Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Bamboo Review: The Invention of Lying Previous entry: The Good, the Bad, the Early 90s

Racism Is Like A Box Of Chocolates: Generally Brown, And Kind Of Sweet

imageA lovely Georgia gentleman has decided to get attention by accusing Barack Obama of, get this, “nigger rig[ging] it”:

Lanzo put up a sign that reads “Obama’s plan for health-care: N*&%*r rig it.”

CBS Atlanta’s Michelle Marsh asked Lanzo why he put up the sign.

“I’ve been putting up signs for 22 years and I’ve put up all kinds of political signs,” said Lanzo.

“Why did you use the N word?” Marsh asked.

“Well, I’ve used it most of my life. There are different ways to put your opinion up, but that’s just the words I choose,” Lanzo answered.

Despite the sign, Lanzo said he’s not a racist.

Lanzo’s also been a not-racist in the past, as well:

The saloon is dubbed the Georgia Peach. Out front, a hard-to-miss sign proclaims: “Is Michael Jackson not guilty because he is a nigger or money?”

Ahem, not exactly a message one expects to see, circa 2005, driving along a pretty country road in Paulding County, Georgia, about 45 miles west of Atlanta.

Oh, there are plenty of folks hereabouts with sheets and hoods stored in the attic. But racism nowadays is more refined. Racist lingo just isn’t bandied about since the Ku Klux Klan shed its robes and moved uptown. Except at Lanzo’s bar.

Now, to their credit, many of our friends on the right are willing to call this racism.  And yes, one of them is named Confederate Yankee, another claims that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a conservative and the third has a big image of Michelle Obama labeled “ugly”.  But they’re not racists, either.  Just like the guy who puts up all the “nigger” signs.

American Power is pissed that nobody is giving him credit for all the times he’s admitted things are racist:

Actually, there are a couple posts linking Lanzo to conservative opponents of the president. For one, Gawker has an entry titled, “Racist Old Man: ‘I Am Not Racist’.” That piece then links to some stupid episodes during the campaign last year that no one takes seriously (Obama food stamps?). Recall, in every single case like this conservatives denounce the racist imagery. Normally, the idiots who post such stuff are shamed by the PC police, and it’s not unusual for a political career to implode.

Of course, when you stop admitting that racist things are racist is when the problem comes into play.  And the chief problem is that many, many conservatives refuse to admit than anything less than a six-foot-tall sign calling a black man a nigger is actually racist. 

Confederate Yankee (NOT AT ALL IRONIC IN THIS SCENARIO - ed.) points out that calling this man a racist would have meant something if we just didn’t call anyone else a racist:

Democrats in the media and in politics have so over-used cries to racism in an attempt to marginalize legitimate opposition that the word has rapidly lost the stigma attached to it. Indeed, in the context of the political blogosphere, bloggers on the center-right have been using the term self-referentially as a sarcastic bit of snark to the constant knee-jerk claims of racism they know will radiate from progressives.

It’s a shame the left has decided to make such reckless use of the word in an attempt to stifle opposition, because when real racism occurs, calling it out with the level of derision it deserves becomes that much more difficult.

Let’s stop here for a second.  On the one side, we have a group that calls out racism where it sees it, and accepts that racists can actually be intelligent enough to try and mask their racism.  On the other hand, we have a group that spends all of its time complaining that things aren’t racism, and making convoluted excuses for why actual racist things aren’t racist because they aren’t as racist as real racism.  And in the middle, we have the guy calling the President a “nigger” who says he’s not actually a racist, just a provocative fellow who enjoys Klan gear and pissing off the NAACP.  Which side do you think is making it harder to debate what is and isn’t racist? 

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 11:44 AM • (52) Comments

Working as I have in racially-mixed environments, I coined the phrase “non-traditional engineering” as being both racially neutral and employment acceptable.

Comment #1: Dana  on  10/10  at  12:22 PM

Jesse, the Confederate flag is just a symbol of southern pride and commitment to states’ rights.  It has nothing to do with racism.

Furthermore, the small metal object I’m blowing isn’t a whistle.  If it were a whistle, you’d hear a sound.  Oh, these dogs just showed up on their own.

Comment #2: Ferox  on  10/10  at  12:41 PM

One time, I was on World of Warcraft, and my guild was discussing that cartoon where the monkey had been shot by the police, and the police said something about “now who’s going to write the healthcare bill” or something.  The consensus was that the cartoon was not racist.  I chimed up and said that I thought it was, and I got soundly shouted down by most everyone who was online, and one person even brought up the old “it’s only hurtful if you allow it to hurt you so therefore black people invented racism”.  And of course, one of their biggest “arguments” was that it’s so easy to accuse people of racism and we have to bravely fight back against the vast majority of the country who will call you racist for doing anything other than worshiping black people.  And then I pointed out that if their position was so unusual, so brave, so difficult to stand up for that they are practically modern day heroes, then why was I the only person arguing the other side?  Why was I the one getting shouted down, if my position was so prevalent and accepted by the mainstream?

It’s like the Christians claiming they are being discriminated against.  Their opinion is so widely accepted, and yet as soon as anyone criticizes it they panic.  And then suddenly the news is flooded with stories about how no one will listen to the Christians anymore and isn’t it awful.

Comment #3: Denise  on  10/10  at  01:03 PM

Jesse, the Confederate flag is just a symbol of southern pride and commitment to states’ rights.  It has nothing to do with racism.

Which is why white redneck canadians put it in the back of their pickup trucks. Oh? Wait sorry… that’s so signify they’re “rebels”. No real news about what they’re “rebelling” against, except maybe that three black people moved into a town of 12,000 middle-aged pasty faced prescription drug addicts. Must be afraid they’d change the “complexion” of the neighborhood. Not in a racist way… you understand.

(Because this is the internet, yes, I did actually catch the original sarcasm. smile )

Comment #4: Left_Wing_Fox  on  10/10  at  01:05 PM

I had always heard the term as “jury-rigged,” and not until I was an adult did I hear the variants. Apparently (possibly this is an urban legend) the “jerry-rigged” variation is an anti-German slur. I have the impression that the third one is more prevalent in the south, but that may just be my own prejudices speaking.

Comment #5: Witt  on  10/10  at  01:37 PM

Dana, if you weren’t mocking anti-racists you’d be content to say “jury-rigged” like a person.

Comment #6: Hershele Ostropoler  on  10/10  at  03:27 PM

To left wing fox, a good friend of mine used to have one of those hanging in his room during college. It was about drinking whiskey and had nothing to do with the south at all. I don’t think he had ever been anywhere southern at the time and I have yet to meet someone who was less interested in state’s rights. At some point the signifier and the signified separated.  Ok, not for everyone but for a large enough percentage of people who use the confederate flag that it might not immediately indicate racist shithead. Not sure how it connected to a particular drink but people are odd.

Comment #7: pharmakos  on  10/10  at  03:45 PM

Ferox: heh.

Comment #8: Amanda Marcotte  on  10/10  at  04:03 PM

Also, Dana, when I hear people use “comical” euphemisms like yours—-which I hear all the time—-it’s incredibly clear what they’re saying, which is, “I’d love to use a racial slur, but meanie liberals won’t let me.”  In other words, it’s just as racist, and more annoying to boot.

Comment #9: Amanda Marcotte  on  10/10  at  04:06 PM

Jury-rigged, bodged, rube goldberg, hacked together, there’s a whole litany terms that don’t make it clear someone is trying to be cute while making a racist reference. Oh, and the original is old enough that it’s absolutely clear someone had to make up n****r-rig as a racist variant because they wanted a racist variant.

Comment #10: paul  on  10/10  at  04:25 PM

It’s a shame the left has decided to make such reckless use of the word in an attempt to stifle opposition, because when real racism occurs, calling it out with the level of derision it deserves becomes that much more difficult.

I’ve been to Scotland. You, sir, are no Scotsman.

This is just like how libertarianism has never really been tried, except for all those times that it was tried and failed miserably because oh look a choo-choo train.

Comment #11: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  10/10  at  04:27 PM

It’s too bad the IT/engineering term “kludge” (sounds like “huge” - does not rhyme with “fudge”) hasn’t become more popular. 

No racist etymology, no other social or political baggage…

Of course, racist rednecks from The South would probably still figure out a way to abuse it and turn it into a racist term.  They seem to be very talented in that way…

Comment #12: MikeEss  on  10/10  at  04:52 PM

MikeEss:

You Nazi! How could you possibly think of using a word that came from those evil germans, most likely by way of those evil jews!

um.

Comment #13: paul  on  10/10  at  04:57 PM

Amanda wrote:

Also, Dana, when I hear people use “comical” euphemisms like yours—-which I hear all the time—-it’s incredibly clear what they’re saying, which is, “I’d love to use a racial slur, but meanie liberals won’t let me.” In other words, it’s just as racist, and more annoying to boot.

Not sure why, since I just “non-traditionally engineered” a broken dining room chair.  Around a concrete plant, “non-traditional engineering” usually refers to a quick, not-exactly-standard fix to get things working long enough to finish the day, or even just the load.  A safety inspector would be amazed/appalled at some of the things that we’ve—the plural meaning me, other white people and some black people—have had to do to get a plant running or a truck repaired.  Normally, a broken gate or a failed solenoid or a blown circuit doesn’t care what color the repairman is.

Comment #14: Dana  on  10/10  at  05:00 PM

pharmakos - Jack Daniels uses the Confederate flag in all of their overseas advertising.  It’s really confusing and upsetting to see those things hanging up in bar in Europe and on the lapels of people who were dressed up for square dancing.  I bicycled through many a town in Belgium and Denmark where I couldn’t figure out if I should get out NOW (which is my reaction on seeing that flag in the US) or if people just didn’t know what that flag means.

And that’s a little story explaining why I don’t drink Jack Daniels anymore.

Comment #15: cola  on  10/10  at  05:37 PM

Jack Daniels is a racist company? I thought it was just a terrible drink for people who don’t know any better.

Comment #16: pharmakos  on  10/10  at  06:20 PM

Jim Beam is better and cheaper anyway and datesvback to America’s first rebel movement that was fought against by federal troops, The Whiskey Rebellion.

But seriously, how could anyone think “nigger rigging” was an appropriate term?

Comment #17: Bacopa  on  10/10  at  06:34 PM

Jack Daniels is distilled in Lynchburg, according to all of the most prominent parts of their overseas advertising. Not saying it got its name for THOSE reasons but when you’ve never been to the South and you have a cliched picture of it already the connection is very easy to make.

Comment #18: Stubborn Kind of Fellow  on  10/10  at  06:54 PM

It’s a shame the left has decided to make such reckless use of the word in an attempt to stifle opposition, because when real racism occurs, calling it out with the level of derision it deserves becomes that much more difficult.

Because calling someone a racist is far far worse than actually being racist.  No one is really racist anymore.

Being racist is bad.  That guy isn’t a bad guy.  He just hates niggers.

This disconnect is kinda funny—they’ve figured out being called a racist is nothing to be proud of, so they don’t want to be called racists.  They don’t want to stop being racist, of course, they just don’t want to be called “racist” for being racists.

And when they are called racists, well, that’s just not fair and you should use that term for BAD PEOPLE, not them, when they’re just over here being good people who actually have a black friend, or would if they ever met a black person.  They’d like ‘em.  Really.  Plus, they wave at the security guard at work, and that should count for something.

Comment #19: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  10/10  at  07:02 PM

I would say that I’d boycott Jack Daniels, but I almost never drink anyway, so it wouldn’t make much difference.  If I were going to drink whiskey, I’d choose Maker’s Mark

Comment #20: Dana  on  10/10  at  07:38 PM

The thing is that I never grew up ever hearing the term “n- rigged” to the point where I had to come up with a cute euphenism for it in a “racially mixed environment.” “Kludge” and “jury-rigged” have always been what I’ve used to describe the idea we’re talking about.

Also, Jack Daniels is definitely the worst of the big-name bourbons, though in general I prefer Irish whiskey.

Comment #21: Tyro  on  10/10  at  08:00 PM

Also, Dana, when I hear people use “comical” euphemisms like yours—-which I hear all the time—-it’s incredibly clear what they’re saying, which is, “I’d love to use a racial slur, but meanie liberals won’t let me.” In other words, it’s just as racist, and more annoying to boot.
Comment #9: Amanda Marcotte on 10/10 at 03:06 PM

I heard “Afro-Engineering” as a “clever” euphemism when I was in college.  It was used by the same people who thought that “Sanitary Engineer” was a stupid PC term for a janitor, not an actual engineering specialty.

The same hostile-polite behavior is observed when someone calls a politician they don’t like a “gentleman.”  The nicer the terms, the more teeth-clenching is involved.

Comment #22: oldfeminist  on  10/10  at  09:15 PM

how could anyone think “nigger rigging” was an appropriate term?

My (white, Midwest-born, middle-aged) neighbor surprised me with a variation on that a while back. I was doing some outdoor chore in a meticulous fashion when he urged me: “C’mon Hec, just Okie-rig it.” I’m going to say the association came from being too broke for proper tools or materials, but being ingenious enough to get the job done well enough with whatever’s available.

N.B.: that doesn’t excuse use of the N-word.

Comment #23: Hector B.  on  10/10  at  10:09 PM

It’s too bad the IT/engineering term ”kludge” (sounds like “huge” - does not rhyme with “fudge”) hasn’t become more popular.

Maybe it would be more popular if you pronounced it like ‘fudge’?  (Which happens to be the way that the IT people in… I want to say the commonwealth, but how about we leave it at the Antipodes, for now, tend to say it).

With jerry-rigging, btw, it was a practice of using ‘jerry’ equipment to repair the failing equipment of the British soldiers… so while the use of the temr ‘jerry’ to refer to Germans was negative, the ‘jerry-rigging’ had positive connotations… they could at least make things that worked.

Comment #24: oldmunni  on  10/10  at  10:15 PM

A few years ago, I heard someone use this expression in real life.  I think it was the first time I’d ever heard the n-word used - at 24 or so.  It was like the time when all of a sudden people in my very white, small, rural, high school started using the word “Jew” as a verb.  I’d never heard or even read such a thing.  And it made me realize that the term gyp (as in swindle) has got to be an ethnic slur.  I don’t really live in an area that’s known for progressive attitudes, but people were generally more into the dog-whistle Limbaugh-type racism, where it’s not polite to mention someone’s race, (ie whinging about reverse racism) than the overt, slur-tossing type.

I think a lot of expressions like this are just learned by rote.  Like how people say “jury-rigged.”  WTF is that supposed to mean?

Comment #25: saraeanderson  on  10/10  at  11:07 PM

The term jury-rigging is most likely not derived from the epithet Jerry, but rather from the Latin adjutare, “to aid.” The phrase dates back to the 17th century, and was first used to describe an improvised mast on a ship. It was eventually expanded to mean any hastily-thrown-together, ad hoc engineering feat. “Jerry-rigged” came out as a variant during World War I, but was almost certainly a play on words, or perhaps a crossing of “Jerry-built,” which referred to shoddy workmanship.

N——r-rig as a phrase dates all the way back to the 1960s. It was certainly created as an affirmatively racist spin on jury-rig.

This is a long way of saying that the phrase “jury-rigged” is a perfectly cromulent one, and one whose etymology nicely captures the essence of what’s being done. “N——r-rigged,” however, is a purely racist term, coined in response to the civil rights movement, and one that has no place in this world or any other.

Comment #26: Jeff Fecke  on  10/10  at  11:08 PM

Oh, and you’re the real racist for pointing this guy’s racism out. Also.

Comment #27: Jeff Fecke  on  10/10  at  11:09 PM

The same hostile-polite behavior is observed when someone calls a politician they don’t like a “gentleman.” The nicer the terms, the more teeth-clenching is involved.
Comment #22: oldfeminist on 10/10 at 08:15 PM

True that two politicians fighting to out politesse each other hides hostility, but that’s hostility between two who accept each other as equals, because generally they’re saying it to each other’s faces, right?.  (The early twentieth century humorist, Will Rogers had examined just this example with two Congressman.)  So, I think there’s a difference here.  Most peoplewho use the derogatory term aren’t using it to the victims face, but to his/her own choir.

Comment #28: phylosopher  on  10/10  at  11:28 PM

Jeff - cromulent?  and I thought I was a pretty good wordsmith - but then again, I’m not a Simpson’s fan. Thanks

Comment #29: phylosopher  on  10/10  at  11:35 PM

“jury rig” surprised me:
“... the sense of makeshift or temporary dates from at least 1616, when it appeared in John Smith’s A Description of New England. It appeared again, in a similar passage, in Smith’s more extensive The General History of Virginia, New-England, and the Summer Isles published in 1624.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_rig
Regardless, liberals are the real racists because, Look! See Dan’s choo choo train!

Comment #30: Janus Daniels  on  10/11  at  12:25 AM

“The thing is that I never grew up ever hearing the term “n- rigged” to the point where I had to come up with a cute euphenism for it in a “racially mixed environment.”

I never heard the term “n- rigged” until today, not that racial slurs are/were unknown here, but that’s a new one on me
I didn’t even realize it was a replacement for “Jury-Rig” until I read the comments


” It’s too bad the IT/engineering term ”kludge”
I use that one a lot, didn’t know that it was because I’m an IT type, thought it was WW2 army slang like snafu

“Jury-Rig” instead of “Jerry-Rig” is also common here, maybe because I’m on the cost and the nautical terminology sticks more?

Comment #31: jefft452  on  10/11  at  12:43 AM

Jerkwads like that come in all gradations and locations. There’s this greasy stump of a bigoted columnist at the Chicago Tribune who thinks you’re the racist for not laughing at his “Obama Chia Pet Head” jokes.

Comment #32: Bitter Scribe  on  10/11  at  01:05 AM

With jerry-rigging, btw, it was a practice of using ‘jerry’ equipment to repair the failing equipment of the British soldiers… so while the use of the temr ‘jerry’ to refer to Germans was negative, the ‘jerry-rigging’ had positive connotations… they could at least make things that worked.

Surprisingly, no.

“Jerry-built” meaning shoddily constructed, England, 1869, possibly in relation to one person.
“Jury-rigged” meaning a temporary and expedient naval repair, dating back to 1788.
And the Miriam Webster dates “Jerry-rigged” back to 1959, probably as a confusion of the two.

I suspect your story was a “just so” explanation invented after the event.

Comment #33: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  10/11  at  01:59 AM

I’m AA native Arizonan; it’s laughable to notice have felt out of place when in an urban area.  I want to ask “where are the white people?” Growing up African American in Arizona from the 50’s makes me adapted to being with whites Mexicans Indians and Asians. 

Language is a vehicle of expression full of both over and hidden meaning,  with code words and euphemisms existing on several levels.  What I’ve noticed is racial overtures used by whites are not displayed (in my experience) by minority group, i.e.  I’ve not observed signs outside of minority businesses saying “Ofays” (or ofay-rigged), “Mes-cans (or mescan-rigged)” “Chinks (or chink-rigged)” “Sand Niggers (or snigger-rigged) et al” 

What is racism?  The unprovoked and exposed hatred of other ethnicities

Comment #34: Senorita BOnita  on  10/11  at  05:00 AM

4. Rockabilly listeners in Finland were hanging the Confederate flag in their walls long before there were any (well, more than a handful) of black people in Finland. To them, it just symbolized America and beer-drinking and rebellion in some undefinable way.

Comment #35: Tatu Ahponen  on  10/11  at  08:12 AM

all of a sudden people in my very white, small, rural, high school started using the word “Jew” as a verb.

Where friends live in whitest exurbia, I heard a kid say “‘chew’ you down.” I guess “chew” is more genteel than “Jew.”

[Confederate flag] symbolizes rebellion

Often far more than slavery, I think. My little brother, a lifelong rebel, demanded a Confederate uniform when he was seven or so. My father got him one, along with a toy rifle that shot cork balls.

Comment #36: Hector B.  on  10/11  at  12:49 PM

“What is racism?  The unprovoked and exposed hatred of other ethnicities”

Nicely put.

Comment #37: shade  on  10/11  at  02:21 PM

Dana (14):

Normally, a broken gate or a failed solenoid or a blown circuit doesn’t care what color the repairman is

Then there’s really no reason for you not to say “jury-rigged” or any of the other longstanding non-racist expressions Paul helpfully listed.

Comment #38: Hershele Ostropoler  on  10/11  at  02:51 PM

Incidentally, does anyone know a good mnemonic for resistor bands?

Comment #39: Hershele Ostropoler  on  10/11  at  02:52 PM

The stars and bars here in Germany is mostly a vague symbol of country and western fans or bikers or a symbol of the old west. We don’t need to use to be complicated codes to be racist against blacks.

Comment #40: _IM_  on  10/11  at  03:17 PM

Dana (1)

Working as I have in racially-mixed environments, I coined the phrase “non-traditional engineering” as being both racially neutral and employment acceptable.

What’s wrong with “temporary fix” or “quick fix”? I just don’t get the need to create cutesy phrases and jargon. I used to deal w/ that allllll the time. Just say what you mean.

Also, Dana (14)

Normally, a broken gate or a failed solenoid or a blown circuit doesn’t care what color the repairman is.

I guess they do care about gender, though, or you’d've said “repair tech.” Right?

Comment #41: teac  on  10/11  at  03:23 PM

Around a concrete plant, “non-traditional engineering” usually refers to a quick, not-exactly-standard fix to get things working long enough to finish the day, or even just the load.

Dana, you said that you specificially coined the phrase because you were in a mixed work environment and needed to give an opportunity for people to complain without saying “n——- rig.” The implication being that if you weren’t in a mixed work environment, you and your coworkers would feel better about letting the slur-laden figures of speech fly.

Seriously, man, what’s wrong with you?

Comment #42: Tyro  on  10/11  at  03:46 PM

“I guess they do care about gender, though, or you’d’ve said “repair tech.” Right?”

Well, it’s not like Dana has daughters… oh wait, he does!

But they certainly wouldn’t be found in any traditionally male area of work… oh wait, he has one daughter in the military, a pretty hardcore bastion of maleness…

Okay, so Dana’s a work in progress (if the word “progress” can be temporarily used to describe his painfully slow journey toward a better understanding of the world and his - minor - part in it)...

Comment #43: MikeEss  on  10/11  at  03:52 PM

Well, it’s not like Dana has daughters… oh wait, he does!

But they certainly wouldn’t be found in any traditionally male area of work… oh wait, he has one daughter in the military, a pretty hardcore bastion of maleness…

Okay, so Dana’s a work in progress

Dana may well be the opposite of the person who cheats on his wife but says that “deep inside” he really loves her: whereas the latter person is one whose immoral actions belie his “good” words about what he “really” believes, Dana’s words are reflective of an ignorant ass, but his actual life as he lives it is one in which he rejects the stupidity that he actually advocates.

It kind of starts with saying that his daughters and the women he personally knows are “the exception” and that one should not use racial slurs in front of actual ethnic minorities and discourage doing so among the people you know and work with, but then it hopefully results in the realization that the “exceptions” to your belief system/philosophy are actually universal values that should be encourage and advocated for. If they actually lived somewhere in which the good of their families and communities involved the need to help poor people and register them to vote, they’d do that, too, but they don’t.

You do kind of see this in a lot of middle aged professional men: for social/professional reasons, they start to cultivate the mannerisms and talking points of right-wing assholes, but in their own lives, they’re actually encouraging of equal rights and opportunities for women, have respect for learning and science, etc. In a certain sense, they’re somewhere between “useful idiots” of the right-wing and straitjacketed captives of the culture where social and professional success depend upon their ability to act out these cultural behaviors. The best one can hope for is that their children will have better social and professional opportunities where they do not adopt the cultural trappings and immoral beliefs of the lunatic right-wing.

Comment #44: Tyro  on  10/11  at  04:27 PM

Yeah, in Vegas theater (not a bastion of progressivism) I was a technician and an operator. My gender never entered the equation.

“Seamstress” is gone, gone in favor of “stitcher” - cuz, you know, men sew, too.

I wonder if his daughter is “point man” on patrol. Or “repairman” if she’s in a mechanized unit.

Comment #45: teac  on  10/11  at  04:35 PM

In all honesty, I’m surprised that the dumb bastard who set up that sign spelled Obama’s name correctly.

Maybe he had help from a kid down the street.

Comment #46: CHV  on  10/11  at  04:39 PM

BTW, Dana has a whole bunch of posts about his daughters on his site, including this one which in comments has a picture of the man himself standing proudly by his Army PFC daughter.

Apparently his other daughter (just two, right Dana?) is also looking into a military career. 

In today’s world, having your kids in the US military is a pretty frightening thought.  I certainly hope that no ill comes to either of them, whether I fully agree with their career choices or not.

I do hope they both learn a lot, and bring much of it back to help re-educate their old man.  If we can get him to understand that women are really human beings too, then maybe we can start getting him to understand that LGBT Americans are human beings, and they aren’t bent on destroying America, but merely wish to live their lives like anyone else.  By that point, getting to accept the existence of atheists should be a piece of cake.

Perhaps we might even make a progressive out of him… in another 20-years or so…

Comment #47: MikeEss  on  10/11  at  07:40 PM

does anyone know a good mnemonic for resistor bands?

I always start by remembering the color sequence Roy G. Biv, and toss out indigo. Then I preface it with Black Brown, and follow it with Grey White.

Comment #48: Hector B.  on  10/11  at  08:32 PM

To all those posting about how in (X European Country) assorted Confederate flags posted on your wall don’t represent racism: the fact that you didn’t know any better doesn’t change the flag’s true meaning.  Now that you know, what shall you do?

Comment #49: Seraph  on  10/11  at  11:30 PM

this may date me. either way.


but i have, so far as i remember, heard the term “MacGuyver it”.
specific example: my computer is dying, i know i need a new one, but… so i sent out a plea “Please, anyone who might have any ideas - i need help, just a MacGuyver for a bit until i can get a new computer”.

i remember solmenly telling someone (a teacher?) that “MacGuyver means ‘to jury-rig’” when i was in 5th grade or so.

i started hearing the n—rig when i was in 8th or 9th. at first, i didn’t realize that it was two seperate words, and that one of those words was the “n” word (i can’t even say the word in my head. i just can’t. it profoundly bothers me, as do a host of other words, that are essentially the same but for other groups.) i was SHOCKED and totally mortified when i was told what it really was. i had *heard* the word as “naggy-rig” and i figure it was some way of saying “jury-rig” (i guess it is, but…). i’m just glad that i stuck to my use of MacGuyver - i only did it to be weird (because that’s how i rebelled as a teen; being weird), but it totally saved me from accidentally making a racist statement.

Comment #50: denelian  on  10/12  at  04:28 AM

    The same hostile-polite behavior is observed when someone calls a politician they don’t like a “gentleman.” The nicer the terms, the more teeth-clenching is involved.
  Comment #22: oldfeminist on 10/10 at 08:15 PM

True that two politicians fighting to out politesse each other hides hostility, but that’s hostility between two who accept each other as equals, because generally they’re saying it to each other’s faces, right?.  (The early twentieth century humorist, Will Rogers had examined just this example with two Congressman.) So, I think there’s a difference here.  Most people who use the derogatory term aren’t using it to the victims face, but to his/her own choir.
Comment #28: phylosopher on 10/10 at 10:28 PM

Gentleman isn’t used only in politics.  Cops and lawyers use it, too.

Comment #51: oldfeminist  on  10/13  at  05:01 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.