Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Woman-assaulting racist Troy Dale West will face felony charges for Cracker Barrel beatdown Previous entry: Once again, sexists choose punishing a woman over their own self interest

I blame Hollywood

Digby has a great post up about the conflict between the actual scientific evidence about torture’s efficacy and the folk beliefs about it.  In sum, being under a lot of stress is a surefire way to stop remembering things correctly, and to produce misleading information.  And that’s just on top of the fact that a lot of people being rounded up and tortured don’t know anything, and the well-established fact that people who are being tortured will quickly and rationally cough up false confessions in hopes that the torture will cease.  (Indeed, Searching for Whitopia, and the one thing that comes up again and again is how allergic the residents of what he deems Whitopia are to reality.  He describes their existence as much like those Russian nesting dolls.  They escape not just the cities but the suburbs to live in a community that’s main value is that you don’t face much in the way of challenges from reality.  And then you move into a gated community, and inside your gated community is your giant house that isolates you from the neighbors and likely has a super high tech security system to protect your from the imaginary criminals.  Indeed, their commitment to living in a fantasy world is such that Benjamin goes house-hunting, and discovers that a charming house with an official historical landmark designation languishes on the market while ugly monstrosities that reference certain architectural traditions in a way that’s almost deliberately cheesy and fake get snatched up.  The tacky wins hands down every time.  Too much reality is unsettling.


And so the residents of these fantasy bubble worlds get most of their information about how the world works from TV.  They get it from fictional shows that aren’t trying to reflect reality at all, and they get it from Fox News, which deliberately distorts reality.  They have no reality-based reference point to check their assumptions against. 

Once in awhile, you really get a glimpse of how out of control the American detachment from reality is getting.  This ACORN nonsense is a classic example.  You have two kids that have been demonstrated to have been lying about what happened when they decided to “catch” some ACORN members doing unethical shit.  But they’re being taken seriously, while their victim—-who has not been proven to be a liar—-is mostly being ignored.

But that’s not even the worst of it.  The thing that I think is making reality-based thinkers absolutely crazy is that anyone with two fucking brain cells to rub together should immediately have, as Auguste did, taken a look at what those kids were wearing and realized the insanely low odds that anyone they encountered could possibly think they were telling the truth.  If you had even the barest understanding of what the world actually is like, then your first assumption should be that the few ACORN employees that did humor them thought this was all a harmless prank, and played along because they are good people with a sense of humor.  Now, you can point out that they were being naive, and should have had their guard up since they had to know that the right wing has made them the next target in their continual effort to hurt and destroy at random, but that doesn’t mean that the most obvious narrative that a reality-based person would have come up with—-that this looked like a joke, and was reacted to like a joke—-should be dismissed.

And lookee here!  The most obvious narrative has been confirmed by one of the people wrapped up in this who hasn’t been proven to be a liar.

Because she thought that it was a stunt by the three youngsters who came to her office—two of whom were later revealed to be videographer James O’Keefe, 25, and college student Hannah Giles, 20, of the new conservative news site BigGovernment.com, along with a third man she says was around their age but “a silent partner”—she decided to fight fire with fire, she said. “The crazy answers that came from me were in response to lies and shocking things they said to me,” she said. “They played with me, and I played back. It’s just that simple.”

And yet, everyone is caught up in this weird need to play along with the obviously stupid supposition that these kids made convincing pimps and prostitutes, while wearing what is obviously a costume they probably first put together for one of those charming “pimps and hos” parties that white college kids think are so funny.  But you think about the American right wing, and how they naturally prefer the cheesy to the tasteful, the obviously fake to the authentic, and suddenly it makes sense.  The basic ability to grasp the fundamentals of reality has been completely distorted.  Believing these two made convincing members of the street prostitution community is a lark if you think god created everything 4,000 years ago and Stephen Baldwin is a serious person.

With that being what we’re up against, trying to get through the message that torture doesn’t work is damn near impossible.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 10:12 AM • (87) Comments

I’ve been borrowing seasons of Buffy & Angel from the library (on your recommendation) & those rare scenes in which torture or physical threats produce information are more disturbing than those of torture for its own sake.

At this point I can’t stand torture portrayed as successful wherever it appears.  It’s a very old trope & a real comic book cliche.  I recall one of the first Superman stories (the first?) either had Supes dangling the bad guy out the window or leaping about the skyscrapers with him in order to terrify him into talking.  It probably goes back further than that in pop culture.

FWIW, Wonder Woman used a magic lasso which caused no discomfort but compelled its prisoner to tell the truth.

Comment #1: haydn60  on  09/24  at  11:46 AM

Yes, this is the most important point.  Aside from being unethical, torture simply is not effective.  A few months ago when every blog was talking about torture, there were always a few people who said something like “Torture is terrible and wrong except in the case where someone has hidden a bomb in a city that will go off in 23 minutes and the police caught the suspect but don’t know where the bomb is to dismantle it, etc., etc., etc., and then it’s ok to do something unethical to that person to save the lives of hundreds or thousands of people even though it violates the rights of that one person.”  The problem with this argument is that torturing the suspect won’t necessarily save those hundreds of people anyway.  In that case you end up torturing someone and risking hundreds of lives in addition to that.  It’s just so difficult for so many people to get that one basic, important point.

Comment #2: bananacat  on  09/24  at  11:47 AM

For anyone who thinks TV depictions don’t affect people’s beliefs about reality, look at how crazed audience members get, from watchers of day or night time soap operas to fans of trash sports and “reality” shows. They discuss characters and their motivations (and the goodness/badness thereof) without even a hint that all of this is coming out of the minds of writers. And that the writers can give their characters whatever motivations or “factual” dilemmas they want to make the plot come out in interesting ways. Is it any surprise that even white house and defense department staff got caught up in this nuttiness? (Albeit it does make you wonder if US history would have been changed simply by a couple of episodes of 24 where information gained by torture backfired horribly>)

(Yeah, sometimes it’s convenient to talk about characters’ motivations as if they were real, or at least intended to be representative of real people, but one should never lose sight of the fact that it’s the writers/producers/actors making them do the things they do, with an eye on drama and audience.)

Comment #3: paul  on  09/24  at  11:47 AM

In the noir thriller Payback there’s a great plot twist that rests on the idea that people believe things more if they have been extracted by torutre.

SPOILERS

The main character wants the bad guys to go to a particular place at a given time (where he blows them all up, but that comes later). So he allows himself to be caught and 3 of his toes broken with a hammer before “confessing” that that’s where he hid the money he stole from them (or something - it’s a long time since I saw the film). Because he obviously didn’t want them to have this information, they take it as credible - but of course he’s just exploiting their irrational prejudice in favour of torture.

There’s some deep observation there about the feeling of authenticity certain antisocial types (bad guy mobsters, edgy cops, wingnuts) get out of possessing something that was not willingly given to them; I don’t have the time or powers of concentration right now to deconstruct it in detail, but I’m sure I’ll be thinking about it a lot for the next few days.

What’s really clever about the movie, though, is that the audience is not in on the trick, and we get sucked in right along with the mobsters. So when the reveal comes, we get to watch ourselves watching the bad guys - because while we were just mislead by a common movie trope, they really bought in to the idea that anything they beat out of a guy with a hammer has to be the truth. Which makes the emotional payoff of seeing them blown to kingdom come just that much bigger, because it exposes them as genuine sociopaths.

It’s a pretty awesome movie, even if it does have Mad Mel in it.

Comment #4: MarinaS  on  09/24  at  11:50 AM

Oh dear. You mentioned “Buffy” and sheltered TV-watching psychology in the same post, and now I’m all pissed off again.

I’ve started to notice a trend where not only is TV not very much like reality, but people are so used to TV being unlike reality that when vaguely realistic stuff shows up, *entirely* too many people throw a gigantic shit fit over how “stupid” it is. And as more and more people start thinking like that—they don’t have the experience with actual difficult situations to empathize with characters in difficult situations, and because it’s “just fiction” they’re too lazy to try—the less realistic media becomes even more popular, until we wind up with Twilight becoming the biggest ridiculous deal ever, because people can empathize with Bella no problem, specifically because Bella is so freaking clueless and has so little sense of self-preservation that she reacts to her situation like someone sitting on their arse reading a book about it, rather than, y’know, someone living in the real world that all of a sudden had to deal with *vampires* and shit of all things. Which I think would wig most of us out. But we expect all our characters to know what genre they live in at all times and to be sufficiently genre savvy, even though the entire *point* of urban fantasy is that it supposedly takes place in our world and nobody has any idea this shit is out there and, y’know, *I* don’t avoid walking down the street at night in the suburbs for fear of being jumped by vampires, so why should ANYONE in Sunnydale that’s not part of the Scooby Gang be expected to do so?

And now we’re starting to expect people in the real world to be “genre savvy” too. Jesus Christ.

I’ll do that when my life starts having dramatic background music, and not one minute before.

Comment #5: thecynicalromantic  on  09/24  at  11:53 AM

Excellent post, Amanda. I didn’t know the details of the ACORN nonsense, but I’ve had bits and pieces of the rest of it floating around in my head for quite a while now. (Or maybe it’s just appealing to my own sense of truthiness…)

Comment #6: Geocrackr  on  09/24  at  11:53 AM

i just have to say, amanda, you have been on fire lately.

seriously.

i have loved just about every single thing you have written in the last month.

it’s creeping me out a little though. please write something obnoxious about marriage to let me go back to not being a total fangirl.

Comment #7: sophiefair  on  09/24  at  12:04 PM

It’s a pretty awesome movie, even if it does have Mad Mel in it.

Whatever you say about Gibson, he’s a hell of an actor.  As a director?  Nuttier than a bag of fruit cakes.  But a stellar actor.

Comment #8: Zifnab  on  09/24  at  12:06 PM

These beliefs about “To get the job done, you have to take the gloves off, and everyone will thank you later” have been prevalent in our culture ever since Dirty Harry (and probably before that, for all I know). A few scientists and their evidence are not going to be able to counter 40 years of programmed entertainment. The problem is that watching a cop threaten and torture somebody is a lot more dramatic than watching them painstakingly interrogate, build up evidence, and wear down the suspect’s defenses. That’s why it’s on TV. People like to watch violence.

The last few times I watched cop shows, it was mentioned significantly how terrible it was that the cops had to abide by those horrible Constitutional protections at all. I was reminded of the time I saw “Minority Report” and, after it was over, heard several people in the audience wondering why the government would abandon the precog program. After all, it was preventing murders! If people no longer understand the very basic concept that you have to actually commit a crime before the government should be allowed to punish you, we really have no hope.

It seems the only true innocents left in the world are Democratic government workers. The right could not possibly be more obvious about wanting to destroy the Democratic party, and yet no one ever seems to see them coming.

Comment #9: sophronia  on  09/24  at  12:15 PM

No he isn’t, Zifnab. He’s a batwiggin’ crazy nutjob, and the cognitive dissonance created by living in a real world with real things in it rather than the Medieval Nazi Fantasy inside his own head makes him naturally suited to portraying characters that need to express a lot of tension. He’s best at doing it in serious/dramatic contexts - Payback and Ransom, both edge of the seat suspence action flicks, are his best flicks by far. With great support from genuinely talented co-stars like Helen Hunt or Goldie Hawn, he can occasionally manage to turn it into comic tension, too. But I’ve never seen him give a convincing performance in a character role, and that includes the much (and needlessly) lauded Hamlet, in which he just played his Lethal Weapon character with longer words.

Comment #10: MarinaS  on  09/24  at  12:28 PM

Lie To Me had a really great episode where Lightman busts up a torture studio and is like, “Morons! All you get from someone being tortured is fear and pain; fear and pain will get you the opposite of truth.” I really enjoyed seeing someone on TV look at torture and go “WHUT? FALSE.”

Comment #11: la_fields  on  09/24  at  12:30 PM

Personally I cannot abide any discussion of torture and the Hollywood depictions thereof that doesn’t include a reference to Marathon Man, which brings up another good point about torture—not only do tortured individuals tend to do whatever they can to tell the torturer what they think the torturer wants to hear (whether that info is true or false), but the tortured individual might not even know the answers to the question(s) the torturer is asking ... or realize that she or he knows even if she or he does know the answer.

Suppose we pick up some supposedly high value person of interest on a battlefield.  There is no guarantee we have the person we think we have.  And there is no guarantee that even a person who knows something will be able to figure out what we are getting at without us tipping our hand so much that we reveal too much of our own secrets.  So instead, we ask “is it safe” and we get “yes” or “no” depending on what they think we want to hear so the torture will stop.

What torture does is immediately set the situation up as being adversarial so whatever information could be gleaned simply gets shut out.  Especially the information of “you have the wrong person”.  If you don’t torture someone, you’ll find out all that much quicker whether or not you even have the right person ...

Comment #12: DAS  on  09/24  at  12:34 PM

I think thecynicalromantic has a crucial point with the term “genre savvy”. It would be bad enough if ordinary people were merely supposed to know what genre they were in at all time, but it’s worse.  One of the big privileges of power is getting to decide what genre the people around you are in, and to change that genre on the fly to reinforce your power. (Think of all the “can’t you take a joke” gambits that come up when someone reacts to bigotry. Or all the cross-racial “misunderstandings” where it always seems to be the white people who retroactively decide what proper behavior should have been.)

Let’s imagine for a moment that the ACORN people had behaved as they “should” have, and either ejected the pranksters (not forcibly, heaven forfend) or gotten the police there in time to arrest them. NICE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE GIRL ARRESTED FOR MINOR PRANK! Fox wouldn’t be resting until Hannah Giles got to have a non-alcoholic beer at the White House and ask Obama for his birth certificate.

When someone else is (literally in this case) writing the script and editing the video, it doesn’t really matter how genre savvy you are, because the genre only gets decided after your part is long done.

Comment #13: paul  on  09/24  at  12:35 PM

“Aside from being unethical, torture simply is not effective.”

Sure it does.  It almost certainly won’t produce genuine accurate information, or let you stop that ticking terrorist time-bomb, but it will produce “information” and “actionable intelligence” which give you excuses and “evidence” to justify doing what you already wanted to do.  That’s why the Cheney Crew was so in love with it.

Whenever this topic comes up, I’m reminded of the Room 101 sequence in 1984.  Having power over people is what it’s all about.  The ability to torture somebody, and then get away, with no repercussions, is a great way of demonstrating your power, just like being able to get away with killing hundreds-of-thousands of innocents in your own little private war in some other country.  The point of torture is to torture.  There is nothing else.  It’s state-sanctioned, real life, no-holds-barred S & M and/or B & D that appeals to people who are sick or dead inside…

And as much as I would like to blame 24 and other examples of casual torture in entertainment, I can’t help but believe if those shows/movies hadn’t been made, the sadistic and malevolent forces behind America’s fall from grace would have found inspiration to do what they wanted from somewhere else…

Comment #14: MikeEss  on  09/24  at  12:39 PM

”*I* don’t avoid walking down the street at night in the suburbs for fear of being jumped by vampires,”

No lycanthropy problem in my neighborhood lately, but vampires?

big vampire scare about 250 years ago, with respected town officials digging up the cemetery and nailing the corpses to the ground with wooden stakes

TV spreads this kind of thinking wider and faster, but its way older then that

Comment #15: jefft452  on  09/24  at  12:41 PM

“In the noir thriller Payback there’s a great plot twist that rests on the idea that people believe things more if they have been extracted by torutre.”

To be fair, most of the plot in that movie is propelled by the complete and utter inability of the antagonists to actually process anything about the protagonist.  I mean, the knots they twist themselves into trying to reject the idea that he’s going to such great lengths over the theft of such a comparatively paltry sum of money are just the beginning of it.

“But we expect all our characters to know what genre they live in at all times and to be sufficiently genre savvy, even though the entire *point* of urban fantasy is that it supposedly takes place in our world and nobody has any idea this shit is out there and, y’know, *I* don’t avoid walking down the street at night in the suburbs for fear of being jumped by vampires, so why should ANYONE in Sunnydale that’s not part of the Scooby Gang be expected to do so?”

It depends a little on the context of the fiction, though.  Like I vaguely recall the Buffy series getting to the point where you saw newspaper headlines like “Disaster Occurs, Monsters <u>Definitely Not Involved</u>.” The situation goes from one where you expect only this handful of people to know about it at all to one where you expect everybody to kind of know about it but only this handful of people being willing to admit/confront it.  Kind of like real-life situations where most everyone in a town realizes that there’s a serial killer at work, but the cops absolutely refuse to put two and two together and start a task force or treat the murders as related.

If memory serves, the trope worked as a mini-twist at the end of Lost Boys, where the main characters just assumed that they were on their own and nobody would believe them because, you know, vampires, and then it turned out to be a known problem in the area.  Zombie movies have used that sort of thing occasionally for a while now, too, though most of them still appear to occur in an alternate reality where nobody’s ever seen a zombie movie before.

Comment #16: preying mantis  on  09/24  at  12:43 PM

But we expect all our characters to know what genre they live in at all times and to be sufficiently genre savvy, even though the entire *point* of urban fantasy is that it supposedly takes place in our world and nobody has any idea this shit is out there and, y’know, *I* don’t avoid walking down the street at night in the suburbs for fear of being jumped by vampires, so why should ANYONE in Sunnydale that’s not part of the Scooby Gang be expected to do so?

That’s not the problem with genre-unsavvyness.  It’s when the characters live in a world that apparently has never heard of a vampire, or a werewolf, or aliens, or zombies, whatever, and therefore are utterly helpless even when they have the time to think about it, even though the danger isn’t any different from what they should at least have had some exposure to in popular culture.

Two good examples of doing it right come from “From Dusk Till Dawn” and “Independence Day”.  In both movies, the characters don’t expect vampires and alien invaders respectively.  Yet, both feature characters who at least react.  After the first fight with the vampires, Seth Gecko gets the survivors together and announces that even though everyone thought there was no such thing as vampires, he doesn’t want to hear it because they obviously just fought vampires, now what does anyone know about vampires?  And they start brainstorming about what they know about vampires, if only from popular culture.  In the latter film, when Will Smith sees their missiles exploding at some distance from the alien ship, he yells “They have shields!” and all the pilots pull away immediately because they know what he means.  Just like you just did reading that preceding sentence, because most English-speaking westerners have been exposed to sufficient science-fiction, even indirectly, to know what the word would imply in that given situation.

Comment #17: KeithM  on  09/24  at  12:47 PM

The so-called reality program, Extreme Home Makeover, just filmed their season opener in my town.  A lot of the locals who showed up to watch the filming and to volunteer were horrified to discover that the stars of show do not actually do any construction.  They were very upset when the stars emerged from their trailers, shot some footage of them holding a hammer and then went back into their trailer. 

How much television do people think is real?  Especially “reality” TV?

Comment #18: BadKitty  on  09/24  at  12:47 PM

And now we’re starting to expect people in the real world to be “genre savvy” too. Jesus Christ.

Look, we all know what’s the deal with vampires, zombies, werewolves, etc… at least the ‘pop culture’ or ‘folklore’ definition. If suddenly your whole world was turned upside down because you actually *met* a vampire, you WOULD know what the hell they were…

...which of course can lead to an interesting genre subversion. I mean, if vampires rule the world (a la White Wolf’s World of Darkness) and there’s pop culture stuff about vampires out there, it means the vampires WANT it out there. Which means it’s probably false. You bring your stake, garlic, cross, etc… and it does JACK SHIT and you’re vampire lunch.

This is why I dislike ‘urban fantasy’. If at least it’s Chthulhoid style monstrosities, you can get away with “nobody knows how these things work”. If it’s vampires or any other part of the Top 10 Popular Horror Cliches, you better have a good explanation why nobody catches on why this guy is never seen in daylight and there’s been a serie of exsanguinated dead prostitutes being found in the area ever since he moved in. “Nobody believes in vampires” is a bad explanation, I mean the police might still get tipped off that you know, possibly there’s a serial killer out there who *thinks* he’s a vampire…

Comment #19: BlackBloc  on  09/24  at  12:52 PM

Burn Notice is a good show because the hero is always like “Torture this guy? Nah, that won’t work… he’d just give us unreliable information that would waste our time.”

Comment #20: Spike  on  09/24  at  01:00 PM

Excellent post.

When conservatives bitch and moan about “Hollywood liberals,” they’re mostly going on about performers, who do tend to be rather uninformed & obnoxious in their politics at times.  However, there are three very good reasons IMO that performers actually tend to be liberal, in ascending order of importance:

1. Culture/diversity- the arts do have a lot of people who don’t exactly fit the traditionalists’ favored models.  IOW, it’s hard to be a homophobe/bigot/prude in artsy environments, especially when many of the most talented people—and working with good people is, after all, very important—aren’t exactly super-white Christian hetero men.

2. The luck factor- pretending that hard work alone breeds success is a joke in the performing arts; any marginally sane person knows that pure chance is the key factor in making it to the top.  Hard work is clearly necessary for most to endure long enough to make a successful career, and of course talent & looks count, but luck is essential because that’s what determines whether one even gets opportunities to excel & be seen.  And the vast majority of Hollywood conservatives, you may notice, are often pretty artistically limited, although many do work their specialties very effectively (Mel Gibson’s something of an exception, but that dude has major, major demons).

3. Reality vs. narrative- this is the most important factor of all IMO, although it’s something that’s only become clear to me as the right’s lack of dramatic discernment became more obvious.  I’m an old theatre major, and it’s true that there were always some people around who could be described as starring in the drama of their own lives, but even the most flamboyantly neurotic ones weren’t as bad as the average “24”/Red Dawn/Rapture-hoping conservative fantasist.  Actors who get more jobs than can be counted on one hand know the difference between scripted drama & reality perfectly well, or else they’d be intolerable to work with.


BTW, I have side rants about reality shows, too wink

Comment #21: latts  on  09/24  at  01:03 PM

I’m going to disagree slightly here. Torture can work if it’s systematic. The reason this is only a slight disagreement is that this means:

You have to torture a lot (hundreds or thousands) of people including many innocents (they’re needed to get general information). If you do this, then you have the Perry Mason type situation: you already know the answers to most of your questions so you know if the person is telling the truth (each person might only give a bit more information). The scale has the added benefit that it works as intimidation: everyone is afraid since anyone could be brought in to be tortured.

The real life case of this is Algeria where widespread torture stopped the revolt against France (it got information and was used as intimidation). Of course, Algeria also shows why you don’t really want to do this: people not only are afraid of the government but also come to hate it and, unless you’re willing to indefinitely become a totalitarian government, resistance comes back stronger (so France was kicked out of Algeria).

Torture on a few individuals doesn’t work, torture on large groups does but only if you’re willing to torture large groups of innocents and become dictatorial. So, democracy and torture don’t mix.

Comment #22: JohnL  on  09/24  at  01:06 PM

”...which of course can lead to an interesting genre subversion”

some movie or show i caught briefly had a vampire on the side of the good guys
good guy keeps asking her “is it true that this will kill you?” “is it true that that will kill you?”  “is it true that this other thing will kill you?”

no relevance, but it was a great bit of humor in an otherwise forgettable film

Comment #23: jefft452  on  09/24  at  01:06 PM

It’s not just Reality TV.

The Fox producer who got caught riling up the crowd in DC was only notable because she was caught doing it.  Back in university, my residence did a food drive for the local food bank one Saturday morning, with a goal of collecting a tonne of food.  We ended up with a tonne and a half.  Because the food drive involved the mayor of the city jumping into the frozen river (with safety precautions) if we raised our goal, there was some local media interest, and so a reporter and her cameraman arrived at our residence to cover the story.  I was in charge of weighing and totaling, so I was the only one who knew if we’d done it or not, so when I finished I announced the total, and everyone cheered.  The reporter was appalled because the camera wasn’t running at the big moment, so she organized things to get me to do it again (I couldn’t hold a straight face, the tape shows me grimacing and shaking my head slightly), and had a bunch of people cheer (you have no idea how fake that sounded) again.

Comment #24: KeithM  on  09/24  at  01:09 PM

Alas there are many pieces of folk wisdom perpetuated in movies and TV besides the thing about torture.  For example, in TV you can “knock him out” with a rap on the head and the guy will wake up an hour later with a headache. 

Then there’s TV Freudian psychology.  The widower who tries to pretend he’s not grieving suffers a series of weird symptoms but then is instantly cured right after he breaks down and cries over his departed wife. 

The unreality also gets physical.  For example, in Chain Reaction, the hero looks back and sees an approaching shock wave.  He guns his motorcycle to escape it.  (hint: the shock wave is supersonic).

Comment #25: llgm  on  09/24  at  01:11 PM

latts @21

to the luck factor add in class
the child of a factory worker might become a famous movie star after being “discovered” while waiting tables, but the CEO of a major oil company is always someone who’s family could afford for him to hang around with the children of high ranking executives his whole life

Comment #26: jefft452  on  09/24  at  01:13 PM

The problem is that watching a cop threaten and torture somebody is a lot more dramatic than watching them painstakingly interrogate, build up evidence, and wear down the suspect’s defenses.

It doesn’t have to be. Two words: The Wire.

Comment #27: Well, what?  on  09/24  at  01:19 PM

big vampire scare about 250 years ago, with respected town officials digging up the cemetery and nailing the corpses to the ground with wooden stakes

Just out of curiosity, are you in New Hampshire?  When I was researching vampire legends a while ago, it turned out that New Hampshire had its own region-specific vampires.

Comment #28: Mnemosyne  on  09/24  at  01:20 PM

Torture is terrible and wrong except in the case where someone has hidden a bomb in a city that will go off in 23 minutes and the police caught the suspect but don’t know where the bomb is to dismantle it, etc., etc., etc., and then it’s ok to do something unethical to that person to save the lives of hundreds or thousands of people even though it violates the rights of that one person.

You know what’s most annoying about this trope?  The limited time available that these assholes use as justification for torture.

The bomber KNOWS when the bomb will go off.  So all s/he has to do is either hold out through the torture long enough for it to go off, piss them off enough to kill her/him, or lie effectively to delay them.  The torture is limited by the time the bomb explodes.

Plus, if the bomber has already decided that ‘getting away’ is not part of the plan; if s/he has decided to die for the cause, you’re simply fucked. 

Back during the Clinton years, when we caught the WTC bombers, tried and convicted them, Clinton upped security measures at airports after sentencing for a few months.  I was travelling then, and my co-workers and I talked about how easy it would be to do serious damage if you didn’t care if you got away.  The hard part of any plan is getting away scot free.  If that’s not necessary, so many more options for destruction are available, and there is little planning that can prevent it.

—————
As for torture working…well, it eventually stopped Dr Tiller.  The systemic violence against obstetricians has made hospitals push abortion services out to independent clinics and has resulted in many OBs not being properly instructed in the procedure and being too afraid to advertise that knowledge if they are. 

—————-

you better have a good explanation why nobody catches on why this guy is never seen in daylight and there’s been a serie of exsanguinated dead prostitutes being found in the area ever since he moved in.

Because real vampires can go out in the daylight, and the sunlight-kills-vampires trope was invented with film b/c it looked good?  Jonathan Harker about has a heart attack in Dracula when he sees a much younger-looking Count wandering around in the daytime.

Sorry, had to read that novel 3 times in school.  Spent a big part of my major comparing Victorian novels to 20th Century film, and vampires are surprisingly relevent.

————

Comment #29: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  09/24  at  01:37 PM

Because real vampires can go out in the daylight, and the sunlight-kills-vampires trope was invented with film b/c it looked good?  Jonathan Harker about has a heart attack in Dracula when he sees a much younger-looking Count wandering around in the daytime.

Yup - perfect job for a vampire would be a lifeguard…

Comment #30: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  09/24  at  01:44 PM

I was travelling then, and my co-workers and I talked about how easy it would be to do serious damage if you didn’t care if you got away.

That was the stumbling block to the CIA assassination program that they tried to start (and why, despite what you see on movies and TV, the CIA, (former) KGB and even Mossad doesn’t actually do assassination that much): the hardest part of sniping someone, for instance, in hostile territory is what happens after the shot is made.  There simply aren’t that many people that willing to lay down their lives, not to mention the cost inefficiency of giving someone highly specialized training so they can perform an assassination…once, and Jason Bourne isn’t your typical operative.

Comment #31: KeithM  on  09/24  at  01:45 PM

In the noir thriller Payback there’s a great plot twist that rests on the idea that people believe things more if they have been extracted by torutre.

If you liked Payback (I did as well), then check out the movie it’s loosely based upon:  Point Blank.  Lee Marvin plays the Porter role, though his character is named Walker.  It’s grittier and closer to the noir style than is Payback, so don’t expect quite the same movie.

Comment #32: Linnaeus  on  09/24  at  01:46 PM

big vampire scare about 250 years ago, with respected town officials digging up the cemetery and nailing the corpses to the ground with wooden stakes

TV spreads this kind of thinking wider and faster, but its way older then that

I’d say it’s even older than that…

Way older.

Comment #33: jamie d  on  09/24  at  02:05 PM

I know that vampires can go in the sunlight, and that zombies are shambling rotten corpses that can’t run very fast…

Oh wait, but then there are vampires that CAN’T go in the sunlight, and zombies that run fast as hell.

That’s what I mean by a good explanation. If your vampires follow all the rules of pop culture, then you would expect people in your urban fantasy story to be knowledgeable about those rules.

There are other problems with a lot of urban fantasy stories. For one, the idea that these things exist in the world and nobody knows gets a bit stretched when you have people like Dresden who encounter a million of them in the course of his work. It’s the same issue I have with comic books (there’s so many villains and heroes living in Marvel’s New York, how come you never hear about some super villain taking over Mississippi, or a Louisiana-based superteam? And how many actual normal civilians are left in New York, anyway?) Sunnydale has more vampires than most small towns have people (well, it IS a Hellmouth… still, people are clueless? PLEASE! At least in Angel’s L.A. you would expect most people to be clueless, the proportion of demons per inhabitant is a bit less ridonculous.)

Comment #34: BlackBloc  on  09/24  at  02:06 PM

“For one, the idea that these things exist in the world and nobody knows gets a bit stretched when you have people like Dresden who encounter a million of them in the course of his work.”

The Dresden Files (the book series, don’t remember how it was in the show) is another one where people know about it, but it’s remarked upon how much effort most people put into not acknowledging it, at least when it actually turns up in front of them.

Comment #35: preying mantis  on  09/24  at  02:24 PM

Indeed, the evidence shows that the Bush administration used torture because it produces false confessions. As long as they could get someone that looked like what your average American thinks of when they think of “terrorist”—-basically, someone Middle Eastern—-to say there were so WMDs in Iraq that Saddam magicked out of existence, they got more vindication for their ridiculous Iraq war scheme.

this, too.  It’s alot easier to get the answers you want to get if the truth doesn’t matter.  If the point is to get the torture victim interview subject to agree that, as someone else referenced, two plus two is five, all of a sudden torture is justified.

This is not new.  The only thing that’s new about it is that we naively thought we were above all that.

Comment #36: jamie d  on  09/24  at  02:36 PM

The fact that conservatives benefit from the lack of distinction between fantasy and reality goes a long way to explaining their comically over-the-top hatred of post-modernism, which is all about fantasies calling attention to the fact that they are fantasies.

Comment #37: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/24  at  02:42 PM

“You know what’s most annoying about this trope?  The limited time available that these assholes use as justification for torture.”

What bugs me is that its an extraordinary circumstance example revolving around one special individual when what its a defense of is systematic torture for lots of people who may or may not know jack shit where there is certainly no time limit. As in they might have been in custody for a good old while before anyone got around to the torturing.

Comment #38: pharmakos  on  09/24  at  02:44 PM

One reason I suspect that liberals have been skeptical of torture as a means to get information is historical knowledge. Most liberals have at least a nodding acquaintance with lurid and silly confessions from Stalin’s show trials, the Inquisition, and numerous witch trials (oddly enough though the Salem trials didn’t have confessions from torture though). I think part of the reasons that GOP conservatives discount these experiences is that the victims (Communists, Jews, Muslims, women, etc.) and even many cases the perpetrators (Communists, Catholics) are people who they generally hold in contempt. Wimpy Commies, Jews, etc. might falsely confess and stupid Commies and Papists might believe them. But manly men wouldn’t and genius Americans would be able to tell the difference.

And BlackBloc, about 2 years ago Marvel started to address the only in New York issue by creating superhero teams in all fifty states. Personally I think that supervillains should focus on small towns to create their doomsday devices. I mean, mayors in those towns would probably give them tax breaks for all the jobs they were creating.

Comment #39: histro-geek  on  09/24  at  02:49 PM

There are actually a some examples of hollywood showing the futility of torture as interrogation, but not too many.

I can think of only one in particular to directly dramatize the nature of torture itself as anything more than either sadistic punishment or heroically edgy answer-getting: Closet Land, which is a rather disturbing, very personalized, exploration of the various aspects of torture, with emphasis on the integration of psychological manipulation.

Comment #40: jamie d  on  09/24  at  02:49 PM

“What bugs me is that its an extraordinary circumstance example revolving around one special individual when what its a defense of is systematic torture for lots of people who may or may not know jack shit where there is certainly no time limit.”

Well, the whole point of it is to get a foot in the door, as it were.  Once you get people agreeing that yes, it is sometimes okay to torture someone, under certain circumstances, it’s easier to slide who and when and why toward more and more mundane situations.  It’s a debate tactic used by people who are already pro-torture.

Comment #41: preying mantis  on  09/24  at  03:01 PM

@KiethM: Oh, there are definitely shows/movies with problematic genre-unsavviness. (Or arbitrary scepticism. “Okay, so vampires are real. But werewolves are a myth! Don’t tell me there’s werewolves, do you think I’m stupid?” Or that go slightly overboard on the “normal people don’t notice things” excuse.) I’m sorry if I wasn’t clear, but I was talking specifically about characters that are clearly not in the know when the audience is (it used to be called dramatic irony), or have JUST been introduced to the genre they’re in. If I met a vampire (and it were proven to be a vampire, not a particularly deluded goth or somebody on weird drugs), I like to think I’d be able to process this and deal with it (on a functional level, perhaps doing the not-thinking-about-it-too-hard thing like how most kids don’t really believe their parents ever had sex), and I’ve imbibed massive amounts of vampire folklore and media so I would get all academic about it pretty quickly. But my immediate reaction would probably be something along the lines of being extremely surprised, and, of course, if I had not yet ever met a vampire but I was going to be attacked by one in about thirty seconds, I would have no fucking IDEA.

But I know people who get really, really frustrated when bit characters or characters right at the beginning of the story don’t seem to already be in the “this is urban fantasy” mindset when the action starts, and react to the initial shock of discovery with anything resembling shock. Or when characters react to scary shit by being more scared than the viewers sitting safely in their living room watching an image on a screen. Or when characters stop ass-kicking as effectively when they’re injured, especially if there’s no blood (being thrown across a room and landing on your neck HURTS, okay). Or when characters crack under torture. Or when a character kills somebody or gets buried alive or raped or shot or dumped in a war zone or is otherwise traumatized, and then acts traumatized. Or any number of things that show the limitations of the human mind and body when it’s in a less comfortable position than watching a movie. And it drives me bananas, especially because I want to be a writer but I do not want to have to write perfectly macho and detached and always-on-top-of-everything-to-the-point-of-being-psychic Mary Sues who cannot feel physical or emotional pain in order to have people not hate my characters. Every creative writing class I’ve taken says they’re supposed to have some sort of flaw…

@BlackBloc: the first season of Dexter has exsanguinated dead hookers and no vampires. And many, if not most, modern vampire series give their vampires spishul ass-covering abilities like glamoring, the little drink, “vegetarianism”, a really wide hunting range, etc. so that they *don’t* leave a trail of exsanguinated bodies. There have been a whole series of historic “vampire serial killers”, and most of us still don’t believe in actual vampires. I find it completely believable that 99% of fictional characters would probably investigate every possible non-magical option first.

Comment #42: thecynicalromantic  on  09/24  at  03:07 PM

@15, 22, 36, 39:

You all remind me that the point of torture isn’t to get information - the point of torture is terrorism. Typically it’s to terrorize the population of the victims themselves (e.g. Algeria, Stalin), but we have the extra-special bonus of getting to torture foreigners (and a few of our own citizens for good measure) in order to show our own population that our government is composed of moral monsters, and if they’re willing to do that then who knows what they’d be willing to do in their own country. I suspect it’s part of reason the wingtards are having such a freak-out now that the Dems are in charge - as long as it was their guys doing the torturing then they could pretend it only happened to those dirty foreigners/liberals/Muslims/darkies who deserved it; since it’s not their guys in charge anymore they’re projecting that Dems are as monstrous as the Reps have become and are afraid that the torture tactics are going to be turned on them.

Comment #43: Geocrackr  on  09/24  at  03:09 PM

It’s state-sanctioned, real life, no-holds-barred S & M and/or B & D that appeals to people who are sick or dead inside…

Minor quibble: Consent of both parties matters in BDSM.

It’s been said a lot, but it needs to be said again:

To have a ticking-bomb scenario where it could even be possible to have torture work, you would need to know that there is a bomb, that the person you have knows it exists, and that the person you have knows where it is, and you would have to be able to immediately confirm whether or not what they say is true. And if you have enough information about the bomb plot to know it exists, who is involved in it, and the level of their involvement in it, and enough information to be able to immediately fact-check whatever your victim tells you, why the hell don’t you have enough information to stop the bomb plot?

All this, of course, aside from the fact that your victim will not tell you the truth.

Comment #44: Rebecca  on  09/24  at  03:12 PM

I should clarify; that “even possible to have torture work” is misleading. It should be “to have the kind of ticking-bomb scenario where torture advocates claim torture would save lives.”

Comment #45: Rebecca  on  09/24  at  03:17 PM

To me, one of the most honest depictions of torture and what it is good for was in Reservoir Dogs. Everybody knows about the cop and what Mr. Blonde does to him, but what always struck me was Nice Guy Eddie before that. When he comes in and finds them beating on the cop. He says ‘You can beat on him until he tells you he started the Chicago Fire, but that doesn’t make it so!’

Then when they leave to move the cars, Mr. Blonde starts cutting him up just because he wants to.

But then, these are bad guys doing it, so I suppose maybe we’re supposed to sympathise with the cop because he doesn’t know anything and feel relieved when Mr. Orange acts. Still, Nice Guy Eddie’s statement was pretty clear about the futility of it all.

Comment #46: Santa Claustrophobia  on  09/24  at  03:28 PM

FWIW, Wonder Woman used a magic lasso which caused no discomfort but compelled its prisoner to tell the truth.

The creator of Wonder Woman was a psychologist who had a hand in inventing the polygraph machine. He was also a polyamorist and into light bondage play, which he thought was a positive method for sublimating power politics, by channeling it into consensual kinky sex. So yeah. WW was well outside the norm for pop culture depictions of emotionally driven power situations.

it’s also odd to think that the truest adaptation to film of Wonder Woman would be softcore bondage porn. We are one strange species.

Comment #47: Keith  on  09/24  at  03:36 PM

“react to the initial shock of discovery with anything resembling shock.”

In fairness if every film about the supernatural had a holy fuck vampires do exist bit that went on about how the world is now a very different place to the one we thought it was it would be about 20 minutes of oh why do you make us suffer this exposition can’t you just get to the storyline which would then suffer having had 20 minutes taken out of the typical 120 minutes run time. That’s not counting minutes lost to obligatory long shots with haunting/new metal/emo music as the characters walk around and look mawkish. The only example I saw recently of good “how is the world different” was in District 19, the worst in idiocracy.

In Buffy the populace of sunnydale gradually gets more information on what’s going on. In Season 1 they were all vampires wat? In season 3 Buffy’s fellow students give her an award for being class protector even if they aren’t terribly clear on what exactly has been going on. If I remember right they act as cannon fodder in a pitched battle at the end of the season. In the last season the general public just leave because they know things are about to get dramatically worse.

“Well, the whole point of it is to get a foot in the door, as it were.  Once you get people agreeing that yes, it is sometimes okay to torture someone, under certain circumstances, it’s easier to slide who and when and why toward more and more mundane situations.  It’s a debate tactic used by people who are already pro-torture.”

Oh ok, my response to that thus far has been what is she/he even talking about rather than what are they trying to accomplish by saying that.

Comment #48: pharmakos  on  09/24  at  03:45 PM

This topic covers some of the major reasons why I hate people.

One addendum to the torture doesn’t work brigade:  Most capable leaders don’t like torture because it undermines their regimes.  Not because the populace hates it…After all, if you’re the local devil, you can get away with alot…but because people who control the legitimazation of torture wrests away political control from the head guy.  How and where and under what circumstances torture is delivered is a very awesome, highly leverageable power.  Which is why grand vizier-type people indulge in it, until the capable boss arrainges a messy death as a show of “justice”.  The Inquisition is a highly interesting variant of this dynamic.

BlackBloc, and all of you into the whole urban fantasy thing…Caitlin R Kiernan wrote one of the very best (really a genre smash up) urban fantasy “trilogy” around, and it incorporates a very realistic sense of how and why people control the knowlege of the supernatural.  The three books, Threshold, Low Red Moon, and Daughter of Hounds are all actually fairly standalone novels with dicontinuitous continuity.  However, it’s still best to read them all in order to understand what’s actually going on inside each novel.  The first is essentually an analogue (and much better done) of “Event Horizon”, while the second is a serial killer thriller, and the last a subtle superhero thingie.

Comment #49: shah8  on  09/24  at  03:47 PM

I’m not sure I would blame TV as I have a problem with the whole “X media makes people stupid” type of arguement. I think the torture scenes on 24 exist to confort wingnuts in their opinion they already have.

And I don’t think wingnuts really think torture works. They like torture because they’re a bunch of sociopathic sick fucks who enjoy crushing the testicles of little boys. (lookin’ at you John Yoo)

Comment #50: sirkowski  on  09/24  at  03:51 PM

Ah, about the vampire wtf?

We’re all highly read peeps who’s watched stuff like “Let the Right One In” which assumes that the audience, and the characters within, have brains enough to know what they see.

The real world is full of morons who fear reality, and have to be spoonfed anything that doesn’t conform to their world.  Those are the people who, if confronted with a real, unbreathing vampire, wouldn’t believe their lying eyes.

Of course, most urban fantasy secrit folks doesn’t really work, because there aren’t big clods of smart people and big clods of dumb people.  Plenty of people everywhere are sensible and well adjusted, and would say, Vampire?  Vampire!! RUUUUUUUNNNNN!!!  Or ask a zillion question if it’s not about eat me.

Okay, and Buffy?  People do fine with believing in vampires.  Just not Sunnydale, because Mayor Wilkins did a major spell that prevented people from recognizing bad things that were happening as it was.

Comment #51: shah8  on  09/24  at  03:57 PM

And BlackBloc, about 2 years ago Marvel started to address the only in New York issue by creating superhero teams in all fifty states. Personally I think that supervillains should focus on small towns to create their doomsday devices. I mean, mayors in those towns would probably give them tax breaks for all the jobs they were creating.

In the anime “Prefectural High School Earth Defense Force”, the bad guys (The Telephone Pole Syndicate) decide to start their world conquest plans out in a rural prefecture rather than Tokyo, because *everyone* tries it in Tokyo first and the resistance is strong there, whereas they don’t expect much resistance out in the sticks.

Comment #52: Alara J Rogers  on  09/24  at  04:02 PM

51-

Yeah, but assume a vampire is like a serial killer or the usual fear of potential death. It is what it is, there is potentially fear, but there is also the area where it becomes routine but horrible, like in The Wire or inner cities with gang shootouts. There’s a danger, but you got to live your life and have your “oh shit” routine, but beyond that, it’s saving up to move or getting by.

Comment #53: Cerberus  on  09/24  at  04:13 PM

“Just out of curiosity, are you in New Hampshire?  When I was researching vampire legends a while ago, it turned out that New Hampshire had its own region-specific vampires.”

Southern Conn
(Liberman is not my fault)
The vampire scare in the 1730’s (or 40’s, dont remember exactly) was New England wide

Comment #54: jefft452  on  09/24  at  04:19 PM

”I was travelling then, and my co-workers and I talked about how easy it would be to do serious damage if you didn’t care if you got away.  The hard part of any plan is getting away scot free.  If that’s not necessary, so many more options for destruction are available, and there is little planning that can prevent it. “

This also bothers me when the neo-cons tell you that terrorists need a state sponsor for all the training

It’s a lot easier to plan to kill a bunch of people and don’t care if you get away then to plan to rob a bank, keep the money, and not go to prison

Comment #55: jefft452  on  09/24  at  04:28 PM

The thing about genre savviness is also what defines these whitopias. They imagine themselves in all of the dramatic tales, but they’re the smart ones. They move out to the good places, keep out the bad element, then fortress up their houses and their interactions with others to keep the smart serial killer or robber at bay. All of these interactions, genre savvy actions if the camera’s eye were on them.

But they aren’t and by trying to be that “smart” genre savvy character they turn into something foul. And that is also a story untold in the stories we see on television and movies. No one covers the girl next door who knows all the rules and lives in terrified anticipation of besting the movie villain, because the movie villain is killing the person who hasn’t warped themselves in that expectation and go about their day.

There is genre blindness in movies and tv sometimes, but most of it is to build our genre savviness of that which won’t affect our lives. Plans and precautions are made and prejudices reinforced in how we interact with others, so that the world is worse for the genres we actually run into.

And so we see the people supporting 24 style torture, because they are genre savvy for the big bad guy coming to hurt them rather than some poor shmuck who needs some help and that extends to every aspect of their life. They are on-guard, ready against the vampire attack, ready against the serial killer, ready against the mugger, so when the homeless guy needs a buck, the black guy needs help with a locked car, their neighbors need to be reminded that they are human people who exist, they are nowhere to be found.

It all comes down to quality of life.

Comment #56: Cerberus  on  09/24  at  04:29 PM

“how come you never hear about some super villain taking over Mississippi”

um.. why would they want it?

Comment #57: jefft452  on  09/24  at  04:30 PM

This comment thread is going weird places. The initial post was about conservatives using stupid fictions to reason about real world dilemmas only they don’t go for real dilemmas they go for hypothetical ones that are more dramatic but are pretty implausible because they suit the fictions. Then the libruls howl you are not jack bauer you are a silly sausage who thinks he is jack bauer and that would be fine if you didn’t go out and torture people who haven’t seen the show. The preference for fiction then explains why they are taking those clowns on biggovernment seriously. That’s one explanation, though I prefer no one really believes it they just say they do because they don’t like the libruls who are in this case acorn but yeah willingness to believe leads to believing which is necessary for committed full throated roaring horseshit.

Now we are into why (and I added to this) don’t those jackasses in Werewolf Apocalypse 7 call animal control? Basically liberals trying to use real world thinking to think about non real world things. This annoys me because now I think they enjoy fiction more than me and in saying that I recognize its a petty thing to mention even for the purpose of making a joke that has gone horribly flat by the end of this sentence.

Comment #58: pharmakos  on  09/24  at  04:33 PM

(there’s so many villains and heroes living in Marvel’s New York, how come you never hear about some super villain taking over Mississippi, or a Louisiana-based superteam? And how many actual normal civilians are left in New York, anyway?)

I have a superhero-universe novel I’m working on where the protagonist, a supervillain, lives in Baltimore precisely *because* the world’s biggest superteam is in New York, even though she’s originally a New Yorker. (And she lives in Baltimore because her specific form of supervillainy involves a lot of blackmailing politicians, but she can’t live in DC because there’s a government-sponsored anti-super police force in DC that protects the capital from supervillains. So she lives in Baltimore and she *commutes* to DC to commit acts of supervillainy. grin) (Also, it’s in New York because that’s where the UN is, not because New York is just so cool.)

There also are in fact regional superhero teams all over the place, numerous supers working for real-world rogue states or terrorist organizations, numerous supers working for real-world governments who in reality use questionable tactics and in the story have supers doing questionable things, and a libertarian supervillain NiceGuy(tm) who lives on an island he made himself in the Pacific because he can, but that still isn’t going to get him into the protagonist’s pants. (She refuses to sleep with him precisely *because* he thinks that impressing her with his great feats of supervillainy should get her to sleep with him.) There are in this universe relatively few of the X-Men style supervillains who are 100% about promoting the cause of their superhuman race and don’t really care in the slightest about the struggles of the ethnic group they were born into.

Comment #59: Alara J Rogers  on  09/24  at  04:48 PM

pharmakos : Torture is wrong. 24 is fiction. Amanda’s post was great.

The thing is we’re all agreed on that, these things are not controversial, and now I have nothing to say that’s on-topic while trying to keep from doing actual work. So I’ll probably back to discuss stupid things like genre savvyness in a few minutes when I have to wait for another code compile. wink

Comment #60: BlackBloc  on  09/24  at  04:49 PM

Alara J Rogers : I like your ideas and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

I’ve been tossing around the idea of making a fantasy novel that squares with left-anarchist politics. The only problem i see with that plan is that I don’t think I’m that great a writer, and that I expect this means I will be as subtle in making my point as Ayn Rand…

Comment #61: BlackBloc  on  09/24  at  04:58 PM

Precisely why I don’t write novels either.

I think I’ve had some pretty good ideas.  Expressing them?  I’d be worse than combination of Ayn Rand and the Marquis De Sade and even (OH)John Ringo(NO).

Comment #62: shah8  on  09/24  at  05:01 PM

Basically liberals trying to use real world thinking to think about non real world things.

Or real world things. The point is, narrative thinking and realistic thinking follow way different patterns, and it takes some degree of awareness to differentiate between the two, or at least experience of both narratives AND reality. For some people with very unchallenging realities, narrative thinking is taking over to the point where it is expected that everyone think narratively all the time, and whenever people think realistically instead, Now They Are Stupid. This is resulting both in realistic fiction getting denounced as non-realistic, which is absurd, and in real life getting denounced as non-realistic, which is just as absurd. Book characters should always be aware of what sort of book they’re in and know all its tropes backwards and forwards. Real people should also be always aware of what sort of book they’re in, and know all its tropes backwards and forwards. And the ease with which this turns into a blame-the-victim mentality when people “allow themselves” to be surprised by something, or fail to handle it with correct dramatic aplomb… it scares me.

Because, seriously, if you can blame someone for not “expecting” to get jumped by something that doesn’t exist (“but there were rumors of mysterious impossible things happening!”), you’re probably not that far away from also being able to blame someone for getting attacked by things that do exist.

Comment #63: thecynicalromantic  on  09/24  at  05:20 PM

<i.And BlackBloc, about 2 years ago Marvel started to address the only in New York issue by creating superhero teams in all fifty states. Personally I think that supervillains should focus on small towns to create their doomsday devices. I mean, mayors in those towns would probably give them tax breaks for all the jobs they were creating. </i>

In the more thoughtful superhero RPGs (I know, I know - don’t look at me like that) such as Abherrant, this issue is considered.  India and China wind up considerably more powerful in the post-powered world.

Comment #64: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  09/24  at  06:20 PM

Then the libruls howl you are not jack bauer you are a silly sausage who thinks he is jack bauer

Molesworth, is that you…?

Comment #65: Rebecca  on  09/24  at  06:32 PM

“Molesworth, is that you…?”

I felt compelled to google molesworth. Compelled! 

“Book characters should always be aware of what sort of book they’re in and know all its tropes backwards and forwards.”

Unless its genre fiction I disagree. I’m not sure what I think of the rest of your post. Thinking of yourself and others with fictional tropes seems inevitable sometimes and mostly its harmless. People like the story of being married or whatever and they try to live up to it. I like the story of myself as a leftie that goes to protests and wishes what they make things better for everyone in some concrete way. The world has more erotic and fascinating stories but mine is alright. I’m not sure when the use of fiction becomes weird and dangerous. I can tell when it has become so. There are usually a lot of dead bodies.

On the point of knowing your own tropes. When you said that I thought of the Fox real americans who have a list of things they should like and I figure they must try to like them but no one really buys it and you have to figure they know they are bullshitting themselves. Once you know your tropes and that they are tropes you have gone beyond them.

“I’ve been tossing around the idea of making a fantasy novel that squares with left-anarchist politics.”

You probably already have but if you haven’t you should check out Ursula Le Guin’s The Dispossed.

“now I have nothing to say that’s on-topic “

Its the problem with people who write about real things isn’t it. Like the taser post. I have nothing to add to that. Nothing. Its there, you see statistics and nothing in personal experience contradicts it. What is there to say other than, yah the cops should stop assaulting people because its convenient and more or less legal.

Comment #66: pharmakos  on  09/24  at  06:56 PM

Book characters should always be aware of what sort of book they’re in and know all its tropes backwards and forwards.

Like Ambush Bug?

Real people should also be always aware of what sort of book they’re in, and know all its tropes backwards and forwards.

Clearly I’m in some sort of badly-plotted dystopian nightmare book…

“This episode was very badly written!” —Gwen DeMarco, Galaxy Quest

Comment #67: liberalrob  on  09/24  at  07:11 PM

“FWIW, Wonder Woman used a magic lasso which caused no discomfort but compelled its prisoner to tell the truth.”

being compelled to tell the truth may or may not be a discomfort IMHO

Comment #68: jefft452  on  09/24  at  07:15 PM

“I’ve been tossing around the idea of making a fantasy novel that squares with left-anarchist politics.”

You probably already have but if you haven’t you should check out Ursula Le Guin’s The Dispossed.

1) I did read it
2) It’s sci-fi, not fantasy
3) We can always use more of them wink

I heard Earthsea was good. Same author.

Comment #69: BlackBloc  on  09/24  at  07:17 PM

@liberalrob: Hey, when I got to college I was stuck for two years in the first half of Fanny Burney’s Evelina. (It’s one of those long-winded 18th century novels where an innocent young girl is introduced to the dissipation of fashionable life and then we mock everybody.) I have not yet gotten my contrived 18th-century ending where I become a landed aristocrat, though. *sulk*

Comment #70: thecynicalromantic  on  09/24  at  07:29 PM

I know its not fantasy. I read the first earthsea book. Its like every cliche ever but done in total earnest. Has a sort of quality to it but I would never recommend it. There was a terrible tv version with Danny Glover. He must have been a big fan.

I don’t know any really political fantasy books apart from Terry Goodkind’s objectivist horror show, “the sword of truth”. That’s worth reading for the crazy. Number one scene has to be where the main character massacres a bunch of unarmed pacifists at a peace rally because they lack “moral clarity”. I would definitely read a leftie fantasy book.

Comment #71: pharmakos  on  09/24  at  07:33 PM

Now we are into why (and I added to this) don’t those jackasses in Werewolf Apocalypse 7 call animal control? Basically liberals trying to use real world thinking to think about non real world things. This annoys me because now I think they enjoy fiction more than me and in saying that I recognize its a petty thing to mention even for the purpose of making a joke that has gone horribly flat by the end of this sentence.

Oh, you’re going to hate these guys...

Comment #72: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  09/24  at  08:15 PM

I don’t read a lot of sci-fi or fantasy, but Ursula Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness is one of the great novels in the English language about gender - an intelligent, engrossing feminist sci-fi that knocked me on my ass when I read it in high school.

Comment #73: Brendon  on  09/24  at  08:36 PM

Generally speaking, you have to call the UK’s sci-fi scene for political whatever (especially for anarchists)...
Iain Banks Culture series
Ken McLeod’s Fall Revolution
etc, etc…
Octavia Butler’s Parable duology is the only influential noninsane political sci-fi work in the US

If you strike off religion, there just isn’t that much sophisticated politics in fantasy.

Comment #74: shah8  on  09/24  at  08:54 PM

Ooops, that I can recall off the top of my head, sorry.

Comment #75: shah8  on  09/24  at  08:54 PM

“FWIW, Wonder Woman used a magic lasso which caused no discomfort but compelled its prisoner to tell the truth.”

being compelled to tell the truth may or may not be a discomfort IMHO

The Wonder Woman animated film.  Steve Trevor, just captured after crashing on Thymescira, is being held by the lasso, facing a group of superhumanly powerful and very pissed off women (and their queen).  This results, despite his obvious efforts not to say anything and be respectful, in him blurting out “You daughter has a great rack” when it’s demanded if there’s anything he’d like to say.

Comment #76: KeithM  on  09/24  at  08:57 PM

If you strike off religion, there just isn’t that much sophisticated politics in fantasy.

Hence my interest in making one. Lack of supply. I like fantasy but some of its tropes are… distasteful, politically. But if someone can subvert the Technocrat/Progressive tropes of sci-fi into something a bit more leftish, I suspect it’s possible to do it for fantasy,

Comment #77: BlackBloc  on  09/24  at  09:17 PM

Talking about liberal politics in fantasy and no one’s mentioned Pratchett?

Comment #78: Rebecca  on  09/24  at  11:42 PM

If you strike off religion, there just isn’t that much sophisticated politics in fantasy.

Hmm.  Try looking at this, and this (they do have religion, of the “Pope calling a crusade” type).

Comment #79: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  09/25  at  01:56 AM

I don’t know any really political fantasy books apart from Terry Goodkind’s objectivist horror show, “the sword of truth”. That’s worth reading for the crazy. Number one scene has to be where the main character massacres a bunch of unarmed pacifists at a peace rally because they lack “moral clarity”. I would definitely read a leftie fantasy book.

Goodkind’s first two books were actually good, but the series degenerated rather quickly. The infamous “evil pacifist” scene was in the eighth book, which is about as pleasant reading as Mein Kamph. The context is that the pacifists are serving as willing human shields for the Bad Guys, so, therefore, according to Goodkind, they exactly as evil as those they’re protecting and deserve to die along with them. Which is slightly, but only slightly, less outrageous than killing them for the hell of it. Now, if you have to kill a bunch of defenseless people in order to keep the Bad Guys from Taking Over The World, you might very well end up deciding that killing the defenseless people is the right thing to do, but you don’t put them in the same category as “those evil bastards trying to kill me” and celebrate your great victory over them.

Comment #80: Doug S.  on  09/25  at  02:55 AM

Someone brought up Marvel’s “The Initiative”

Which is intensely realistic and profoundly stupid.

Superheroes working out a particular city? fine. But the state of florida, for example, has several population centers. Which are an hour apart by flight.

The state of Missouri has 2 major centers, which are on opposite ends of the state and about as far apart as New York and DC. Missouri’s team has to be able to scramble for a crisis in either, or even both at once? No one expects Spiderman to swing down and protect DC.

and how would the Rangers (Texas’s team) manage to cover both Austin and Houston?

Now, this is clearly a terrible idea. But it strikes me as realistic because it’s showy and looks like something is being done, but it isn’t effective, might be counter productive, and wastes money, but the politicians in charge can claim credit for something that stars in parades and is patriotically named and such.

Comment #81: karpad  on  09/25  at  03:40 AM

You’d think Tony fucking Stark would have thought of a better idea, though, even if it’s not as showy. But that’s the issue with average IQ comics writers trying to write for super-genius level characters.

Comment #82: BlackBloc  on  09/25  at  10:24 AM

Tony’s not always a very thorough thinker.  Man’s more deep than wide (I can’t believe I just said that about Tony Stark).

Comment #83: NBarnes  on  09/25  at  11:49 AM

Rebecca—for some reason, Pratchett never made it all the way into fantasy fandom.  It’s bizarre, because his stuff is easily some of the best around, but because it’s humor . . .

I dunno.  Maybe there’s just too much of it, and people are too intimidated by how good it is.

Comment #84: Punditus Maximus  on  09/25  at  01:46 PM

I’ve always hated what I call Violence Nerds. These are filmmakers like Tarantino and authors like John Irving and, to a lesser extent, Jerzy Kozinski. They have a puerile fascination with violence, the more gruesome the better, as they play with their characters like bored cats. The violence they lavish in their films and books is usually cartoonish and served up with heaping soupcons of disdain for the victims. I refuse to watch “24,” but from everything I’ve read about it, it’s crafted by Violence Nerds of the first order.

Comment #85: Bitter Scribe  on  09/25  at  01:51 PM

Blackbloc, did you ever read Marge Piercey’s “Woman on The edge of Time”? It also has some Sci-fi in with the fantasy but I think it’s one of the better attempts at anarchist sci-fi I’ve read.

A friend of mine runs a distro, mostly for the sake of his “No Quarter” Zine which is about radical interpretations of Pirates (it’s an awesome). He’s also really into Sci-Fi and fantasy with anarchist undertones. His blog is at http://anarchistpirates.blogspot.com/ and I bet if you get in touch with him he could give you a lot more reccomendations for anarchist fantasy.

Comment #86: HonestB  on  09/25  at  08:21 PM

*an awesome read

Comment #87: HonestB  on  09/25  at  08:22 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.