Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Reading and misreading Eric Holder’s call to discuss race Previous entry: How Brown v. Board hasn’t managed to conquer the prom

NAACP national calls for Prop 8 to be overturned

Legal IssuesLGBTRace

Perhaps this will silence some of the critics who can’t let go of the zombie meme that most blacks are homophobic—and that leadership won’t step up and say something. This hits all the right notes. (via press release, no link):

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People today announced support of measures before the California legislature challenging Proposition 8, which altered the California Constitution to deny same-sex couples the freedom to marry and equal protection under the law.

In a letter to legislative leaders, NAACP national board chair Julian Bond and President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous urged passage of House Resolution 5 and Senate Resolution 7 to put the legislature on record calling for invalidation of Prop. 8 as an improper and dangerous alteration of the California Constitution.

The NAACP’s mission is to help create a society where all Americans have equal protection and opportunity under the law,” said President Jealous. “Our Mission Statement calls for the ‘equality of rights of all persons.’ Prop. 8 strips same-sex couples of a fundamental freedom, as defined by the California State Supreme Court. In so doing, it poses a serious threat to all Americans. Prop. 8 is a discriminatory, unprecedented change to the California Constitution that, if allowed to stand, would undermine the very purpose of a constitution and courts - assuring equal protection and opportunity for all and safeguarding minorities from the tyranny of the majority.”

SR 7, sponsored by Equality California (EQCA), will be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Feb. 24th and will proceed to the full Senate for a vote shortly thereafter. Its companion bill, HR 5, also sponsored by EQCA, passed the Assembly Judiciary Committee on Feb. 17th and is eligible for a vote before the full Assembly as early as today.

The California State Conference of the NAACP filed briefs with the California Supreme Court in the legal challenge against Prop. 8, arguing that the measure drastically alters the equal protection guarantee in California’s Constitution and that the rights of a minority cannot be eliminated by a simple majority vote. Several other civil rights organizations, faith leaders, unions and leading corporations also filed briefs urging the invalidation of Prop. 8.

The NAACP has long opposed any proposal that would alter the federal or state constitutions for the purpose of excluding any groups or individuals from guarantees of equal protection,” said Chairman Bond. “We urge the legislature to declare that Proposition 8 did not follow the proper protective process and should be overturned as an invalid alteration that vitiated crucial constitutional safeguards and fundamental American values, threatening civil rights and all vulnerable minorities.”

Needless to say, this is the message that needs to be spread throughout churches in the socially conservative black communities around the country.

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 11:01 PM • (13) Comments

President Jealous?  that has a certain ring to it ...

Comment #1: Ms Kate  on  02/23  at  11:33 PM

I had a long comment working, but I dumped it.

The gist of it, though, related to the last comment by Pam.  it seems to me that there’s a split between black political leadership and black religious leadership.  During the Black Freedom Movement, these two leadership groups tended to be relatively united, at least until the 1964-5 passage of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, after which the movement really splintered.

There may be strong overlaps between these two groups, and they still have to deal with each other, but they also seem to have gone along different trajectories, at least as issues of civil rights are concerned.  There seems to be a more expansive notion of civil rights among political leadership, while the religious leadership seems to have a more restricted ownership/guardianship relationship to those rights.  (I should also recognize splits within religious groups, with the more evangelical and pentecostal groups tending toward the right, with the established churches like the AME tending to be a bit more moderate.)

One of the problems, it seems to me, is a universalizing approach to black communities, be they religious or political (and this doesn’t even bring immigrant groups into the mix).

I dunno. I know where my work tends to take place—with student groups on college campuses, with students who cross over these different political, religious, and immigrant categories.  But, it also seems that this is a whole discourse in which this white, radical, atheist, liberal has no place…....

OK, enough wine for tonight.

Comment #2: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  02/23  at  11:42 PM

Jeff is onto an important point, I think. To the best of my recollection, the argument was never that black people were homophobic per se. Rather, it was that the black churches were, and they exercised considerable influence in favor of Prop H8. There’s probably no better illustration of the split Jeff is talking about than in the family of Martin Luther King, Jr. His widow and all but one of his children get that the struggle for gay rights is on an equal footing with the struggle for civil rights for people of color. But one of King’s daughters (I forget her name) is absolutely dead-set against any equation between civil rights of the sort her father fought for and gay rights as they’re being fought for today.

It’s also the case that there has been an awful lot of ugly blowback against the gay community, with quite a bit of broad-brushing and unjustifiable pigeon-holing involved. Just as not all black voters supported Prop H8, not all gay folk believed that they did.

Comment #3: Michael  on  02/23  at  11:59 PM

Pretty with it for a 100 year old! Happy Birthday NAACP!
And I agree the beef is with certain religious organizations rather than race.

Comment #4: TedG  on  02/24  at  12:30 AM

This is off-topic, but speaking of the magnificent organization originated in my hometown: During the brief period (summer of ‘00 and I forget why I bothered) I listened to Hatemonger Limbaugh, I heard him refer a number of times to the “NAALCP.” L, huh. Knowing his mindset, I guessed it stood for “lazy” but it was just a guess. Anyone know for sure? I’ve wondered all these years.

Comment #5: daphne  on  02/24  at  12:50 AM

Liberal.

I only know this because my friend used the acronym and defined it in our AP US History course 5 years ago.  For an assignment.  He got a warning-shot and a snarky comment from the teacher.

Comment #6: themann1086  on  02/24  at  02:08 AM

Thanks, mann. “Liberal,” though it seems obvious, surprises me because wouldn’t Limbaugh consider most African Americans too reflexively liberal to bother to attach the label, or distinguish them from the barely existing non-liberals? While “lazy,” oh, I guess that would be just as redundant to a bona fide racist as well.

Comment #7: daphne  on  02/24  at  02:24 AM

This news made me smile.

Comment #8: Nenya  on  02/24  at  07:20 AM

I first met Julian Bond while working for the McGovern campaign back in 1972. He impressed me then as he does now with his erudition and soft-spoken demeanor that reflects well when confronting the shrill voices of those seeking to invalidate the rights of religious, racial, or sexual minorities.

Comment #9: BobbyV  on  02/24  at  08:36 AM

O noes!  The Saints may soon no longer have any smokescreen left at all for their support of Prop 8!  I feel faint.

Comment #10: kaninchen  on  02/24  at  12:19 PM

So awesome.  Disconnections, rivalries, and indifference between different groups working on human rights issues have cost us decades of potential progress.  Glad to hear this news.

Comment #11: libdevil  on  02/24  at  04:01 PM

Typical.  You give equal rights to one group and soon they start insisting everyone have them…

Comment #12: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  02/24  at  04:32 PM

O noes!  The Saints may soon no longer have any smokescreen left at all for their support of Prop 8!  I feel faint.

Don’t worry—as long as Grand Inquisitor Palpatine runs the Church, the Roman Catholics will provide plenty of support to the LDS for any homo-bashing they want.

Comment #13: womzilla (Kevin J. Maroney)  on  02/26  at  11:50 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.