Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: The Promise Of Tomorrow Previous entry: Re-fighting the 60s

She Wants Her Cookies

imageSarah Palin is alleging that the San Fransisco Chronicle “suppressed” an interview with Obama that they’ve had up on their website since January.  How, pretell, was it “suppressed”?

As Sweetness & Light points out, the Chronicle has failed to keep the January, 2008 interview as available as they could have, and, in the 48-minute interview, they failed to specifically point to Obama’s wholly uncontroversial remarks

What a brazen lie it is to suggest that The Chronicle covered up Mr. Obama’s threat to bankrupt the coal industry. (We’re looking at you, Governor Palin.)

Just look at that headline.

It should be obvious to any sentient being that this amazing interview contained explosive comments from Mr. Obama’s about his intentions:

“So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them, because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.”

But this quote should go without saying from the detailed description of the interview by The Chronicle. (And, as you can see, it does go without saying.)

Besides, if you listened to the entire 49 minute tape you would have heard Mr. Obama say that.

The standard created here, of course, is that any time a news source does an extensive interview lasting nearly an hour, they are not only obligated to keep the interview readily and immediately available for anyone who might ever come looking for it at any point ever, but that they must write full headlines for every single statement that may in any way be interpreted as potentially newsworthy.  And then keep all of that readily and immediately available to any group with a prurient interest in whatever the hell it is you’re supposed to have caught.

Keep in mind that this does fit in perfectly with Palin’s take on media responsibility, which seems to involve the idea that making things marginally harder for her is what the Founding Fathers meant by “treason”.  She also contends that Girl Scouts Thin Mints are what they meant by “pursuit of happiness”, and will use the full force and majesty of the Vice President’s Senatorial Army to fuck a troop leader up.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 02:57 PM • (25) Comments

To hell with CO2, what we need is a cap and trade agreement on Teh Stooooupid!

Comment #1: Ms Kate  on  11/03  at  03:07 PM

Palin is too unable to process complex information to even understand what she is talking about in the first place.  I put together a panel for a high-end conference on climate change and sat through a couple of hours of discussion on cap and trade that spanned european experience and the implications for US policy. 

Aides for senators and representatives were in attendance - ones from coal states - as well as utility people.  Not one of them ever said “this will put us out of business”.  They may not have liked the idea, but they asked questions that made it clear that they could and would work with it.

Comment #2: Ms Kate  on  11/03  at  03:10 PM

Rush Limbaugh is leading with this on his show today, and is running all over the place with it. It’s hard to tell exactly what his drug-addled point is, but it’s something to the effect that Obama will bankrupt the middle class because they all want to create coal-fired power plants.

Clearly, the Obama candidacy is now doomed.

Comment #3: zadig  on  11/03  at  03:14 PM

Hannity was wanking on this last night, too. 

At this point, all they are accomplishing is getting out their own vote.  They hope.

Comment #4: Ms Kate  on  11/03  at  03:16 PM

San Fransisco Chronicle

Palinism or typo?

Limbaugh and Hannity are evil little trolls.  The truth is completely irrelevant to them as it is always superseded by something coming straight out of their asses.

Comment #5: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  11/03  at  03:21 PM

This is just their last, desperate gasp as their claws are pried away from the lever of power.

BTW, while Obama supporters have been putting grassroots democracy into action, the wingnuts have been copying and pasting boilerplate and conspiracy theories in their echo chamber blogs.

Guess which is gonna be more effective at winning this thing tomorrow? You betcha! wink

Comment #6: Ben D.  on  11/03  at  03:36 PM

This is rich coming from Palin, who thinks softball questions are Out To Get Her ZOMG. Sheesh.

Comment #7: Nenya  on  11/03  at  03:57 PM

Actually, the interview is available at the SF Chron here:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/opinionshop/detail?blogid=42&entry_id=23562

Comment #8: Beth Wellington  on  11/03  at  04:24 PM

My troop leader could take Palin.

When thin mints are outlawed, only outlaws will have thin mints!

Comment #9: Moi  on  11/03  at  04:41 PM

Aw, now I want some thin mints!

Comment #10: prescaarthur  on  11/03  at  05:05 PM

The McCain-Palin camp know they’re losing and what they’re doing now is preemptive damage control.  They first move started with Acorn, with them setting the stage for a voter-fraud defense in the likely event they lose the election.  Now they’re sowing the seeds for a liberal media bias claim.  Losing is always demeaning, but being the first white man to lose the presidency to a black man? Talk about a need to save face. 

I live in Cincinnati and last night both Palin and Obama were in town for rallies.  Palin held hers in neighboring Clermont County, which, according to the U.S. Census, is 97 percent white and nearly as Republican.  Obama held his at the University of Cincinnati.  Cincinnati is located in and surrounded by Hamilton County.  Hamilton isn’t as white or Republican as Clermont, but the GOP has long counted it as a Republican stronghold.  Obama’s rally drew some 27,000 people.  Palin’s drew 7,000.

According to the local news (a paper that endorsed McCain), Palin’s reference to the San Francisco Chronicle tape prompted several people in the back of the crowd, near the press area, to yell at reporters - “Why don’t you report this?” and “The media is evil.”

Comment #11: Rachel  on  11/03  at  05:15 PM

Thin Mints are the perfect bait when shooting animals from a helicopter.

Comment #12: Rugged in Montana  on  11/03  at  05:24 PM

“Tuscaloosa Plumbers for Jesus” McCain Robo Calls…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIaIvgmqsSY

Comment #13: Daveybp  on  11/03  at  05:40 PM

I think it’s “pray tell” instead of “pretell”?

Comment #14: Entomologista  on  11/03  at  05:52 PM

It’s that Librul Media thing again. Whaaah. Go tell it to Fox News.

Comment #15: Southern Beale  on  11/03  at  06:07 PM

Look, the Chron is in San Francisco. Hence it is guilty of a coverup. QED.

Comment #16: paul  on  11/03  at  06:09 PM

“—The standard created here, of course, is that any time a news source does an extensive interview lasting nearly an hour, they are not only obligated to keep the interview readily and immediately available for anyone who might ever come looking for it at any point ever, but that they must write full headlines for every single statement that may in any way be interpreted as potentially newsworthy.  And then keep all of that readily and immediately available to any group with a prurient interest in whatever the hell it is you’re supposed to have caught. —”

Bullshit.  There is no “standard” being created here.  This is just another round of GOTCHA! politics in which Sarah Palin tries to make the San Fransisco (evil!  SF!  evil evil! /splash holy water) Chronicle culpable in some evil coup by the Obama campaign to destroy sweet, innocent, martyred Big Coal.

They won’t be demanding the Washington Times or the New York Post adhere to these elevated standards.  They won’t be requiring FOX News to start amending its headlines.  The Chronicle somehow sided with a “liberal” and are getting chewed out by “conservatives”.

Frankly, if this election lasted another week, we’d have watched the Obama campaign debunk this as another whiny bullshit allegation with half a dozen counts of hypocrisy aimed at the McCain’s media blackout maneuvers just for garnish.  But Obama is winning in a landslide anyway and the story won’t have time to get traction much less deal any serious damage.  So I’m happy to sit back and watch the whole “scandal” dissolve into the next news cycle by Wednesday.

Comment #17: Zifnab25  on  11/03  at  06:33 PM

Because paying anything for pouring sludge in the river, even if it’s non-toxic, is paying too much!

Comment #18: Crissa  on  11/03  at  07:46 PM

Hey, leave Thin Mints out of it!  But now that I think of it, I’ve been a Girl Scout leader for more than a dozen years, and my Senior Scouts could take her out, no trouble.  They’re a tough, alternative, liberal-leaning, THINKING group of young women (can you tell I’m proud of them?).

Comment #19: NobleExperiments  on  11/03  at  08:06 PM

This was just a way for Palin to point out that Obama said something dumb.  It’s kinda her job, at this point.  Most paranoids are allowed to vote, so the candidates appeal to them, too.

I think I read somewhere that the US gets 50% of it’s electricity from coal.  I don’t believe any President will turn off half the lights.  Do you?

Comment #20: Fred 2.0  on  11/03  at  08:59 PM

This was just a way for Palin to point out that Obama said something dumb.

while I don’t agree that he said something dumb, even were I to grant you this argument, the rule about pointing out stupidity is to avoid saying something so dumb people like me have no choice but to use juvenile misspellings like stoopid to characterize the statement. Mrs. Palin failed miserably and better keep her dirty mitts off my cookies.

Comment #21: ol cranky  on  11/03  at  09:30 PM

Obama didn’t say something dumb.  Palin didn’t understand what he said, mischaracterized it, and then said something super-dumb.

And, yes, according to my 8 year old, super-dumb is a word.  The 4 y/o says super-super-super-dumb is a word as well.

Comment #22: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  11/03  at  09:42 PM

hmmm, my 9er likes “crapiscles”, and decided to teach 6 & 4 “poo-flinger”. trade ya!

Comment #23: redwards  on  11/04  at  02:43 AM

Thin mints stopped being the pursuit of happiness when they switched to a new manufacturer who only put mint extract in the chocolate, instead of having a perfect layer of minty filling between the chocolate cookie and the chocolate coating. /38 year old former Girl Scout

However, Girl Scouts are not only high-minded, they probably scare the living crap out of Palin with their pro-tolerance, lesbian-friendly cookie boxes.

Comment #24: Samantha Vimes  on  11/04  at  04:23 AM

Obama said he’d bankrupt any new coal plants that industry tried to build.  Do you think that’s actually smart?  We see what he really does, but saying that was not smart.

Comment #25: Fred  on  11/05  at  05:43 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.