Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Howling monkeys “win” by howling, being monkeys Previous entry: Why class does matter in the Gates arrest debate

Netroots Nation panels

Hope to see some of you this year at Netroots Nation in Pittsburgh on August 13th-16th.  I’m pretty stoked, since it’s usually a great time.  I’ll be on two panels, both on Saturday the 15th.  (At least so far, there’s often last minute additions.)  Please come check them out if you’re coming to the conference.

The first is “Women Bloggers Found: Has Feminist Blogging Gone Mainstream?”, Saturday at 10:30 AM.  The panelists are our own Pam Spaulding and myself, as well as Jill Filipovic, Samhita Mukhopadhyay, and Lindsay Beyerstein.  We came up with the idea over drinks at WAM!  Here’s the description:

A few years ago, male bloggers ‘round the liberal bloglandia were wondering out loud, “Where are the women bloggers?” Many of the women in the feminist and progressive blogospheres responded with frustration—we were there, and had been, the whole time. Today, the blogosphere looks awfully different, as feminist bloggers are increasingly mainstreamed and able to exert stronger influence on online discourse. But “blogging while feminist” isn’t always easy, and feminist bloggers have faced harassment and threats that are uniquely gendered and sexualized. Feminists who have been most successful at running bigger blogs have also been mostly young, white, heterosexual and middle-class—so their issues have been presented to the mainstream progressive movement as the whole of feminism. This panel will look at what has changed, what hasn’t and who remains on the edges of progressive blogging. It will also examine how female bloggers—and feminist bloggers in particular—are treated in mainstream spaces, and what we can do about it.

We concentrated on collecting bloggers who’ve been doing this for years and have gained some prominence, mainly because we all remember back when male bloggers used to ask where all the female bloggers were, because there really weren’t many big time female or feminist bloggers a few years ago, and the biggest exception to the rule—-Digby—-hadn’t come out as female yet.  Obviously, things have changed significantly in many ways (and in some ways not), and we thought it would be interesting to have bloggers who’ve been a big part of the change to talk about what we’ve learned. 

My other one is an all-star panel of reproductive rights activists who are trying to use the internet to get out our message in innovative ways.  It’s called “Advocating for Reproductive Rights in the Age of Obama”, and it’ll be me as the moderator, Jodi Jacobson from RH Reality Check, Joerg Dreweke from the Guttmacher, Aimee Thorne-Thomsen from the Pro-Choice Public Education Project, and James Wagoner from Advocates for Youth.  We put the panel together specifically because these are all organizations that are plugged into the netroots and have found innovative ways to use and study new media.  It’s Saturday at 1:30.  Here’s the description:

The mainstream media may think having a pro-choice president is all that matters, but reproductive rights activists know there’s so much more to the issue. Instead of just making up for ground lost under Bush, how can we push for a reproductive justice framework, where more people have their real needs met? Most importantly, how can we use online tools like blogs and social media to spread the word despite silence from many mainstream sources?

I suspect reproductive rights are going to be a big issue when we do this panel, because they’re becoming a major cudgel for conservatives trying to attack health care.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 01:23 PM • (5) Comments

Tangential question: I’m curious as to whether Digby experienced a qualitative difference in the dissenting comments and trolling on her blog after revealing she’s a woman, i.e. a shift towards gendered insults. Attracting a certain level of trollery is inevitable for a prominent political blogger, I’m sure, but did things change when she became less anonymous, and visibly female?

I don’t know if she’s talked about this (I only read her blog on occasion), but if she has and anyone could point me towards the relevant post(s), I’d be really interested. And it’d be useful evidence to point the terminally clueless towards next time I’m arguing this issue somewhere. grin

Comment #1: Nic_C  on  07/24  at  02:45 PM

She’s said that she did notice a real shift in the responses she got, but I can’t remember when.  But yes, she’s definitely said it changed.

Comment #2: Amanda Marcotte  on  07/24  at  04:24 PM

Digby had a rock solid rep (at least among the Left-blogosphere) so it was a little difficult to decide to dismiss her when the fact she was a “her” was revealed.

I do wonder how it would have gone if it was known up front that she was a she — would it discount her work enough that she would be unable to get traffic? 

She does primarily political stuff, as do dday and Tristero, her co-bloggers.  In that respect, she’s competing with some big political blogs.  Then again, given the number of “what Digby said” references she gets in the average month, maybe she doesn’t compete so much as compliment.

Hullabaloo doesn’t look like it’s profitable, although I hope she at least breaks even.  Given the fantastic quality of her work, she deserves a spot in the NYT, instead of being a lonely leftist voice out of the People’s Republic of Santa Monica…

Comment #3: MikeEss  on  07/24  at  04:38 PM

Digby had a rock solid rep (at least among the Left-blogosphere) so it was a little difficult to decide to dismiss her when the fact she was a “her” was revealed.

Sorry; what I meant was not whether those previously on her side changed their views and dismissed her because she was a woman (although that, also, would be telling), but rather whether the objections to things she said from people who disagreed with her took on an aggressively sexist tone after her revelation - i.e. it altered the way that hostile commenters interacted with her, and made her more of a target. Which, from what Amanda says, they did.

Comment #4: Nic_C  on  07/24  at  05:31 PM

I am looking forward to that event. Hope to see you all there. Anyway, a headline today is about Ben Roethlisberger, the famous QB player. He was being sued for sexual assault.  No criminal charges have been filed against Ben Roethlisberger, but a civil suit has.  The accuser, Andrea McNulty claimed that last year, Big Ben, as he’s called in the press, forced her to have sex with him at the casino she worked at in Las Vegas.  Some claim she’s filing without basis and needs pay day loans.  So far, McNulty has said that she feared Harrah’s, her employer, would fire her if she didn’t keep it on the QT.  It remains to be seen if Ben Roethlisberger will need secured loans to cover the lawsuit.

Comment #5: IsabelaI  on  07/25  at  06:48 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.