Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: A Day In The Life Of A Feminist Previous entry: Sally Kern and her zombie anti-gay meme at OKC wingnut fest

Jobless rate jumps to 7.6 percent, 598K jobs lost

As the GOP strokes itself with glee in its attempt to undercut the stimulus package for political gain, look at what the tax break, spend and warmongering economy of their former Dear Leader has wrought just in the last year—3.5 million jobs have vanished. (AP):

Recession-battered employers eliminated 598,000 jobs in January, the most since the end of 1974, and catapulted the unemployment rate to 7.6 percent. The grim figures were further proof that the nation’s job climate is deteriorating at an alarming clip with no end in sight.

The Labor Department’s report, released Friday, showed the terrible toll the drawn-out recession is having on workers and companies. It also puts even more pressure on Congress and President Barack Obama’s administration to revive the economy through a stimulus package and a revamped financial bailout plan, both of which are nearing completion.

The latest net total of job losses was far worse than the 524,000 that economists expected. Job reductions in November and December also were deeper than previously reported.

With cost-cutting employers in no mood to hire, the unemployment rate bolted to 7.6 percent in January, the highest since September 1992. The increase in the jobless rate from 7.2 percent in December also was worse than the 7.5 percent rate economists expected.

...The average time it took for an unemployed person to find any job — full or part time — rose to 19.8 weeks in January, compared with 17.5 weeks a year ago, underscoring the increasing difficulty the out-of-work are having in finding a new job.

Some other numbers for the Republicans to ponder as they dick around.

* Factories slashed 207,000 jobs in January, the largest one-month drop since October 1982
* Construction companies got rid of 111,000 jobs.
* Professional and business services chopped 121,000 positions.
* Retailers eliminated 45,000 jobs.
* Leisure and hospitality axed 28,000 slots.
* 598,000 non farm payroll positions lost on a seasonally adjusted basis.
* 2,647 unemployed for more than 6 months.

UPDATE: Oh man, here’s a compilation video from Think Progress showing how Senate Republicans don’t see a need to act promptly (or have any bright ideas for that matter). My remaining Republican do-nothing Senator Richard Burr and the Palmetto State queen are among those weighing in.

LINDSEY GRAHAM (R-SC): We do not need any more news conferences. What we need is getting more than 16 people in a room. We need to slow down, take a timeout, and get it right.

  ROGER WICKER (R-MI): As Thomas Jefferson reminded Americans in his day — and I quote — “Delay is preferable to error.” Let’s not rush into doing this the wrong way.

  JOHN ENSIGN (R-NV): So we need to act much more responsibly than this bill acts. It’s still time. There is no hurry.

  TOM COBURN (R-OK): There’s no reason for us to hurry up, number one. There’s no reason for us not to look at every area of this bill and make sure the american people know about it.



BONUS BRASS BALLS: Former Chief of Staff Andy Card whines about President Obama not wearing a jacket and tie at all times in the White House (as if Dear Leader always did—ha—see this slideshow at Huff Post that proves Card and other cranky GOP babies are lying). LEFT: A jacketless President George W. Bush signs forms with staff secretary Harriet Miers in the Oval Office on January 22, 2001…two days after his inauguration. And as Jamison Foster at County Fair notes, Card is caught in a baldface lie since he’s photographed right next to Bush as George Tenet stands there without a jacket on (RIGHT). 

So while Card tries to change the subject from the flailing economy to this BS:

“The Oval Office symbolizes…the Constitution, the hopes and dreams, and I’m going to say democracy. And when you have a dress code in the Supreme Court and a dress code on the floor of the Senate, floor of the House, I think it’s appropriate to have an expectation that there will be a dress code that respects the office of the President.”

Mr. Card went on to add that, while he would not criticize Mr. Obama for his appearance, “I do expect him to send the message that people who are going to be in the Oval Office should treat the office with the respect that it has earned over history.”

He needs to think about how Bush and Cheney, even if they were in a suit and tie 24/7, did far worse in terms of respecting and honoring this country by sh*tting on and torching the Constitution for the last eight years.

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 12:03 PM • (34) Comments

It’s all dog whistle. Wingnut legend has it that St. Ronnie always wore a suit and tie to the Oval Office. This young buck Barack HOOSSANE wouldn’t understand the significance…
More fiddling while America burns. Thanks Andy, but next time pick a better tune at least.

Comment #1: histro-geek  on  02/06  at  12:14 PM

Card’s a classic stuck up “suit = important” Massachusetts Prick.

It’s a stupid stuffy elitist thing around these parts that Card doesn’t understand isn’t taken well in red and purple states, or even other blue states.

More superficial bullshit - move on.

Comment #2: Ms Kate  on  02/06  at  12:22 PM

Ms Kate: Yes, there is definitely a conservatism to office dress in the Northeast in general, in the Boston area in particular. However, Card also typifies Republicanism in general: Competence, honesty, basic human decency are all much less important than the appearance of “respectability.”

Comment #3: Nobody in Particular  on  02/06  at  12:41 PM

We got a division-wide email at my Giant Evil Corporation telling us that all executive salaries have been frozen until further notice.  It’s not going to make the people whose salaries were cut by 18% feel much better, but at least it’s something to share the pain.

Comment #4: Mnemosyne  on  02/06  at  12:56 PM

Ok, so I’m not the only one who felt that “Obama isn’t respecting the Oval Office because he doesn’t dress properly” was a racist dog whistle.

Comment #5: Entomologista  on  02/06  at  01:10 PM

to be fair, there is another side to dress in Boston, and that’s “Lab casual” which basically amounts to “Don’t wear anything you’d feel bad loosing if you accidentally splash bleach or some other chemical on during the day”  Not even the professors wear suits, unless their going to try and beg a grant out of the NIH.

Comment #6: Voice in the Crowd  on  02/06  at  01:11 PM

As has been pointed out before, there are existing pictures of people not wearing a jacket in the oval office during the bush administration. The claim that there was a strict code of dress was made up to be used as a bludgeon against anyone not wearing their jacket or to give people the idea that Bush was a “grown up.”

I really don’t know whom this claim, false as it was, was supposed to appeal to. I think there is a segment of the middle class that regards “dressing up” as a sign of good breeding and character (eg, the sort of people stereotyped to dress up to go shopping).

As far as scientists and “Lab casual,” I think generally if you are accepting the Nobel Prize, it is acceptable to wear a nice suit. Otherwise, wearing expensive clothes while giving a seminar places you under suspicion of trying to pull one over on the audience by distracting them from your data.

Comment #7: Tyro  on  02/06  at  01:19 PM

“There is no hurry”?

“There is no hurry”?

What planet are these people living on? More importantly, are they hiring there?

Comment #8: Lauren O  on  02/06  at  01:22 PM

JUST IN: Barack Obama latest remarks on the economy—made during the announcement of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, he continues smacking down the GOP foot-dragging and animus.

Last month, another six hundred thousand Americans lost their jobs. That is the single worst month of job loss in 35 years. The Department of Labor also adjusted their job loss numbers for 2008 upwards, and now report that we have lost 3.6 million jobs since this recession began.

That’s 3.6 million Americans who wake up every day wondering how they are going to pay their bills, stay in their homes, and provide for their children.  That’s 3.6 million Americans who need our help.

I am sure that at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, members of the Senate are reading these same numbers this morning.  I hope they share my sense of urgency and draw the same, unmistakable conclusion: the situation could not be more serious. These numbers demand action. It is inexcusable and irresponsible to get bogged down in distraction and delay while millions of Americans are being put out of work. It is time for Congress to act. It is time to pass an Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Plan to get our economy moving again.

This is not some abstract debate. It is an urgent and growing crisis that can only be fully understood through the unseen stories that lie underneath each and every one of those lost jobs. Somewhere in America, a small business has shut its doors; a family has said goodbye to their home; a young parent has lost their livelihood, and doesn’t know what’s going to take its place.

These Americans are counting on us. All of us in Washington must remember that we’re here to work for the American people. And if we drag our feet and fail to act, this crisis will turn into a catastrophe. We’ll continue to get devastating job reports like today’s – month after month, year after year. These aren’t my assessments – these are the assessments of independent economists. Millions of jobs will be lost. More families will lose their homes. More Americans will go without health care. We’ll continue to send our kids to crumbling schools, and be crippled by our dependence on foreign oil.

That is the result of the inaction, and it is completely unacceptable to the American people.

The American people did not choose more of the same. They did not send us to Washington to get stuck in partisan posturing, or to turn back to the same tried and failed approaches that were rejected in the last election. They sent us here with a mandate for change, and the expectation that we would act.

The bill before Congress isn’t perfect, but it is absolutely necessary.  We will continue to refine it and improve it.  There may be provisions in the bill that need to be left out and some that need to be added.  But broadly speaking, it is the right size. It is the right scope. It has the right priorities to create 3 to 4 million jobs and to do it in a way that lays the groundwork for long term growth by fixing our schools; modernizing health care to lower costs; repairing our roads, bridges, levees, and other vital infrastructure; and moving us towards energy independence.  It is what America needs right now. It will take months – even years – to renew our economy. But every day that Washington fails to act, that recovery is delayed.

Comment #9: Pam Spaulding  on  02/06  at  01:28 PM

Anyone know how many of the people in that video are up for reelection in 2010 and how many just got re-elected?  How many of them are trying to look like fiscal conservatives because that’s what they think their states want them to look like?

Comment #10: Voice in the Crowd  on  02/06  at  01:31 PM

No, Entomologista, you’re not the only one.  The dog whistle came out at ABC News as well.  Think Progress noted that Obama was blasted for his “lavish lifestyle” while he calls for maximum salaries at bailed out corporations (http://thinkprogress.org/2009/02/05/abc-obama-salary/).  Idiots!

Comment #11: fastiller  on  02/06  at  01:32 PM

“It has the right priorities to create 3 to 4 million jobs and to do it in a way that lays the groundwork for long term growth by fixing our schools; modernizing health care to lower costs; repairing our roads, bridges, levees, and other vital infrastructure; and moving us towards energy independence.”

...well, there’s yer problem right there.  Some of those jobs will be given to those people, some of those schools will educate the offspring of those people, those roads and bridges will help some of those people — levees? we know who they’re for — and “energy independence”?  Did Al Gore get reincarnated as a black man?

***

Snark aside, it’s good to hear him stand up and lay it out.  This is more like the Obama I voted for, and it’s about time…

Comment #12: MikeEss  on  02/06  at  01:42 PM

Did Coburn, Wicker, Ensign, and Graham say the same things during the passing of the Patriot Act?

Comment #13: Joshua  on  02/06  at  02:04 PM

What planet are these people living on?

Unfortunately, ours.  I wish the Mothership would come back and collect them.

Comment #14: Magis  on  02/06  at  02:37 PM

I grant I only wear suits as protective coloration in certain environments, but my understanding is that it’s perfectly proper to take off one’s suit jacket when working, especially when one is working alone.

Regardless, the way I want the President to show deep reverence and respect for the Constitution is not by having an extra layer of wool between his skin and the Oval Office, it’s by actions that show that reverence and respect.

Comment #15: LongHairedWeirdo  on  02/06  at  02:44 PM

I haven’t read FreeRepublic for their take on Card’s comment, but I’ve been impressed how universal Card’s comments have been mocked online. Even conservatives feel vaguely embarrassed by them, whining that bloggers are focusing on Card’s comment rather than whatever the Democratic sins-of-the-week are supposed to be.

Comment #16: Tyro  on  02/06  at  02:47 PM

I love that in the slideshow Saint Ronnie, Hammer of the Reds, pbuh, is not only not wearing a jacket, he also not wearing a tie, and his shirt if of a distinctly casual cut.  Must be photoshopped.  You can tell by the pixels.

Comment #17: togolosh  on  02/06  at  02:58 PM

Some people say the Constitution talks about freedom and liberty in concrete terms.  It discusses how to build a representative government by the people and for the people.  It lays out powers of the various branches and serves as a template under which a living society can function.

Other people say the Constitution talks about no shirt, no shoes, no service.

Interpretations differ, but shouldn’t we really leave that up to the courts?

Comment #18: Zifnab  on  02/06  at  03:11 PM

“Interpretations differ, but shouldn’t we really leave that up to the courts?”

Only if it doesn’t involve those Librul Activist Judges…

Comment #19: MikeEss  on  02/06  at  03:16 PM

How can you tell if a Republican is lying?

Comment #20: Punditus Maximus  on  02/06  at  03:24 PM

Let them try to keep blocking the stimulus. Let the people see who the real obstructionists are.

If they try to filibuster in the Senate, I hope the Democrats force them into a real filibuster, as in the Senate shuts down completely. None of this “gentlemen’s agreement” bullshit.

As for Card, he can stuff his jacket and tie where the sun doesn’t shine.

Comment #21: Bitter Scribe  on  02/06  at  03:31 PM

Somehow, even if President Obama wore a jacket and tie at all times I somehow doubt he’d be welcome at their country clubs.

Comment #22: Ms Kate  on  02/06  at  03:36 PM

“How can you tell if a Republican is lying?”

...their lips are moving…

Comment #23: MikeEss  on  02/06  at  03:47 PM

Ugh. Count me as one of those people who’s struggling to find a job. I’ve been looking for about 6 months now. Granted, I’m still with my parents and they understand the shittiness that is this economy, but still.

Hoping the Democrats will actually act like proper vertebrates.

Comment #24: Margaret  on  02/06  at  03:52 PM

How can you tell if a Republican is lying?

They float if you chain them and throw them in a duckpond.

Granted, it’s less accurate than MikeEss’s reply, but far more entertaining.

Comment #25: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  02/06  at  03:59 PM

When a Democratic majority says that white is white, Republicans will say that white is black. When a When a Republican majority says that white is black, Democrats will say that white is navy blue. I’m not sure which pisses me off more.

Oh, and Richard Burr’s argument that the stimulus package is bad because the founders didn’t envision it? They didn’t visualize cars or telephones either, but that doesn’t mean we should stop using them. If that’s his vision of the ideal America, he can move to Colonial Williamsburg. Still, I know why Burr said the founder can’t spin in their graves. It’s because jackasses like him keep digging them up.

Comment #26: Master Mahan  on  02/06  at  04:08 PM

I can completely understand why the Republicans are obstructing passage of the stimulus: To pay for the billions in tax credits and loans to state governments to issue new debt, at some point in the (relatively) near future Congress will have to raise income taxes (likely on businesses and top earners) and cut spending (military?) to restore some measure of fiscal sanity.  No Republican wants to be connected both with a huge spending bill and the tax increase necessary to support it.

Comment #27: deep6  on  02/06  at  04:49 PM

How can you tell if a Republican is lying?

Punditus Maximus on 02/06 at 01:24 PM

There’s a smell of flatuence in the air - after all, that end is where their best ideas come from.

Comment #28: phylosopher  on  02/06  at  04:52 PM

Redefinition:  “Bipartisanship” now means that, when kicking Mitch McConnell in the nuts, to make sure you get both of them.

Comment #29: damnedyankee  on  02/06  at  05:52 PM

...and don’t forget to avoid using swear words as you express your obscene ideas: the Republican credo.

Comment #30: daphne  on  02/06  at  09:00 PM

Redefinition:  “Bipartisanship” now means that, when kicking Mitch McConnell in the nuts, to make sure you get both of them.


McConnell has only got one ball,
Limbaugh has two, but they’re very small.
Cheney’s are in his heiney,
And Malkin has no balls at all!

Comment #31: boring old dude  on  02/06  at  09:16 PM

Competence, honesty, basic human decency are all much less important than the appearance of “respectability.”

Bingo.

You know most of the people watching the reporting on SportcoatGate are going “Who the fuck cares?”

Comment #32: annejumps  on  02/06  at  10:48 PM

Not only are jobs being lost, but the temp agencies are having trouble finding work for their people.

Comment #33: Samantha Vimes  on  02/07  at  08:17 AM

Oh, and Richard Burr’s argument that the stimulus package is bad because the founders didn’t envision it?

They sure as hell didn’t envision corporate personhood, either!

Comment #34: Ms Kate  on  02/07  at  10:19 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.