sex. Democrats Love These Things. Be Afraid.”  By Tuesday, I expect at least one candidate, probably Sharron Angle, to put out an ad that shows a bunch of Latino dudes leaving a mosque and gang-raping a white woman.  (Though I suppose you could turn that into a counter-ad that says, “But Sharron Angle says she should make lemonade out of these lemons.”)  I remember a time, not that long ago, when these sorts of messages were sent through dog whistles, that in turn were hastily researched and analyzed and translated by bloggers.  But no more!  Fearful that their base is too stupid to understand nudges, Republican candidates are spelling it out in big red letters.

*Republicans believe the base is racist.  Any time a liberal points out there might be a little racial animosity motivating the conservative base, conservatives get all upset, saying “RAAAAAAACIST”, as if this disproves the charge, or accusing liberals of being the “real” racists, in the classic “I’m rubber, you’re glue” maneuver that they picked up from their local kindergarten playground.  But we’re not the only ones saying it.  If there’s one thing that an ad is saying when it shows Latinos as a group hellbent on raping and pillaging, or suggests that there’s something wrong with Arab Americans being involved with politics at all, it’s that the people making it believe their audience is not only racist, but considers racism to be an extremely important part of their political identity.

*Republicans believe their base doesn’t give much of a shit about policy.  As I noted earlier, the weirdest thing about about all these political ads is how unmoored they are from the real world consequences of voting and electing people to office to enact policy.  A number of candidates around the country ran ads about the Islamic community center near the WTC, but the only one who, in theory, could even do anything about it is Carl Paladino, and even that’s iffy.  And, as I noted earlier, voting on the topic of “immigration” isn’t actually going to accomplish the desire goal for the bigots, which is the expulsion of the people they spend so much time hating.  Angle is backing up the Arizona law, but running for a national office where she wouldn’t actually be able to pass that kind of legislation.  Even if Republicans pass some laws addressing immigrants, they are almost certainly going to be laws that are aimed at keeping immigrants coming to the U.S., where they can be used for cheap labor, but limiting their rights so they can’t ever get to a point where they’re voting, drawing Social Security, or getting a shot at fair wages or joining unions.

In other words, these ads basically encourage people to vote as a form of self-expression.  This is (see point #1) stupid.  It’s a secret ballot, and not really the appropriate place to express yourself.  Write a blog, make a sign, read crappy books by assholes like Laura Inagraham in public, if you want to express yourself, but the voting booth is where you try to affect policy.  I suppose the rationale is that if enough people express their racism at the voting booth, then they send a message by electing their candidate.  But surely there are better ways for the bigot voters to send the message “We hate people that don’t look or worship like us” than to send morons like Sharron Angle to Congress, I’d think.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 04:49 PM • (51) Comments

“Jews!  Jews!  Jews! Make Germany great! Jews!  Stab in the back!  Did we mention the Jeeeeews!”

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

Comment #1: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  10/28  at  04:56 PM

They really do have total utter contempt for their base, ex. John Rease (R-WV) telling his ad agency to make the “West Virginians” (really actors from Philadelphia)  in his ads to look “hickey”.

Comment #2: Ben D.  on  10/28  at  05:01 PM

*Republicans believe the base is stupid.

*Republicans believe the base is racist.

*Republicans believe their base doesn’t give much of a shit about policy.

Nice to see that the GOP establishment is capable of being correct in some of its core assumptions.

Comment #3: Gracchus.  on  10/28  at  05:01 PM

Are people (and generally speaking, not just conservative rank-and-file) actually that clear on the functions and limits of government? I have certainly heard plenty of people apply “there oughtta be a law” statements to things that can’t possibly be legislated.

And I’m almost certain that the vast majority of voters have next to zero knowledge about the scope of an individual office’s powers. In many peoples’ minds, all levels of government are basically interchangeable. A friend who serves on a state legislature frequently gets requests, for example, to repeal the Arizona “ihre papiere bitte” law, which, nice sentiment—but he serves on the MARYLAND legislature.

The effect of a teabagger spite-vote may be futile self-expression, but I daresay the *intent* of it is often to bring about real policy change—and the voter is unaware of the futility on either count.

Comment #4: Well, what?  on  10/28  at  05:05 PM

It is all part of the class war that has been waged by the upper class for 40 years.  Very successfully waged.  All they need to do is convince 51% of the people in 51% of the districts…

Comment #5: James  on  10/28  at  05:11 PM

@Comment #4: Well, what?  on 10/28 at 03:05 PM

The effect of a teabagger spite-vote may be futile self-expression, but I daresay the *intent* of it is often to bring about real policy change—and the voter is unaware of the futility on either count.

Thing is, I’m not so sure it’s really futile. The Tea Baggers’ anger may be inchoate, but, it has actually been effective in scaring the Democrats, and keeping them from doing things.

Comment #6: atheist  on  10/28  at  05:14 PM

Oh, it’s only futile in the sense Amanda discusses—that you can’t very well express *yourself* individually through a secret ballot. I agree that it has the effect intended by the right-wing overlords.

Comment #7: Well, what?  on  10/28  at  05:24 PM

How is it determined what ads show up on this website? Because right now there are like 4 ads for teabagger krisi noem all over this page for me.

Comment #8: alysia  on  10/28  at  05:24 PM

On the plus side - maybe the election doesn’t matter much after all.

Comment #9: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  10/28  at  05:25 PM

This is a classic “let them hang themselves” situation, aka, “when your enemy is destroying himself, don’t interfere.”

Slagging on Hispanics will do for the GOP nationally what it did for them in California.

OT, sorry, I know it’s annoying when people bitch about ads, but that “Skins” thing is going to induce an epileptic seizure in somebody some day.

Comment #10: Bitter Scribe  on  10/28  at  05:44 PM

@Comment #7: Well, what?  on 10/28 at 03:24 PM

Oh, right, that. Silly me.

Comment #11: atheist  on  10/28  at  05:44 PM

I see ads all the time for Rick Scott who running for governor of Florida.  He’s running against Obamacare.  Seriously?  Either Rick Scott is stupid or he thinks that voters are too stupid to realize that the GOVERNOR of Florida cannot repeal HCR.  Now, if he was running for Senate or Congress he might have a chance of repealing HCR.

Comment #12: phinky  on  10/28  at  05:48 PM

I clicked through on comment #9 and saw three more ads for this lady. She is really after me.

#12—People really do not get the division of power between state and federal governments. It is one of the many problems with our Democracy; people don’t understand the powers of the offices they are voting for, and then feel that their vote did nothing because Obama didn’t stop crime in st louis or the governor didn’t do anything about the healthcare bill. People then get discouraged and don’t vote. It drives me nuts.

Comment #13: alysia  on  10/28  at  05:54 PM

Hey, if there’s one thing Rick Scott knows, it’s the perils of government healthcare.  I mean, Rick Scott stole a billion dollars from the government and got away with it, so he’s got clear and convincing evidence that the system is broken…

Comment #14: libdevil  on  10/28  at  05:56 PM

Fearful that their base is too stupid to understand nudges, Republican candidates are spelling it out in big red letters.

Either that, or they’ve decided they need to create new racists.

Comment #15: ryang  on  10/28  at  06:01 PM

Republicans believe their base doesn’t give much of a shit about policy. As I noted earlier, the weirdest thing about about all these political ads is how unmoored they are from the real world consequences of voting and electing people to office to enact policy.”

Fucking government, how does it work?...

Comment #16: MikeEss  on  10/28  at  06:07 PM

#13, I have a friend who told me that she contributed to my paycheck after she paid to renew her tags.  I didn’t have the heart to tell her that her tag fees go to the state government and I work for the federal government. 

#14, I’ve seen the ads for Alex Sink attacking Scott for defrauding Medicare. 

What’s scary is that Scott and Sink are almost tied in the polls and the wingnuts are making a big deal about how Sink received a text message during the last debate.  Ummm, yeah, getting a cheat sheet texted to you is exactly the same as ripping off the federal government of millions of dollars with two different companies.  Do these people not know the difference?  Even though both are wrong, they are not morally equivalent.

Comment #17: phinky  on  10/28  at  06:11 PM

alysia @13 People really do not get the division of power between state and federal governments.

I see proof of that here. I’ve seen signs that state: “Mike McMahon Raised My Property Taxes 18.5%” and that struck me as being odd, because as far as I know, property taxes are set by the state and city, not by our Representatives in the Federal Government.

Of course, as a lowly renter, I could be wrong.

Comment #18: Bethynyc  on  10/28  at  06:16 PM

“Fearful that their base is too stupid to understand nudges, Republican candidates are spelling it out in big red letters.”

...big red letters that the base imagines are being turned around, slowly, one-by-one, by a blond bimbo, thus allowing them the thrill of guessing what the letters might spell out…but they already know what it’s going to say (tweaking Amanda’s slogan): Mexicans. Mosques. Abortions. Butt Sex. Foreign Negroes In The White House. My Evil Democrat Opponent Loves These Things. You Should Be Afraid Of Them…

Comment #19: MikeEss  on  10/28  at  06:18 PM

Are people (and generally speaking, not just conservative rank-and-file) actually that clear on the functions and limits of government?

Some of them are still wondering why Joe Lieberman hasn’t cleaned up video games or covered up Britney Spears’ midriff.

Comment #20: ThresherK  on  10/28  at  06:37 PM

Well, what at 4: What was that Onion article? Oh yeah it was “Local Man is passionate defender of what he believes is in the Constitution.” I’d say that most Republicans have no idea what the government can and can not do or the scopes and limits of various offices. Of course, some people on our side have the same problem.
 
  Also, Jonathan Chait has pointed out that the Republican plan to limit government spending will increase deficits, a lot. According to Yglesias, Cantor wants to cut an antiquity whaling subsidy that Obama already plans to cut.

Comment #21: Lee  on  10/28  at  06:46 PM

PIATOR, you just stopped my heart with that shit, good thing it’s been debunked:

http://io9.com/5585294/methane-bubble-doomsday-story-debunked

Comment #22: typist  on  10/28  at  06:48 PM

Here is a really good and crazy Republican ad courtesy of Jonathan Chait:

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/78753/democrats-want-make-america-greece-ancient-greece

Comment #23: Lee  on  10/28  at  06:50 PM

Yes, God forbid we be as successful and influential in history as the Greeks and Romans! Anything but that!

Comment #24: Ben D.  on  10/28  at  07:05 PM

Lee—that is my representative. Nate Silver gives him a 100% chance of winning. I would take a blue dog over that guy in a heart beat.

Comment #25: alysia  on  10/28  at  07:19 PM

good thing it’s been debunked:

You hope.

Of course, that’s just what THEY would put out while they desperately sought a refuge for the elite and their sycophants…

Comment #26: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  10/28  at  07:23 PM

Alysia, oh God. I feel sorry for you. Any Blue Dog would be an improvement over Steven King. Most Republicans would be an improvement over Steven King.

  Ben D., the Roman elite at least knew the importance of spectacle and keeping the population fed. The Greeks were certainly more fun than Evangelical Christians.

Comment #27: Lee  on  10/28  at  07:27 PM

PIOTR: I’m sorry but are you really that much of a nihilist? Do you really only believe in worst case scenarios? Junk science is almost a big problem on the Left as it is on the right.

Comment #28: Lee  on  10/28  at  07:28 PM

@Comment #28: Lee on 10/28 at 05:28 PM

I think he’s just funnin’ us.

Comment #29: atheist  on  10/28  at  07:29 PM

Lee—I have often WISHED I lived in Michelle Bachman’s district. King makes me weep a bit for Western Iowa.

Comment #30: alysia  on  10/28  at  07:34 PM

What really makes me mad about King is that our district has Sioux City—the 3rd largest in Iowa and a very very blue collar meat-packing town. It has been absolutely destroyed by the death of unions. Unfortunately, mexican immigrants seem to get the blame more than any of the often violent union busting of the past several decades. We also have the suburbs of Omaha (the largest metro that is partially in IA). You would think we could have someone a little less off the deepend with that.

Comment #31: alysia  on  10/28  at  07:38 PM

The saddest issue with voting in the US is that since the end of WWII and the rise of corporations to be all encompassing monstrosities of existence the ability to vote economic relief to the middle class and the poor has been sporadic at best.  Thus when the candidates who need the vast corporate sums to run campaigns actually run for office they need to run on social issues.  Thus the rise of abortion as a serious debate.  The whole ideology of the system in the US is terribly screwed up, the free market has given the power to the powerful especially at the ballot box. 

Arguably the youngest generation maybe able to turn the tide but it seems highly unlikely as global corporations become more powerful.  I can honestly say the only thing that could turn the tide is if global wealth left the US and we could finally hold elections without a billion dollar influence peddler looking for favors.

Comment #32: Xeranar  on  10/28  at  08:16 PM

I think he’s just funnin’ us.

Some days around here it’s like throwing hand grenades into a fish pond, and watching the fish continue to swim around saying “did you hear something?” to each other.

Comment #33: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  10/28  at  08:28 PM

@Comment #33: Phoenician in a time of Romans on 10/28 at 06:28 PM

Well, if you really seriously want to warn the world about whatever, you could maybe provide some choice excerpts and a title, to give context. Lazy asses like myself don’t always want to click on links with little-to-no context.

Or you could continue to be annoyed at us uncaring fish… its all the same to me honestly.

Comment #34: atheist  on  10/28  at  08:38 PM

To quote a good book called “Rissa Kergulen” by F. M. Busby, where corporations started getting directly involved in elections (they are the equivalent of a person, after all…):

“And there’s only one latrine in all of U! E! T!”

Comment #35: KMac  on  10/28  at  08:39 PM

Fucking government, how does it work?…

Under Republicans, it doesn’t.

Comment #36: Jerry Vinokurov  on  10/28  at  08:48 PM

Bitter Scribe @ 10: No, no, no: “when your enemy is drowning, throw him an anvil.” That’s what Democrats can never make themselves do.

Comment #37: felagund  on  10/28  at  09:27 PM

Some days around here it’s like throwing hand grenades into a fish pond, and watching the fish continue to swim around saying “did you hear something?” to each other.

And sometimes you sound like the secular equivalent of an evangelical warning me to repent before the End Times come.

Comment #38: Ben D.  on  10/28  at  09:35 PM

Well, if you really seriously want to warn the world about whatever,

Uh-huh.

you could maybe provide some choice excerpts and a title, to give context. Lazy asses like myself don’t always want to click on links with little-to-no context.

*sigh*

Comment #39: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  10/28  at  09:35 PM

And sometimes you sound like the secular equivalent of an evangelical warning me to repent before the End Times come.

Ranting about THEY and their plans would seem like a clue, don’t you think?

Never mind then.

Comment #40: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  10/28  at  09:36 PM

Politics are basically tribal. The problem this poses for democracy is not often faced squarely.

Comment #41: Steve LaBonne  on  10/28  at  11:11 PM

Steve LaBonne, funny that you mention politics being tribal. A few months ago at Jonathan Chait’s blog at the New Republic, a commentator mentioned the same thing and noted that conservatives seem to understand this better than liberals in the United States. Thats why they keep winning more elections, they understand that people vote for their team/tribe rather than for competent and serious politicians and win by getting their tribes out voting Republican. Personally, I tend to view politics as a team sport but both analogies work.

  I think liberals often have trouble recognizing this because liberals tend to favor the individual over the collective (or tribe or team) and can’t quite grasp why a person would vote for a tribe or team that would obviously harm them. Our hosts certainly criticized the triabalistic tendencies of the right several times.

Comment #42: Lee  on  10/29  at  07:31 AM

In many peoples’ minds, all levels of government are basically interchangeable.

Yup. Everything from the local dog-catcher right up to the Secretary General of the United Nations just gets rolled up into one big undifferentiated mass labelled “THEM”.

Comment #43: Dunc  on  10/29  at  08:00 AM

I usually work as an election officer here in northern Virginia.  I have some neighbors who are absolute wackjob wingnuts, and every election we have to remind them not to campaign inside the polling place.  In 2008 they, once again, were ranting about liberals, “demoncrats” etc, etc.  I, again, politely asked them to stop campaigning inside the polling place.  They went off, blaming Obama!  I was a bit angry an d tersely told them that the law was a STATE law and it had been passed by a Republican legislature and signed by a Republican governor.  It was like talking to a brick wall.

FYI, the law has been changed so wearing a pin or tshirt or talking to a friend in line is no longer against the law inside the polling place…..

Comment #44: Woodrowfan  on  10/29  at  09:53 AM

The tribalism thing also helps make people stupider. If you start having thoughts (“Hey, that’s complete and utter baloney!”) that might dissociate you from the tribe, you’re going to push them away.

Comment #45: paul  on  10/29  at  10:45 AM

Yes, God forbid we be as successful and influential in history as the Greeks and Romans! Anything but that!

Comment #24: Ben D.

This!
Is!
Panda!!!

Comment #46: cynickal  on  10/29  at  12:40 PM

Lee @ #42—I have never thought about the parties that way before, but it is truly ironic. The “tribal” voting model comes out of sociology and is based on marxist theories of conflict. The “individualistic” voting, called Rational Choice in Polsci parlance, comes out of economics and is based on the assumption that voters are rational actors where rational means acting in one’s own self-interest.

In the US, it is liberals who believe in government intervention because things like group identities, etc keep us from having a truly level playing field, while conservatives claim that group identity doesn’t exist and that success is solely the result of individual actions.

Comment #47: alysia  on  10/29  at  01:53 PM

Hey, so, I kind of inferred the “tribal” mindset from a bunch of secondary and tertiary sources.  Is there a good text or textbook I could pick up which has the original batch of thinking that goes with “tribalism”?

I feel like there’s some stuff that could be “game-theoried up” and bring the “rational choice” and tribal models together mathematically.

Comment #48: Punditus Maximus  on  10/29  at  03:20 PM

Well there are two “schools” of voting behavior that draw on the social model. There is the Columbia School which says that people vote for people who look like them. It is based off a study done in the 40s so the groups they look at are Catholics, Protestants, and Jews as well as working vs upper class. I cannot remember the book that the study was published in, but basically some advertising profs from Columbia did a study of the impact of political ads and found that most people were not persuaded during elections but already knew who they would vote for.

Then there is the Michigan Model that says that party ID is a basic part of a person’s identity and that the tribal identity is actually party ID. This book was published in the 1960s and is called The American Voter.

The Rational Choice book is by Anthony Downs and called an Economic Theory of Voting. One problem with this theory is that voting is a fundementally irrational act because you as an individual will never matter to the results of an election: “the voting paradox”


I, too, always wanted to combine RC with the other models, but Rational Choicers and Social modelers are sworn enemies in polisci and usually don’t do cross research. The closes I can think of for that would be Alexander Schuesslers A Logic of Expressive Choice or else some of the work by Morris Fiorina.

Comment #49: alysia  on  10/29  at  03:51 PM

Alysia—that’s enough for me to work outward, thanks.

Comment #50: Punditus Maximus  on  10/31  at  05:00 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.