Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Greenspan’s “once-in-a century” financial crisis counters McCain’s economic hallucinations Previous entry: The beginning of the decline of McCain

Sarah Palin’s diversity in action as governor: cronies and classmates - and definitely no blacks

(UPDATE: I highly recommend reading Alaskan Amy Jones’s well-researched blog about this topic.)

While there aren’t a lot of black people living in Alaska (4.46%), it would be interesting to know what Governor Sarah Palin thinks of her taxpaying black citizens and her approach to inclusion.

Wait no longer. The President of the African American Historical Society of Alaska, Gwendolyn Alexander, who is also one of the Juneteenth Directors in Alaska, released a statement that reveals quite a bit about the veep nominee. (via Electronic Village):

“As for Governor Sarah Palin’s involvement in the African American community, the Governor’s office hasn’t participated in any of our Alaska Juneteenth Events. All previous Alaskan Governor’s have traditionally attended and participated in our annual Juneteenth Celebration. Gov. Palin was the first governor not to send out a congratulatory letter or assist us in any way with our Juneteenth activities.

I didn’t have the courtesy of receiving a reply when I asked for a representative from the Governor’s office to come and speak at our Juneteenth Celebration if Governor Palin was unable to attend. I never even heard of Gov. Palin until she was elected Mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, in Mat-Su Valley.

Governor Palin is a very energetic and spontaneous woman. With some of the things being said and going around this state right now, I’m surprised none of the national media have bothered to come here and get the words directly from the mouths of the people who have lived with her all of these years instead of ‘surfing the net!’

My other opinion is why would an individual who, to my knowledge, has not hired any African Americans on her gubernatorial staff, insist so passionately on being on a television show owned and operated by an African American, Oprah Winfrey?

While meeting with Black leaders concerning the absence of any African Americans on her staff, Gov. Palin responded that she doesn’t have to hire any Blacks and was not intending to hire any. What kind of attitude is this toward African American for who may be the first Vice-President of the United States?

It’s an attitude that doesn’t surprise me at all. It’s right in alignment with a Values Voter Summit attended by many GOP luminaries that promotes the display and sale of Obama Waffles. It’s in alignment with a party and campaign that is already working to cage voters through unclear ballots and contest voters from foreclosed homes.

What is Palin’s history as governor in terms of appointments? Perhaps there were no qualified POC she could find to promote diversity in her government. Or maybe she has very specific requirements for the posts that no blacks could meet. Oh wait, look at this! (NYT):

As she assembled her cabinet and made other state appointments, those with insider credentials were now on the outs. But a new pattern became clear. She surrounded herself with people she has known since grade school and members of her church.

...Ms. Palin chose Talis Colberg, a borough assemblyman from the Matanuska valley, as her attorney general, provoking a bewildered question from the legal community: “Who?” Mr. Colberg, who did not return calls, moved from a one-room building in the valley to one of the most powerful offices in the state, supervising some 500 people.

“I called him and asked, ‘Do you know how to supervise people?’ ” said a family friend, Kathy Wells. “He said, ‘No, but I think I’ll get some help.’ ”

The Wasilla High School yearbook archive now doubles as a veritable directory of state government. Ms. Palin appointed Mr. Bitney, her former junior high school band-mate, as her legislative director and chose another classmate, Joe Austerman, to manage the economic development office for $82,908 a year. Mr. Austerman had established an Alaska franchise for Mailboxes Etc.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 10:03 PM • (33) Comments

Did she appoint any women at all?  Or just white men?

Comment #1: Queen Elizabeth III  on  09/14  at  10:21 PM

We badly need competent people running things right now and can not afford another administration prone to this kind of cronyism. And she looks even worse on that count than Bush, which is astounding. No one with even the dimmest view of what’s gone wrong these past seven years can possibly take McCain seriously after this choice.

Comment #2: Monsieur Eek  on  09/14  at  10:29 PM

Yikes - that is as bad or worse than Massachusetts!

I guess this woman never heard of the phrase “size of the talent pool”.  She just wants bootlickers and asskissers - nobody who will ever tell her no or anything else she wants to hear - like a certain president whose aids were so afraid to talk to him that it took days before he heard of the loss of a major city!

Dangerous fool.

Comment #3: Ms Kate  on  09/14  at  11:02 PM

Amazing.  At least when most politicians play this kind of cronyism, they’re recruiting people from other parts of the government or from private enterprise.  In other words, despite their intention to hire friends and yes men, at least those friends and yes men know something about running government or a business.  Palin is so backwater, she had no one else to turn to except the most unqualified of the unqualified.

Comment #4: keshmeshi  on  09/14  at  11:09 PM

Looks like Side Show Sarah is being judged by the content of her character and quality of her experience after all ... and failing miserably.  Oh, but it isn’t fair to actually examine both because that isn’t showing proper deference to her stinkless shit.

Comment #5: Ms Kate  on  09/14  at  11:14 PM

Wow.  Pick only white people and out of a talent pool of every 1,000 people you have only 683 to pick from.  Pick only from evangelical Christians and you have, at most, 120.

Wow.

Comment #6: seeker6079  on  09/14  at  11:30 PM

People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook.—Richard Milhous Nixon, famous crook.

Comment #7: Hector B.  on  09/15  at  12:08 AM

It’s even worse than Massachusetts because most of the politicians in the Boston crony pool went to prep schools and colleges like BC, BU, Harvard, and the like.  Wasilla High and Idaho State aren’t quite in the same league, alas….wink

Comment #8: Ellid  on  09/15  at  12:30 AM

I don’t know.  It sounds like picking the owner of a Mailboxes Etc. franchise to be your economic adviser might be a bit better than picking a horse-racing guy to head FEMA.  At least he might have a clue about income and expenses, stocking items, and planning ahead.

Then again, maybe W thought Brownie was good at estimating the odds…

Comment #9: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  09/15  at  01:04 AM

Caren, Brownie wasn’t even a horse-racing guy- he was a horse show guy. 

Alaska under Palin= the Coalition Provisional Authority under Bremer, now with more disdain for professionals!

Comment #10: RobW  on  09/15  at  01:28 AM

The cronyism is bad, but the lack of diversity? Seriously this is Alaska were talking about. I recall Gov Dean got slammed with this same criticism in 2004.  Its not unreasonable to have no representation of an ethnic group when that group makes up less than 4% of the population.  I dont think it would be in anyones best interest for her to pick someone out of an extremely small pool in the name of tokenism.  Of course it does appear she wasn’t picking the best people for the job. But it just sounds kind of funny to criticize an Alaskan for a lack of diversity.

Comment #11: matt  on  09/15  at  02:03 AM

matt:

The cronyism is bad, but the lack of diversity? Seriously this is Alaska were talking about. I recall Gov Dean got slammed with this same criticism in 2004. Its not unreasonable to have no representation of an ethnic group when that group makes up less than 4% of the population.

There’s a pretty big difference between not being able to find a qualified black employee because they only make up 4% of the state’s population and telling representatives of the black community to their faces that you have no intention of hiring anyone black.

Saying “yeah, we totally did that shit” isn’t really the best way to maintain plausible deniability.

Comment #12: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  09/15  at  02:15 AM

> “While meeting with Black leaders concerning the absence of any African Americans on her staff, Gov. Palin responded that she doesn’t have to hire any Blacks…”

Well, this is true - she isn’t necessarily under any obligation to have some black staff members, and since there’s a low black population in Alaska anyway there’s a good chance it’s just a meaningless coincidence…

> “...and was not intending to hire any.”

... Ah. Looks like it is racism after all.

Comment #13: Nick the Australian  on  09/15  at  02:28 AM

This is quite interesting, especially in the context of her earlier comments regarding her wearing a Buchanan button and attending/sending a taped welcome to conventions of the AIP, a secessionist party.

When asked about what appeared to be her support for Buchanan and/or the AIP, Palin claimed that her actions were nothing more than an ex-officio courtesy of the type which she, as mayor or governor, extends to all persons/groups who come to her town or state.

It seems that the circle of her courtesy is somewhat narrower than she implies.

Comment #14: Nancy Irving  on  09/15  at  05:40 AM

Dan, there’s other minorities besides blacks.  In Alaska, native americans are the largest minority at around 15% of the population.  So, any Inuit among her circle of freinds, I mean, governing staff? 

Silly question, I know.

Comment #15: Flex Gunship Palin  on  09/15  at  07:05 AM

While meeting with Black leaders concerning the absence of any African Americans on her staff, Gov. Palin responded that she doesn’t have to hire any Blacks and was not intending to hire any.

Ok, cronyism.  She sounds terrible - a complete joke. But again, as with the pay-for-your-own-rape-kit issue, neither the OP nor any of you commentators are actually making an argument here.  Let’s see the actual quote, not a second hand report.  There is one obvious interpretation of this you’re all conveniently ignoring - that she had already filled out her staff (with buddies), and so *of course* was not planning on hiring anyone else.

But I guess that doesn’t matter, because for the “reality based community,” “conservative” and “racist” are the same thing.

Comment #16: Mike  on  09/15  at  07:20 AM

Mike, look at it this way: how dumb did she have to be, in a state with so few African Americans, to flat out state that she didn’t have to hire any blacks and wasn’t gonna when she could have easily punted and “asked for recommendations”?

Comment #17: Ms Kate  on  09/15  at  08:09 AM

Mike, look at it this way: how dumb did she have to be, in a state with so few African Americans, to flat out state that she didn’t have to hire any blacks and wasn’t gonna when she could have easily punted and “asked for recommendations”?

Ok, this is a good argument for calling her dumb.

Comment #18: Mike  on  09/15  at  08:15 AM

Yep, dumb.

Anyone who felt it necessary to moderate their extreme sense of entitlement for public consumption could have just made conciliatory noises about how hard it is to find good people, let alone people of color, and “asked for help” - ignored it, of course, but still made a good show of paying some fucking attention!

Comment #19: Ms Kate  on  09/15  at  08:21 AM

Or evil. I tend to veer toward the “evil” side of the perennial question, “are they evil or stupid?” I tend to assume they know damn well what they are doing, crediting plenty of intelligence.

Though Palin’s form of arrogance and self-centeredness is the kind that does look remarkably like stupidity. I’m thinking here of the “confidential, privileged” e-mails which were cc’d to her husband. She does indulge in putting her hand directly into the cookie jar as thouigh she thinks it is invisible and no one will ever notice her denying stealing any with a mouthful of crumbs muffling her voice and scenting her breath.

The continuum between evil and stupidity here is the possibility that she just doesn’t see people who differ from her “world-view” as being real people at all. Anyone worth considering would do exactly as she does, so why bother hiding it? Naysayers are the stupid, evil ones, and will therefore 1) not dare voice any opposition or 2) crumble when threatened, easy to destroy.

There is that 80 percent popularity to contend with. IIRC, the current President once enjoyed such delirious approval ratings too; no doubt if the whole USA had enjoyed oil revenues on the per capita scale of Alaska he too could have parleyed them into a popular glow without the national terror scare he actually had recourse to. Obviously to most of us now, Bush’s onetime popularity had nothing to do with sober, good governance, and now it is plain to a majority that he didn’t actually deliver any. But for a time, his very “confidence” which is now seen as some combination of viciousness and stupidity contributed to the glow. In the same way, the Palin regime in Alaska has actually elicited ominous complaints and worries from responsible local government leaders, and we’ve seen what happens to librarians, musuem curators, and other “pointy-headed” types with the integrity to stand up to her whims—but apparently the ordinary people of the state have yet to reap the whirlwind of the inevitable consequences of such a cavalier approach to actual governance; until they do, her narrow-mindedness looks like serentity and wisdom.

But I for one have never suggested she is just too stupid, or disqualified by any lacks that aren’t in the moral sphere. I bet she is at any rate smarter than Bush. It’s just that she’s objectively speaking evil, however sweet she thinks she is when dealing with “her own kind of people.” (The ones who know not to cross her, for instance). She believes in the moral superiority of her clique, and that it overrides the need to listen to or pay attention to any other type of people. She thinks the rules are for other people (the wrong kind of people). And not surprisingly she embraces the GOP of our lifetimes, with its insanely wicked baggage of privatization, class warfare against the pooer majority, associated racism, homophobia, and other bigoted baggage, and rabid geopolitics of arrogant ignorance.

It’s the evil that makes one stupid.

Comment #20: Mark Foxwell  on  09/15  at  08:51 AM

We should count our blessings: “stupid evil” is to be preferred over “clever evil” or “competent evil”.

Comment #21: Eric, Rejector of Memez  on  09/15  at  12:27 PM

It would be fun to make a video using a Wasilla high school year book and saying “oooh - he’s an exterminator ... but now he’ll be in charge of homeland security!” and “she’s a hair dresser ... and our next Secretary of Health and Human Services!”

Comment #22: Ms Kate  on  09/15  at  12:55 PM

Umm,

Didn’t Bill Clinton have lots of people (the FOBs) who he had a similar relationship / hiring attitude towards?

I may be wrong, if so, educate me.  If I’m not, how is this different?

People appoint those who they know, with the values and politics they know and trust.

But, you all’s opinion would be appreciated.

Steven

Comment #23: L. Steven Beene II  on  09/15  at  02:52 PM

I may be wrong, if so, educate me.  If I’m not, how is this different?

Because the FOB’s were accomplished people who actually knew something about the job that he put them into.  Clinton didn’t make an assemblyman from a tiny borough his Attorney General.

Hiring people that you know and trust to do a job they’re qualified for is fine.  Hiring your incompetent cronies (“Heckuva job, Brownie!”) and putting them into jobs that they have no idea how to do is not.

Did you miss the whole part where someone who’d never supervised people before was put in charge of 500 of them?

Comment #24: Mnemosyne  on  09/15  at  03:22 PM

There is that 80 percent popularity to contend with.

I’d be pretty happy with my governor if she sent me a check for thousands of dollars.  Just sayin’.

Additionally, and in all seriousness, Alaska is an extremely Republican state.  Palin would have to do a really horrible job in a mere 20 months to get a popularity rating lower than 80 percent.

Comment #25: keshmeshi  on  09/15  at  03:26 PM

Of course, Republicans were the ones who thought it was a terrific idea to put a bunch of recent college graduates in charge of a $13 billion budget.  Because you don’t need to know anything about rebuilding a country to run the reconstruction in Iraq—all you need is a resume with the Heritage Foundation on it and you’re completely qualified.  What does it matter if they manage to misplace $9 billion?  Their hearts were in the right place and that’s all that matters.

Comment #26: Mnemosyne  on  09/15  at  03:27 PM

Sarah Palin—still building the on-ramp to the bridge to nowhere.

Meanwhile, work is under way on a three-mile road on Gravina Island, originally meant to connect the airport and the new bridge. State officials said last year they were going ahead with the $25 million road because the money would otherwise have to be returned to the federal government.

Leighow said the road project was already under way last year when Palin stopped the bridge, and she noted that it would provide benefits of opening up new territory for development—one of the original arguments made for the bridge spending.


http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/511471.html

Comment #27: Hector B.  on  09/15  at  04:41 PM

Well, we already knew she despises Jews. Usually despising “anyone not white like me” goes right along with that package.

Comment #28: mythago  on  09/15  at  05:12 PM

So, any Inuit among her circle of friends, I mean, governing staff?

There aren’t many Inuit in Alaska.

Palin’s husband is partly of Alaska Native (Yu’pik Eskimo nation) ancestry, though.  I don’t know about any of her official advisors.

Comment #29: JupiterPluvius  on  09/15  at  07:05 PM

I may be wrong, if so, educate me.  If I’m not, how is this different?

Because they were, um, qualified? Bush/McCain/Palin cronyism is much worse. And one thing Clinton didn’t do was appoint unqualified white people to the exclusion of ANY black people. NOR did Clinton do what Bush the Elder did, and appoint a woo-lordy unqualified black person to the Supreme Court instead of someone who was at all qualified from any background. The Clinton/Palin analogy could be made here (see Lani Guinier and Jocelyn Elders) but then, you’d have to argue AGAINST racism instead of for it. So, fail.

Comment #30: serena kitt  on  09/15  at  07:48 PM

This was said:
” What does it matter if they manage to misplace $9 billion?  Their hearts were in the right place and that’s all that matters. “

If you mean the money in Iraq?  No, bribes are a way of life over there.  You have to understand the culture - you don’t grease a palm, it don’t get done.  To them it’s not unethical in the least, though that’s changing.

And, puleez, some of the FOBs were political hacks who could barely make it at the state level.

Since Palin has far fewer [pick color] people to choose from - she’s not going to have many in her cabinet.  Not too many Arabs or ethnic Russians either - but that seems to escaped everyone here.

Clarence Thomas was qualified, just not the “correct” ideology.  Look at Bader-Ginsburg - she REFUSED to answer questions as to her liberal bias and she got confirmed.  Qualified or not, she had a blatant (look up her C.V.) agenda to create new laws.

It seems a lot of animosity here is due to dislike of ideology, not the supposed qualifications.

Steven

Comment #31: L. Steven Beene II  on  09/15  at  09:22 PM

Steven:

Since Palin has far fewer [pick color] people to choose from - she’s not going to have many in her cabinet. Not too many Arabs or ethnic Russians either - but that seems to escaped everyone here.

Considering that it was explained pretty clearly both in the post and in comments, one would have thought that you’d have understood that the objection here isn’t simply that Palin didn’t have any black people on her staff. Apparently, however, that was too optimistic.

Clarence Thomas was qualified, just not the “correct” ideology. Look at Bader-Ginsburg - she REFUSED to answer questions as to her liberal bias and she got confirmed. Qualified or not, she had a blatant (look up her C.V.) agenda to create new laws.

The main difference between Bader-Ginsberg and Thomas is that Bader-Ginsberg had served as a law professor for 17 years and a federal judge for 13 years before being appointed to SCOTUS. Thomas had three years as state ADA and three years in private practice (which ended eleven years before his appointment), and was a federal judge for precisely one year.

If Clarence Thomas was qualified for his current job, then literally everyone who has ever received a JD then gone on to spend the bulk of their career as a mid-level bureaucratic functionary is also equally qualified to sit on the highest court in the land. Which, considering the way that the Republican Party likes to staff its governments, actually isn’t too far off the mark.

And for the record, Thomas didn’t answer all that many questions about his ideological stances at his appointment hearings, either. In fact, most Supreme Court nominees have refused to answer or deflected questions on controversial issues during their hearings.

It seems a lot of animosity here is due to dislike of ideology, not the supposed qualifications.

Um, no. But thank you anyways for so aptly demonstrating that you don’t have the first fucking clue what you’re talking about.

Comment #32: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  09/16  at  02:41 AM

Alaska has a population of around 25,000 African-Americans, with a total population of around 700,000. Therefore, African-Americans make up around 4% of the overall population of Alaska, with higher percentages in the larger cities like Anchorage.

You need to also be familiar with the history of African-Americans in Alaska:

http://www.akhistorycourse.org/articles/article.php?artID=233

For example, African-Americans who built the highway to Alaska stayed to live after it was completed. Taking the position that the people who continue to play a significant role in the building of the infrastructure of Alaska should not be represented on the staff of Gov. Palin is preposterous.

Gov. Palin’s attitude toward Alaska’s black population indicates what her feelings might be toward all African-Americans as vice-president and possibly president of the United States. Like Sen. McCain, Gov. Palin shows little or no respect for the observance of Juneteenth Independence Day in America. Juneteenth is an official state holiday observance in Alaska which requires the Governor to issue an annual proclamation. Despite the statute, Gov. Palin did not issue a Juneteenth Proclamation in 2007.

Gov. Palin still refuses to meet with African-American leaders of the Ministers Alliance to discuss job opportunities for African-Americans during the building of the Alaskan pipeline. Again, in my opinion,
if elected to the White House, most likely her actions toward African-Americans will not change. Let African-American leaders in Alaska tell their own story about Gov. Palin. I have spoken to several of them and remain quite concerned about what I am hearing.

Juneteenth is America’s 2nd Independence Day celebration. 29 states and the District of Columbia recognize Juneteenth as a state holiday or state holiday observance, as well as the Congress of the United States.

Together we will see Juneteenth become a national holiday in America!

“DOC”
Rev. Ronald V. Myers, Sr., M.D.
Chairman
National Juneteenth Holiday Campaign
National Juneteenth Observance Foundation (NJOF)
National Juneteenth Christian Leadership Council (NJCLC)
http://www.Juneteenth.us
http://www.19thofJune.com
http://www.njclc.com
http://www.JuneteenthJazz.com

Comment #33: Rev. Ronald V. Myers, Sr., M.D.  on  09/21  at  09:42 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.