Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Yes, Sexy Puritan, that’s it exactly Previous entry: Zombies are Republicans

Insider to Ed Schultz: Palin is clueless; NRO columnist calls for her to bow out

Progressive radio show host Ed Schultz has spoken to folks inside the McCain campaign, and there’s a serious meltdown over Palin:

McCain Camp insiders say Palin “clueless”

Capitol Hill sources are telling me that senior McCain people are more than concerned about Palin. The campaign has held a mock debate and a mock press conference; both are being described as “disastrous.” One senior McCain aide was quoted as saying, “What are we going to do?” The McCain people want to move this first debate to some later, undetermined date, possibly never. People on the inside are saying the Alaska Governor is “clueless.”

Of course this should be an attempt to lower expectations if/when the veep debate occurs, but given her recent performances (scoring a perfect -100 on every interview), I tend to believe this is real panic. And if that isn’t enough, you can’t get a more scorching indictment of Sarah Palin than this one, by Kathleen Parker at the National Review, of all places. Read some of the damning column below the fold.
Parker calls for Palin

to bail out

.

Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League.

No one hates saying that more than I do. Like so many women, I’ve been pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform brilliantly. I’ve also noticed that I watch her interviews with the held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does. My cringe reflex is exhausted.

Palin filibusters. She repeats words, filling space with deadwood. Cut the verbiage and there’s not much content there. Here’s but one example of many from her interview with Hannity: “Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to get into the issue that we’re talking about today. And that’s something that John McCain, too, his track record, proving that he can work both sides of the aisle, he can surpass the partisanship that must be surpassed to deal with an issue like this.”

...If Palin were a man, we’d all be guffawing, just as we do every time Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because she’s a woman — and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket — we are reluctant to say what is painfully true.

What to do?

McCain can’t repudiate his choice for running mate. He not only risks the wrath of the GOP’s unforgiving base, but he invites others to second-guess his executive decision-making ability. Barack Obama faces the same problem with Biden.

Only Palin can save McCain, her party, and the country she loves. She can bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend more time with her newborn. No one would criticize a mother who puts her family first.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 04:30 PM • (32) Comments

The problem (for McCain, not for us) is that she’s a fundie diva who thinks God wouldn’t give her nuthin’ she can’t handle. So she’s not going anywhere. And yes, if McCain sacks her the election’s over tomorrow - and that much, anyway, she knows.

I wonder how much cramming is actually going on in these cram sessions, and how much of it is Palin finding reasons not to sit down and study (“Who is the vice-presidential nominee here, Joe? Hmm?”)(which has got to go up Lieberman’s ass sideways)(which almost makes the whole thing worth it). The Couric interview was worse than the Gibson, and I didn’t think that was possible. She’s actually backsliding.

Comment #1: Rick Massimo  on  09/26  at  04:41 PM

I think Palin will withdraw “for family reasons” very soon.  I just can’t see any other outcome.

On a possibly related note; I read Giuliani, and significantly, his current wife were on McCain’s plane travelling with McCain to tonight’s debate.  Hmm…  What’s up with that??

Comment #2: bicmon  on  09/26  at  04:43 PM

As Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann were discussing last night, McSame is the lord of long shots.  Everything about his campaign will be a long shot.  Palin’s resignation less than six weeks before Election Day?  Gosh, what a Mavericky McMaverick long shot that’ll be!

It’s like The Apprentice, only in reverse.

Comment #3: Zandar  on  09/26  at  04:53 PM

I tried.  I really, really tried to sit through the clip of Gov. Palin trying to explain and rationalize her assertion that just because Alaska is the closest US state to the Russian Federation she has “foreign policy experience.”

However, I had to shut it down because my brain tried to crawl out of my earhole.

If McCain sacks Palin, all hell’s out for noon in the GOP, because his best bet at that point (what with the tanking economy) will be Mitt Romney.  The Republican al Qaeda will revolt almost en masse.

I’ll have to ask the nurses to let me out of the wetpack so I can lay in supplies of extra popcorn for the debates.

Comment #4: The Wanderer  on  09/26  at  04:59 PM

If she tanks the VP debate next week, Gov. Palin better stay away from small aircraft.  I don’t believe for a second that the Rethugs are above taking out one of their own if they think it’ll help them maintain power.

Comment #5: libdevil  on  09/26  at  05:01 PM

For once, I think Kathleen really, really nails it: Palin is soooo not there!  This is exactly where the Tiny State Stuff matters so much - she is totally out of her league.

I too wonder if “family reasons” will have her saying “thanks, but no thanks” before too long.

Comment #6: Ms Kate  on  09/26  at  05:01 PM

I don’t know, I could see the “don’t ask me questions, it’s meeeeeeeeeean” thing taking her pretty far.  Think of what it did for W.

Anyway, the reporters are only asking her questions about the issues because she’s a girl.  And they’re mean.  Mean!

Comment #7: killjoy  on  09/26  at  05:12 PM

Miss Alaska 1984, Contestant Number 8, clueless?

Judge for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qQKdHxeMkk

And then digg it:

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Sarah_Palin_The_Alaska_Pageant_Intro

Comment #8: Yamara  on  09/26  at  05:13 PM

If Palin were a man, we’d all be guffawing, just as we do every time Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because she’s a woman — and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket — we are reluctant to say what is painfully true.

Amusing that she comes right and says the whole GOP establishment is sexist, judging Palin by a different standard because she’s a woman.

Comment #9: ummeli  on  09/26  at  05:20 PM

It’s a trap!!

She’s just pretending to be vacant. When the debate rolls around, she’s gonna go all William Freakin’ Buckley on Biden’s ass!

Or not.

Comment #10: Quaker in a Basement  on  09/26  at  05:22 PM

But because she’s a woman — and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket — we are reluctant to say what is painfully true.

Speak for yourself, KathPark.  All of us over here on the liberal side of the fence have been calling her unqualified since the announcement.

You called us “sexist” for it.

Guess what?  Campbell Brown is right; the sexism is on your side.  There’s nothing wrong with calling a woman an idiot, if, in fact, she’s an idiot.  (Well, and acknowledging that one idiotic woman does not mean all women are idiots).

McCain should go all mavericky and straight-talky and admit he picked a woman b/c Hillary lost and he wanted women to vote for him despite the fact he’s never once supported legislation that would support women.  Admit he doesn’t really see the difference between Hillary and Sarah b/c they both have vaginas.  Also, that the fundies wanted one of their own dominionists one heartbeat away. 

Admit it.  It was a rash choice, and he trusted the wrong people to vet her.  She’s obviously not ready, and since it’s his instinct to PUT COUNTRY FIRST, he’s going to have to let her go for the good of us all.

Wouldn’t that be mavericky, my friends?  Seriously!  From a POW, we could accept it!  For 5 years he had to survive on his own without having other people vet co-candidates for him, so it shouldn’t b e a surprise that when he had other people vetting co-candidates, it didn’t work out.  He’s going with his gut, now.  Welcome my real VP choice:  Joe “thank g-d I can stop tutoring her” Lieberman!

Comment #11: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  09/26  at  05:27 PM

My fundie friends all two of them love Palin. They see her running in 2012. Without McCain holding her back they see her the next president. I have a feeling Palin sees herself the same way, sometime the most incompetent people are the most confident.

Comment #12: karl  on  09/26  at  06:15 PM

This is just too good to be true. Americans turning against a clueless candidate because she’s clueless? In the nation that elected Ronald Reagan twice?

No. Freaking. Way.

Comment #13: Bitter Scribe  on  09/26  at  06:15 PM

Quaker in a Basement:
If she calls Biden a queer and threatens to beat him up, maybe we’ll finally get some class back in politics!

Comment #14: AndersH  on  09/26  at  06:20 PM

Hillary Clinton isn’t my favorite politician by a long shot, but damned if Palin doesn’t make me miss Hillary with a passion.  When Clinton was asked what qualifications she had to be President, she actually had non-joke answers.  She didn’t pout and refuse to speak to reporters because they might be mean to her.  She didn’t run out of talking points after two minutes and say, “I’ll get back to you on that,” in the tone of someone who’s just realized she forgot to pick up Capri Suns for the peewee hockey team.  She could even speak in complete sentences!

I’m not sure how much the VP debate will kill Palin’s momentum, though.  It might turn off the PUMAs* and people who wanted to vote for a woman but won’t really want to vote for a dim, uninformed one, but I have the sinking suspicion that a lot of Republicans prefer a female candidate who just playacts cutely at politics.  (It’s the same with their male candidates, really; fake macho men like Bush are way more popular with the base than real war heroes like Kerry or McCain.)

*Incidentally, the only PUMAs I know personally are men.  I don’t know what this says about anything.

Comment #15: Shaenon  on  09/26  at  06:36 PM

Two interesting takes on Palin:

Christopher Orr at the New Republic asks if the McCain campaign “broke” Palin.

http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/09/26/has-the-mccain-campaign-broken-sarah-palin.aspx

And Judith Warner thinks she finally gets why some women see themselves Palin and comes to a conclusion that is really interesting for feminists to contemplate.

http://warner.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/25/poor-sarah/?em

Comment #16: chingona  on  09/26  at  06:39 PM

Sarah Palin, the next Harriet Miers? 

One can only dream.  She doesn’t seem like a take-one-for-the-team kind of person.

I know this is mean, but it seems like the only strength of hers that appeals to a mass audience is her looks, and I really don’t see what the big deal is.  I mean, sure, compared to the standard-issue female Republican politician she’s attractive.  But it’s not like McCain is running with Angelina Jolie’s older sister.  I just don’t get the constant references to her attractiveness.

I also don’t understand the toe-throat-Joe-Biden comment in Parker’s piece.

Apparently today is a bad day for me.

Comment #17: deep6  on  09/26  at  06:44 PM

You know the final exam nightmare?  I have a recurring variety of that dream, but not about tests.  In my nightmare, I’m thrown into situations like 1) being forced to play for the Chicago Bulls at a key moment, 2) having to fly an F-18 into combat when I don’t even know how to make one go forward, or 3) having to perform heart surgery on my grandmother because the doctor needed to take a phone call.

I imagine Sarah Palin is feeling the same way right now.  Only it ain’t no dream.

Comment #18: Informis  on  09/26  at  06:46 PM

Oh, and although I really don’t think Palin’s very bright, that doesn’t mean I think it’s wise to underestimate her.  Like Bush, she makes up for her intellectual shortcomings and lack of any genuine interest in government by being a) very charming and b) very, very nasty to anyone who gets in her way.  As other commentators have noted, the only times she seems comfortable and confident in interviews are the times when she’s given an opening to attack Democrats, liberals, elites, people in cities, non-Alaskans, and similar dangerous enemies of Sarah Palin.

Comment #19: Shaenon  on  09/26  at  06:48 PM

as much as I love the idea of this story, I find it hard to believe that Ed Schultz has sources inside the McCain campaign.

Comment #20: dirtgirl  on  09/26  at  06:59 PM

Help me out here - is Biden really a lot worse than I think he is? Because he seems to be pretty close to the mean, in terms of how often he says dumb things on the campaign trail. Am I just not hearing about this stuff, or are these rightwing writers just making shit up?

Oh, wait, I think I might have answered my own question.

Comment #21: spencer  on  09/26  at  07:21 PM

I don’t think Palin’s going anywhere, even if she’s a complete disaster in the debates and for the rest of the campaign. It would be an unrecoverable implosion for McCain and the GOP. The entire evangelical base would revolt, probably form a third party and try to nominate a dark horse ticket paring Palin with Sam Brownback or something. The rest of the party, consisting of a motley assortment of gun nuts, corporate lobbyists, and elderly Cubans, would probably be too demoralized to even get out of bed the morning of Nov. 4.  It would be the end of the modern American political landscape as we know it.

We can hope, can’t we?

Comment #22: jte  on  09/26  at  07:29 PM

While I completely believe Schultz’ claims here, I really wish this was coming from somewhere like the NY Times or CBS News or some more mainstream media outlet.  The problem with this report is that it comes from an admittedly biased source, so while most of us here will completely believe this, if they tried to play this outside of the progressive echo chamber, it would be largely discounted, much as a similar report which claimed problems in the Obama Campaign would be largely written off if it were to come from Rush Limbaugh.

Sigh.  I hope more people in the press pick up on this and can claim their own sources, because I think it’s something that could be completely devastating to the McCain Campaign.

Oh well… I’m honestly not that worried about this election anymore at this point.  The damage has already been done, and its only gonna get worse, whether they have a VP Debate or not.  If they try to cancel, it’s going to expose the fact that they are terrified of letting her be seen in such an vulnerable setting; if they let her go on, she’s likely to open her mouth and words are likely to come out.  And it’s not gonna be good, at all.

Comment #23: DTG in STL  on  09/26  at  08:23 PM

Help me out here - is Biden really a lot worse than I think he is? Because he seems to be pretty close to the mean, in terms of how often he says dumb things on the campaign trail. Am I just not hearing about this stuff, or are these rightwing writers just making shit up?

It’s the narrative. Biden is “gaffe-prone”, so every gaffe he makes is evidence of that. Whereas someone else making the same number of gaffes would be treated as though it were a series of one-offs.

Comment #24: Dolbia  on  09/26  at  08:32 PM

Palin seems to combine the worst aspects of Bush (vapidness, lack of intellectual curiosity, inarticulateness) and Cheney (vindictiveness, secrecy, bloodlust). 

As far as physical attractiveness, she’s good-looking, but I see better looking women in her age bracket at the local Stop-n-Shop!

Comment #25: Big Bad Bald Bastard  on  09/27  at  12:44 AM

I’ve been thinking recently, as McCain was doing his ‘the economy ate my debate homework’ routine, that it seems very very likely that Palin will run for the Republican nomination in 2012.  And she might win it.  The Crazy Jesus People love her.  It is impossible to overstate how much they love her.  They’ll give her money and give her votes.  Obama vs Palin, 2012.  It’ll be a trip.

Comment #26: NBarnes  on  09/27  at  01:37 AM

notice how Hide-Her-Away-from-the-Media Palin didn’t make any comments after the McCain-Obama debate last night.  Fox News and CNN got a handful of words from Biden.  But NOOOOOOO Palin in sight.  Biden’s gonna tear her up on thursday.  i’m betting my whole portfolio on that (whatever’s left of it) - thanks Bush!!!!!!

Comment #27: Catherine  on  09/27  at  04:44 PM

why isnt macain back in washington getting the bailout package taken care of ?

Comment #28: ipaintgolf  on  09/27  at  05:57 PM

Palin is very confused, not smart, mean and nasty. Palin thinks she is smart in my view she is a very selfish, self centered, to say she did not blink when asked to be a VP knowing she is a complete IDIOT has no knowledge, in my view she is dumber than a box of rocks. Mclaim picked his perfect match.

Comment #29: Maria Ramos  on  09/27  at  06:51 PM

According to Gov. Palin she can see Russia from her back yard in Alaska!!! I’m going to my back yard in Florida to see my grandkids in North Carolina!! DUHHHHHH, SARAH.

Comment #30: Maria Ramos  on  09/27  at  07:09 PM

Palin could withdraw without sinking McCain if she claims it is because statements from meanie leftie liberals are harmful to her children. It’s for the kids. I don’t want to bow out, but the cruelty of the MSM will hurt my family. That will keep the fundies on board, voting for McCain out of revenge against the liberal media and their scary brown darling candidate. Then McCain will pick Mitt to placate the Wall Street base.

Could happen.

Comment #31: Martin O  on  09/28  at  03:49 PM

Like Bush, she makes up for her intellectual shortcomings and lack of any genuine interest in government by being a) very charming and b) very, very nasty to anyone who gets in her way.

True. But that’s only a problem once she’s in office. In the shortness of a presidential campaign, she doesn’t have any chance to charm the press, whom she’s being hidden from, and without the power of a political office, she can’t exact any nasty revenge on anyone.

Palin thinks she is smart in my view

This is almost definitely true. This is where her provincialism gets in the way: whom has she ever been around to compare herself to intellectually? She thinks she’s very smart because she doesn’t know what smart is.

Comment #32: Tyro  on  09/28  at  06:09 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.