Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Why on earth is the President talking to *women*? Previous entry: Bamboo Review: Mad Men “Public Relations”

Real scandals vs. non-scandals

It’s interesting to me that the Daily Caller has chosen right now to hump the “OMG liberals talk to each other!!!!!!” non-story, since this is right on the heels of a legitimate media scandal—-Andrew Breitbart’s smear campaign against Shirley Sherrod, and how it was shamefully taken seriously long enough to get Sherrod fired, when it should have been ignored right off the bat, due to Breitbart being a known liar.  Even worse, there’s still an aching silence where media and government mea culpas for taking the ACORN lies seriously should be.  CNN did blow the doors off Breitbart’s latest racially motivated smear campaign, but there is still a lack of follow-up coverage exposing Breitbart and his entire crew for being the racist fuckwit liars they are. 

The timing of the Journolist faux scandal could be a coincidence.  The Daily Caller realized that they were getting a lot of hits with this, because above all other things, movement conservatives are motivated by resentment.  Simply having a list of people they could enviously deem the “liberal elite” and obsessing over the fact that they talk to each other is basically enough to get movement conservatives riled up.  The rationalizations for this whole non-scandal mongering are paper thin; the ugly reality is that the theme of the Daily Caller expose is, “The cool kids think they’re so cool, but we totally eavesdropped on their conversations.  So there!”  If there was any doubt in my mind before this that the whining about the “liberal elite” was pandering to jackasses who are jealous that other people who aren’t jackasses live well, this wiped it out.  Screeching about the “liberal elite” is about as transparent as screeching about the evils of hipsters who think they’re so cool because they bother to keep up with new music whine whine whine. 

Still, I worry that this whole thing is being parlayed into an attempt to play the “both sides” card, which is conservatives’ last ditch cover story when they’re exposed as dirty motherfuckers.  Indeed, reading whining from the likes of Roger Simon about how a listserv is the end of journalism after the disgraceful Sherrod episode convinces me that this is exactly what conservatives are aiming for.  But there is no “both sides” here.  The right wing noise machine shamelessly pushes blatant lies into the public discourse, the mainstream shamefully reports on them, and the Democrats shamefully ask “how high?” when known liars like Andrew Breitbart tell them to jump.  The Sherrod thing only ended up well because of a couple of lucky breaks, as Ari Rabin-Havt explained on a panel at Netroots.  Most of the time, the truth doesn’t come out until much later and then is summarily ignored.  And we’re supposed to think that a bunch of liberal journalists using each other as a way to sharpen their thinking, get information, and vent is some scandal.  I’m beginning to think that the Daily Caller and Politico folks are mostly offended that the journalists on the list still think there’s value in journalism that reports on real issues and explains actual policy to the public.  Why do that when you could be riding fake scandals, smearing innocent people, and passing off Beltway gossip like it’s news? 

Luckily, it does seem to me that, for once, the mainstream media is actually doing its job here.  The real scandal—-Andrew Breitbart’s shamelessly smearing of an innocent woman and the Obama administration’s shameful cowering in front of bullies—-is getting big time media coverage, whereas the non-scandal is mostly being ignored (from what I can tell).  I’d like to say I think this bodes well for the future, but honestly I doubt it.  Things just broke the right way this one time, but it’s almost surely coincidence.  Hell, I doubt that even Andrew Breitbart is really over, even though in a right-thinking media environment, he would be.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 06:34 PM • (28) Comments

due to Breitbart being a none liar

- I think you mean a known liar here.

I’ve really been enjoying seeing the big liars finally be called out a teensy bit in the MSM.  Here’s hoping for the future!

Comment #1: Mimi  on  07/28  at  07:22 PM

Yeah it is frightening. It’s McCarthyism in action is what it is.

Comment #2: atheist  on  07/28  at  07:35 PM

Mimi got it: but, very interesting phonetical typo.  (hmm, ‘phonetical’ doesn’t seem to be a word….)  Someone probably got their PhD. studying similar errors.

Comment #3: Eric_RoM  on  07/28  at  07:36 PM

Luckily, it does seem to me that, for once, the mainstream media is actually doing its job here.  The real scandal—-Andrew Breitbart’s shamelessly smearing of an innocent woman and the Obama administration’s shameful cowering in front of bullies—-is getting big time media coverage, whereas the non-scandal is mostly being ignored (from what I can tell).

Nah - that only goes to show that the Liberal Media Conspiracy is intent on covering up its Liberal Media Conspiracyness.

Comment #4: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  07/28  at  07:40 PM

I appreciate Cenk Uygur’s point that if the mainstream media were really liberal, it would seem that liberal journalists/think tankers/academics wouldn’t have to try to plot to get the media to cover stories in a way that was friendly to Democrats.  So any allegations of massive plots to sway coverage is precisely evidence that the mainstream media is not liberal.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cenk-uygur/the-list-of-journolist-pa_b_658852.html

Comment #5: Azelie  on  07/28  at  07:43 PM

The thing that really irritates me the most about the Sherrod thing is that somehow or other the Obama Administration has been painted as the biggest villain in the whole mess.  I do think Obama and Vilsack and anybody else in the Administration who might have played a role in Sherrod’s termination need to be held accountable for displaying political cowardice, but the gravest sin of the White House is that, once again, it allowed fuckwits on the right to steer them into another terrible decision.

When it became clear that Sherrod was completely innocent of the implications being made against her, Breitbart and the Fox Fucks started pointing fingers at the White House, blasting them for rushing to judgment without having all of the info.

It takes a serious degree of pyschopathy to spend one news day hammering the president for having Sherrod in his employ and not firing her sooner, and then spend the very next day blasting the president for doing the exact thing that you demanded him to do the day beforehand.

The smartest strategy for Obama would be a full revocation of Fox News’ media access to the White House and members of the Administration.  Yes, Roger Ailes’ little lemmings will bluster and screech about the injustice of it all, but I don’t think it would cost Obama a single vote.  It may even push his approval numbers up, because it would be a rare instance of Obama refusing to roll over when Fox told him to.

The regular viewers of Fox News and people who consider it a legitimate news organization did not vote for Barack Obama in 2008, nor will they vote for him in 2012.  I wish the president would stop trying to win over people who will always hate him and start standing by those who support him.

Unfortunately, the bright-eyed idealistic young Illinois state senator who declared in Boston in 2004 that “We are not a nation of red states or blue states, we are, and always have been, the United States of America” may have been wearing rose colored glasses when he made that pronouncement.  Bipartisanship, if it was ever alive to begin with, is dead.  I don’t want it to be “us against them”, but that’s where we’re at, even if we hate acknowledging that fact.

Comment #6: DTGslu2K  on  07/28  at  08:00 PM

Murrow, they can’t do that.  They tried something a while back, I forget exactly what, but it wasn’t as drastic as what you are suggesting, and all the little shitbags in the rest of the media went nuts.  If you don’t give Fox access, we won’t come either.  The adminstration had to back down.

I don’t know why the rest of the media insists on pretending that Fox is a news outlet, but they do.

Comment #7: JennyLI  on  07/28  at  08:11 PM

I don’t know why the rest of the media insists on pretending that Fox is a news outlet, but they do.

Thirty years of “liberal media” shrieks have left them terrified. More than that…they believe the lies from the right. Elite-DC, including the WH Press Corps, is a conservative town.

Comment #8: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  07/28  at  08:15 PM

I should add, what we media scholars call the “objectivity norm” in news has left them incapable of identifying truth and reality.  It’s always “on the other hand” but they are actually incapable of dealing with reality…I mean, they still buy the idea that trickle-down works and that class warfare is only engaged from below….

Comment #9: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  07/28  at  08:17 PM

“Hell, I doubt that even Andrew Breitbart is really over, even though in a right-thinking media environment, he would be.”

That’s just it, though.  It really is a “right”-thinking environment.

Plus, I say again the truth no one wants to acknowledge: The “news” isn’t about informing anyone about anything, it’s entertainment.  Any actual transfer of accurate information from a media talking-head to viewers/listeners is purely coincidental.

Scandal, real or otherwise, draws an audience.  Policy, facts, logic, rational discussion — they’re all boring unless you’re one of us.  Talking about a blond college student who disappeared, or a bride who ran away from her wedding, or a brain-dead woman whose artificially animated body is being argued about, all those thing were good entertainment in the past.  Recently, pretending that ACORN is advising fake white pimps about tax evasion, endless flogging of a series of temper tantrums by old white people, talking up how a couple of Black guys “intimidated” voters, or a Black woman being “shown” (through careful editing) to be an unrepentant anti-white bigot — those things bring an audience.  Talking about the real problems we face?  Boring!

It’s interesting how the Afghan and Iraq wars are pretty much non-events anymore.  They served their purpose in the beginning, but now thing are in the shitter, nada.  The US Economy?  Who cares?

The news entertainment business is a ravenous beast.  The hunt for the next big (ratings-wise) story is never-ending.  Assholes like Breitbart have figured this out.  And so they get the news DJs to spin their latest record with little effort.  And since the Reichwing has an endless vendetta against the Left, they can always come up with something to keep the media beast fed that also advances their interests…

Comment #10: MikeEss  on  07/28  at  08:18 PM

It’s interesting how the Afghan and Iraq wars are pretty much non-events anymore.

They’re not to the people who live there.

Who, as has been demonstrated, have long memories and unforgiving natures.

Comment #11: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  07/28  at  08:28 PM

Off Topic: With regard to your “CSA” series you may find this article about the dwindling nutritional value of our fruits and vegetables interesting.

Comment #12: Alan  on  07/28  at  08:37 PM

“They’re not to the people who live there.”

Obviously.  And they’re not non-events to those who’ve been sent over there with no coherent objectives and no reasonable way to achieve them, sent on lies told by rich men who were advocating war for their own benefit.  The ones coming home in body bags are beyond caring, but their families are not.

But, again, when we’re winning it’s entertaining (as sick as that is).  When things go bad, take too long, are not morally black-and-white, etc., then we don’t want to hear about it anymore.  So the news-tainers need to find other stuff to keep us entertained. 

Bread and circuses.  The Romans knew all about that.  We’re (most of us) too dumb to notice what we’re being fed…

Comment #13: MikeEss  on  07/28  at  08:41 PM

MAJeff:  The objectivity norm is a bunch of crap as an explanation. Objectivity is only invoked when explaining why the villagers give huge swathes of print, airtime and bandwidth to raving rightwing loons claiming the moon is made of communist green cheese. When the story line is about something the right wing wants, you can’t even get sane conservatives onto the op-ed pages or the bobblehead shows.

Comment #14: paul  on  07/28  at  09:23 PM

If you don’t give Fox access, we won’t come either.

I guarantee if they stuck to it for a week, they’d come back.

Comment #15: Eric_RoM  on  07/28  at  09:50 PM

<i.Bread and circuses.  The Romans knew all about that.  We’re (most of us) too dumb to notice what we’re being fed… </i>

Indeed.

Comment #16: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  07/28  at  10:42 PM

Just a small follow-up to my previous comment about banning Fox News from the WH Press Pool…

I just caught a post at NewsHounds urging progressives to sign a petition to the WHCA to give the front-row center seat in the Brady Press Room to NPR over Fox News, who apparantly is vying for the seat.  This is the same seat that had previously been occupied by the legendary WH correspondent Helen Thomas longer as I have been alive… it would be disgusting to see it soiled by (presumably) Major Garrett or any of the other propagandist tools from the Murdoch empire.

Comment #17: DTGslu2K  on  07/29  at  01:25 AM

Hell, I doubt that even Andrew Breitbart is really over, even though in a right-thinking media environment, he would be.

Here in the DC metro area, ABC news ran a story for two days—this after the fact that the video was misleading was general knowledge— lionizing Breitbart for having so much power to create a story out of whole cloth and push all the right buttons to control the media.  They even went so far as to suggest that the “Age of Breitbart” might be upon us, since Andrew Breitbart wants it to be and he’s so powerful n junk. 

The idea that all that power goes away the minute they stop listening to him did not seem to occur to the horrid little shit that wrote the story.

Comment #18: Heo Cwaeth  on  07/29  at  01:36 AM

They even went so far as to suggest that the “Age of Breitbart” might be upon us, since Andrew Breitbart wants it to be and he’s so powerful n junk.

*gag*

Ugh, that makes me sick.  Why are these people fawning over a known liar?  It’s like they’re thinking “Oooo! He duped us!  That was a crafty trick, manipulating video!  Wow, he’s soooo amazing!”  Do they go to magic shows to be blown away that the guy made the bird disappear and reappear, and not realize that it’s a trick?  Would they be impressed if someone came up to them and took a coin from their ear?

Comment #19: SporkeyO  on  07/29  at  08:55 AM

Hey speaking of scandals, sex scandals organized to take out politicians are called centipedes: 

http://tinyurl.com/2a9vtje

Next time your favourite politician suddenly becomes the focus of sexual outrage at a particularly bad time, consider this.

Comment #20: woohooyippie  on  07/29  at  08:58 AM

I do not happen to think hipsters are evil; however, nearly eveyone I’ve met IRL who self-IDs as such has been an arrogant ass (AA); they have also mostly been male.  Perhaps female hipsters are less so.

This may be just my bad luck, and no doubt influenced by my own age demographic, but I think the group “hipster” is at least as burdened with AAs as most general groups.  (Specifically conservative groups are a whole different ballgame though, as I’ve seldom met anyone in them who is not an AA or raging loonie-tune).

Comment #21: helen w. h.  on  07/29  at  09:12 AM

I don’t think we should forget the biggest victims of a right-wing hit job: Dan Rather and Mary Mapes.  CBS was too quick to fire them and there are still people who believe the forgery lie.  This is why despite his “conversion”, I will not forgive Charles Johnson.

Comment #22: Albert Cirrus  on  07/29  at  09:23 AM

What Eric said @15.
Also, paul @ 14, those seats on the news talk shows? Since the conglomerates that now own the networks want the news to be a cost center and turn a profit, most of those seats are sold.  The loons will pay more than any sane person will, so the extremists have a soap box and the some of us turn it off when we can’t stand it any more (or change the channel to watch Stewart and Cobert poke fun at them).  With the financial straights papers are in, I’d not be suprised if they were doing the same thing, to a point.
Is lonnie seriously an idiot or a parody?  It’s so hard to tell anymore.

Comment #23: helen w. h.  on  07/29  at  09:29 AM

I don’t know why the rest of the media insists on pretending that Fox is a news outlet, but they do.

I suspect it’s because the rest of the media may want to find employment some time in the future, and want to keep open as many options as possible. That, and that they all know each other from Sally Quinn’s cocktail parties, and well, one must support one’s side, what?

Comment #24: benvolio  on  07/29  at  12:16 PM

On the one hand, I wish the Obama White House would realize the futility of trying to appease the Republicans. I think it was Amanda who noted that they don’t see it as good faith, they see it as weakness.

On the other hand, I doubt the unedited video would have been found until the administration acted (was it Breitbart who released the unedited video as well? I’ve been following this only very patchily). Obama couldn’t have won this one. It’s lucky for him that the mainstream angle on this is what a dreadful human being Andrew Breitbart is rather than how rashly the Obama Administration overreacts to things.

Incidentally after the White House shifted gears and started apologizing to Sherrod, I recall seeing a headline along the lines of “White House offers accused racist her job back.” From a paper I don’t normally think of as a mouthpiece for the Right.

the ugly reality is that the theme of the Daily Caller expose is, “The cool kids think they’re so cool, but we totally eavesdropped on their conversations.  So there!”

Funny, that’s exactly what I took away from Climategate.

I appreciate Cenk Uygur’s point that if the mainstream media were really liberal, it would seem that liberal journalists/think tankers/academics wouldn’t have to try to plot to get the media to cover stories in a way that was friendly to Democrats.  So any allegations of massive plots to sway coverage is precisely evidence that the mainstream media is not liberal.
Comment 5—Azelie

Yabbut if reporters and editors want to be neutral or conservative, but there’s a massive conspiracy by liberal elites to mislead the American public….

That’s the liberal media canard. Not the ridiculous idea that most people in media with authority over content are liberal themselves, but that they have to take orders from liberals, exept for the brave people at News Corporation.

The regular viewers of Fox News and people who consider it a legitimate news organization did not vote for Barack Obama in 2008, nor will they vote for him in 2012.
Comment 6—Murrow Fan

I don’t think that’s totally right. I suspect most people who aren’t politically involved think Fox News is a legitimate news organization, even if they don’t generally agree with its political leanings (some don’t for whatever reason expect neutrality in journalism; some figure the reporting is neutral even if the opinion bits are not). And Obama got almost 53% of the popular vote, and I don’t think there are 69.5 million wonks and non-racist Yellow Dogs.

Comment #25: Hershele Ostropoler  on  07/29  at  12:30 PM

Obviously.  And they’re not non-events to those who’ve been sent over there with no coherent objectives and no reasonable way to achieve them, sent on lies told by rich men who were advocating war for their own benefit.  The ones coming home in body bags are beyond caring, but their families are not.
gucci womens sunglasses/links of london ring/louis vuitton belts/thomas sabo charm

Comment #26: chenchen21621  on  08/02  at  05:53 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.