Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Humble Mumble Previous entry: With This Illness, I Thee Fraud

Mad Men blogging: a day late, but still here

Spoilers, as usual.

One of the bravest things that “Mad Men” does is small and often subtle, but we saw it in a big way in this episode.  The Drapers are shitty parents.  Don doesn’t do even close to his share, and Betty was kept an emotional child in so many ways, and therefore she can’t step up and be an adult when her children need her.  We only got around to watching the latest episode last night, but boy did you see the Drapers’ blindness to their own children in a big way.  Sally didn’t need the world.  She just needed a hug and an explanation that just because the adults were laughing doesn’t mean they’re not sad.  But Betty’s too locked up in her own grief at being an orphan to notice her responsibilities as a parent.  Hard to say what Don’s deal is.  Seems to me he started for a second and then decided that sitting with Betty was more important than comforting Sally.  Guess he’s still in the doghouse.

Obviously, the theme of last night’s episode was separating from your parents.  What was interesting was that it was decidedly ambiguous on the value of this, even though growing up and standing on your own two feet is one of those values that goes unquestioned.  We worry about Sally, who has clearly—-and for understandable reasons—-decided that her parents can fuck off, but obviously, she’s so young and that attitude might end up damaging her badly.  Betty is separated from her parents by force, and it’s unlikely that she’s going to come around to seeing herself as a legitimate grown-up like she should, but will probably become more dependent on Don.  And of course, you have the new client with his enthusiasm for jai alai.  His father is going to have him flush a million dollars down the toilet in order to learn how to be a man who is separate from his parents, a decision that seems fucked up to me, and I was happy to see that Don saw it, too.  The gap between him and Pete on this is interesting.  Don knows the value of money.  He still isn’t sure about the value of parents, though.  He looks at the picture of his folks, and you realize that Don was always separate from them. 

Peggy had the most clear-cut situation.  Her mother sucks, and she needs to get some distance between herself and her mother.  Even her sister sees this, and she’s not inclined to be generous to Peggy.  That guilt trip Peggy’s mother laid on her made me want to throw things at the TV.  Though it’s clear that Peggy is still trying to forge a life for herself with very little in the way of role models, which is why she makes the mistake of leaning on Joan when crafting her ad for a roommate.

Mistake, you ask.  Yes.  I appreciate the idea that Peggy’s description of herself—-with Joan’s advice—-is aspirational, but I’m wary of the fact that she’s lying about herself.  Of course, lying about yourself is generally rewarded in the world of “Mad Men”, which has interesting things to say about how Americans achieved class mobility by learning to fake it until they make it.  But I couldn’t help but think that Peggy was taking a step down the ladder with her ad. The roommate she attracts strikes me as someone who’s hanging out in the secretarial pool until someone marries her and puts her in some suburban home to waste away like Betty’s doing.  And Peggy fronts like she’s interested in the same things, and let’s face it, she’s not.  All the talk about men and sex wouldn’t be so worrisome if I didn’t get the impression that it’s the absolute center of her new roommate’s world, that all the fun-loving and game-playing is aimed directly at one goal: man-pleasing.  The weird insistence that Peggy shouldn’t have privacy bothered me, too. 

Not that I don’t think that Peggy shouldn’t chill out and have more fun.  This is clearly a goal for her, and maybe what’s going to happen is that she’ll learn to loosen up some and have fun.  But it seems like there’s not much room for her to do things her way.  Her social choices have so far been limited by her unwillingness to play like she’s dumber or less successful than she is, and I don’t see having a new roommate fixing that.  She needs to find people who appreciate her for who she is.  But of course, that sort of thing was in short supply in the 60s.

One thing I found interesting was the way the show highlights that Peggy isn’t getting paid what she’s worth, but they do it without hitting you over the head with it.  She has enough for nice suits and to buy her mom a TV, but she can’t afford a Manhattan apartment on her own.  Which wouldn’t necessarily be such a big deal, except that it seems that Paul, Harry, and Sal—-who are all around her professional level—-can afford to have Manhattan apartments.  Paul has the same job she does, and he’s not as good at it, and we’ve seen his apartment.  Do I foresee Peggy getting ballsy enough to demand equal pay for equal work?  If she does, what will Don do?  Will he dismiss her with the same excuses about how women don’t need as much money, or will he realize that he should pay his best copywriter what she’s worth?  One thing I’m more certain of is that Don is going to remember that she was the only one who knew the Patio ad was a bad idea.  And that’s why he didn’t hold Sal accountable, because Peggy was the one who pointed out that no matter how well they did it, it would suck.  And she was right.

I still cannot fathom how anyone found Ann Margaret singing “Bye Bye Birdie” as anything but horrible and shrill. 

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 07:08 PM • (35) Comments

While on the subject of income, check out the Washington Post. 2009, not 1960. I don’t know what’s more maddening, the income of the head of the NRA, or the women who have $20,000/yr. jobs as florists and wedding planners, which scream that they are married to well-to-do husbands. Other “female” jobs such as librarian still make distinctly less than male jobs at about the same level.

It seems that nobody with a lower or recently lowered income wantted to talk to the Post.

At least the guy who works as a “dead animal operator” (it’s what you think, he picks up roadkill) makes more money than I expected for such a shitty job. Probably because nobody else wants to do it.

Comment #1: sara  on  09/08  at  08:12 PM

Of course Peggy is getting paid less than the men doing the same job.  That still happens in 2009.  Remember, newspapers were still running separate employment sections for Men and Women back in the 1960s.

Comment #2: CParis  on  09/08  at  08:13 PM

Not to mention that the Patio ad felt like it was 4 freakin’ minutes long.  I was like what is this, an infomercial?  Yeah, I know that’s not relevant to the Mad Men era but were there ads that long back then? 

Since the series began I’ve been intrigued by the question of whether Joan is proto-feminist or the type of woman who would be an anti-feminist “Queen Bee” today.  She’s so assertive and bossy that I would tend to think the latter but OTOH she seems to want to be supportive of Peggy and many of the other women in the office.  I loved when they had her do editing work last season, which she excelled at, and then replaced her with a man.  She seethed with resentment over it and it showed what happened to all too many women back then. 

Also, I totally agree with what Jessica at feministing said about how Joan would make a terrific copywriter.

Comment #3: DonnaDiva  on  09/08  at  08:57 PM

For what it’s worth, Paul’s got a really nice apartment - in Jersey City. Which is historically even cheaper than Brooklyn.

Comment #4: Brendon  on  09/08  at  09:01 PM

She needs to find people who appreciate her for who she is.  But of course, that sort of thing was in short supply in the 60s.

Finding that isn’t exactly a walk in the park these days either.

Were copywriters paid well in the ‘60s?  Because they sure aren’t now, or is that more pink-collar ghettoization?  All the copywriters I’ve ever met are women and they’re paid shit.

Comment #5: keshmeshi  on  09/08  at  09:03 PM

<blockquote>Which wouldn’t necessarily be such a big deal, except that it seems that Paul, Harry, and Sal—-who are all around her professional level—-can afford to have Manhattan apartments. <blockquote>

It always seemed to me that Sal was on a slightly higher level than the other copywriters and account execs.  He’s the art director, no?  Which means he’s ultimately responsible for producing (with help, of course) all of the visuals in every ad that Sterling Cooper produces.

I have to say that I was struck by Don’s insistence that his son not wear the WWI German soldier’s helmet that Eugene gave him.  Perhaps I shouldn’t be, given that Don saw someone die rather horribly in Korea, but I still thought it was interesting how Don regarded the helmet’s owner as a person, and Eugene just thought of him as “the enemy.”

Comment #6: Linnaeus  on  09/08  at  09:04 PM

actually, paul lives in jersey (because he’s so cool and avant garde and not corporate like that, RIGHT? *sarcasm*)  so it’s reasonable to think he’s got a bigger and nicer place than peggy because it’s even further away from manhattan and that he may not make a ton more than she does (but of course it would be foolish to assume he’s not paid more than she is by some amount).

this was a good episode—i’m glad that grandpa gene did right by sally when her parents have dropped the ball (in don’s case) and actively damaged her (in betty’s).  i won’t be sad to see him go though—his resemblance to john mccain is downright eerie.  we call him “creepy john mccain grandpa” at my house.

amanda, as an Insufferable Music Snob and general hip lady, i eagerly await a future mad men post when you dissect the character of paul kinsey as Corporate Tool Hipster Wannabe.  seriously.  he’s the epitome of “tries too hard to be cool and edgy but is actually mired in traditionalism.”

Comment #7: chareth cutestory  on  09/08  at  09:04 PM

Other “female” jobs such as librarian still make distinctly less than male jobs at about the same level.

A little fyi from the inside, 60% of today’s library higher-ups—head librarians, library directors, and such—are men.  This, in a field that is 3:1 women:men.

Comment #8: rowmyboat  on  09/08  at  09:21 PM

amanda, as an Insufferable Music Snob and general hip lady, i eagerly await a future mad men post when you dissect the character of paul kinsey as Corporate Tool Hipster Wannabe.  seriously.  he’s the epitome of “tries too hard to be cool and edgy but is actually mired in traditionalism.”

Have there been any previous episodes/will there be episodes where they touch on the “Square/Nerd/Geek vs. Cool” divide?

Comment #9: exholt  on  09/08  at  09:23 PM

After this episode, G turned to me and said, “And that’s why Sally will change her name to Rainbow when she moves to San Francisco.”

Comment #10: Mnemosyne  on  09/08  at  09:25 PM

That guilt trip Peggy’s mother laid on her made me want to throw things at the TV.

It’ll be interesting to see whether they bring up Kitty Genovese next season, since it happened in 1964…in Kew Gardens, Queens.

(BTW, based on a few sources [Nixonland, Carson’s monologues from the time], I think the contemporary perception of NYC by 1963 was that it was in decay, so I don’t think Don’s pitch in “Love Among The Ruins” was foreshadowing: it’s how Don sees NYC at that point in time.  Of course, it’s possible that only Don sees that, amongst the twits at Sterling Cooper.)

Comment #11: NY Expat  on  09/08  at  09:53 PM

He still isn’t sure about the value of parents, though.  He looks at the picture of his folks, and you realize that Don was always separate from them.

Given the circumstances of Don’s birth and the way he was treated by his parents, it’s understandable that he’d not feel connected to parents or parenting much.

Comment #12: Linnaeus  on  09/08  at  10:02 PM

I look forward to Amanda’s episode review every Monday, or Tuesday as the case may be.

I’ve seen every episode and more and more I’m wondering whether these characters are being rendered mostly as archetypes or mostly as individuals - perhaps the measure shifts depending on the character. Since I was born in the mid-70’s it is not an easy task for me to recognize the behavior of the characters in Mad Men - is the overall intent that Betty/Don’s poor parenting skills a representation of early 60’s parenting or as simply Betty and Don being terrible parents?

Clearly there are some characters that lean heavily into the archetype category - Betty as the ideal candidate to digest Feminine Mystique, Peggy as its representation. So then are the other aspects of Peggy’s character intended to be a representation of the type of individual woman in the early 60’s as pioneer or is that reading too much into her ambition - her ... say, dour demeanor is simply an aspect of Peggy or is it what the creator/writers consider an aspect of the role that Peggy fills as that archetype?

Anyway - I can’t think of another show that has made me examine it as much as this one. The Wire was equally good but for very different reasons.

Comment #13: Packman  on  09/08  at  10:02 PM

@ DonnaDiva, comment #3 Yes, the commercials were one full minute long, which now seems like an eternity.  There was one for Anacin where the woman got a tension headache, screamed at her kids, went to the neighbor’s for coffee, then it cut to the doctor giving a lecture on how Anacin works, and then she went home and made up with her kids.  It’s hard to imagine now, but life really moved much slower then.  I think the pace of the show reflects that.

Also, an Emmy for the woman who plays Sal’s wife.  The expressions that crossed her face when Sal did his Ann-Margret performance had me ROTFL.

Comment #14: jackspratt  on  09/08  at  10:45 PM

Peggy’s got much to be dour about: remember the chipper little thing that signed on at Sterling Cooper?

Well, she’s been ground down by an affair with a married prick, an unintended, unknown pregnancy, being forced to give her child away, a short stay drugged up in a mental asylum, a family that’s in turn spiteful and guilt-inducing, a church that sees her as an unrepentant sinner, and the continued, ongoing sexism of the men she works with day in and day out, for which she’s paid less than any of them.

Peggy tried to warn ‘em about the Patio spot, not only does no one acknowledge that, but her resentful male co-workers set up a secretary to play a mean-spirited prank on her.

You’d be dour, too.

Comment #15: judybrowni  on  09/08  at  11:02 PM

Also, an Emmy for the woman who plays Sal’s wife.  The expressions that crossed her face when Sal did his Ann-Margret performance had me ROTFL.

jackspratt, yes!  That was one finely-depicted arc of dawning realization.  So subtle and so utterly real.

Comment #16: litbrit  on  09/08  at  11:52 PM

Co-sign on Sal’s wife!  After getting all sexy in her baby doll negligee and begging her husband for some “affection”, he pleads exhaustion, but still has the energy to do his Ann-Margret routine.  Uh-oh.

Comment #17: CParis  on  09/09  at  12:02 AM

Peggy tried to warn ‘em about the Patio spot, not only does no one acknowledge that, but her resentful male co-workers set up a secretary to play a mean-spirited prank on her.

It’s not publicly acknowledged, but that triumphant look she shoots Don after the meeting and his weary nod says that he knows, at least, that she was right.

G had a totally different take on the prank—he thought it was the guys treating her as “one of the guys” by playing the same kind of prank on her that they would on one of their own, a sort of initiation into the club.  It’s definitely one of those things that could be meant one way by the perps and taken another way by the victim.

Comment #18: Mnemosyne  on  09/09  at  12:58 AM

mnemosyne@10- I was thinking the same thing.  How old is Sally?  How old will she be in 4 or 5 years?

When Don tells her dismissively to go watch television, and she turns it on to see the immolation footage, I really got a feel for this.

Comment #19: jamie d  on  09/09  at  01:24 AM

Don’s gift to Sal reminded me of the theory (maybe I read it here?) that closeted gay men rise to power in conservative circles because the people at the very top don’t see them as a threat.  Don has something on Sal, so he’d much rather see him succeed than Pete (who has something on Don).  So when Don “hires” Sal or tries to talk Pete’s client out of signing, are his motives altruistic, purely business, or Machiavellian?  His eyes are kind, but he’s also had plenty of time to game it out in his head.

If the intangible missing from the Padio ad was the Male Gaze, though, Don’s shooting himself in the foot.

Comment #20: HonoreDB  on  09/09  at  01:27 AM

You really think a gay man knows nothing about the (heterosexual) Male Gaze?

The problem with the Patio commercial is the same as it was from the beginning, male clients and male advertising execs forcing their idea of the Male Gaze on a product meant to be sold to women.

Peggy certainly didn’t feel it was good natured one-of-the-boys teasing, and it wasn’t: it was mean-spirited, and it was getting back at Peggy for being right, despite being “lesser-than.”

Comment #21: judybrowni  on  09/09  at  03:24 AM

I still cannothttp://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/mad_men_blogging_a_day_late_but_still_here/ fathom how anyone found Ann Margaret singing “Bye Bye Birdie” as anything but horrible and shrill.

Gawd yes.  “Bwye bwooye buhr—HEEEEEEE!”  Peggy’s comment that it’s a 25-year-old acting like a 15-year-old was on the money.

And third on the actress playing Sal’s wife.

I was sorry to see Granpa Gene go, for Sally’s sake.  They had a nice conspiracy going on.  He was one of those crypto-semi-feminists, favoring Sally over her brother, encouraging her to try stuff like driving (!) and being strict with her in a way that suggests he believed that would build her up, not break her down.

Comment #22: oldfeminist  on  09/09  at  04:16 AM

Erk.  Sorry about that URL in there, have no idea how that happened.

Comment #23: oldfeminist  on  09/09  at  04:16 AM

Yeah, the gay male camp for Bye Bye Birdie was used really really well in that scene and Sal’s wife really hit it out of the park, though she similarly hit it out of the park in the dinner scene last season where Sal invited Ken over and was practically drooling over him.

And yeah, I’m getting a lot of signs that Sally will be as invested in the counter-culture of the early 70s as her parents are in the conformist culture of the early 60s. I mean, especially the monk immolation picture which is unremovable from the iconography of protest and especially Vietnam war protest (with some protestors emulating the act).

I wonder if anyone also caught the odd interplay with grandpa, Don, and the kid about the helmet. I mean, it was obvious there was already the separate views on war with grandpa seeing it as critical to being a man and Don obviously quickly learning how pointless it is during Korea, but I wonder if there was an undercurrent with the escalations in Vietnam going on at the time and Don trying to avoid that future for his son.

I’m wondering if this battle will continue on later once the war “officially” begins in two seasons.

And yeah, Grandpa McCain (love that description) was really complex. It seemed like he was this Archie Bunker figure with really bad advice most of the time, but with Sally he seemed to be trying to do right by her. I wonder if it’s to make up for how he treated his actual daughter when he was raising her?

And yeah, I’m getting the same sort of backslide feeling on Peggy. I honestly expect that this will be where she discovers that she is a more full person but doesn’t need to “force fun” to have it. Or I could be wrong and the roommate will actually turn out to be someone borderline radical to along with Kinsey give a little taste of the counterculture’s evolution in this time period from beat to hippie and radical. I mean, isn’t next year the beginning of the Merry Pranksters and the acid tests?

Comment #24: Cerberus  on  09/09  at  07:45 AM

I was so sad about Grandpa Gene.  And yes, Ann Margerets singing is hideous. That was considered sexy? Her voice grates.

Comment #25: pitbullgirl65  on  09/09  at  07:47 AM

Okay, here’s my defense of Ann-Margaret. When I was a little bit younger than Sally Draper, I was obsessed with Ann-Margaret in “Bye, Bye Birdie.” I’d seen the movie on a re-release, and I played the soundtrack album constantly.

When I was a kid in the mid-1960s, Ann-Margaret seemed amazingly beautiful, confident, and powerful. Frankly, she was the best role model I had of how to be a strong woman in control of her life (sad, but true). I was especially taken with the “Gotta Lot of Living to Do” number, in which her character is declaring her (temporary) independence: “Gonna have fun/Gonna be wild/Have my own way.” Sounds a lot like Peggy’s goals with her recent attempts at a lifestyle makeover.

I certainly get the Roger Sterling critique, “It’s not Ann-Margaret.” “Bye, Bye Birdie” is a crappy movie, and Ann-Margaret’s character is ultimately a blank. But she’s got a quality that’s really exciting, or at least that was to me as a little girl.

Comment #26: neely  on  09/09  at  07:51 AM

And I know it’s been three seasons and the character is a hipster tool, but I still love that the name of the guy currently most invested in the nascent counterculture and real protest work of the time is an allusion to Alfred Kinsey.

Comment #27: Cerberus  on  09/09  at  08:00 AM

Oh, and did anyone else notice how the living will scene was a bit of a knife-stab towards all the death panel bullshit both with Betty displaying the refusal to accept death stance that drove the opposition and Grandpa Gene hinting at how things went really wrong with her mother when they didn’t have a living will?

I thought that was a good subtle point to the moron brigade.

Comment #28: Cerberus  on  09/09  at  08:23 AM

@ myself @24

I should change that to definitely making up for mis-raising Betty as he pretty much says that straight out in the will scene that she could have been so much more than Mrs. Don Draper if she believed that she actually had the possibilities that Peggy is finding and Sally will probably find. I’m rather hoping though that Betty will find some of those herself especially as I believe this year was when Feminine Mystique was published, though it’s hard to see exactly when with the trap of child birth.

Comment #29: Cerberus  on  09/09  at  08:29 AM

When I was a kid in the mid-1960s, Ann-Margaret seemed amazingly beautiful, confident, and powerful. Frankly, she was the best role model I had of how to be a strong woman in control of her life (sad, but true).

I’ve always had a soft spot for Ann-Margret* because she always seemed to throw herself into her roles so enthusiastically.  She wasn’t a great dancer or singer, but at least she always seemed to be enjoying herself.

That’s one of the reasons her performance in Carnal Knowledge is so powerful—Jack Nicholson’s character meets her and turns her into a withdrawn shell of a woman with his constant browbeating and abuse.  It’s a pretty horrifying movie.

* Margret, not Margaret.  Swedish, you know.
/pedant

Comment #30: Mnemosyne  on  09/09  at  06:18 PM

One thing I’m more certain of is that Don is going to remember that she was the only one who knew the Patio ad was a bad idea.

and I love that look that Peggy gives him while exiting the boardroom after that whole fail of a screening…

I really identify with Sally in a big big way. My parents were (still are in lots of ways) emotionally stunted like that as well. God, my heart broke - all she needed was a hug. Not to be told to sit in front of the TV. *sigh*

Comment #31: Danica Lefse Queen  on  09/09  at  07:33 PM

Oh, and did anyone else notice how the living will scene was a bit of a knife-stab towards all the death panel bullshit both with Betty displaying the refusal to accept death stance that drove the opposition and Grandpa Gene hinting at how things went really wrong with her mother when they didn’t have a living will?

In terms of comments on contemporary politics, what I noticed more was how Ho-Ho the jai alai idiot summed up the way business (and government bailouts) is done now: 50-50 shot at success—if it succeeds, it’s because of him, if it fails, it’s someone else’s fault. This is why the father is making such a dreadful parenting mistake giving him that money: this spoiled kid will never learn from his errors. Even Bert Cooper, the “eat-or-be-eaten” Randian, understands that, because he built his business from scratch.

It’s no co-incidence that old Ho-Ho went to Dartmouth—this degenerate gambler has MBA (or Tuck’s Master of Science in Commerce degree) written all over him. He’ll just keep upping the ante, privatising profits, skimming in the short-term and always—always—shifting the risk and blame to others. Ladies and gentlemen, 1962’s Ho-Ho is 2009’s Fortune 500 board member.

And just adding to the chorus about Sal’s wife—freaked-out doesn’t begin to describe the look on her face.

Comment #32: Gracchus.  on  09/09  at  09:56 PM

I thought that was a good subtle point to the moron brigade.

Nah, the moron brigade only watches this show to wax nostalic for the “good old days.” The wouldn’t get the point if it was on a nail hammered into the 2x4 that’s hitting them on the head. They’re fun in-jokes for us, though.

Comment #33: Gracchus.  on  09/09  at  09:59 PM

And just adding to the chorus about Sal’s wife—freaked-out doesn’t begin to describe the look on her face

OK, clearly I’m in the minority here, but I thought that look went on a bit too long.  It went past realistic horror and into holding a pose that you’d never hold in real life, lest your husband get wise to the fact that you now know his closeted status.*  I can excuse it as hyper-realism, which seems to be what the show goes for since a vast majority of the costumes/props/scenery look completely brand-new and unworn.

Not a big deal, just not Emmy-worthy, either.

* I’m aware that Sal is too wrapped up in his big moment to notice his wife’s horror, but if you were his wife, after the initial shock wouldn’t you drop the dumbfounded look for a moment longer just in case he wised up?

Comment #34: NY Expat  on  09/10  at  04:15 AM

I don’t think Sal was looking at his wife through much of her horror take.  You really think she’d try to hide the shock?  that she’d necessarily even be able to?

And I don’t think Ann-Margret is horrible or anything.  I just heartily dislike the simpering tone of that song.  I was instantly revolted by it when I saw it for the first time as a kid. 

I loved The Telephone Hour, though.

Comment #35: oldfeminist  on  09/11  at  12:39 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.