Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: The too little too late debate review post Previous entry: Everything’s Okay!

Scrubbing Bubbles scrub problems right down the drain

Two thoughts came to me when I saw this headline on Google News:
image
1) BEGIN?

2) Hey, where’d the story go?
image

Memory Hole rescue after the jump. Hey Fox News, it’s the internet!

A growing number of Republicans are expressing concern about Sarah Palin’s uneven - and sometimes downright awkward - performances in her limited media appearances.

Conservative columnist Kathleen Parker, a former Palin supporter, says the vice presidential nominee should step aside. Kathryn Jean Lopez, writing for the conservative National Review, says “that’s not a crazy suggestion” and that “something’s gotta change.”

Tony Fabrizio, a GOP strategist, says Palin’s recent CBS appearance isn’t disqualifying but is certainly alarming. “You can’t continue to have interviews like that and not take on water.”

“I have not been blown away by the interviews from her, but at the same time, I haven’t come away from them thinking she doesn’t know s-t,” said Chris Lacivita, a GOP strategist. “But she ain’t Dick Cheney, nor Joe Biden and definitely not Hillary Clinton.”

There is no doubt that Palin retains a tremendous amount of support among rank-and-file Republicans. She draws huge crowds, continues to raise a lot of money for the McCain campaign, and state parties report she has sparked an uptick in the number of volunteers.

Asked about Palin’s performance in the CBS interview, a McCain official briefing reporters on condition of anonymity said: “She did fine. She’s a tremendous asset and a fantastic candidate.”

But there is also no doubt many Republican insiders are worried she could blow next week’s debate, based on her unexpectedly weak and unsteady media appearances, and hurt the Republican ticket if she does.

What follows is a viewer’s guide to some of Palin’s toughest moments on camera so far.

Speaking this week with CBS’s Katie Couric, Palin seemed caught off-guard by a very predictable question about the status of McCain adviser Rick Davis’ relationship with mortgage lender Freddie Mac. Davis was accused by several news outlets of retaining ties - and profiting from - the companies despite his denials.

Where a more experienced politician might have been able to brush off Couric’s follow-up question, Palin seemed genuinely stumped, repeating the same answer twice and resorting to boilerplate language about the “undue influence of lobbyists.”

These missteps could be attributed to inadequate preparation and don’t necessarily reflect more deeply on Palin’s ability to perform as vice president. But when reporters have tried to probe Palin’s thinking on subjects such as foreign policy, she’s been similarly opaque.

In an interview with ABC’s Charlie Gibson, Palin gave a muddled answer to a question about her opinion of the Bush Doctrine.

And given the chance to describe her foreign policy credentials more fully, Palin recited familiar talking points, telling Gibson that her experience with energy policy was sufficient preparation for dealing with national security issues.

In the same interview, Palin let Gibson lead her into saying it might be necessary to wage war on Russia - a suggestion that most candidates would have avoided making explicitly and that signaled her discomfort in discussing global affairs.

Then, asked this week by Couric to discuss her knowledge of foreign relations - in particular, her assertion that Alaska’s proximity to Russia gave her international experience - Palin tripped herself up explaining her interactions with Alaska’s neighbor to the west.

On the economy, too, Palin has avoided taking clear stances. In a largely friendly interview with Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity, Palin spoke in tangled generalities in response to a question about a possible Wall Street bailout - and even preempted her campaign by coming out against it.

On Thursday, Palin finally took questions from her traveling press - but shut things down quickly after Politico’s Kenneth P. Vogel asked her whether she would support Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, who has been indicted for corruption, and Rep. Don Young, who is under federal investigation, for reelection.

Unlike her other interviews, at least this time Palin had the option to walk away.

Nothing new there, other than that it’s Fox News (via AP) saying it. But color me unsurprised that, apparently, someone over there got cold feet. They probably should have noticed the front-page Google News link before they did it, is all I’m saying.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Auguste on 01:16 PM • (15) Comments

There really isn’t anything more to say, is there?

Interesting side-note: one of my friends is in a near split decision with Obama and McCain (basically because of the “clinging to their guns and god” comment and b/c he like’s McCain’s experience), and is thinking that he’ll vote for Obama over McCain because of Palin.  Maybe there are more out there, that like both presidential candidates, but Palin’s idiocy scares them away from the McCain side. 

Then again, my friend is unusually researched for an average voter.

Comment #1: Antigone  on  09/28  at  01:58 PM

I didn’t agree with Andrew Sullivan’s prediction that Palin would be forced to withdraw but after the Couric interview and the attempt to cancel/replace the VP debate, I think it could happen.

Palin would call her first press conference and break down in phony tears to announce that the evil liberals had caused her children such pain and suffering that she is forced to step down. Then she would leave without taking questions. If it’s going to happen it has to be before Thursday.

Comment #2: pragmatic idealist  on  09/28  at  02:31 PM

<blockquote?“But she ain’t Dick Cheney, nor Joe Biden and definitely not Hillary Clinton.”</blockquote>
Way to admit that Hillary Clinton actually scares the crap out of the right.  It actually makes me like them a little better.  Or at least dislike them a little less.

Comment #3: jTuba  on  09/28  at  02:55 PM

Winston Smith is alive and working for Faux News…

Comment #4: MikeEss  on  09/28  at  02:56 PM

“basically because of the “clinging to their guns and god” comment “

I take it he didn’t bother to look at the full comment and actually understand it but instead listens to what some pundit said about how it makes Obama an elitist.

“he like’s McCain’s experience”

As what a deregulator and Bush butt buddy? A pathetic naval pilot who if not for being from an Admiral’s family would never have been let near a plane even to change the liquid in the chemical toilets?

Comment #5: tootiredoftheright  on  09/28  at  04:43 PM

“butt buddy”

If you are truly “too tired of the right,” maybe you should stop talking like them.

Comment #6: Viceroy Matt  on  09/28  at  05:10 PM

“maybe you should stop talking like them”

Never seen one of them use it but boy do they get ticked if you use it to describe them.

Comment #7: tootiredoftheright  on  09/28  at  05:14 PM

Never seen one of them use it but boy do they get ticked if you use it to describe them.

Yeah.  Homophobes get mad if you imply that they’re homosexual.  Funny, that.

Comment #8: Seraph  on  09/28  at  06:38 PM

Asked about Palin’s performance in the CBS interview, a McCain official briefing reporters on condition of anonymity said: “She did fine. She’s a tremendous asset and a fantastic candidate.”

I still find it hilarious and amazing that a campaign official felt the need for anonymity when saying something really nice about Palin. When you feel like supporting the second person on the ticket will cost you credibility then there’s some serious problems with your campaign.

Comment #9: QuietStorm  on  09/28  at  07:55 PM

I saw this on Google and wondered what they’d wiped. Thanks for catching it!

Comment #10: Grammar RWA  on  09/28  at  09:33 PM

A growing number of Republicans are expressing concern about Sarah Palin’s uneven - and sometimes downright awkward - performances in her limited media appearances.

Hey, Republicans: I bet you’re wondering why her appearances are so limited!

Comment #11: SamFromUtah  on  09/28  at  11:32 PM

I’m expecting a significant “health issue” with either baby Trig or Bristol to “force” Sarah Palin to “reluctantly” resign from the campaign.

Comment #12: rolo  on  09/29  at  01:33 AM

prag: people have started voting in some states, and I’m pretty sure that most places it’s too late to replace Palin on the ballot.

Comment #13: pseudonymous in nc  on  09/29  at  01:48 AM

Homophobes get mad if you imply that they’re homosexual.  Funny, that.

Especially if they’re preachers!

Comment #14: Big Bad Bald Bastard  on  09/29  at  08:37 AM

“maybe you should stop talking like them”

Semantic Note:

Using the term “Butt Monkey” rather than “Butt Buddies” removes the homophobic stigma and implies the mindless animals as convservatives sadly present themselves.

See, everyone’s happy.

sort of.

Comment #15: egg  on  09/29  at  04:24 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.