Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: ‘Concern’ for birth rates a cover for racist twaddle Previous entry: Bishop Harry Jackson concerned Values Voter peers may appear racist

Mad Men blogging: The joke isn’t funny anymore

BIG FUCKING SPOILERS.

Last night’s episode was titled “Guy Walks Into an Advertising Agency”, and so you knew from the beginning that this was ironic and the proceedings were going to be very dark.  And they maintained a sense of unease right up until the Great Foot Mangling, and they did it so well we immediately rewound the show and watched it again.  And you can see how literary you can be if you do this, since there’s ominous portends, with the most overt being the way Roger Sterling talked about the way his father died in a car accident, and how the windshield severed his arm.  (An injury that’s significantly less common now, because of laminated glass.)  The first reference to Vietnam was wedged in, as well, and I have to admit that they pulled that off as well as you can.  “Mad Men” has always been about the moment before—-before all the accumulating tensions sent people’s world into a tailspin.  But last night, I suspect, was the moment the show signaled that the characters have passed the point of no return, though they don’t know it.

The Great Foot Mangling is the JFK assassination in miniature, though of course it’s an accident in this case.  But all the elements are there: Guy McKendrick is the charming young leader taking over from Boring-But-Efficient.  People are initially wary of him, but his charm is hard to deny.  A sense of cautious optimism kicks off the party, and everyone really starts having a good time, until a sudden and shocking act of violence blows through it all.  You even had Joan walking around in a bloody dress hours after the event, just as Jackie Kennedy was. And suddenly you realize that nothing will be the same.  For Sterling Cooper, the 60s are really underway now.

The separation of Guy McKendrick from his foot was just the most dramatic in a series of separations and endings.  Initially, Joan was supposed to be separating from Sterling Cooper, but now she’s simply ending her dreams of upward mobility through marriage.  Roger Sterling, who has really represented the old guard this season, is being pushed out of his job.  (What the hell does he do, anyway?)  Pryce has given up his belief that being a good worker for a corporation will result in rewards.  Sally is still aching from the loss of her grandfather, and is coming to the realization she can’t lean on her mother for anything.

Pryce got some of the most interesting lines.  “Pax Romana.”  Well, that ended when McKendrick’s foot was spewed all over the creative team, the walls, and the floor.  The reference to Tom Sawyer’s funeral was an interesting one.  In the original novel, Tom and the boys hear all the townspeople saying nice things about them, and they feel loved and appreciated, and so they reveal themselves.  But Pryce says he heard his eulogy and didn’t like it at all.  He’s learned what Joan’s known for a long time—-that if you don’t fit people’s image of a role, no amount of competence will get them to see you that way. 


Of course, we saw that Joan is the only one who didn’t collapse under pressure during the Great Foot Mangling.  In fact, for a moment, you realize that she’s the one who should be a doctor, not her husband.  She can have that job back in a second.  I imagine that Joan’s smart enough to realize that it’s easier just to ask for her job back rather than apply for new ones.  Watching her cry was tough, but the whole foot incident should erase that from everyone’s memories, giving her a chance to ask for her job back without sacrificing her dignity. 

And so now the future is really, truly uncertain, which is how you know the 60s are really under way.  Joan’s husband dodging her questions is just the most obvious example, but right now, no one knows what’s going to happen to them.  Pete Campbell is with Sterling Cooper “for now”.  Where’s Roger Sterling going to go, now that the new bosses passively-aggressively told him he’s redundant?  Will Joan be able to get her job back?  Is Pryce going to have to go to Bombay?  Will Peggy decide to choose a new agency over her loyalty to Don?  Who fucking knows?  For these characters, the future has become far more uncertain than it usually is.  No wonder the episode ends with Sally screaming her head off.  The darkness is scary.  And if there’s no such thing as ghosts, how come the Draper household continues to be haunted?

But here’s the thing: The uncertain future is incredibly scary, but it’s also full of possibility.  And Don Draper is the only one who sees it, this time.  He holds the baby and assures Sally that there’s nothing to be afraid of, that this baby represents the unknown, and that is a very good thing.

And for those who are skeptical about my theory about the Great Foot Mangling being a tip of the hat to the JFK assassination, I offer a comparison.  The shot of the vehicle moving through the crowd, the slow turn, the movement for a bit, and then the explosion of gore:

 

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 05:28 PM • (67) Comments

Roger Sterling, who has really represented the old guard this season, is being pushed out of his job.  (What the hell does he do, anyway?)

He occasionally makes pithy and accurate observations like “It’s not Ann-Margret.” And does the rascally old-boy glad-handing intros before tossing things over to Don for the nuts and bolts (recall the steakhouse damage-control scene with the MSG guy). However, starting with Mencken’s department store in season 1, and moving through Admiral TVs this season, it’s becoming increasingly clear that in order to survive Sterling Cooper will have to consider its WASP clients a minority rather than a majority.

It’ll be interesting to see if Pete gets it—despite his continuing reliance on stories about his Knickerbocker ancestors with clients like Ho-Ho and deb-ball Charleston performances (i.e. the pedigree that got him hired in the first place), his reaction to Roger’s blackface act and his Admiral idea indicate that he does get it.

Unfortunately for Roger, the bottom-line Brits get it, too.

Pryce has given up his belief that being a good worker for a corporation will result in rewards.

The flip-side of the bottom-line Brits: this is the period where the MBAs obsessed with the quarterly numbers and the style-over-substance Human Resources Culture (which Joan, as a proto-HR person understands) truly takes hold. No-one can rely on the old assumptions anymore, and it’ll be at least a generation before people accept it.

That’s the theme of this season: the social compact is changing on macro and micro scales, and how those great characters handle that change.

Comment #1: Gracchus.  on  09/21  at  06:15 PM

One day you’re on top, the next day you lose your foot to a secretary on a lawn mower
Oh god that was funny.

Comment #2: pitbullgirl65  on  09/21  at  06:32 PM

The torrent is in the queue.  I am totally jacked up to see this.

Comment #3: Zifnab  on  09/21  at  06:37 PM

Between Oliver! and Tom Sawyer, you’ve got two orphans who ended up well. Hmmmm.

Comment #4: Roxanne  on  09/21  at  06:39 PM

Yeah, Don’s the one person who came out ahead in a very visible, obvious way.  The future for him is suddenly bright.

Comment #5: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/21  at  06:40 PM

Telling you ...he’s going to pull a Jerry Maguire.

Comment #6: Roxanne  on  09/21  at  06:42 PM

That’s certainly what Conrad Hilton was hinting at.  And good on people who figured out that’s who that was.

Comment #7: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/21  at  06:47 PM

Is Pryce going to have to go to Bombay?

They told him in the hospital that he’ll be staying in New York now because Guy No-Foot clearly won’t be able to do his job anymore.

I’d never seen the Zapruder footage before, and I have to say that I mostly just *really* can’t tell what’s going on at all - it may be a parallel shot, but it’s hard for me to tell!

Comment #8: Mimi  on  09/21  at  07:21 PM

Huh, I hadn’t noticed the parallel between the two events, despite re-watching it a couple of times, but in retrospect, it seems rather obvious. I was expecting them to handle the moment of JFK’s assassination, which was a huge symbol for both people in the 60s and today as the “lighting of the fuse” moment and a huge important shake-up, in the usual highlighting yet subdued fashion they have for the other big tragedies.

I still think the same, but I think this was their way of bringing about the visceral impact of that moment as well as a nod to the explosive violence of the escalation of Vietnam and at the reaction to the protests.

I thought it was also interesting how not only was he a stand-in for JFK, but after the event, of what often happened to the war wounded of Vietnam, how they were cut-off and written-off from their old lives and support networks. Very much like if he had got it blown off in a shell in Vietnam.

I wonder if that wasn’t a dual metaphor considering it is possible that the UK guys might bring more of a hammer down on the HR side as a sort of a response to losing their prodigy, aka bringing the war home.

Comment #9: Cerberus  on  09/21  at  07:43 PM

There were a couple of small moments also that really seemed to strike me as well. I thought it was really odd and interesting how the “young gun” character was in this episode. Both with setting off the foot mangling incident and with his attempted defense of the Vietnam war as not really applicable. I wonder if he’s going republican or is starting his own Crane transformation into the club of frat house assholes.

And I thought it was interesting to see Sally’s reaction to the barbie, which the end seemed to focus more on the fact that it was all connected to the ghost of Grandpa Gene, but at the time, seemed to have her respond to the thing on its own as being unwanted. I was thinking about it in the context of the earlier thread on how femininity is constructed at a young age and as a potential hint at her growing disinterest in the feminine role that is suffocating her mother.

And yeah, Joan is a better doctor than her husband and it’s really interesting how this season they’ve been hinting that the company really revolves around a small core of truly irreplaceable people, chief among them Joan and Don who really seem to be crucial to keep the company from destroying itself or falling apart.

Comment #10: Cerberus  on  09/21  at  07:55 PM

I don’t know if it has noted here before, but Mad Men has some serious foot fetish stuff going on.  In just this season, beyond Bert Cooper’s thing about taking off your shoes to enter his office, you have all the bare feet outside the hotel in the out of town episode, and of course Miss Farrell dancing around the maypole with bare feet in the grass.  It is never the point of the scene.  It is always incidental, but it is often there.  I just never expected them to chop a foot off.  Eeek.

Comment #11: jackspratt  on  09/21  at  08:01 PM

I was stunned by the way the Brits were just dropping Guy No-Foot (good one, Mimi), given what a shiny and expensive CV he had. I didn’t get the JFK thing, but sure - plus, the irony of Joan’s bloody “Jackie” dress when Joan herself is clearly Marilyn…

Don’s not the only one who came out ahead this episode - remember Harry was “the only one in this room who got a promotion.”

Joan’s dilemma… I think she’ll be reluctant to ask for her old job back. First, Moneypenny has taken it over, and he’s not going to be demoted so easily. Second, the whole point of her leaving was that she was “following the dream” of upward mobility through marriage, and if she comes back she’ll have to deal with the pity and scorn of all of the other secretaries for her “failure” (unless she can think of a good lie for cover), and she is too proud to put up with that. I’m really curious about what she’s going to do now - I doubt they’re going to write her off the show, so high probability of her return for that reason, but if not for that I would say very low odds. It’ll be really difficult to let her return to SC in keeping with her character.

Comment #12: Geocrackr  on  09/21  at  08:08 PM

One more thing - when I saw that Barbie the first thing I thought was “What’s she going to do to it?” Dismemberment was my guess.

Comment #13: Geocrackr  on  09/21  at  08:11 PM

I suspect Joan and Betty will be having some form of transformation into actually figuring out what they want in here, but it seems so far off. I’m suspecting for Joan at least, that a moment of rebellion is looming pretty strong. Her husband sucks not only on important matters, but in the fictional priorities Joan wanted to marry someone for and they’ve made it pretty clear this episode that Sterling Cooper literally can’t function without her control.

But that’s been the case for Don and all of the oppressed group characters who really seem to be as inches from a moment they metaphorically cough and announce their desires as the WASP characters seem oblivious with the exception of Pete Campbell and Kinsey. It definitely helps with the change is coming feel.

Comment #14: Cerberus  on  09/21  at  08:12 PM

Oh! One more thing: Roger! I’m not sure exactly what he does (some equivalent of salesman, I surmise) but he’s rich now. He can afford to get forced out into a very comfortable early retirement if it comes to that. It’s hard for me to feel sorry for him.

Comment #15: Geocrackr  on  09/21  at  08:14 PM

This is kinda interesting:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601630719,00.html

The contents of the edition of Time Conrad Hilton fronted.

Comment #16: Roxanne  on  09/21  at  08:21 PM

13-

She certainly wasn’t playing with it. They made it seem like she threw it out the window because of her ghost fear, but the doll was pretty much in its same state as when it was first given to her (no dress-up), so I’m thinking there’s as much resistance to what the gift represents re: cultural femininity as the guise it comes in.

Though it is interesting that the restrictive femininity comes to haunt Sally as “proof of a ghost” in the sudden inexplicable return of the unwanted object.

Again, it would be really really interesting what we’ll see in say six years time if it is still running.

12- Yeah, but lying to save face is Joan’s best skill and the one she has polished to a shine. It’s the only way she has survived her husband, for certain with her “perfect wife” act. I doubt she’ll return next episode considering there is that giant hurdle of her pride to clear, but I suspect in the next couple of episodes, she’ll arrange some scheme to “reluctantly return, just to help out” or as a “favor to the people complaining about MoneyPenny.” But considering her character and her commitment to self-destruction since her rape, it’s possible she’d take a rather crappy job someone will run into her at just to avoid the “shame” of going back.

Comment #17: Cerberus  on  09/21  at  08:22 PM

15-

Yeah, when he walks, it’ll be into a rather nice retirement that was probably not long off to begin with considering his new marriage. Though, considering the portents to an incoming personal tragedy re: his new wife, it’s possible that all aspects of his life will collapse at once.

Comment #18: Cerberus  on  09/21  at  08:27 PM

16-

Interesting indeed. Especially this from the cover article:

Two-Way Streets. This year nearly 12 million Americans—12% more than last year—will travel outside the U.S., and a surprising lot of them will want the comforts of home. Newly affluent Europeans and Japanese have also joined in the wanderlust, and the world’s byways are fast becoming two-way streets.

In regards to the newly global business and the comments on Bert’s Japanese decor.

Comment #19: Cerberus  on  09/21  at  08:32 PM

And on the point of not getting credit for actual competence, but impressions, it’s also important to note that the tractor mess really mostly fell on the secretary as “being dumb” ignoring that two men were the ones who set it up by bringing the dangerous object into the foreground and that it’s a woman who saved the day in the form of Joan.

Comment #20: Cerberus  on  09/21  at  08:37 PM

OT: Baby Panda at San Diego zoo.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFo2et67KzM

Comment #21: BABH  on  09/21  at  08:48 PM

I was struck (so to speak) by the Brits gift of the stuffed snake-charmer’s cobra, complete with basket.  Poor Pryce.  His obvious and first reaction was aesthetic disgust overridden by a good British upbringing that made him behave graciously and with good manners, even in the face of having just received a truly tacky present, never mind it’s ominous overtones (he was about to be sent to India).  I was curious enough to find a bit to read about snake charmers: they are nomadic people, traveling from place to place, and they play music to the cobras in order to hypnotize them and render them manageable.  Hmmm.

And oh, that lawnmower scene!  Holy shit.  Amanda’s JFK parallel is spot-on.  The cleaning-up of the blood all over the glass walls (am I a horrid person for having laughed out loud?) reminded me of the shower curtain in that 60’s horror classic, Psycho, which my Mum says was utterly seared into people’s imaginations back then—no-one had ever gone where Hitchcock went to such spectacular and chilling effect.  I noticed some other commenters (on other threads about this episode) picked up on this, too.

I always loved Joan.  Now I want to be Joan.

jackspratt, the foot thing is very interesting!  Now I will always be looking at shoes (quelle surprise.)

Finally, I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that there are some varieties of Brit *other* than the ones on MM—you know, wimps, twits, and insufferable assholes.  Some of us can be rather nice, as long as you don’t mock our accents or expect us to take a perfectly lovely pot of tea and water it down beyond recognition with ice and flaccid bits of lemon, for crying out loud.

Comment #22: litbrit  on  09/21  at  08:52 PM

It’ll be interesting to see if Pete gets it—despite his continuing reliance on stories about his Knickerbocker ancestors with clients like Ho-Ho and deb-ball Charleston performances (i.e. the pedigree that got him hired in the first place), his reaction to Roger’s blackface act and his Admiral idea indicate that he does get it.

Haven’t seen last night’s episode yet, but we were talking about Pete last week and it seemed pretty clear to us that Pete is such a serious social climber with such a single-minded focus on making money that it makes perfect sense that he would be taken aback at the idea that the client would pass up huge profits out of racism.  I mean, as far as Pete’s concerned, money’s money—who cares where it came from?  Why on earth would you pass up a profit just because you don’t like the kind of people who are buying the product?

At least now I know to eat dinner before watching the show.  wink

Comment #23: Mnemosyne  on  09/21  at  09:13 PM

20—“ignoring that two men were the ones who set it up by bringing the dangerous object into the foreground and that it’s a woman who saved the day in the form of Joan. ”

Right?  Who the fuck brings a fucking tractor into an office?  It’s a credit to the writers and actors, though, that when I was watching it I didn’t think, “who the fuck brings a fucking tractor into an office?”  I just thought, “wow, this place is ridiculous.  They’re driving a fucking tractor around.”  A minor but important distinction.

I thought it was interesting that Peggy fainted while Joan went all EMT on Guy No-foot.  Clearly Peggy still has a long way to go to live up to Joan’s example.

Comment #24: LauraB  on  09/21  at  09:38 PM

@22 - The Psycho reference hits home, I think. It didn’t occur to me as I was watching it (I was laughing too much) but the early 60’s was long before even the tamest exploitation bloodfests that are commonplace today. The WWII vets had seen it, but the youngins and wimens had relatively sheltered lives as far as bloody violence goes (witness the different reactions of Roger and Harry). But am I the only one who thinks there was way too much blood splattered around for one guy to produce w/o severing a major artery and bleeding out?

Comment #25: Geocrackr  on  09/21  at  09:53 PM

I thought it was interesting that Peggy fainted while Joan went all EMT on Guy No-foot.

The last time Peggy fainted, it was in the hospital and no one was there to catch her. Notice who caught her this time?

Comment #26: Roxanne  on  09/21  at  10:05 PM

But am I the only one who thinks there was way too much blood splattered around for one guy to produce w/o severing a major artery and bleeding out?

I assumed it had something to do with the rotating blade on the lawnmower?

Comment #27: LauraB  on  09/21  at  10:14 PM

I was stunned by the way the Brits were just dropping Guy No-Foot (good one, Mimi), given what a shiny and expensive CV he had.

The HR Culture in a nutshell: with few exception, just about everyone is interchangeable. I’m sure Guy would have “done as he was told” by that scary hatchet-man Ford (symbolic name there—Taylor would’ve been a bit on the nose) just as well as Pryce did, although probably with more phony charm and canned pleasantries. He should serve as a cautionary tale to Pete, who’s also an account man, but is (was?) less sure-footed by comparison.

we were talking about Pete last week and it seemed pretty clear to us that Pete is such a serious social climber with such a single-minded focus on making money that it makes perfect sense that he would be taken aback at the idea that the client would pass up huge profits out of racism.  I mean, as far as Pete’s concerned, money’s money—who cares where it came from?

This is Pete’s story arc: he actually isn’t a social climber because he doesn’t have to be—he was born into a family on his mother’s side that was probably in Mrs. Astor’s 500. Unfortunately, he also had a father who was an incompetent alcoholic wastrel who squandered the family money, so he does have to be a money-grubber. Left only with the social pedigree, he’s spent the past two seasons realising that you can’t bloody live off name and ancestry alone.

they’ve been hinting that the company really revolves around a small core of truly irreplaceable people, chief among them Joan and Don who really seem to be crucial to keep the company from destroying itself or falling apart

It’s a nice scene between them in the hospital, the only two competent people at S-C who also know they’re indispensible (note also who’s sitting in the background of that scene). Harry is indispensible, too, but at this point he’s too clueless to understand it. Roger obviously isn’t indispensible, but he thinks he is—the HR Culture and the MBAs don’t really care that he’s an amiably foolish Lewis to Don’s Dean, or even that his name is on the building. I know a few business founders who’ve come out of board meetings with a similar sense of shock.

It’s a credit to the writers and actors, though, that when I was watching it I didn’t think, “who the fuck brings a fucking tractor into an office?”

Well, as Roger observes (and, I suspect, correctly), somewhere in the business it probably happened before. Sorry, but I love that guy.

Comment #28: Gracchus.  on  09/21  at  10:30 PM

somewhere in the business it probably happened before. Sorry, but I love that guy.

OMG, that was the money quote right there.  I shrieked with guilty laughter.

Comment #29: litbrit  on  09/21  at  10:56 PM

Telling you ...he’s going to pull a Jerry Maguire.

Not this season ... perhaps season 4 or (pleasepleaseplease) 5. Don may not have “people” or a pedigree, and guys like Hilton and Bert might not particularly care, but he still enjoys the superficial appearance and very real privilege of a WASP male. Sterling-Cooper is still a good place for him to straddle both sides of the line (creative and accounts, if you will), and he knows it. He also knows that a snake kills to eat, and that a greedy snake can be its own worst enemy.

Comment #30: Gracchus.  on  09/21  at  11:11 PM

[Just noticed a typo at 28… should be Mrs. Astor’s 400.]

Comment #31: Gracchus.  on  09/21  at  11:18 PM

In the scenes from next week’s episode, there is a male body lying on the floor.  If Dr. Dickhead offs himself, Joan could go back to her old job at SC.

Comment #32: jackspratt  on  09/22  at  12:14 AM

Hell of an episode!

I don’t know - maybe it’s just me, but I found myself laughing at Don’s “WHOO!” after he applied the aftershave while getting a shave with Roger.  It was utterly incongruos to the stoic and detached facade that he usually presents. 

It reminded me of similar outburst from Mulder in the Jose Chung’s From Outer Space episode of the X-Files.

Comment #33: AMendoza  on  09/22  at  12:17 AM

Another link: Pryce has hinted that he’s done playing by the old rules.  So was LBJ.  I’m just saying.

Comment #34: Amanda Marcotte  on  09/22  at  12:43 AM

the early 60’s was long before even the tamest exploitation bloodfests that are commonplace today

Actually this is not quite right. The early ‘60s were actually the beginning of serious exploitation bloodfests.  For example, Herschel Gordon Lewis directed Blood Feast in 1963.  Take a look at the trailer.  It’s not Saw or Hostel, but it’s all about the blood and gore (in supersaturated color).  If you’ve never seen one of Lewis’s films, they’re unusual in part because, for horror films, they are relatively uninterested in suspense. They really are largely about setting up graphic violence, the results of which stays in the frame for a long, long time.

Comment #35: Ben Alpers  on  09/22  at  01:36 AM

(Yes, I finally watched it.  I knew about the foot but I was still pretty startled when it actually happened.)

I was stunned by the way the Brits were just dropping Guy No-Foot (good one, Mimi), given what a shiny and expensive CV he had.

I think that we sometimes forget how much life sucked for everyone who wasn’t a physically perfect straight white male in the 1950s.  Losing his foot wasn’t just a nasty accident—it literally ruined him.  It made him a cripple, someone to be pitied and shunned in case the accident was catching somehow.

Comment #36: Mnemosyne  on  09/22  at  01:37 AM

But am I the only one who thinks there was way too much blood splattered around for one guy to produce w/o severing a major artery and bleeding out?

I assumed it had something to do with the rotating blade on the lawnmower?

Ive seen a lawn-mower accident, lots of gore and splatter for surprisingly little permanent damage
Ive seen a table saw take off a thumb with very little blood,
and a band saw take the better part of a hand and no blood at all on the saw, walls, etc

don’t know how typical these are

Comment #37: jefft452  on  09/22  at  01:49 AM

Mnemosyne:

Losing his foot wasn’t just a nasty accident—it literally ruined him.  It made him a cripple, someone to be pitied and shunned in case the accident was catching somehow.

Every time someone said something about his losing a foot, I thought about the stereotype of the supermale with a foot long penis.  He lost his manhood. 

Deuteronomy says you can’t go to heaven if you’ve lost your penis or testicles.

Comment #38: oldfeminist  on  09/22  at  02:01 AM

I’m not sure that a handful of acknowledgements of the foot as a part of the human body over a couple dozen hours of TV show constitute a foot fetish.  The shoe-removal thing in Cooper’s office helps to establish his character as some sort of mildly eccentric, worldly fellow, while nothing is short-hand for “hippie tree hugger” like dancing barefoot in the grass.  This is no Quentin Tarantino, where cameras (and characters) linger lovingly on foots for whole minutes for no apparent reason.

Comment #39: Denise  on  09/22  at  02:15 AM

I’m not sure that a handful of acknowledgements of the foot as a part of the human body over a couple dozen hours of TV show constitute a foot fetish.

I don’t know that it counts as a foot fetish, but given how carefully the show seems to be plotted, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was some subtle foreshadowing.  Especially since I suspect oldfeminist is right and there’s an undertone of castration to the accident—if so, that makes the sensuality/sexuality of the barefooted teacher even more obvious.

Comment #40: Mnemosyne  on  09/22  at  02:56 AM

Did anyone catch the Dylan bit at the end?

“‘Hey hey, Woody Guthrie, I wrote you a song. ‘bout a funny old world that’s a comin along. Seems sick and it’s hungry and it’s tired and it’s torn. It looks like it’s a-dyin’ and it’s hardly been born.”

Before the storm.

Comment #41: perlstein  on  09/22  at  03:14 AM

Also watch Sally process this one in two months (about two episodes, the way they’re pacing things):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_Street_Baptist_Church_bombing

Comment #42: perlstein  on  09/22  at  03:19 AM

I was struck (so to speak) by the Brits gift of the stuffed snake-charmer’s cobra, complete with basket.  Poor Pryce.  His obvious and first reaction was aesthetic disgust overridden by a good British upbringing that made him behave graciously and with good manners, even in the face of having just received a truly tacky present, never mind it’s ominous overtones (he was about to be sent to India).  I was curious enough to find a bit to read about snake charmers: they are nomadic people, traveling from place to place, and they play music to the cobras in order to hypnotize them and render them manageable.  Hmmm.

That scene was the scene were the Evil Overlord gets rid of an underling by giving him a deadly “present”. From the moment they offered the box I was expecting it to explode, or a hand to shoot out and strangle the guy, acid, anything. I knew it wouldn’t happen, because it’s not that genre, but it was that scene. And then they up the stakes, because he opens the box and it’s A SNAKE ! That was weird enough that I thought when he put his hand in there it would turn out to be live snakes under the dead one who would bite him. I had to tell myself “not that genre ! not going to happen !”.

And then they demote him to India, which is the appropriately Mad Men way of killing an underling and we’re back home. Awesome scene.

Re Sally : She certainly wasn’t playing with it. They made it seem like she threw it out the window because of her ghost fear, but the doll was pretty much in its same state as when it was first given to her (no dress-up), so I’m thinking there’s as much resistance to what the gift represents re: cultural femininity as the guise it comes in.

I so recognized myself at that age in her disappointed “Oh. A Barbie”. But it’s not just that she doesn’t like Barbies : I think the whole charade of Betty giving her a bribe to love her brother turns her off just as much as the bribe being a lame one.
(heh, “lame”. That’s what you get for using ableist language. Um, “terrible one ?”)

I’m not sure that a handful of acknowledgements of the foot as a part of the human body over a couple dozen hours of TV show constitute a foot fetish.

Like Mnemosyne I wouldn’t call it a “fetish”, but I remember reviews and analyses of the first episode mentioning all the feet and speculating it would be relevant to the coming season. They’re certainly right so far…

I think that we sometimes forget how much life sucked for everyone who wasn’t a physically perfect straight white male in the 1950s.  Losing his foot wasn’t just a nasty accident—it literally ruined him.  It made him a cripple, someone to be pitied and shunned in case the accident was catching somehow.

Indeed. I had been telling myself that it wouldn’t be a big problem, he could get a prosthetic foot and wouldn’t be able to walk as much as before but he could still do the job, right ? But did they have decent prostheses at the time ? And there’s recovery and physical therapy and everything, right ?
So when the Englishmen dashed all that speculation I wasn’t so much shocked at the conclusion, as at how obvious it was to them. There wasn’t even a question. Cripple = no job and that’s that.

Comment #43: Caravelle  on  09/22  at  03:39 AM

Finally, I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that there are some varieties of Brit *other* than the ones on MM—you know, wimps, twits, and insufferable assholes.  Some of us can be rather nice, as long as you don’t mock our accents or expect us to take a perfectly lovely pot of tea and water it down beyond recognition with ice and flaccid bits of lemon, for crying out loud.

Uh-huh. Consider yourself lucky - there are precisely three characters in US pop culture identified as Kiwi - Jermaine, Brett and Murray.

God, what I wouldn’t give for a sneering villian threatening the hero with being “thr’wn off the brudge to slip wif the fushes”...

Comment #44: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  09/22  at  04:09 AM

37-

landmower accidents tend to be ugly because of the thresher. Saws are designed for clean cuts, but a thresher is designed to rip the fuck out of shit and to cut it a thousand times over a good size area. So it’s not so much the fact that it severs a toe or two as it’s the shredding of that toe or two both in the initial cut and about a thousand times in the second afterwards.

For a splatter fest, something like a thresher would bring the most blood, because of that fact, it’s just not a clean cut or puncture.

43-

Yeah, I was trying to say that, but you said it better re: Sally. It’s a shit gift in her eyes and the way it was given to her was equally offensive. And wasn’t it the mounting outrage at how Vietnam era cripples were treated that started the handicapped movement to fight against ablism? Another way the hint at the beginning of the Vietnam War may have been the biggest hint of all of the ensuing gore and perhaps why it was important for the character defending it to be the one to bring the tractor into the room.

It was similar defenders of the war who would be delaying the end of the war to bring home even more war wounded and war dead from that folly as we have noted in the Iraq War pimps helping sell the continued postponement of the end of our Iraq War folly.

Comment #45: Cerberus  on  09/22  at  07:49 AM

The HR Culture in a nutshell

The planets revolve around the sun due to the HR culture.  The moon goes around the earth and the HR culture makes it so.  The female fish drops eggs in the gravel at the bottom of the stream and the male, enmeshed in the HR culture, fertilizes them dutifully.

Comment #46: Ms Kate  on  09/22  at  12:50 PM

OT, but somewhat related…

Jon Hamm is featured alongside Will Ferrell and Olivia Wilde (“Thirteen” from House) in a hilarious parody PSA on Funny or Die about protecting insurance companies from the evils of healthcare reform…

“People are saying a lot of mean things about health insurance companies and their executives and it’s gotta stop,” pleads Thomas Lennon.

“These great business men are American heroes,” says Linda Cardellini.

“So why is Obama trying to reform health care when insurance companies are doing just fine making billions of dollars in profit?” Will Ferrell asks.

http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/041b5acaf5/protect-insurance-companies-psa

Comment #47: DTG in STL  on  09/22  at  01:44 PM

The planets revolve around the sun due to the HR culture.  The moon goes around the earth and the HR culture makes it so.  The female fish drops eggs in the gravel at the bottom of the stream and the male, enmeshed in the HR culture, fertilizes them dutifully.

Indeed, the HR Culture/4th Purpose has become an almost a law of nature of modern corporations. One of the nifty things about the show is that it depicts the moment in history when it was really taking hold, when someone like Joan who implicitly understands the game starts helping define and formalise it.

In the last episode, Roger demonstrated an understanding as well (“most of the time business comes down to ‘I don’t like this guy’”), but on a more informal, high-level basis. In this episode, after that dreadful board meeting, Bert made explicit one of the key tenets of what will become the HR Culture in a resigned way: “we took their money, and now we have to do what they say.” And he’s not talking about actually doing one’s job competently for a paycheque (the old understanding), he’s talking about jumping through hoops related to personality and politics—hoops that Roger never expected he’d have to deal with.

It’ll be another 5 years before people like Laurence J. Peter and Peter Drucker start investigating what’s going on in these new organisations, another generation before a significant number of employees understand what they’re stuck with, and a major technological revolution before some of them start finding a way out.

Comment #48: Gracchus.  on  09/22  at  01:49 PM

I don’t know that it counts as a foot fetish, but given how carefully the show seems to be plotted, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was some subtle foreshadowing.

Sure, there’s definitely an argument to be made that the writers meant to contrast the no shoes rule in Cooper’s office with the no shoes while dancing in the grass, and then the no shoes at all because you don’t have a foot.  I just get irritated when people think that anything having to do with feet is automatically a “serious foot fetish”.  Pet peeve.

Comment #49: Denise  on  09/22  at  04:15 PM

Sure, there’s definitely an argument to be made that the writers meant to contrast the no shoes rule in Cooper’s office with the no shoes while dancing in the grass, and then the no shoes at all because you don’t have a foot.  I just get irritated when people think that anything having to do with feet is automatically a “serious foot fetish”.  Pet peeve.

It’s more of a trope than a fetish in the Mad Men universe, “feet on the ground” and all that. And the writers definitely are making that contrast between the genuine and artifice. Matt Weiner said that the overarching (sorry) theme of the show is the contrast and grey area between what is and what seems to be.

One of the most explicit expressions of that theme is made by Bert in this season’s first episode, when Pryce is examining his Dream of the Fisherman’s Wife woodcut:

PRYCE: Remarkable.

COOPER: I picked it for its sensuality. But it also, in some way, reminds me of our business. Who is the man who imagined her ecstasy?”

PRYCE: Who indeed?

[DRAPER enters the office, shoes off]

COOPER: We were just talking about you.

Personally, I didn’t think they needed to make it that crystal clear. But there you go.

Comment #50: Gracchus.  on  09/22  at  04:39 PM

And he’s not talking about actually doing one’s job competently for a paycheque (the old understanding), he’s talking about jumping through hoops related to personality and politics—hoops that Roger never expected he’d have to deal with.

How old are you Gracchus?  Because I remember hearing stories in the 1980s about what went on before the Human Resources people levelled the playing field and cut the shit.

As for “the old understanding”, hogwash.  At least in the Northeast, the personality game was always the game, HR culture or no, and continues to be. In other places, it didn’t exist on the same level, and started to die out of it’s own ineffeciency.

Comment #51: Ms Kate  on  09/22  at  05:09 PM

How old are you Gracchus?  Because I remember hearing stories in the 1980s about what went on before the Human Resources people levelled the playing field and cut the shit.

My age is beside the point. Like I said, a generation—22 years, give or take— brings us to the mid-80s, and yeah, you better believe that racist and sexist BS went on. In certain industries, it still goes on.

The point here isn’t about affirmative action and equal opportunity, which are government regulatory initiatives that corporations have tasked HR with covering shareholders’ and executives’ arses on (it’s better a function of the legal dept, but I digress). In that particular case, it happens to have worked to most employees’ advantage as well.

What I’m discussing is about a deeper issue regarding the way most corporations treated their employees up starting in the period of the show, into the 1980s and beyond—Taylorism with a graduate degree and a smiling face.

<blockquote>As for “the old understanding”, hogwash.  At least in the Northeast, the personality game was always the game, HR culture or no, and continues to be. In other places, it didn’t exist on the same level, and started to die out of it’s own ineffeciency./<blockquote>

Personality and politics has always been a given. But the old understanding between employee and corporate employer was exactly that: you do a job with competence, you get your paycheque. Conflicts of personality and politics were handled informally, preferably between adults.

Obviously (as we see on the show) this wasn’t a good thing when the conflict was based on juvenile issues like race or gender. But the series also allows us to see good managers who can handle and moderate other conflicts nimbly without corporate poking its nose in.

What’s being shown this season on Mad Men is another part of the social compact that’s undergoing change. The conflicts of personality and politics are starting to be covered up by the HR Culture, and they’re incorporated into the formal fabric of office life. In the coming decades, “everyone’s a criminal” S.O.P.s, bogus peer evaluations, pressuring people to work on days off, and the threat of being separated from the company health plan will be used as cudgels to keep employees in line on all matters, and to get rid of employees that the MBAs find too expensive, inconvenient, or just plain don’t like.

Comment #52: Gracchus.  on  09/22  at  05:46 PM

And I’m sorry, Ms Kate, if you personally object to my opinion of the role of HR departments (and their mercenary cousins, management consultants) in the modern corporation—especially regarding whose interests they serve, and whose they claim to serve. To make it perfectly plain, it’s also my opinion that their functions can be better and more effectively handled by other departments and offices (e.g. CFO for benefits management and payroll, legal for regulatory compliance, office manager for non-management conflicts and general morale, hiring managers for hiring, etc).

I’m sure there are some small efficiencies to centralising things in one department of jack-of-all-trades bureaucrats in a large corporation, but the days when HR was considered an absolute requirement in such situations are 20 years in the past. Fortunately for them, HR departments are uniquely positioned to maintain their existence within organisations.

Workplace environments for women and minorities are better and more efficient now than they were then, but that’s thanks to government, not HR. Workplace environments are also in some ways worse and less efficient now than they were then, in large part due to the HR (or, more specifically, the 4th-purpose culture that engendered it). Personality and politics conflicts remain, and—with the rise of MBAs and management “science”—HR departments have become another highly refined tool in waging those battles (for those who know how to use them), just as office managers were a less formal tool in earlier days. That’s my view and, so it seems, it’s one shared by the producers and writers of this insightful and wickedly accurate series.

Comment #53: Gracchus.  on  09/22  at  06:10 PM

One more thing, to bring things back on-topic: notice how Roger learns about his position in the changing social compact. He notices (ok, someone else points it out, and then he notices—nice touch) that he’s been “accidently” left out of the org chart, that icon of HR and management consulting.

And then shark-eyed Ford drives the needle in deeper by scrawling Roger’s name on the slide.

Comment #54: Gracchus.  on  09/22  at  06:19 PM

Dear sweet jeebis but I loved this episode.
I KNEW that they were going to screw over Pryce. Daft bastard.
The foot! The Deere! The Joan!
God I hope Joan gets some sort of… vengeance or something… I just.. ok that was the wrong word but I love her so much.
And Connie from NM was back - wanting free shit. Hahah! The rich never change.

Comment #55: Danica Lefse Queen  on  09/22  at  06:45 PM

Another foot mention—Roger at the barber shop says he’s thinking about having his feet done, while the manicurist works on his hands. 

Later on, he’s “cut off at the knees.”

Comment #56: oldfeminist  on  09/22  at  07:54 PM

I predict Joan and Peggy will end up over at Grey with Duck. The cast will be split between old-establishment Sterling Cooper and hipster-turtleneck Grey and the competitions and rivalries of the show will spread out between the two agencies.

Gracchus:

Personality and politics conflicts remain, and—with the rise of MBAs and management “science”—HR departments have become another highly refined tool in waging those battles (for those who know how to use them)

Right. If you’re facing discrimination or some other sort of mistreatment at work, try going to your HR department and see who they advocate for. The job of the HR manager is basically to have 1,001 ways to say ‘suck it up and take it or find another job.’

BTW, a thing I noticed that I haven’t seen anybody else talk about was with the dog. Remember that’s Sally’s dog; Don got her for Sally’s birthday. But when Sally was screaming and baby gene was crying, the dog came in and barked at Sally to hush and then trotted off with Betty and baby Gene. It was a little allusion to Sally’s being kind of left out in the cold when things are really tough for her right now.

Comment #57: snobographer  on  09/22  at  08:02 PM

Ok, I may be in the minority here, but I’ve found the HR department where I work to be extremely responsive.  Without going into too much detail, I recently had a rather major issue that would fall under the heading of “pay inequity,” and when I brought it up, not only was it resolved under a month, but HR is also investigating whether others are affected in the same way.

I am fully willing to admit that this experience is atypical.  Just pointing out that the system is at least, theoretically, functional in some contexts.

Comment #58: LauraB  on  09/22  at  08:25 PM

Ok, I may be in the minority here, but I’ve found the HR department where I work to be extremely responsive.

I’m glad to hear it. Despite what Ms Kate might think, I’m not on a crusade against individual HR people, but rather am questioning the need for such departments, criticising the way those departments generally operate, and pointing out that the negative aspects of those practises now affect most Americans’ lives almost from cradle to grave.

While I’d still maintain that a situation like yours could have been resolved with the help of others (e.g. a sympathetic supervisor, a compliance person from legal, the comptroller, etc.), and while I’m sure the follow-up investigation is being conducted less out of altruism than fear, I’m glad to see you were able to enjoy one of those rare side benefits.

Comment #59: Gracchus.  on  09/22  at  09:06 PM

Not-Bridget posted on another site that the song Paul was singing when the Brits came in was the hymn “Jerusalem.”  The words are a poem by William Blake.  It is based on a legend that Jesus visited England during his lifetime.  It was adopted as an anthem by British workers against their corporate overlords because it contains the phrase “Dark Satanic mills.”

The first line is “And did those FEET in ancient times.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_did_those_feet_in_ancient_time

Comment #60: jackspratt  on  09/22  at  11:57 PM

jackspratt, that is an awesome observation by Not-Bridget.  Cheers to you for sharing it!

(Now I have that hymn, which is also something a lot of Brits tend to sing en masse after the fourth round of Watney’s, playing in my head at three in the morning, thankyouverymuch.)

Comment #61: litbrit  on  09/23  at  04:28 AM

Idiom fail: It’s portenTs, not portenDs. Ominous portents. Good work otherwise.

Comment #62: wapsie  on  09/23  at  12:41 PM

I’m only wandering back here after many weeks, but I can’t think of anywhere better online to post (or read!) Mad Men observations.

 

Since posts have closed on the thread discussing the episode where Grandpa Gene dies, I’ll post something I noticed about that episode here that I haven’t seen anyone comment upon elsewhere.

The series even comments on the way we look back at things. Grandpa Gene’s recollections suggest a tradition of connecting to the past, while Don’s is one of modern disconnection (well in keeping with his background and character).  The world Gene was born into was that of Victorian/Edwardian tradition, a tradition the war he fought in annihilated.

The closing theme of that episode, Over There, is a distinctly American song, unlike most of the other Great War tunes, about the newness of American involvement overseas.  But it also struck me that Over There is a song about a particular year, the one where US troops were called to serve abroad: 1917.

And that got me to thinking of the relevance of that year, and its relation to our own.  This seems to have come to the attention of the series creators, as they imagined what their characters thought of people as distant in time from them… as they are from us:

 1963 = Year Mad Men Season 3 is set
-1917 = US entry into WWI
_____
      46 years

 2009 = Mad Men Season 3 first broadcast
-1963 = Year Mad Men Season 3 is set
_____
      46 years

46 + 46 = 92. This is what a century looks like, in human terms. This is the sharp, leading edge of the wedge that is the Long Now.

I should also point out that to someone in 1917, thinking back 92 years to 1825, would have to imagine a world before Victorians, before photography and the other fruits of science and technology.  In 1825 the word nostalgia was a clinical term for “homesickness”, which was considered a serious mental disease.

 

Also, a small but important correction to Amanda: This earlier episode is the first mention of Vietnam, with the burning monk on television. The reference in this week’s episode, just before the foot went flying, is perhaps the first mention of American military involvement.

Comment #63: Yamara  on  09/23  at  12:51 PM

I recently had a rather major issue that would fall under the heading of “pay inequity,” and when I brought it up, not only was it resolved under a month, but HR is also investigating whether others are affected in the same way.

Well that’s cool. But isnt’ HR the department in charge of keeping track of salaries and job descriptions? Shouldn’t they just use that inside knowledge and specific expertise to make sure everyone’s paid fairly in the first place rather than wait until a discrepancy is reported and correct it?
Still, it’s a lot better than what I got, which was a lot of excuses to pay $12k more to a guy with less relevant experience and a fraction of the workload.

Comment #64: snobographer  on  09/23  at  03:26 PM

My thoughts about Joan and her re-entry to Sterling Cooper could revolve around her not so great surgeon husband going to Viet Nam, then she will have to support herself.  Perfect entry back in to the company.

Comment #65: Elizasherr  on  09/23  at  08:25 PM

Snobographer, in this case, no, not really.  Again, I don’t want to go into too much detail about my specific situation, but I work in a small division of a large entity, and in my small division the salaries are “market-based” whereas in the rest of the institution, they’re pretty well defined and regulated.  There are some other confounding factors as well.  Yes, absolutely, they could have done a better job, but it’s not totally unreasonable to me that HR wasn’t on top of this.  The CFO et al of my division, however—he knew.  And he didn’t give a shit.  Which is why I was grateful to be able to take it to HR.

Comment #66: LauraB  on  09/23  at  08:42 PM

oldfeminist;

“Deuteronomy says you can’t go to heaven if you’ve lost your penis or testicles.”

Deuteronomy says absolutely nothing about going to Heaven. You’re probably misreading (or parroting someone else’s misreading of) the rule that priests and Levites with certain physical deformities could not serve at the Temple, but still received a share of the offerings.

Comment #67: ScaryIntolerantFundy  on  09/24  at  03:02 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.