Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Stoney321 reads Twilight so you don’t have to Previous entry: Race Finally Transcended

Read it. Laugh. Then weep. Then pass it on.

Via Brian and John Cole, the victims of the War On Drugs (that would be ordinary taxpayers and citizens who are being bled dry only to have basic constitutional rights revoked because they make it hard to bust drug users) scored a small victory as a resistance group caught some crooked ass cops in Odessa, TX* lying on warrant affidavits in an effort to snag some drug dealers, and of course make a little money off asset forfeiture.** 

KopBusters rented a house in Odessa, Texas and began growing two small Christmas trees under a grow light similar to those used for growing marijuana. When faced with a suspected marijuana grow, the police usually use illegal FLIR cameras and/or lie on the search warrant affidavit claiming they have probable cause to raid the house. Instead of conducting a proper investigation which usually leads to no probable cause, the Kops lie on the affidavit claiming a confidential informant saw the plants and/or the police could smell marijuana coming from the suspected house.

The trap was set and less than 24 hours later, the Odessa narcotics unit raided the house only to find KopBuster’s attorney waiting under a system of complex gadgetry and spy cameras that streamed online to the KopBuster’s secret mobile office nearby.


Of course, they arrested the attorney, but let him go when the Kopbusters showed up with media in tow.  What were they going to charge him with?  Making cops look like fools?  Or is it illegal now to be innocent of a crime that the cops want you to be guilty of? 

In fact, it may be.  Not in the technical sense, but in a procedural sense, according to the people who called the Kopbusters to show that the Odessa police are willing to break the law to maximize the number of casualties in the War On (Some People Who Use ) Drugs. 

Cooper chose the Odessa police department for baiting because he believes police there instructed an informant to plant marijuana on a woman named Yolanda Madden. She’s currently serving an eight-year sentence for possession with intent to distribute. According to Cooper, the informant actually admitted in federal court that he planted the marijuana. Madden was convicted anyway.

It should be obvious that what the police in Odessa—-and probably in most of the country—-are doing is using sensors that detect heat lamps, sensors that the Supreme Court has ruled violate the constitutional protection against illegal searches.  Once the cops satisfy their own belief that someone is growing pot,*** they lie on the affidavit, claiming that they smelled marijuana.  Which is obviously a lie, beyond the fact that these people were only growing pine trees.  I don’t know how you’d smell pot smoke in a city where the sulfur smell tends to drown out everything else. 

You want to think about something massively depressing?  The prison industry is a big business now, and they lobby for long sentences for drug users to maximize profits.  Which means that 95% of the people squalling about health care and having to pay for a universal health care program have zero compunction about paying more taxes to make sure that harmless people’s lives are ruined by prison and a lifetime of limited employment options.  Think about that long and hard.  If we took the same money we spend to put people like Yolanda Madden in jail—-and let’s face it, even if she’s guilty, what she did (smoked some pot) hurt absolutely no one—-and spent on health care, we’d actually end up saving money in the long run, because we’d be investing in the future.  And of course, the health of the country would improve.  But what we’d lose is the role the War On Drugs plays in limiting class mobility, especially for the people of color that are most targeted by the police.  Which tells you everything you need to know about the priorities of those who would deny us universal health care, but support the War On Drugs.

*This is the city neighboring Midland, TX, that part of Texas where Dubya laid his Texas roots.  To give you an idea how ass-backwards and racist a place it is.  Also, this city houses the high school that the movie, book, and TV show “Friday Night Lights” is based on.

**Because god forbid people pay taxes. Especially in a part of the country that went from somewhat poor to flush with cash in recent years as the oil profits go through the roof.

***If you’re a gardener who uses heat lamps to grow seedlings, I’d only worry if you live in the “wrong” neighborhood or are of the “wrong” race.  But if you do or are, I’d be fucking worried. 

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 01:14 PM • (49) Comments

The “War on Drugs” is the epitome of lazy, corner-cutting police work in the service of private industry (not only prison, but also alcohol and pharmaceuticals). No wonder it’s been such a high priority for Republicans over the past 25 years.

Comment #1: Gracchus  on  12/10  at  01:31 PM

It’s also only a couple hundred miles(which in Twxas is practically next door) to Tulia, where there was a sizable scandal in recent years involving a war on certain people who weren’t even using drugs. I hope the Odessa PD gets it’s ass sued off, but if I were a member of Kopbusters, I’d be out of there like yesterday.

Comment #2: Incertus, Nacho Daddy  on  12/10  at  01:39 PM

and of course make a little money off asset forfeiture.

Hey, I don’t know how it works over there, but around here, any time someone gets busted with a decent amount of gear, at least half of it magically disappears before getting logged as evidence. I personally know people who were sitting on several kilos when the police kicked the doors in, only to find that it was less than half a kilo by the time it got to court. I even know of one instance where the defendant said “No, I had far more than that”, and had his case immediately thrown out for evidence tampering.

No prizes for guessing where all the missing dope goes.

Comment #3: Dunc  on  12/10  at  01:42 PM

“The police is the Klan is the mafia”
- MDC, “I remember”

Comment #4: BlackBloc  on  12/10  at  01:59 PM

I even know of one instance where the defendant said “No, I had far more than that”, and had his case immediately thrown out for evidence tampering.

LOL

Comment #5: Notorious P.A.T.  on  12/10  at  02:12 PM

The thing that is really sad about the drug war is a lot of politicians and cops know its a borderline insane failure, but are too chicken to say it in public.

Comment #6: Ben D.  on  12/10  at  02:12 PM

not only prison, but also alcohol and pharmaceuticals

I heard the beer and cigarette companies are by far the largest financers of Partnership for a Drug-Free America.

Comment #7: Notorious P.A.T.  on  12/10  at  02:15 PM

Or is it illegal now to be innocent of a crime that the cops want you to be guilty of? 

IIRC, we’ve already gone there, big time.

Comment #8: Captain Goto  on  12/10  at  02:30 PM

I heard the beer and cigarette companies are by far the largest financers of Partnership for a Drug-Free America.

Jesus Christ, that’s pathetic if true.

Comment #9: Ben D.  on  12/10  at  02:42 PM

“I even know of one instance where the defendant said “No, I had far more than that”, and had his case immediately thrown out for evidence tampering.”

That is fucking awesome.

I have a friend that is a State Trooper in KY and works w/a drug sniffing dog. He has never had the opporitunity to help himself to any contraband, but I did ask him about the burning of all the pot plants that you see on TV when they find a big crop. I asked if they all stood around it & got high. He (sadly) said “No, they throw tires on it so its toxic.”.

Comment #10: Mark  on  12/10  at  03:27 PM

Dunc, I had a family member who lived in Hawaii, and he told me that whenever there was a drug arrest where they had it on the TV news, everyone knew that said drugs would be cheaper because the cops sold half of it and destroyed the rest for the cameras.

Blackbloc, Gore Vidal said it best:  “Policemen are recruited from the criminal classes”.

Also, look up Vidocq, perhaps one of the first people to be known by only one name in modern times:

Vidocq began as an informer who listened to prisoners talking amongst themselves in La Force prison and Bicêtre. Twenty months later, the police arranged his “escape” so he could work as an informant on the outside. Officially, he remained at large. When criminals eventually began to suspect him, he used disguises and assumed other identities to continue his work and throw off suspicion. At one point, he was recruited to kill himself.

Finally, Vidocq suggested the formation of a plainclothes unit, the Brigade de Sûreté (Security Brigade) (that later became the Sûreté Nationale), which was done during 1812. He commanded as many as 12 detectives, many of them ex-criminals like himself. During 1814, at the beginning of the French Restoration, Vidocq and the Sûreté tried to contain the situation in Paris. He also arrested those who tried to exploit the post-revolutionary situation by claiming to have been aristocrats. During 1817, he was involved with 811 arrests, including those of 15 assassins and 38 fences. By 1820 his activities had decreased the crime of Paris substantially. His annual income was 5,000 francs, but he also worked as a private investigator for a fee. Evil rumors at the time claimed that Vidocq set criminals up, organizing break-ins and robberies and having his agents wait to collect. Even though some of Vidocq’s techniques might have been questionable, there seems to have been no truth about this. In 1818, Vidocq received his pardon from Louis XVIII.

and this is for Amanda for the hell of it,  from Gore Vidal:

We’re supposed to procreate and society, god knows, is ferocious on the subject. Heterosexuality is considered such a great and natural good that you have to execute people and put them in prison if they don’t practice this glorious act.

Jesus Christ, that’s pathetic if true.

It makes a perverse kind of sense.  They stand to lose the most if any of the currently illegal drugs were to be made legal.

Comment #12: dead souls  on  12/10  at  03:37 PM

It makes a perverse kind of sense.  They stand to lose the most if any of the currently illegal drugs were to be made legal.

I don’t know why Phillip-Morris and Coors couldn’t just start making marijuana and cocaine. Marijuana and cocaine with stupid advertisements and probably of less quality, but stuff that would sell like hotcakes for them all the same.

Comment #13: Ben D.  on  12/10  at  03:38 PM

Jesus Christ, that’s pathetic if true.

Why?  Don’t you think that most corporations would jump at the chance to make their competition illegal?  I think most would do just that if they could figure out a way to do it (look at the stupid things that the RIAA and MPAA have done over the years to criminalize the ‘net just to keep their business model intact as an example divorced from drug laws).

I’ll bet you’d also find a lot of folks in organized crime who funnel money to keeping anti-drug laws on the books too.  For a similar reason - criminalization keeps prices up, with the majority of the risk on the backs of the users and the low-level suppliers.  High profits, and low (personal) risk - what capitalist could resist that market?

Comment #14: NonyNony  on  12/10  at  03:47 PM

I don’t know why Phillip-Morris and Coors couldn’t just start making marijuana and cocaine. Marijuana and cocaine with stupid advertisements and probably of less quality, but stuff that would sell like hotcakes for them all the same.

I for one have always assumed that the rumors of warehouses full of “Marlboro Greens” are based not on reality (pot goes stale, right?) but on business plans for being first-to-market in case of legalization.

Comment #15: Auguste  on  12/10  at  03:50 PM

’ll bet you’d also find a lot of folks in organized crime who funnel money to keeping anti-drug laws on the books too.  For a similar reason - criminalization keeps prices up, with the majority of the risk on the backs of the users and the low-level suppliers.

Oh, I can believe that organized crime wants it illegal. But corporations? They’d make millions if it were legalized. And yeah, you can grow your own pot, but people will buy it for the marketing just like they do with beer and cigarettes.

How many people do you know who homebrew over buying a case of yellow pisswater? Exactly!

Comment #16: Ben D.  on  12/10  at  03:52 PM

And as someone who lives in the home town of Phillip-Morris, trust me. They would have zero moral guilt over selling any kind of drug!

Comment #17: Ben D.  on  12/10  at  03:53 PM

Corrupt cops piss me off like just about nobody else on the planet.  I really wish I ran the world so that I could make laws that say that if you just do a crime, you get X punishment, but if you’re a crooked cop and you do that same crime, you get 3X punishment, just because you’re being held to a higher standard, because you are the goddamn police.

Comment #18: NBarnes  on  12/10  at  03:59 PM

POLICE, n. An armed force for protection and participation.

—Ambrose Bierce, “The Devil’s Dictionary”

Comment #19: Bitter Scribe  on  12/10  at  04:00 PM

The trademarks for “Acapulco Gold” and a number of other street terms for particular strains are held by tobacco companies.  In the early 1970s there was real hope for legalization, and Nixon’s Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse recommended legalization of pot and limited decriminalization of a few other drugs.  That lead to a brief land rush by tobacco companies staking out trademark territories to take advantage of the situation.  Sadly things fell apart shortly after the report was issued thanks to Watergate and by the time there was any hope of making real progress again the backlash had begun.

Comment #20: togolosh  on  12/10  at  04:12 PM

...oh hai, let me use this as an opportunity to talk about ME! I was arrested over Halloween weekend because someone in my car had weed. I ended up on probation for a year, and have to take drug classes for the next few months. Oh, and I have to pay a $1700 fine. The guy who was in line in front of me in court plead guilty to a hit-and-run accident where he damaged someone’s car and property, and he got a $100 fine. Since what I did was 17 times worse, my fine makes a lot of sense. Or, you know, not.

Comment #21: Jenny Dreadful  on  12/10  at  04:40 PM

I left out the tobacco companies mainly because I’ve heard the same rumours Auguste had about packaging and branding for “Marlboro Greens”—easy enough for them to re-tool their cancer stick lines to put out pot cigarettes (no doubt adulterated with all sorts of deadly preservative and flavouring crap), and they’re happy to sell any substance with the potential for addiction.

Alcohol companies would likely suffer with a popular and organic new entrant to the market, so I can definitely see them (especially Coors) supporting the “War on Drugs.”

Comment #22: Gracchus  on  12/10  at  04:51 PM

For what it’s worth, Sen. Jim Webb has been very active in fighting our insane drug laws and mass incarceration rates. It’s not a popular cause, and I don’t agree with Webb on everything, but this is why it’s good to elect people who are actually interested in principled battles, sometimes even more than people who agree with you on all the issues. (And yet another example of how ludicrous it was for the “centrists” and conservatives to try to use his election to claim credit for the 2006 elections.)

Comment #23: Redshift  on  12/10  at  05:57 PM

The only thing Webb is really truly “conservative” on is guns. But so is Howard Dean, and nobody calls him a “conservative Democrat”.

Comment #24: Ben D.  on  12/10  at  06:05 PM

This post is so fucked up with wrong information on how police conduct drug investigations…..Amanda you really need to get your shit straight or at least pretend you know how police work is done!!

Comment #25: cookie  on  12/10  at  06:05 PM

Details, cookie?  Because I’ve done some reading on drug investigations, and this sounds right to me.  Now, if you were talking about how good, responsible departments conduct such investigations, you’d have a point, except for the fact that they are not the topic of convo. here.

Comment #26: Ismone  on  12/10  at  06:50 PM

I think cookie is a corruption of “cokie”, as in “coke head”.  As usual, drug induced fantasies rule Cookie’s keyboard, as these problems have been documented and reported throughout the entire United States for twenty years.  The only thing that has kept it from being worse was the emergence of a really bad drug, which forced them to actually do some real work with all that funding.

Comment #27: Ms Kate  on  12/10  at  07:07 PM

I was in elementary school when the cops first began coming out and telling us to just say no, mmm kay? Even then I knew that it was a farce. The direct parallels to Prohibition are pretty darn clear.

As for Cookie, they’re not a coke head, they’re a pot smoker. “Cookie” is what you have the munchies for after smoking a big joint, am I right?

Comment #28: K. Mac  on  12/10  at  07:39 PM

Huh, I use heat lamps to save on electricity in the winter over my workstation… It makes a nice warm glow which the cats appreciate and the heat doesn’t go out the leaky windows… And one of the heat lamps which kept our lizard happy last year is now entertaining a rather picky tropical plant that’s supposed to like it indoors but seems to need to be tended every few hours instead.

Comment #29: Crissa  on  12/10  at  07:48 PM

Crissa:
You’re under arrest!

Comment #30: seeker6079  on  12/10  at  08:23 PM

Hey cookie, read about Tulia for some examples of fine police work:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulia#1999_drug_arrests

Apparently there’s going to be a movie about it released next year, starring Billy Bob Thornton and Halle Berry.

Comment #31: befuggled  on  12/10  at  09:42 PM

Once upon a time, a police officer claimed he could “smell” pot on me even though I had not smoked any.  He also claimed I had a greenish tinge to my tongue which they said was evidence of recent usage.  Luckily I had lab tests come back and vindicate me, but I had never heard of the tongue thing before.  It has no basis in reality.  Most people have no idea the police will just make shit up to prove an arrest was justified until it happens to you.  Their word carries more weight than yours in a courtroom, so it makes it virtually impossible for someone without $$ means to get justice.

If the police choose to mess with you, it will cost you an arm and a leg to prove your innocence.  And the burden of proof is on the defendant much more than people realize.

Comment #32: Anon  on  12/10  at  10:12 PM

I think one reason megacorporations aren’t eager to upset the status quo and try to profit from legalized marijuana is that the plant is relatively easy to grow—they don’t call it “weed” for nothing.

The bottom would fall out of the price if it were legal; people probably would mostly use stuff they grow themselves, or pay their greener-thumbed friends (perhaps not with money but with friendly barter—favors, cookies, etc) to grow it for them. As generations of ingenious drug-war scofflaws have demonstrated, you can grow it pretty much anywhere.

Sure there would be a market for commercial products, but it would have to be remarkably good yet remarkably cheap to be competitive—and demand for tobacco and booze would definitely drop.

And absurd theories about marijuana being a “gateway drug” to the contrary, I suspect that on the whole demand for harder drugs that would be less likely to be legalized (in a sane society—heaven only knows what weird trajectory an actual path to legalization would follow in this society we live in) would fall as well. It might indeed be a gateway after all—a gateway back from much more risky alternatives for many people.

From a humane standpoint there is very little bad and much good that would come of decriminalizing marijuana, but from the point of view of the powers that be in the status quo, the reverse is true—all bad, no good.

Until individual power brokers start suffering from chronic pain or glaucoma—but hey, breaking the rules and getting away with it is what privilege is all about, right?

Comment #33: Mark Foxwell  on  12/10  at  11:05 PM

When I first read this story what immediately came to mind was:

Sarano’s got the disks! Sarano’s got the disks!

Comment #34: encephalopath  on  12/10  at  11:09 PM

I once bought a compact flourescent security light at Home Depot to grow the Bacopa plants that now thrive in my anaerobic aquatic clay bed. I asked the clerk if I could wire it to a plug rather than a junction box. “I cand advise you to do that” he said.

“Well, but I could. Right?”
“It certainly wouldn’t be safe outdoors.”
“But I won’t be using it outdoors.”
“I don’t really need to know about that.” he replied.

We looked at each other strangely. “Oh, Oh, It’s for aquatic plants” I said. I suppose most of the people he was used to dealing with were pot growers. BTW, CFl security lights are way cheaper at Home Depot than they are at the “hydroponics” store or at aquarium shops. Most of the stuff at the fish shops is high K-temp power compacts for growing corals. No good for plants. Aquatic plants like under 6000K and that’s best for land plants too. Forget the purplish “plant” lights. High quality warm-daylight bulbs in a shop light are a low cost option. But the CFl security lights are incredibly bright and efficient. The wavelength mix is not optimal, but they are so strong that their sheer power makes up for that

I leave the vertical blinds next to my aquariums a little bit open. The cops come through here often and I want them to see that the eerie low K-temp glow is my tanks.

Comment #35: Bacopa  on  12/11  at  02:31 AM

Mark Foxwell, that would be true if you were only growing the plants for a single use product, but since you can get a variety of fiber goods out of the plant once you’ve harvested it, that really doesn’t make a lot of sense.  Unlike tobacco, most of the marijuana plant is usable for one thing or another, including biofuels and paper products.  Insert joke about companies going “green”.

Comment #36: Godless Heathen  on  12/11  at  08:07 AM

I think one reason megacorporations aren’t eager to upset the status quo and try to profit from legalized marijuana is that the plant is relatively easy to grow

Tobacco is also easy to grow. Beer is easy to brew. Most people are just lazy, or at least not sufficiently interested.

However, while tobacco and marijuana are both fairly easy to grow, producing a high-quality finished product requires a fair bit of care and attention to growth conditions and curing. Not too mention the fact that the important bit of the cannabis plant is the flower, which is only produced annually unless you artificially regulate its exposure to light.

From a humane standpoint there is very little bad and much good that would come of decriminalizing marijuana, but from the point of view of the powers that be in the status quo, the reverse is true—all bad, no good.

Decriminalisation is, in many ways, the worst of both worlds - you’ve still got completely uncontrolled sale and use, you’re still not collecting tax revenues to offset the public health costs, you’re still funnelling money to organised crime, etc, etc…

Comment #37: Dunc  on  12/11  at  09:36 AM

NBarnes: “I really wish I ran the world so that I could make laws that say that if you just do a crime, you get X punishment, but if you’re a crooked cop and you do that same crime, you get 3X punishment, just because you’re being held to a higher standard, because you are the goddamn police.”

Yes, the reason to attach greater criminal punishments and civil liability to police misconduct is that police crimes are committed under color of state authority, with all of the protection and impunity for some misconduct that state authority provides.

Victims of police misconduct don’t have the security of the state on their side, at least at first.

Comment #38: Luke  on  12/11  at  10:28 AM

Not too mention the fact that the important bit of the cannabis plant is the flower, which is only produced annually unless you artificially regulate its exposure to light.

If MJ was legalized, I can easily see a market for a grow kit that would have everything that was needed:
Light source, programmable timer, containers, potting soil, etc., all designed for an optimum yield along with a small ‘MJ growing for Dummies’ instruction booklet.

If MJ was legalized, I can easily see a market for a grow kit that would have everything that was needed:

Such things are already available, but they’re not exactly cheap, and they’re not cheap to run. Again, it’s perfectly doable, just like home-brewing or tobacco growing, but most people won’t bother when they can just go to the shop and buy a pack of ready-rolled joints. The principle reason people grow their own at the moment is that you can’t just go to the shop.

I save an absolute fortune as a home-brewer. It’s easy, it’s reliable (far more reliable than growing any kind of plant), it doesn’t cost a lot to set up, and you get a quick return. You can start brewing from kits for less than $100 all told (I guess, I’m converting from UK prices), you’ll save enough on your first batch to pay for the equipment, and after that it’s pure profit. Yet how many people do it? Enough to support a small industry and a couple of specialist publications, but not exactly a lot of people, and certainly not enough to worry the booze industry.

Comment #40: Dunc  on  12/11  at  01:22 PM

i can’t find out WHY pot is illegal, and while i have found much info on why it is bad that it is illegal, and much speculation in the goods that can happen if it is made legal - that first dash into crime-hood… secret origins?

Comment #41: denelian  on  12/11  at  04:22 PM

“95% of the people squalling about health care…”

I think the 95% number is wrong.  There are a bunch of libertarians out there.  See Radley Balko, for example.

I suppose you could outlaw pot and other drugs based on the same “Precautionary Principle” that the environmentalists use.

Comment #42: Fred2  on  12/11  at  05:34 PM

i can’t find out WHY pot is illegal

Anti-Mexican racism, and because people liked it. Various trumped-up bullshit that is either 1. not true or 2. much truer of other, legal drugs.

I suppose you could outlaw pot and other drugs based on the same “Precautionary Principle” that the environmentalists use.

Um… no.

Comment #43: dan  on  12/11  at  06:53 PM

Well, Dunc, coming from a country that invented the bread machine, I can tell you that there are currently indoor growing plant kits that go for as much as 2500USD$, there is a polite but necessary legal fiction that they are sold for the cultivation of ‘legal’ plants.

They used to advertise a little stand-up grow box that could fit into the closet that used florescent tubes, but I don’t know if it still is sold these days.

I would say a complete ‘individual’ grow box system should only cost 50$, from then on the costs would by water, power for the lights, and whatever kind of fertilizer was needed to keep it going after 1 or 2 crops.

If you’re interested in the reasons marijuana was made illegal, one of the first books written on the subject is available free online: The Emperor Wears No Clothes by Jack Herer.

In short, commercial hemp was threatening a few other industry’s profits, so those industries worked to demonize the drug part of the plant with a massive propaganda wave, most of which was based entirely on lies and racism, then quietly lobbied to make the plant itself illegal.  Interestingly, the law that made marijuana illegal, the Marijuana Tax Act, only did so by placing a convoluted and nearly impossible tax burden on the plant and its products, then placing criminal penalties for the “tax evasion.”

You see, the precedent at that time was that substances could only be prohibited through a constitutional amendment.

In the years since, the war on some drugs has proven to be profitable in numerous other ways.  Meanwhile, anyone who dares to grow hemp risks watching the fields burn while being hauled off to prison.

Comment #45: Jrod  on  12/12  at  01:24 AM

Uh, Dark Avenger, Maybe you’re a little too young to remember the magazine ads in the early 80’s for teh Phototron indoor plant growing system. You see, before the Nancy Reagan “Just say no” and the escalation of the drug war so that Ronnie would seem tougher for the 84 elections, pot culture was much more open. Phototrons could be advertised in major magazines.

Just looked it up, the Phototron is still around.

Comment #46: Bacopa  on  12/12  at  02:26 AM

I don’t know if it still is sold these days.

The Phototron was what I was talking about, I forgot the name.

I’m not that young, I could easily be Amanda’s youngest uncle smile.

Ah, the Phototron… I remember seeing those advertised in High Times. Nice but of kit, but perhaps a bit too small for my needs. wink

I’m not trying to argue against homegrown, or that nobody would do it if decriminalised / legalised. I’m just arguing that the fear of homegrowers limiting their market share is not what stops major companies from supporting decriminalisation / legalisation. To take Coors as an example, I very much doubt they’re interested in diversifying in that direction (it’s a completely different business) and you must never forget that they’re run by a bunch of crazed reactionary whackaloons. We’ve reached the point in the War On Some People Who User Certain Kinds Of Drugs that the propaganda has become self-generating - there’s several generations out there who really believe all that “Reefer Madness” crap.

Comment #48: Dunc  on  12/12  at  11:54 AM

Another reason to lie about actual sources is to hide what could be construed as soldiers spying on U.S. citizens.

The National Guard Counter Narcotics Program sends funding from the Federal Gov to the States so state, local, and federal law enforcement can use military equipment and is one of the main resources for the FLIR system.  (I don’t know for a fact it was used in this case, but I know it is used a lot and there is a good chance it was a National Guard Helicopter that first spotted something.)

You may ask why not just use Army helicopters, well that would be illegal because of the Posse Comitatus Act, so Law Enforcement gets around it by using National Guard troops because National Guard troops belong to the State, not the Army.  So it is a legal loophole for federalizing soldiers.  The rule is that the soldiers can not do the surveillance, it has to be law enforcement.  Usually they work in teams, the soldiers using the equipment and a token officer there just in case they officially spot something.  It isn’t quite soldiers spying on U.S. Citizens, but it is close.  Is this really what we want to spend tax payer dollars on?  Hundreds of thousands of dollars in fuel, manpower, and maintenance for the helicopter to identify people growing a couple hundred dollars worth of pot in their houses?

Comment #49: Synikal  on  12/12  at  04:24 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.