Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Aluminum! Previous entry: The patriarchy weighs in on the Democratic primary

More Ribs, Please

Ruh-roh.

Openly frustrated by what they see as an ongoing double standard in the press’s treatment of his campaign, Sen. John McCain and his aides have been aggressively denouncing unfavorable stories as “smear jobs” and “scurrilous attacks,” while the candidate himself has launched a series of stinging attacks on Sen. Barack Obama.

It’s a dangerous posture for a candidate whose political success is intimately tied with his image as an irrepressible happy warrior — equal parts President Ronald Reagan and Vice President Hubert Humphrey, with a dash of his old Arizona buddy Rep. Mo Udall’s sharp sense of humor — and whose appeal to independents owes nearly as much to character and personal narrative as to issues and ideology.

Shorter Politico: I thought we were friends, John!  Friends!  You even signed my yearbook!
The rest of the article is simply a bunch of theorized ways in which McCain could go crazy and do angry ninja shit, all of which is motivated by the same barely concealed sense of violation - John McCain spent years wining and dining (literally) a press corps from his perch of being Maverick McMaverick.  Now that he’s in a position where something’s actually at risk and he’s running as the standard bearer of a party rather than your cool friend with the kickass house and the party bus, he’s got to actually start treating the media like he’s *gasp* a Republican.

If you look at the arc of McCain’s career, the one thing that stands out is that he’s never actually been in danger of…anything, really.  He hasn’t been in a truly close race since the 1980s, and he hasn’t had to seriously fight a Democrat in a winner-take-all format since the same time.  It was always easy for him to be the media’s best friend (and boy, are they friendly) precisely because he never had anything to lose - either he was so far behind (2000 and most of 2007) that being friendly to the media got him credibility and cachet to carry him through or so far ahead that bad coverage really didn’t matter.

The primary season was effectively a joke.  McCain managed to beat a cousin-marrier, a walking corpse, a shiny-haired cultist, a paranoid, elfin obstetrician and a nice guy who used to be really fat (but was still, like all the rest of these guys, broke). 

I think John McCain might be an anime character.

This is the first time in more than 20 years that McCain’s faced an actual challenge, and certainly the first time since he defeated the Four Winds of Mesa Hills Country Club and inherited the mantle of Maverick of Mavericks that something’s truly, honestly been this credibly close and in danger of being taken from him.  Reporters, I’d stop planning on sharing quiche recipes with him and start planning on hearing how you’re worthless vultures giving a black guy an easy ride because of your liberal guilt.

Don’t say I didn’t warn you.  Or offer up a better dry rub recipe, if you want it.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 09:40 PM • (13) Comments

By the way, the Project for Excellence in Journalism has looked at the campaign coverage too:

  From January 1, just before the Iowa caucuses, through March 9, following the Texas and Ohio contests, the height of the primary season, the dominant personal narratives in the media about Obama and Clinton were almost identical in tone, and were both twice as positive as negative, according to the study, which examined the coverage of the candidates’ character, history, leadership and appeal—apart from the electoral results and the tactics of their campaigns.

  The trajectory of the coverage, however, began to turn against Obama, and did so well before questions surfaced about his pastor Jeremiah Wright. Shortly after Clinton criticized the media for being soft on Obama during a debate, the narrative about him began to turn more skeptical—and indeed became more negative than the coverage of Clinton herself. What’s more, an additional analysis of more general campaign topics suggests the Obama narrative became even more negative later in March, April and May.

Remember that as the Clintons and their fans try to spin this as “the press picked on us!”

Comment #1: Phoenix Woman  on  06/08  at  10:28 PM

What exactly does the right expect to be done about media bias?  I have NEVER been able to figure this out in all their rants about it; it’s similar to how they’re unable to provide a straight answer to the “how long should a woman who has an abortion be jailed” question.

Should there be a “media bias handicap” imposed upon Obama, in which he should refuse to be inaugurated if he wins by less than a certain percentage?  And if so, how much is this percentage?  (Evan Thomas, the Newsweek reporter, pegged it at 15% once; he later backtracked it to 5%, and not surprisingly right-wing blogs picked up the first number but never noticed the second.)

Alternatively, should media figures be barred from voting?

And what exactly are they trying to accomplish by telling it to me?  They’re insulting my intelligence by saying that I didn’t vote for Democrats out of my own volition.  It’s like when they complain about “liberal academia” and more directly insulting my intelligence by saying I only get my grades because my professors like my politics (except these views never even get discussed in engineering, which is also a field where you can find a majority of conservative professors at many colleges.)

Comment #2: calvinhobbes  on  06/08  at  10:56 PM

BTW: Has anyone read ‘God’s Debris’ but Scott Adams?

But but but the corporations want McCain. Isn’t that why the market tanked? wink

Who represents the real possibility for meaningful change? Guess…

Obama? McCain? Mickey Mouse? Try the former… Who’s getting all the attacks…

Comment #3: Pinky  on  06/08  at  11:14 PM

“Bambi” kept poking at Bill Clinton him until he went bonkers. By November McCain will be chasing his own tail.

Comment #4: PanAmerican  on  06/08  at  11:37 PM

See, posts like this are why I am so glad Jesse is back. So so so glad.

Comment #5: SarahS  on  06/08  at  11:45 PM

Is this right? 

cousin-marrier - Rudy Giuliani
a walking corpse - Fred Thompson
a shiny-haired cultist - Mitt Romney
a paranoid, elfin obstetrician - Ron Paul
a nice guy who used to be really fat - Mike Huckabee

Comment #6: Neil the Ethical Werewolf  on  06/09  at  12:01 AM

Oh, I figured Huckabee for the cousin-marrier cos he’s a fundie, but I think you’re right. Giuliani could be the walking corpse, too, for that matter.

Comment #7: felagund  on  06/09  at  12:59 AM

That. picture. is. Awesome.

Comment #8: TheDeadlyShoe  on  06/09  at  04:03 AM

w00t the return of jesse!! now we just need some billmon and well be set.

Comment #9: belle waring  on  06/09  at  04:11 AM

Shorter McCain 2008: How disrespectful it is that they don’t just read our press releases!

Obama hasn’t been too friendly with the media.  And the media hasn’t been too friendly to him.  But I think Obama has an advantage over McCain’s position in that Obama long ago realized that the media’s favor isn’t much of an advantage, while McCain jokes (with too much seriousness for some) that the media is his base.

Another thing I think about this is that McCain feels some need to have the media on his side, while Obama knows the media is interested in him because he’s a story.  So one serves ribs, while the other carefully doles out access.  With the campaign funding advantage of the Democratic Party this year, I expect more of the same.  McCain needs the media’s favor much more than Obama does, and McCain’s proposal to have many unmoderated debates is done much more out of need than any Mavericky desire to put his views in front of the voters.  And that’s why Obama hasn’t booked himself on that tour, in my opinion.  He’ll do it, but not much.  And McCain will grumble but not be taken too seriously by a media that is much more attention starved for the other Senator.

Comment #10: jon  on  06/09  at  06:54 AM

Pinky:  I’ve read God’s Debris by Scott Adams.

Actually, it’s a pretty interesting read. smile

Comment #11: Mhorag  on  06/09  at  11:57 AM

while the candidate himself has launched a series of stinging attacks on Sen. Barack Obama.

Really?  I must have missed the attacks that stung in amidst the flood of weak dumbass falsehoods that the Obama campaign has effortlessly responded to.  What’s next?  Re-running Tom “Indicted” Delay’s “Marxist” remark, and saying “Ooh, that’s gonna leave a mark”?

Comment #12: mds  on  06/09  at  12:09 PM

And the anime character McCain mostly resembles is ... Happosai from “Ranma 1/2.” In looks and temper, at least, if not in panty-thieving proclivities (as far as we know).

Comment #13: Terry K.  on  06/09  at  02:51 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.