Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Bamboo Reviews: Sex and the City Previous entry: Random Question

Just why would we get the idea that he’s McSame?

This is brilliant. The Jed Report has a mashup of the obliteration of John McCain…by John McCain on whether he’s hand-in-glove with Dear Leader.

And here is today’s WTF moment by McCain, via The Carpetbagger Report:

“I will look you in the eye and promise you that I will get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice,” McCain said in response to a direct question from one of the 2,000 people in attendance at the college’s Pemberton campus gym.

  McCain said the key to ending the long search for bin Laden was to increase the number of human spies abroad.

  “We need better human intelligence. We need people who can swim in the water,” McCain said.

Below the fold—a big McCain fundraiser’s past remarks about rape roil the campaign.
***

Rape remarks deep-sixes McCain fundraiser

Meanwhile, the latest with-friends-like-these moment comes from what ABC calls a “verbal blunder” by one of McCain’s fundraising buds.

Sen. John McCain on Friday abruptly cancelled a Monday fundraiser that had been scheduled at the home of a Texas oilman, after ABC News contacted the campaign inquiring about a verbal blunder the Texan made during an unsuccessful 1990 campaign for governor.

Clayton Williams stirred controversy during his 1990 campaign for governor of Texas with a botched attempt at humor in which he compared rape to weather. Within earshot of a reporter, Williams said: “As long as it’s inevitable, you might as well lie back and enjoy it.”

His Democratic opponent at the time, the late Ann Richards—who, coincidentally, would lose the governor’s mansion to George W. Bush in 1994—highlighted the comments in a TV ad during that 1990 campaign.

How on earth is that statement a “blunder?” That wasn’t a slip of the tongue or a misstatement; Williams thought he was telling a good old boy joke. Well, considering the Arizona called his wife a c*nt in public, he probably would have laughed at that “joke” himself.

By the way, McCain’s campaign said it wouldn’t give back any of the $300K raised by Williams. The DNC’s response:

“Mr. Williams’ comments are not only outrageous and disgusting, they degrade our values as Americans.  John McCain should make it clear that he understands just how offensive these comments are by not only canceling a fund-raising event but also returning the money Wlliams raised for his campaign.  Senator McCain should know that you cannot expect the American people to trust you if you say one thing when you stand on the stump and turn a blind eye to this kind of language when you think no one will notice.”

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 09:33 AM • (11) Comments

I love how McCain’s managed to be George Bush III when needed, a maverick reforming outsider when needed, staunchly anti-abortion, secretly pro-choice, anti-torture, pro-torture, a mavericky Repub who’s very independent from the Party, a strict follower of the Party-line and platform, a believer in reforming the campaign finance laws, a violator of campaign finance laws - and on, and on, and on…

He’s had at least two positions on every single important political issue for the last 25-years.

He’s also been caught with his hand in the cookie jar at least once.

But Obama is the one with a “cult” following…

Interesting times.  Or something…

(BTW, why doesn’t Firefox’s spellchecker know Barack Obama’s name…?)

Comment #1: MikeEss  on  06/15  at  09:54 AM

Ah, good ole Clatie… we were living in Austin when he ran against Ann Richards and made this remark.

It’s absolutely ridiculous of the McCain campaign to say, “Oh gee, we didn’t know about THAT!” regarding Clatie’s remarks. BS- they just hoped enough water had gone under the bridge.

Comment #2: louise  on  06/15  at  10:42 AM

Evidently, when a Republican says something disgustingly offensive and painfully stupid (both strategically and as a human) it becomes a “verbal blunder”. Because this is all just a game to them, so all that matters is that he was stupid enough to say it out loud while in a campaign. The strategic mistake becomes paramount, and the horrifying substance is pushed to the background. The DNC responses is quite correct, but sadly I’m sure that, too, will be reduced to strategery by the media.

Oh, and that video needs to get submitted to the Colbert Report. I want to see that on national TV.

Comment #3: BStu  on  06/15  at  11:00 AM

What?

Hillary’s supporters are going to vote for McCain anyway, right?  They’re all hystericalish and need a Straight Talker(tm) to talk ‘em down.

It was just a joke after all.  An old joke!  An experienced joke.  HRC’s voters like experience.

And we cancelled it anyway—>we were for Clayton before we were against him.

If this guy gets elected, I really am going to have to look into moving to Canada.

Comment #4: Caren, Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  06/15  at  11:05 AM

McCain will issue a statement but probably keep the money.  It’s a shell-game anyhow, since those donors who went through Williams can donate through another in that long list of people who bundle money at fundraisers and become bigtime political players by buying their way into the room.  Obama’s campaign calling for a return of the money is cheap political theater rather than anything substantive.  It would be better to just watch to see what McCain does and hang him on that rather than try to wrap things up.  Now, if McCain returns the money, the issue pretty much ends.  (And he’ll get that money anyhow, so it really won’t hurt that part of his campaign.)

Political fundraising types aren’t generally the types of people either party wants to have appear in headlines.  They’re usually a bunch of rich white men with country club memberships, well-coiffed children, trophy wives, real-estate and other business skeletons in the closet, and they know how to get their friends and acquaintances to donate big money to political causes.  Not exactly sweat, pickup trucks, and apple pie there.  Whether they are from Hollywood, Dallas suburbs, Madison, Phoenix, Newark, or Charleston, these people are not the face any political party wants to show as representative of their candidates.  It would be nice if that was something we could get away from, and Obama is making steps in the right direction.  But as long as rich people like to go to parties and throw money around with other rich people, the practice will continue.

Comment #5: jon  on  06/15  at  11:15 AM

How on earth do they expect us to believe they didn’t know about Claytie’s rape comment?  No woman in this state, Dem or Repub, has forgotten or forgiven that one.  It’s the same ol’, same ol’.  I have a fantasy of walking into RNC headquarters and screaming, “Why do you insist upon treating me like an idiot?!?!?”

Comment #6: BetsyTX  on  06/15  at  12:36 PM

He’s had at least two positions on every single important political issue for the last 25-years.

Oh, and the best part is that he hasn’t simply changed his mind over the span of 25 years, he can hold all of these opposing views at the same time.  He’s no ‘flip-flopper’, McCain.

BTW, I’ve also wondered why firefox’s spellcheck doesn’t recognize Barack Obama yet.  But then again when I mentioned Jane Austen in a comment yesterday it didn’t recognize that, either.  It seems like the only surnames it recognizes are ones that are based on a correctly-spelled word (Gold, Bush, Pandit), or surnames that are important in history in a long-view sort of way (Shakespeare, Gandhi, Churchill).  I’m not sure that it’s necessarily a race/culture thing.  I have a very anglo surname, and it also gets the red underline.

I noticed, after first thinking about it, that any US presidential surname I typed in was OK, so I wonder if Obama will be accepted come January?

Important names from history that are not “correct” per firefox:  Mandela, Leonardo, Hemingway, Thucydides, Kant. 

Important names which are “correct”: Sartre, Hitler, Khan (but not Gengis or Kublai for some reason), Napoleon, Lenin, Stalin, St. Francis of Assisi.

What a weird little game I’ve invented…

Comment #7: The Opoponax  on  06/15  at  05:02 PM

But as long as rich people like to go to parties and throw money around with other rich people, the practice will continue.

No. That’ll be pretty much forever. What the problem is is the idea, right or wrong, that ludicrous amounts of money are necessary for a political campaign. We need to get back to serious public funding systems, or alternately much lower single donor ceilings.

Comment #8: Erl  on  06/15  at  05:18 PM

You know, one minute clips taken out of any larger context mean nothing. The clip in the background could very well have been from between 2001 and 2003, when McCain was making clear that his political feud with Bush from 2000 was not going to lead to him bolting the party like Sen. Jeffords, and that he supported Bush’s foreign policy circa that time.

His statement that the key transcendant issues were foreign policy issues leads me to suggest that those statements of support for Bush were made pretty soon after Sept. 11, when political differences were set aside and everybody was falling into formation against an external enemy. 

McCain and other Republicans very vocally challenged the administration on its handling of Iraq in 2006-2007, and it was that challenge, in large part, which led to the ousting of Rumsfeld and the installation of the much more effective Gates at DOD and Petraeus in charge of the operations in Iraq.

Comment #9: mitchforth  on  06/15  at  06:05 PM

The Opoponax, clearly the programmers are Star Trek fans over history fans.

Comment #10: Nerdgirl  on  06/15  at  07:14 PM

As long as jerkass supporters are inevitable, McCain may as well lay back and enjoy them.

Or at least their money.

Comment #11: Bitter Scribe  on  06/15  at  11:29 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.