Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: And the RNC crown goes to…Michael Steele Previous entry: Employer sued for vegetarian=gay taunts

Reflections on a crazy week

Boy, this last week really drove home what it’s going to be like for the netroots now that Democrats are finally in charge.  I, for one, am feeling really good about it.  The mainstream media has shifted right back into the zone they were in when Clinton was President, which is to assist the right in doing whatever it takes to obstruct and bully the Democrats, which was frustrating but also means that the liberal blogosphere will have no problem whatsoever determining what we’re going to do now.  We can safely put to rest concerns that we won’t have any work to do without the immediate motivation of Republicans running the government, in no small part because Republicans are still, sadly, running the show, especially when it comes to media.  And pushing back against the mendacious media that strives to keep Democrats from ever doing a good thing for fear that Limbaugh will scold them for “bias” (which he’s going to do anyway) is something the liberal blogosphere excels at. 

This uproar over the inclusion of expanded family planning services in the economic stimulus package was, beyond anything else, a signal that despite the severity of our times, Republicans are willing to use the silliest of premises to create obstacles for Democrats, and worse, the mainstream media will lap it up without question.  Only a crazy fringe of Americans believes any of the notions entertained as serious arguments on the cable news networks.  Ideas that usually dwell on fringe websites run by crazy Christians who sleep with stuffed fetuses were being treated as legit ideas on cable TV, including the idea that voluntary family planning was indistinguishable from mandatory infertility, and pointed credulity at the idea that any woman might have a legitimate reason not to give birth at any point in time.  The news media ate up the idea that contraception services could easily be separated from all other health care, including gynecological health care, for no other reason than they bought into the fringe notion that there’s automatically something seedy about women who use contraception.  Racist and sexist dog whistles dominated the media debate over this, in a repeat of the concern trolling of welfare in the media that led to Clinton’s welfare “reform” debacle.

But the game is different this time, because in the Clinton era, there were two kinds of media—-right wing media and mainstream media that lived in terror of right wing media.  Also, a smattering of liberal sources that were easy to dismiss as fringe.  But now all of us who were impotently standing by in the past have a major vehicle to show that we’re out here, and we’re strong in numbers and we’re not afraid to push for what’s right.  Is that enough to change the game?  I think, upon reflection, that it is.  I think that the addition of all these new voices to the cacophony meant that the economic stimulus bill wasn’t nearly as devastated as it could have been when the media was able to tell a false story pitting “average” Americans (all right wingers, in their view) against the evil liberal elite.  A lot was changed, but I can’t help but think it would have been worse if Democrats didn’t have the netroots sending the message that we’ve got their back. On the birth control thing, it’s almost assured now that it’s going to pass as a separate bill.  Would it have quietly died without the pressure emanating from the netroots?  I think that it might have.  Spineless Democrats are a major issue, and we’ve got a big job ahead of us when it comes to stiffening those spines.  Will it matter?  Maybe, maybe not.  But couldn’t hurt to try. 

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 08:25 PM • (13) Comments

I hope you’re right.

Here in Illinois, it’s been interesting since Blago’s been impeached.

I voted for him twice, and even knowing what I know now, I’d vote for him over Judy Barr Topinka again.  Blago is like George Ryan, they both probably belong in jail, but they fulfilled their campaign promises.

Pat Quinn, my new governor, has to go.  He’s going to raise our taxes—>that’s the platform Judy ran on and was rejected by the voters here.  He’s pushing very very hard to push the primary and next gubernatorial election out 2 years, so that he gets a full term.  The media seem to have no problem with this.

I’m outraged.  I didn’t vote for this guy, and I don’t want him running my state.  Let’s face it, most of the pols in Illinois that get anywhere got there by being part of one of the three Democratic Machines.  They aren’t clean, they just weren’t wiretapped by the Feds.

I’ve heard a lot of people who are not happy about Pat Quinn, but you don’t hear a thing in our media, which is bootlickingly awestruck at Quinn.  Telephone polls, wildly inaccurate as they are, had the impeachment of Rod as 51% wrong vs. 49% right—this despite his 13% approval rating.  During his speech outside his house he claimed to love the people of Illinois; the heckler from the crowd?  Shouted “We love you too!”

If you didn’t talk to anyone, you would think that Rod was reviled and the new governor beloved.  Why are they reporting this story like this?  Rod probably should be in jail, but Pat Quinn?  Is not going to make things better and this whole “extend the term” stuff is an arrogant power-grab—he knows no one wants him. 

Yet the media in this blue state just sits back and makes up a story.

I really don’t see the point of watching news anymore.  On the net there is commentary and there are references and when someone puts bullshit up, there are several others who debunk it.  For all their whining, the MSM has really abandoned journalism.

I hope Obama understands this.  I think he does, and I think he understand how important the network he built up during his candidacy is.  But he doesn’t need us now for another 2-4 years, so we cannot just sit back and relax and hope that change is really here.

Comment #1: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  01/30  at  09:23 PM

“...a smattering of liberal sources that were easy to dismiss as fringe.”

I assume you mean stuff like IndyMedia, “Democracy Now!”, Noam Chomsky, etc. I wholeheartedly agree with 99.9% of this post and I think the netroots have shown an impressive political potency. However, I wish liberals would not be so dismissive of more radical sources that also provide important critiques of the Right. The more people that want to be part of our coalition, the better. Besides, buying into the idea of leftists as “fringe” only helps the Limbaughs of the world.

Comment #2: Margo  on  01/30  at  10:00 PM

It really does look like the last-minute slew of prosecutions (or in Blago’s case, mere threats of prosecution) of Democratic governors (and God knows how many lower offices that might be happening under the radar) by Bush-appointed and until quite recently supervised prosecutors are having a serious cumulative effect, one that will presumably persist until the interim governors face elections.

I find it hard to believe that Eliot Spitzer and Blago were the very worst criminals who were governing a state at the time; perhaps they are merely the worst offenders among Democrats.

I would never want the Obama Dept of Justice to be as partisan as the Bush one clearly was, but I suspect that just being diligent and applying the same standards of investigation to all high-ranking elected officials as the former admin did to their Democratic targets would turn up at least 2, if not far more, other Governors who are just as dirty or more so.

Then again, I don’t know that the previous admin’s prosecutors and investigators were following reasonable rules and actually would expect, given their track record on other kinds of cases, that they were constantly violating them. I certainly wouldn’t want the Obama DoJ to cheat, even if it would rid us of some pestilent officials.

I rather suspect there are plenty to be bagged by strictly scrupulous methods.

But I doubt that Democratic prosecutors would even dare to bring those cases forward—it would look partisan.

Comment #3: Mark Foxwell  on  01/30  at  10:04 PM

From yesterday’s Countdown:

HAYES:  You can just see the writing the wall.  I mean, this was obviously never going to go anywhere.  And part of that is just structural.  I mean, after 2006 and 2008, the people that are left in the House Republican caucus are representing really, really conservative red districts.  I mean, these are not people that have to worry that much about their re-election prospects if they do anything but resist President Barack Hussein Obama.

So, I just don‘t think that there‘s a lot of political leverage right there with the House Republican caucus.  It‘s essentially a rump caucus of right wing zealots at this point.  And I know that sounds strong but it‘s not really too far from the truth.

OLBERMANN:  But what about the Senate?  I mean, the vice president in conversation with John Harwood today indicating that there might be concessions and exchanges with the senators in the Republican Party.  Why?  Why after this performance from them in Congress—why not tell them to, you know, leave the country if they feel like it?

(LAUGHTER)

HAYES:  Well, look—there are a few reasons.  I mean, first of all, if the Republicans choose to obstruct by a filibuster, the Democrats don‘t have the votes to win on a straight party line, they‘re going to need to get one, possibly two votes depending on who gets seated.  So, there has to be a little bit of give-and-take.

Comment #4: Dark Avenger Guardian Chow Mein  on  01/31  at  12:32 AM

It really does look like the last-minute slew of prosecutions (or in Blago’s case, mere threats of prosecution) of Democratic governors (and God knows how many lower offices that might be happening under the radar) by Bush-appointed and until quite recently supervised prosecutors are having a serious cumulative effect, one that will presumably persist until the interim governors face elections.

I’m not too inclined to include Pat Fitzgerald among the highly partisan Bush prosecutors right off the bat.

Prior to targetting Blago, his two highest profile cases brought down Republicans - former Illinois Gov. Jim Ryan and Scooter Libby.

The guy doesn’t appear to be driven solely by ideologically based witch hunting, given his history.

Comment #5: DTG in STL  on  01/31  at  06:59 AM

And now we’ve got Henry Waxman saying that they’re going to do health care reform this year.  It’ll go through the Energy and Commerce committee in the House, which he chairs. 

Waxman is kind of amazing.  During the Reagan Administration, Republicans were trying to gut the Clean Air Act.  He found a way to block the vote by introducing 600 different amendments, tying up the voting process until Republicans had to give up.  (His amendments were wheeled into the room in shopping carts.)

Comment #6: Neil the Ethical Werewolf  on  01/31  at  12:01 PM

Spineless Democrats are a major issue, and we’ve got a big job ahead of us when it comes to stiffening those spines.

Yeah, and it’s also good for Obama to be yelled at by netroots Democrats a lot.  The only way that the media can tell that somebody is a moderate is if the base is yelling at them.  Attack him when he compromises, and you burnish his moderate cred, which he needs if he’s going to maintain high approval numbers and get big stuff passed.

Comment #7: Neil the Ethical Werewolf  on  01/31  at  12:24 PM

Margo, I wasn’t criticizing your affection for them.  I was criticizing their efficacy, which is minimal.

Comment #8: Amanda Marcotte  on  01/31  at  12:48 PM

“I wasn’t criticizing your affection for them.”

Oh good. I’ll go hug my Chomsky teddy bear now. This kind of condescension is part of the reason why Democrats have such a hard time pushing progressive policies, such as family planning services for poor people. Liberals have bought into the right-wing paradigm that demonizes anyone left of center.

“I was criticizing their efficacy, which is minimal.”

Their efficacy is minimal in no small part because they are ignored and shut out of more mainstream coalitions like the netroots. Thank you for proving your dedication to the impotence and fragmentation of the left. What was the point of this post again?

Comment #9: Margo  on  01/31  at  01:33 PM

Margo, I don’t think those sources are shut out anymore.  People in the netroots are happy to link to them—plenty of that sort of stuff on the dKos diary list—and they are part of contemporary left-wing media coalitions. 

Amanda was referring back to the Clinton era, before the netroots existed.  And really, it’s hard for me to see how the left-wing media of that sort played a substantial role in shaping mainstream coverage back then.  Certainly they didn’t play the kind of huge role that Limbaugh and talk radio did on the right.

Comment #10: Neil the Ethical Werewolf  on  01/31  at  02:24 PM

Their efficacy is minimal in no small part because they are ignored and shut out of more mainstream coalitions like the netroots.

We had netroots during the Clinton Administration?

Comment #11: Mnemosyne  on  01/31  at  05:12 PM

Caren:

For all their whining, the MSM has really abandoned journalism.

What we’re seeing now is just the culmination of a 30-year-long trend in the mainstream media. Sometime back in the late 1970s, the major TV networks decided that the news needed to whore itself out for advertising dollars, in no small part because doing so is stupidly easy, while actually coming up with quality non-news programming is hard and makes executives feel like they’re not the smartest people in the room. Can’t have that, or the whole corporate structure comes crashing down in a steaming pile of bruised, Armani-clad egos.

The “news” no longer has anything to do with what normal people think of when they think of journalism. The only thing the MSM loves is itself. And despite how this trend started, I don’t even think it’s about money anymore. There are only so many advertising dollars to go around, and the news is only half an hour long. It’s become nothing more than a self-contained mutual-admiration society.

On the rare occasions that I bother to watch TV news anymore, I watch the BBC America’s nightly broadcast exclusively. They’re the only ones who still seem to give a fuck about anything other than oblivious self-admiration.

Comment #12: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  01/31  at  09:59 PM

Personally, I plan on printing out the picture attached to this post and mailing it to my congress-critters on a weekly basis.

Ok, maybe just a postcard.

Comment #13: cynickal  on  02/02  at  06:36 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.