Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Just ‘cause Jesus is involved doesn’t make it not rape culture Previous entry: Dude

Nonviolence, Nonviolence

imageYou remember when Gandhi fought against the British occupation of India through a systematic program of nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience?  Of course you do, you got the Facebook invite. 

Well, a moderately transformative health care bill takes effect in 2014, a full two electoral cycles after passage and during which its opponents have more than enough time to mobilize against it in a full and fair democratic process.  Obviously, it’s time for some Gandhi shit.

It is hardly surprising then that Americans are feeling a growing panic as they watch their constitutional republic descend into a banana republic. President Obama is fond of quoting Mahatma Gandhi’s line that “we should be the change we want to see.” But Gandhi also said that “civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state has become lawless and corrupt.” Americans instinctively understand this which is why pockets of resistance to ObamaCare are already emerging. The question is only whether they can be constructively harnessed into a grassroots, Gandhi-style civil disobedience movement powerful enough to undo this monstrosity.

So, to be clear: between 2001 and 2009, to cite one example, the executive branch of the country declared the power to unilaterally declare captives of the state “enemy combatants” and hold them without any available recourse to the Constitution or international treaties; in 2010, we passed a healthcare bill which requires you to purchase health insurance from any of hundreds of private insurers (maybe).  As bad an idea as I think the mandate is, for a variety of reasons, this is like getting pissed at someone for bringing food in the bed when the house is on fire. 

But let’s look at the shape this nonviolent civil disobedience takes:

Any strategy of nonviolent civil resistance has to first make a good faith effort to achieve its end through the available political and legal means. But there comes a time when changing the law requires acts of conscience.

For opponents of ObamaCare that time is Dec. 31, 2013. That’s when the individual mandate will go into effect. If ObamaCare hasn’t been repealed by Congress or nullified in court by then, its opponents would be justified in urging Americans to refuse to buy coverage or pay fines and dare authorities to come after them.

By some estimates, Uncle Sam will need to hire an additional 17,000 IRS agents or so just to enforce the coverage mandate. But even if a few million Americans simultaneously refuse to abide by it, they could easily overwhelm the system. Self-rule or swaraj, Gandhi said, requires a collective understanding of the immense capacity of citizens to “regulate and control” the coercive apparatus of the state through mass nonviolent resistance.

Let’s set something straight right now.  Nonviolent civil disobedience is a powerful tool used to show that an oppressed people are mobilized and motivated to stand for their freedom against an oppressive and illegitimate power which is otherwise denying them the rights for which they are fighting.  Its most famous applications are in colonial India, the Jim Crow South and apartheid-era South Africa.  Martin Luther King, Jr., Gandhi and Nelson Mandela all understood that lawbreaking isn’t something you engage in simply because you don’t think the law is a good idea

In other words, in the Olympics of Oppression, Tea Partiers are Malta.  Twenty-first century America’s answer to the Indian subclass of the 1910s and 1920s consists of middle to upper-class members of the dominant racial and religious groups with an inordinate amount of political power, media coverage and one of the two major political parties in the most powerful country in the world begging at their feet.  I now feel dumber for having written that.  Not Liberal Fascism stupid or John Boehner stupid…but stupid. 

If Teabaggers wonder why we think they’re crazy, or why they’re called Teabaggers, or why the going narrative is that they’re barely hinged loons who are dangerous ignorant about life, the universe and the meaning of everything, it’s this.  The Tea Party may constitute the most privileged set of rebels in human existence.  There is nothing they have to give up (except their weekends), no travails through which they must suffer; it’s like Star Wars, except Darth Vader gave Alderaan a series of tax credits and then revealed that his father was from Kenya.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 05:16 PM • (27) Comments

Don’t forget how they’re a Silent Majority too.  They’re neither, but that’s what they think they are.  They really think the majority of Americans are cheering their bully antics.

Comment #1: DonnaDiva  on  03/25  at  05:44 PM

Not to mention that they seem to have missed out on the whole “non-violent” bit.

Comment #2: Tobasco da Gama  on  03/25  at  05:44 PM

oh my shit, your last sentence totally nailed it. What a bunch of unhinged whiners.

Comment #3: bethany  on  03/25  at  05:53 PM

Okay, so, they’re great plan in order to stick it to Obama is to go without health insurance?  I assume anyone with insurance will, of course, have to drop it in order to not be confused with someone going along with the mandate.

I predict this to be exactly as popular-and effective-in practice as Going Galt is.

Comment #4: acallidryas  on  03/25  at  06:02 PM

it’s like Star Wars, except Darth Vader gave Alderaan a series of tax credits and then revealed that his father was from Kenya.

So glad I missed the keyboard, since I’m at work.  Where I just told off a Teabaggish coworker and got him to be apologetic about being a tool.  Go me!

Comment #5: lonespark  on  03/25  at  06:09 PM

I love watching their petulant temper tantrums.

Have we finally reached Peak Wingnut?

Comment #6: Ben D.  on  03/25  at  06:09 PM

I have always had the impression that the tea-baggers HAVE insurance already. They just don’t want to have to pay for anyone else’s. I agree that this will have the same popularity as “going Galt”’ these folks aren’t going to personally go without health insurance for a single second!

Comment #7: KMTBERRY  on  03/25  at  06:10 PM

lonespark:  Story?

And KMTBERRY has nailed it: This isn’t a self-sacrificing bunch.  This is the “fuck-you-I-got-mine” crowd at work here.

Comment #8: damnedyankee  on  03/25  at  06:19 PM

No tea-bagger will have to drop their health care.  They will have a new thing to be outraged about by 2013 and a new ridiculous plan to go along with it.

Comment #9: semi_factual  on  03/25  at  06:20 PM

Tea Baggers are the only revolutionary movement in human history who stands FOR the status quo.

“What do we want?”

“No Change, ever!”

“When do we want it?”

“We already have it!”

Comment #10: Keith  on  03/25  at  06:26 PM

So the poorest teabaggers are to resist getting health insurance and pay fines which are not going to be hard to issue simply because it isn’t as you can hide whether you have health insurance or not.  So they think making the government hire more IRS agents is a good plan?  Because the government will just hire more agents, fine every one of those idiots, and make them pay the fines.  Good lord, they are so incredibly dumb it amazes me.

Comment #11: Xeranar  on  03/25  at  06:43 PM

The Tea Party may constitute the most privileged set of rebels in human existence.

Tea Baggers are the only revolutionary movement in human history who stands FOR the status quo.

Wait, what about those slave-owning would-be aristocrats that demanded a civil war when their balance of power in the US was threatened…?

 


Oh, right.

 

 

Comment #12: Yamara  on  03/25  at  06:50 PM

Good point, Yamara.

Comment #13: Ben D.  on  03/25  at  06:51 PM

So the poorest teabaggers are to resist getting health insurance and pay fines which are not going to be hard to issue simply because it isn’t as you can hide whether you have health insurance or not.

There’s even a relatively cheap opt-out mechanism for these yahoos: if they pay a couple of hundred bucks a year then they’re free and clear of Blackazoid’s Soshalizm. If they want to crab about that, fine with me—anyone that stupid is bound to have at least one misadventure a year that’ll end them up in the E.R., so they’ll get more than their money’s worth.

Comment #14: Gracchus.  on  03/25  at  06:59 PM

Am I a horrible person for thinking it would be hilarious if they all actually decided to go without health insurance, and then had a big convention, and one of them ended up spreading a virulent, treatable, and somewhat expensive disease? Just enough so they’d end up a few thousand out of pocket.

Comment #15: Samantha Vimes  on  03/25  at  07:15 PM

By some estimates, Uncle Sam will need to hire an additional 17,000 IRS agents or so just to enforce the coverage mandate.

Hey, jobs! smile

Am I a horrible person for thinking it would be hilarious if they all actually decided to go without health insurance, and then had a big convention, and one of them ended up spreading a virulent, treatable, and somewhat expensive disease? Just enough so they’d end up a few thousand out of pocket.

Some particularly creative asshat among them will call it a biological warfare attempt to kill all the Tea Partiers and they’ll run with that and start shooting.

Comment #16: Kyra  on  03/25  at  08:21 PM

Keith, that comment wins the internets for today

Comment #17: GumbyAnne  on  03/25  at  08:26 PM

Am I a horrible person for thinking it would be hilarious if they all actually decided to go without health insurance, and then had a big convention, and one of them ended up spreading a virulent, treatable, and somewhat expensive disease?

Yes, completely.  Which disease did you have in mind, and can you buy it online?

Comment #18: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  03/25  at  08:28 PM

For the record, I DO think it’s fucked up that you HAVE to buy insurance, and they did not include the public option.

But protesting against either of those elements is not the issue here.  The conservative mindset is that it’s okay to give up all will and power to an authority figure if he’s “legitimate”.  Y’know, he cares for your interest, he’s morally upright, he’s like you… Which is why conservative rabblerousers and manipulaters go out of their way to make Democrats seem “illegitimate”.  If they’re not looking out for you and of your tribe, they can’t be trusted with authority.  In fact, if they’re not with you, they must be against you!  This is straight out of Lakoff, but I think his theories do a pretty good job of describing what’s going on.

Comment #19: Jake  on  03/25  at  08:35 PM

So they don’t buy insurance, pay a small fine, and when they end up in the emergency room… what?  They get care anyways. 

Reminds me of the FLDS clan that has multiple wives on government assistance while claiming to fight against “the controlling hand of big government”.  In other words, gimme gimme, but don’t expect a dime in return.

Yep, these are real, true, patriotic “Americans”.  *headdesk*

Comment #20: NobleExperiments  on  03/25  at  08:38 PM

KMTBERRY:

I have always had the impression that the tea-baggers HAVE insurance already. They just don’t want to have to pay for anyone else’s.

Which is both sad and hilarious in and of itself, because paying for other people’s shit is, you know, the whole fucking point of the insurance industry. It’s almost as if Teabaggers believe that as long as they haven’t filed a claim, their insurance company gives their premiums back at the end of their policy period.

Shit like this is why stupid people shouldn’t be allowed to vote. They’re not even smart enough to realize that they don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about.

Comment #21: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  03/25  at  09:46 PM

Do they know that Gandhi was a socialist?

Comment #22: ramona  on  03/25  at  11:45 PM

Shrug. I hate the individual mandate as well, coming from the left side of the health care debate, but factoring this sort of rebellion into the equation is part of what led me to support the passing of the health care bill. The revolt won’t hurt the government, it’ll hurt the health care industry, and lead to the formation of a better system. At least I hope so, because I don’t see future-Congress making it work right just out of the goodness of their hearts.

Also I get to watch the teabaggers squirm and self-purify into a ideologically pure, heavily armed, brick-chucking core of old men who can’t move more than six inches per second, which overall I view as a bonus.

Comment #23: brandon  on  03/26  at  01:30 AM

Reminds me of the FLDS clan that has multiple wives on government assistance while claiming to fight against “the controlling hand of big government”.  In other words, gimme gimme, but don’t expect a dime in return.

I think they’re actually operating on a different wavelength of crazy - some FLDS go a step past “I got mine so fuck all y’all” and actually think its a virtue to weaken the government by being as big a leach as you can.  The “keep government out of my medicare!” crowds lack that kind of self-awareness and deliberate purpose, which is probably why they seem so random - they’re still it that phase of rationalizing things where you just spout out shit at random and hope something sticks.

Comment #24: Kyso K  on  03/26  at  01:31 AM

There’s even a relatively cheap opt-out mechanism for these yahoos: if they pay a couple of hundred bucks a year then they’re free and clear of Blackazoid’s Soshalizm. If they want to crab about that, fine with me—anyone that stupid is bound to have at least one misadventure a year that’ll end them up in the E.R., so they’ll get more than their money’s worth.

I’m sure there are sub-100 dollar plans out there that will function basically as cover for not having real insurance.  And when they inevitably try to use this plan it will cover nothing and will bankrupt them.  That’s the real issue with health care, it isn’t that you need or don’t need the insurance it is when you need a service you’ll be bankrupted by more than a day of care.  Catastrophic health insurance is the cheapest option that the republicans are pushing but it won’t pay out immediately and like real health insurance to get enough to justifiably cover just about anything without bankrupting you you would need to pay as much as a regular base-line health plan.

Comment #25: Xeranar  on  03/26  at  01:33 PM

“In other words, in the Olympics of Oppression, Tea Partiers are Malta”

On my car radio a few days ago, I caught Michael Smerconish (sp?) debating the pros & cons of a sugar tax on soft drinks

he went to the phone lines and a string of callers said a sugar tax was “tyrany” fron the “nanny-state”

sorry, but if you think that the difference between liberty and tyrany is a bottle of cola costing a buck thirty instead of a buck and a quarter, then you need a nanny because you are a child

Comment #26: jefft452  on  03/26  at  05:23 PM

The people who will really be hurt by the mandate are the ones who already can’t afford insurance and don’t have health care. After it goes into effect, they will still not be able to afford health care and they will be civilly disobedient by necessity, not as a political statement. They’ll just pay the fine like they do all the other regressive taxes the Democrats have loaded them up with.

Comment #27: Abgrund  on  03/29  at  09:02 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.