Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: The gendered war over the grunting lunkhead gym rats Previous entry: Working out and being hawt: the partisan double standard

No Safe Space For Blackness

MoviesRace

On Sunday, my mom and I went to go see Jumping the Broom, which is nominally a comedy and which is, more importantly, a movie starring a predominantly black cast that's not directed by Tyler Perry.  The discussion we had beforehand revolved around rewarding Hollywood for actually making the thing, regardless of quality; seeing a mediocre romantic comedy became a chance to send a message that there are audiences willing to see movies starring largely minority casts.  It outdid the similarly programmed Something Borrowed, so in some ways, it may have worked.

Unfortunately, it also required us to sit through a treacherously terrible movie.  The movie was produced by megachurch pastor T.D. Jakes, which means that it's not a bad comedy.  It's a bad sermon with some poorly timed jokes thrown in.  The core plot of the movie focuses on the relationship between Sabrina (Paula Patton) and Jason (Laz Alonso).  Sabrina begins the movie by asking God not to let her "give away her cookies" anymore after waking up in the apartment of an otherwise committed man following a one-night stand - and  yes, by "cookies", she does mean her vagina.  She takes a vow of abstinence until marriage, and then almost immediately meets Jason by hitting him with her car.  Because he's her soulmate, he tends not to mind the fact that she just rammed an Audi into his ass, and six months later, they're engaged.  

Despite the inability of either lead to deliver a line in a way that isn't either annoying or focused on the absolute intensity of their injury-based love, we proceed to their wedding and meet their families.  It's a standard premise: her family is a bunch of snooty elites, and his family is a bunch of working-class commoners.  Culture clashes ensue, and things generally turn out okay, I suppose.

The hard part here isn't the banal plot.  It's how the movie treats these competing models of blackness, and ends up coming to a determination that both are flawed.  Sabrina's family and friends are a broad stereotype of bougie blackness, impossibly attractive, needlessly materialistic, and consumed with melodrama.  Her parents are in a loveless marriage, and her friends are snobbish jerks; they've rejected the slave tradition referenced in the movie's title (and at one point, her mother even declares that the family used to own slaves, because it was in no way necessary to the plot).  

Jason's family, on the other hand, is a walking pastiche of hoodness, from the uncle who's been married four times to the mother that doesn't know what various foods are; it's the mother's incessant meddling (after praying on it, of course) that ends up nearly destroying the wedding.  The movie is supposed to serve as an endorsement of abstinent commitment and faith in a Christian God, but what it becomes is a broad critique of How Black People Live.  

Sabrina and Jason are both upwardly mobile young people who have well-paying jobs doing things in large buildings, but they rush into a marriage based on her self-esteem issues and career path (she's moving to China in two months, so they have to get married).  Jason is a confused, bland man whose main contribution to the plot is proving that people who come from little means can gain success.  The rest of the cast is a group of jealous, horny, possessive assholes of various stripes who all cling fiercely to the things that give them a specific cultural identity.  The only person who seems happy and healthy is, of course, T.D. Jakes in his cameo as the wedding pastor.  

It's hard enough to find positive, normal portrayals of black families, even if the families have flaws.  It becomes that much harder when we fall into the Perry/Jakes trap of portraying all black people as irrevocably flawed until some sage reminds them of the true path, whether it be Jesus or a cross-dressing narcissist who's richer than God.  There are two undercurrents here: the first is a wait for another black leader, another Martin or Malcolm; the second is a fundamental discomfort with the lives of black folk.  There's an image of socioeconomic normalization in the white community, where everyone can aspire to an uncontroversial middle-classness, but that doesn't exist with nearly the same certainty in the black community.  

What comes out of that uncertainty are movies like Jumping the Broom, where a discomfort with the ability to remain authentically black at any level results in a critique of blackness at every level.  The disturbing undercurrent of this is that it turns Perry into Jakes into something more than entertainers; depending on your viewpoint, they either become prophets of the banal or predators feasting on the uncertainty of black adaptation.  Neither are particularly beneficial to black people, but following them makes you feel like you're doing something, even if it's just outdoing a terrible John Kraczynski romcom.

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 10:02 AM • (21) Comments

To paraphrase the writer George S Kaufmann, “If you want to send a message, use Twitter.”

Comment #1: Dark Avenger Guardian Chow Mein  on  05/10  at  11:32 AM

I’m sorry for focusing on minor details, but did you say “cookies”?  Cookies?  But cookies are small, delicious morsels that I love to eat and which are especially delightful if enjoyed alongside a glass of warm milk…

...come to think of it, not a bad euphemism at all.

Comment #2: DBK  on  05/10  at  12:18 PM

Fantastic post, Jesse. Just fantastic.  Say what you will about the *&^% Cosby family as represented in the show but it was at least comfortable with the idea that black people can be both high achieving and happy: that you can be black, successful and American without sacrificing one thing to the other.

I think its a mistake, though, to look for a high end Hollywood project to be cutting edge or even authentic and interesting about the African American experience in the form of a rom-com. This was, as you observed, niche marketing to a particularly virulent subset of the African American market: people who like to buy what T.D. Jakes is selling.  What we need is tons and tons of lower level, less expensive, independent films that try to approach all these subjects (romance, action adventure, comedy, tragedy, westerns, war movies) from a variety of specifically African American perspectives. Most of them will be stinkers because, well, most movies are pretty bad. But eventually some new filmmakers and screen writers will get the hang of producing good movies for both a niche market and for a wider mixed race audience who will be familiar with their work and eager to see what they are doing. The audience for Japanese movies in this country isn’t limited to Japanese-Americans and the audience for Woody Allen movies, though limited, isn’t limited to Jews.

aimai

Comment #3: aimai  on  05/10  at  12:21 PM

I was going to see the movie as a matinee for the same reasons. It’s not Tyler Perry and I give enough of my money to see (mostly) shitty movies made by white people so I can support a predominately black cast.

And then I read that TD Jakes was a producer. I was skeptical at first but again, I give enough of my money to white companies and filmmakers. Last year my friend and I saw Death at a Funeral even though I don’t normally like supporting remakes. So JtB was going to be that movie this year but now I’ve read your review and I’m probably going to wait for it on Neftlix. Even when you support the movies and they do well, Hollywood doesn’t necessarily see that it’s the cast you’re supporting. There’s a reason Tyler Perry dominates and it’s because people know his audience (black, church going women/men) will show up. I fear this film is only going to reinforce that belief so we’ll get a lot more religiously themed black movies, as opposed to films where we’re portrayed as normal human beings who live on a spectrum.

On a lighter note, as brain dead as Fast Five was I was surprised by how multi-ethnic the cast was and that it just was. Justin Lin didn’t feel the need to toot the Benetton horn and it was just a part of everyday life which is how real life is.

Comment #4: UltraMagnus  on  05/10  at  12:21 PM

This was wonderful.

Comment #5: wsn  on  05/10  at  12:31 PM

Definitely, the whole genre of romantic comedy is a cesspool of nasty stereotypes and sexist premises, so I don’t see why they can’t extend that to racist premises as well. How often do we see the high-powered woman pretty much throw away everything she’s worked so hard for so that she can be with “the one.”

Comment #6: Mighty Ponygirl  on  05/10  at  12:48 PM

Mrs. Psycho and I just watched a DVD of “The Book of Eli” and were struck by how all of the trailers were advertising dim-witted black-cast comedies, apparently because the noble and heroic Eli was also played by a black man.

Ghod, but Hollywood is dumb….

Comment #7: Dr. Psycho  on  05/10  at  01:14 PM

this was an excellent post and i think aimai has it right.  the more films that get made in the first place, the bigger the pool from which GOOD films featuring predominantly black casts can emerge.

Comment #8: chareth cutestory  on  05/10  at  01:19 PM

Mighty Ponygirl:  “the whole genre of romantic comedy is a cesspool of nasty stereotypes and sexist premises”—right on.

It makes it even worse when it’s a minority member making it, because you get racist dingbats who aren’t members of that minority saying, “look, they put it in their own movies, they ADMIT IT!!” instead of reflecting on how that’s just part of the genre.

But apparently we have to endure the 80 percent (or more) crap to get the diamonds.  I just wish I didn’t feel like the film industry is actively preferring to make the crap.

Comment #9: oldfeminist  on  05/10  at  01:19 PM

Just when you think the rom-com genre can’t possibly get worse, someone goes and adds Jeebus to it. This would work better than a “no trespassing” sign for me.

I’m betting that white Xtian fantasists will hop on this bandwagon with their own straight-to-DVD/block-booked cheapo movies, if they haven’t already. Kirk Cameron, your next market opportunity awaits!

Comment #10: Gracchus.  on  05/10  at  01:38 PM

It becomes that much harder when we fall into the Perry/Jakes trap of portraying all black people as irrevocably flawed until some sage reminds them of the true path, whether it be Jesus or a cross-dressing narcissist who’s richer than God.

But… but… Isn’t that the job of the Magical Negro ?
I’m so confused…

Comment #11: Caravelle  on  05/10  at  02:58 PM

I’ve used “cookies” as a metaphor for relationships… but I’ve used it to describe *partners*, as a metaphor for monogamy.


You see, at the dessert table in the cafeteria of Life (my friends and I made this analogy in college), there are cookies, and there are cakes. If you get a slice of cake, it fills your entire plate. That’s your dessert. Cakes are dependable; whatever taste you get, it’ll be like that for the entire cake, and you can count on getting a lot of that taste.

Cookies, on the other hand, can be gathered in a bunch of different types on the same plate, so you get a whole variety of different tastes. Some may be better than others, and some may even be nasty (the cafeteria staff can get… creative….), but most are pretty darn good, and you certainly won’t get bored.

I tended towards cookies in college, some of my friends who shared this in-metaphor had serial slices of cake. And both strategies worked pretty darn well for their respective choosers.

(And yes, we got all Portaled up in this: when the guy I’d been pining for a committed relationship with for *years* was finally generally decided to be a bad, bad idea, it was declared that the cake was a lie.)

Comment #12: Falyne  on  05/10  at  03:03 PM

I like cake too.

Comment #13: DBK  on  05/10  at  03:19 PM

Rom com is almost becoming like Kabuki theater with the recognizable stages - ‘meet cute’ and so forth - it’s laboring under all this formula baggage.

And then you hang a heavy propaganda message on top and it just collapses.

It’s not like there have been no decent ‘message’ films in the past decade or so, but the thing is, most of them lately are more like bio-pics that are based on true stories.

Then again, there were lots of ‘political’ messages and commentary on gener roles in the golden era movies - I mean the entire Tracey/Hepburn genre - and they actually hold up pretty well imo.

Verdict: Not enough artistic horsepower to pull the heavy load of ‘message.’

Comment #14: KingElvis  on  05/10  at  03:20 PM

For me, the fact that T.D. Jakes was involved in this movie, and presumably made or will make some money off of it, is plenty of reason not to see it, not even on NetFlix.  Besides the fact that I think it’s incredibly unlikely I would enjoy any movie he had any input at all into, I will not knowingly put a penny in his pocket.

Comment #15: MTS  on  05/10  at  04:04 PM

I kinda liked “Soul Food,” “The Best Man,” and “Love Jones,” but those came out 14, 12, and 14 years ago. Any good ones since then?

Comment #16: Orange  on  05/10  at  04:05 PM

Then again, there were lots of ‘political’ messages and commentary on gener roles in the golden era movies - I mean the entire Tracey/Hepburn genre - and they actually hold up pretty well imo.

Tempting to say but classic films suffer from the same selective memory process as classic music. The really good and some of the really bad are preserved, replayed, and remembered while the mediocre is forgotten. Look up some of the golden era Rom Coms especially the ones with Kathrine Hepburn and tell me the message isn’t heavy handed.

Comment #17: scrumby  on  05/10  at  05:43 PM

scrumby: I think the selective-memory thing operates even more within individual “classic” movies because so few people watch them from beginning to end. You see a few highlights clips, and usually the horrible, horrible stuff gets left out. There are probably two watchable minutes in all of the beloved Bringing Up Baby, and the Loy/Powell catalog is full of great lines surrounded by half-hours of “my god what are they doing how can they do that oh geez”.

But those at least are the films with a few great lines.

Comment #18: paul  on  05/10  at  07:28 PM

Yipes who goes to see a movie by a pastor? It’s got to be obvious that it’s going to be crap ahead of time. Also instead of Malcom or Martin why not a hooks? Not to mention, but Malcom wasnt the most modern when it came to women.

Comment #19: BeanS  on  05/10  at  07:42 PM

I kinda liked “Soul Food,” “The Best Man,” and “Love Jones,” but those came out 14, 12, and 14 years ago. Any good ones since then?

I thought The Seat Filler wasn’t too bad. Given the movie that brought all this on, it’s definitely work a look.

Comment #20: Santa Claustrophobia  on  05/10  at  08:57 PM

@paul

Ain’t that the truth. I did a film course on Romantic Comedies and the best of the Golden Era could be described as a collection of really good scenes spread through what was an otherwise dull or aggravating story. Most people are pretty familiar with the girl flashing a bit of leg to hail a car but how many know that’s from It Happened One Night; the wedding scene from that is also very famous because Mel Brooks used it in Spaceballs.

Comment #21: scrumby  on  05/10  at  09:06 PM

Thanks for the review, even though it didn’t say what I wanted to hear.

I’d seen a preview for Jumping the Broom and thought it looked interesting.  So often black romantic comedies engage issues of class, culture, and identity in interesting ways while white romantic comedies leave those issues untouched because they can, because white identity is generally unquestioned. Since I like romantic comedies, especially interesting ones, I was planning to see it.  But guess not.

Comment #22: Laura Clawson  on  05/11  at  10:25 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.