Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Hitler Was A Loving Parent To His Jew-Hating Dogs Previous entry: UPDATE: PA state investigation finds Valley Club did discriminate against minority kids at its pool

Stupid on purpose

The War Room examines Bill O’Reilly’s flip-flop on the public option.  Apparently, one minute O’Reilly was saying that sounded like a good idea, and then he flipped around and got back on the approved script of calling it socialism and other such muckety-muck.  I agree with Alex at the War Room.  The flip-flopping seems to be a product of O’Reilly’s confusion about what health care reform even is.  He’s not exactly teaching SAT prep courses, that one.  He is pure reaction with very little thought, and he has two rules: a) If Democrats are behind it, that makes it wrong and b) Women who have sex are dirty fucking sluts.  Anything outside of that range is going to confuse him.

Or is it?  Let me consider a dark possibility for a moment.  Perhaps O’Reilly isn’t confused so much as deliberately trying to confuse.  When it comes to health care, confusing the morons is the name of the game when it comes to building opposition.  How else do you think that town halls get packed with senior citizens screaming about how Obama is trying to turn Medicare over to the government?  They were fed the line they’re spouting.  The confusion on their part is a product of a deliberate strategy from the conservative movement leaders, who realize that being straightforward and honest about health care reform is unlikely to do much in the way of harnessing the troops against it. 

Being waist deep in reproductive rights battles, I definitely see how this confuse-the-troops strategy is working with anti-choicers.  The leaders are working their best angle—-the fact that their troops are stupid fucking people—-as hard as they can.  For instance, the possibility that health care reform will overturn the Hyde Amendment and the federal government will start funding abortions with taxpayer money is laughable.  You’re more likely to have a unicorn show up at your door with a winning lottery ticket. Democrats aren’t touching that one with a 10-foot-pole, in no small part because there’s a lot of male Democrats who think about their own sperm power and get all sentimental and decide that women shouldn’t have the right to interrupt the male conquest of the uterus with abortion.  Rather than get bogged down battling it out over abortion, the Democrats have taken a position of maintaining the status quo.  They’re not going to use taxpayer money for abortions, but they’re not going to make it illegal for insurance companies to cover abortion, either.  It’s actually pretty simple.

But what the anti-choice leaders are doing is telling the troops that health care reform is basically a way to trick them into paying for abortions.  And they’re doing so by using complex-seeming explanations that are boring even if you’re smart enough to understand them (in sum, they’re just using big words to make their lies seem fancier), but are 100% guaranteed to make the morons that make up the anti-choice infantry fall the fuck asleep.  The troops then have permission to believe what they want to believe—-that hot young women are fucking on their dime, and no one is stopping this—-and they take their confused, stupid asses out in public to make loud fools of themselves in an effort to stop health care reform.

With this in mind, it seems possible that O’Reilly isn’t confused so much as trying to confuse—-putting a lot of contradictory information out there, so his viewers give up trying to figure it all out and resort to mindless hating, which is where the conservative movement leadership wants them to be.  Another possibility is that O’Reilly was hired because he’s sure to be a self-contradicting, confusing person, and so it’s not that he’s trying to confuse his audience so much as he can’t help himself, and that’s exactly what his bosses want.  But none of this seems accidental to me.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 11:54 AM • (17) Comments

Being waist deep in reproductive rights battles,

Well, duh, how deep should you be?

8-)

Comment #1: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  09/23  at  12:33 PM

I think you’re giving O’Rielly a bit more credit than he deserves.  I don’t think he can think deeply enough to come up with actual plots or plans.  He’s never impressed me as a guy who can think critically or independently at all. He’s just loyal to his tribe and he gets shouty when he feels threatened.

Comment #2: BadKitty  on  09/23  at  12:54 PM

I agree with BadKitty. One can never underestimate O’Reilly’s lack of perception and perspicacity.

Comment #3: LCforevah  on  09/23  at  01:09 PM

I think O’Rielly’s masters pay him to agitate people because agitated people translate to ratings.  Just as a cheer leader need not have total understanding of the game to induce pep, O’Rielly need not have total understanding of the issues to induce outrage.  He just needs to know his audience and their hot buttons.  If he can’t find one of those buttons naturally, he will insert it himself, facts be damned.

I think it is wrong to see O’Rielly and his ilk as anything other than performers for a nitch.  There is no real agenda behind it.  The problem is that what’s left of the Republican party began taking it seriously.  So, the party is setting its agenda off the entertainers who have no agenda.  Truly, the inmates are running the asylum.

Comment #4: jleaux  on  09/23  at  01:35 PM

Thank you for calling these people what they really are: stupid fucking people. They don’t even realize that they are actively trying to make things worse for themselves.

Comment #5: Mark  on  09/23  at  02:01 PM

My bet is that O’Reilly is neither dumb nor deliberately malicious, at least in the sense of consciously and purposefully deceiving people. Instead, he is just like other hacks disguised as journalists - he makes absolutely no effort to be informed about health care reform (or other policy issues for that matter) and confines himself to the uncritical parroting of the wingnut POV.

And that’s fine. Let’s not forget that the No-Nonsense Working-Class-Origins Self-Made Irish-American part he plays every night is just his nine-to-five. His real vocation, as we all know, is erotic prose poetry:
“Cup your hands under your breasts and hold them for ten seconds.”
excerpted from William O’Reilly’s Those Who Trespass, 2001.

Comment #6: Nimed  on  09/23  at  02:33 PM

They have also been repeatedly selling a weird notion that things “you” don’t like (where “you” is wingnuts) shouldn’t be covered by the government.

Democrats always have to pay out for bullshit like abstinence-only, the war on drugs, wars in general, corporate welfare, nuclear weapons for decades, and all sorts of ill-conceived republican ideas. But whenever a pittance is spent towards things liberal people want taxes to cover (things that genuinely help society), they howl like monkeys at how unfair it is that sometimes in a democracy, some portion of taxes will go for things you don’t personally like.

It’s why they have so much invested in the “real america” is white wingnuts myth, because if public perception changes, then it becomes a much harder sell and people will stop listening when the wingnuts whine that all of the money of everyone, including liberals should only go to things that make wingnut dicks hard.

Comment #7: Cerberus  on  09/23  at  02:40 PM

I think “stupid” and “sowing confusion” are both good answers. Remember, these are the people who can report with a straight face that retirees want the government to keep its hands off medicare…

Comment #8: paul  on  09/23  at  02:54 PM

His real vocation, as we all know, is erotic prose poetry

I can’t think of a better way to make people terrified of and hostile to sex than to give them an audio recording of Bill O’Reilly saying, “I would like you to unhook your bra and let it slide down your arms. You can keep your shirt on.”

Comment #9: junk science  on  09/23  at  03:06 PM

The real irony is that many anti-choicers already pay for abortions through their private health insurance.  In fact, a public option would allow them a choice besides employer-provided health insurance so that they could buy a policy that definitely won’t cover abortions.

As for O’Reilly, he’s just a kid throwing a temper tantrum because he doesn’t want Democrats to win.  If Republicans came up with a health care reform plan that included a public option, he’d be all for it because it really is a great idea.  However, if Democrats manage to get it through, they will look really good to the public, and that’s what O’Reilly is most afraid of.  He’s disagreeable for the sake of being disagreeable, just like a toddler.

Comment #10: bananacat  on  09/23  at  03:36 PM

Thank you for calling these people what they really are: stupid fucking people. They don’t even realize that they are actively trying to make things worse for themselves.

I think they realize that they are making things worse for themselves, but they also realize that they are making things worse the people who “deserve” to suffer, and that’s what they care about most.  Punishing the bad people makes all their suffering worth it.

Comment #11: bananacat  on  09/23  at  03:39 PM

I think it is wrong to see O’Rielly and his ilk as anything other than performers for a nitch.  There is no real agenda behind it.

Oh, I don’t know. The drug and insurance companies that sponsor his show and practically every other “news” program might have a thing or two to say about how the health care reform “debate” is reported and analyzed.

Comment #12: snobographer  on  09/23  at  03:50 PM

“The real irony is that many anti-choicers already pay for abortions through their private health insurance.  In fact, a public option would allow them a choice besides employer-provided health insurance so that they could buy a policy that definitely won’t cover abortions.”

I was saying the same thin but my comment got eated by the internets.  Probably cause I am at work and I had to take 15 minutes to schedule and abortion, funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield.

Comment #13: GumbyAnne  on  09/23  at  04:51 PM

I lost the comment because I left the screen idle for too long, i think.  Sorry if that last comment didn’t make sense.

Comment #14: GumbyAnne  on  09/23  at  04:53 PM

Schedule *AN* abortion.  I should really go back to bed.

Comment #15: GumbyAnne  on  09/23  at  04:54 PM

I can’t think of a better way to make people terrified of and hostile to sex than to give them an audio recording of Bill O’Reilly saying, “I would like you to unhook your bra and let it slide down your arms. You can keep your shirt on.”

Ahem.  “Doesn’t Rush Limbaugh look like one of those gay guys who likes to lie in a tub and…”

Comment #16: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  09/23  at  06:06 PM

Or is it?  Let me consider a dark possibility for a moment.  Perhaps O’Reilly isn’t confused so much as deliberately trying to confuse.  When it comes to health care, confusing the morons is the name of the game when it comes to building opposition.  How else do you think that town halls get packed with senior citizens screaming about how Obama is trying to turn Medicare over to the government?

Actually this doesn’t seem impossible to me. Even if O’Reilly himself didn’t think of that tactic, it is quite possible that someone else gave him the idea.

It’s probably impossible to know for sure. Your take on confusion as a tactic is pretty good though.

Comment #17: atheist  on  09/24  at  12:17 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.