Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Friday Genius Ten “Texas Is Really Big” Edition Previous entry: Why are progressives so stuck on the public option?

Sailors subjected to sexual harassment, gay-baiting—and it was encouraged

CrimeHomophobiaMilitary

This is an outrage. As reported in an investigation by Youth Radio, members of the U.S. Navy’s Bahrain Military Working Dogs Division have been subject to unbelievable abuse by colleagues that involve sexual humiliation, harassment and gay-baiting. And there are FOIA documents to prove it.

It was inside that Bahrain kennel in July 2005 that Petty Officer Joseph Christopher Rocha, then 19 years old, says he was being terrorized by other members of his own division. “I was hog-tied to a chair, rolled around the base, left in a dog kennel that had feces spread in it.”

Rocha says that beginning six weeks into his deployment, he was singled out for abuse by his chief master-at-arms, Michael Toussaint, and others on the base, once Rocha made it clear he was not interested in prostitutes. “I was in a very small testosterone-driven unit of men,” Rocha says. “I think that’s what began the questioning-you know-‘Why don’t you want to have sex with her? Are you a faggot?’”

“Petty Officer Rocha and another junior sailor…were instructed to go into a classroom by Chief Michael Toussaint, who orchestrated the entire training. And Chief Toussaint asked them to simulate homosexual sex on a couch,” Hogan says. 

...Rocha says at the time, he had no gay friends, no male lovers, and wasn’t even fully out to himself about his sexuality. “The fact that I was starting to figure out that I was a homosexual, it was the most degrading thing I’ve ever experienced in my life.” Still, eight thousand miles away from home, he was afraid to report the constant hazing. And Rocha was not the only one.

This sick bastard Toussaint didn’t see anything wrong with this treatment of those he was serving with. And when word started to get out about allegations of rampant abuse of this nature, all talk of it was quashed.

Allegations of abuse across the unit escalated to a point that Navy officials enlisted Marine Corps Captain Brooks Braden to carry out an independent investigation. When Youth Radio reached Braden by phone, he said he didn’t have authorization to discuss “any investigations that may or may not have occurred.” There are a variety of opinions as to what specifically triggered the investigation of the Working Dogs Division. What’s not in question are the Findings of Fact highlighted in the Navy’s report.

...Some sailors participated in the culture of hazing as victims, others as perpetrators, or in some cases both. They say the hazing continued because of a series of threats that were also integral to the culture of the unit, which not only tolerated abuse, but also invited it. To prevent them from speaking out, sailors Youth Radio interviewed say Toussaint would threaten to revoke their handlers’ licenses—taking away their dogs and their specialty in the Navy.

How does this cultivate “military readiness”? It makes you wonder what they would do to women who served in this unit? Never mind Elaine Donnelly’s protestations and fantasies of gay and lesbian service members running rampant—she she probably has nothing to say of the persecution of those serving by heterosexual beasts like Toussaint, and those higher up who believe this is appropriate for “unit cohesion.” This has nothing to do with sexual orientation and everything to do with criminal behavior. BTW, did I mention that since the launch of the investigation, the Navy has promoted Chief Michael Toussaint to the rank of Senior Chief

There is much more in this article that you have to read.

The Palm Center responds to the news:

Rocha was a military police officer with anti-terrorism training who graduated at the top of his military class, and who received favorable performance evaluations throughout his career.  His unit mates first suspected that he is gay in 2004 when he refused to sleep with female prostitutes, a practice that was widespread at his base.  Rocha did not report the abuse, which continued until 2006, because he feared retaliation as well as discharge under “don’t ask, don’t tell.”  According to Aaron Belkin, Director of the Palm Center, “it is very hard for an organization to get rid of abuse as long as discrimination remains official policy.”

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 11:12 PM • (20) Comments

Sadly, I know what Donnelly’s response to this would be: that Rocha should never have been there in the first place, and that if we allow open service we can expect many more incidents such as this one.  At some level, she believes that violence is the normal and natural response to the presence of Teh Gay.

In other news, the Senate Armed Services Committee is planning a hearing on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell in the fall, but we still don’t have a repeal bill introduced in the Senate.  Call and write your Senators!

Comment #1: BABH  on  09/03  at  11:30 PM

“It makes you wonder what they would do to women who served in this unit?”

Actually, there were women in the unit - the report details a case where they were forced to act as lesbian lovers while handcuffed to a bed. On videotape.

Comment #2: jalmondale  on  09/04  at  12:34 AM

How did this one guy set the tone for this entire organization? Why do a tiny handful of people—CEOs, especially—get the power to make an entire culture, and even reality itself within that organization?

No wonder we see an epidemic of cheating and lack of ethics in this country. We see what happens to whistleblowers and people who think for themselves: they get punished and their reputations ruined. Whereas the sociopaths in power walk away with wealth and authority. We emulate what we see out of sheer social and financial survival.

Comment #3: Lucy Montrose  on  09/04  at  02:32 AM

Disgusting, disgusting.  My tax dollars are going to fund some man’s heterosexual fantasy camp.  These are sex workers in the middle east, btw, they don’t just go home to their apartments and hang out with their friends on the off time.

Comment #4: Ursula  on  09/04  at  03:37 AM

This is demented on so many levels.

Comment #5: Nil  on  09/04  at  05:08 AM

Hey, being routinely and systematically abused and humiliated by your brothers-in-arms is one thing, but the idea that one of them might have oogled your ass once? That’s just beyond the pale.

Comment #6: Sophist FCD  on  09/04  at  05:36 AM

Tell me there’s something that we can do to bring these people to justice!

Comment #7: Aconite  on  09/04  at  06:55 AM

Since when is engaging in a criminal act not only acceded to but actively encouraged in a governmental organization?

*Rereads*

Oh, I see.  It doesn’t count if said criminal act is only the exploitation of women.

Comment #8: speedbudget  on  09/04  at  09:03 AM

This case makes the evil of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” manifestly obvious.

I’m so glad that Sam Nunn and Bill Clinton ensured that this kind of harrassment be tacitly encouraged, lest the “morale” of the troops suffer!

Comment #9: Whispers  on  09/04  at  09:57 AM

What do you expect under an administration that promised to change the tone in washington?

Seriously. I think that this kind of abuse is pretty much bound to happen when the top brass encourage torture of prisoners, look the other way at murder of civilians and rapes of civilians and contractors. A culture of intimidation and corruption is pretty much bound to spread.

Comment #10: paul  on  09/04  at  10:28 AM

Senior non-commissioned officers always set the tone for military units.  This is normally a feature, not a bug.

But it looks like the Navy—or at least this component of the Navy—might have an NCO problem.  First, the Navy has clearly given Chief Toussaint authority for which he clearly lacks the temperament and leadership skills (NCOs are responsible for the training and welfare of every person under their command, not just the ones they like).

Additionally, Petty Officer Rocha is also an NCO, albeit a junior one.  He has the military authority—and the duty—to explain the facts of life to his leadership, and he should do so.  If he did, and got no results, the Navy might have officer problems as well.

In any event, this supports my contention that integrating homosexuals into the military services is not a unit cohesion problem.  It is a leadership problem.

Comment #11: R. Stanton Scott  on  09/04  at  10:42 AM

Interesting that he started out being harassed for doing something that any good Christian boy who believed in his Abstinence Only education would do - ir, something that said Good Christian Soldier’s parents and community would expect of him!

Comment #12: Ms Kate  on  09/04  at  11:10 AM

Ms Kate:

I thought it was only the Good Girls who were supposed to abstain.

Comment #13: paul  on  09/04  at  11:21 AM

This is repellent.  Once again, I am ashamed of my government.

I am not military and do not know the military code.  However, I thought the military were subject to court martial for criminal offenses, like paying a prostitute for sex.  I also thought that the military were subject to discipline for non-illegal acts, like having extramarital affairs?  But I don’t know if this is still the law, or if it is limited only to officers.  Finally, the actions perpetrated against this individual are clearly criminal assault and battery, as well as a conspiracy to commit the same.

I believe the leader of the actions, as well as the actors who perpetrated the actions, should be court-martialed.  This is not how to “toughen up” people to serve their country.

Comment #14: blondie  on  09/04  at  12:41 PM

holy cow, i think i may be gay! who knew? ok, maybe not, but according to this NCO, the fact that i’ve never had any interest, whatsoever, in prostitutes, puts me on the fast track to larry craigdom. actually, if i had a choice, i’d prefer to be bi, i could always get a date.

i’d like to say i’m shocked by this. really, i would. sadly, that would be a lie. being from a military family, and having seen these clowns up close and personal, this surprises me not in the least. what does surprise me is that it made it to the public. perhaps, the navy will now be forced to do something about it.

don’t hold your breath.

Comment #15: cpinva  on  09/04  at  03:05 PM

Petty officer… not NCO..

Comment #16: whiskeytangofoxtrot  on  09/04  at  07:10 PM

blondie, it’s illegal for sailors and Marines to solicit prostitutes, however, the navy doesn’t really have shore patrol/MP’s on the watch for people out in town. The adultery thing is also illegal, for lack of a better term, it’s almost like a misdemeanor. They’re still subject to court martial under the UCMJ but can accept a non-judicial punishment… i.e. reduction in rank, loss of one month’s pay, restriction to the barracks, extra-duty, etc.

In my opinion, they probably won’t get a court-martial.

Rocha should have done what all people are taught to do in boot camp… request mast. First to his commanding officer, if need be, straight up to fleet admiral. Shit’s gonna roll uphill on this one.

Comment #17: whiskeytangofoxtrot  on  09/04  at  07:31 PM

R. Stanton Scott & whiskeytangofoxtrot: It’s not really news that the US Armed Forces have a pretty serious professionalism problem in the officer corps.  Is it credible at all to think that Toussaint ran this unit like this and his commanding officer didn’t know?  Is it credible to think that the officers passing judgment on his promotion to Senior Chief simply didn’t know any of the details at all of his previous service?

Of course it’s not credible.  They knew, they just didn’t care.

We have a serious professionalism problem in our armed forces.  Very serious.

Comment #18: NBarnes  on  09/05  at  01:37 PM

“Rocha should have done what all people are taught to do in boot camp… request mast. First to his commanding officer, if need be, straight up to fleet admiral. Shit’s gonna roll uphill on this one.”

the kid was 19, had he done what you suggest, he might well be dead. shit may roll uphill, but it does so slowly. 

“Petty officer… not NCO..”

last time i checked, a Chief Petty Officer (CPO) is considered an NCO.

Comment #19: cpinva  on  09/05  at  01:54 PM

cpinva, you keep telling yourself that the dude might be dead. Requesting mast is basically your right to complain to your higher ups about your command without any reprecussions and it can go as high as you want it to be. I don’t think you should be calling him a kid. He’s an adult and can make adult decisions.

Last time I checked, a petty officer is the equivalent of an NCO but not the same thing. A chief is equivalent to a Senior NCO (E-6 and above).

NBarnes, don’t let the fuck-ups of a select few CPO’s and officers cloud your judgement of the leadership of the military as a whole. Seriously, think about it… if Rocha didn’t talk about it to his superiors, then how could they know?

Comment #20: whiskeytangofoxtrot  on  09/07  at  03:43 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.