Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Roseanne Cash spanks the hippie bashers Previous entry: Sequels

Thank god Matt Yglesias is a dude

It’s been implied that men need to have appropriate and convincing penis-centric reasons for voting for Obama (and for fearing a McCain presidency), so how about not getting our penises shot off in a series of foreign lands?

[McCain] wasn’t just worried by North Korea’s nuclear program in 1994, he called it “the most dangerous and immediate expression” of “the greatest challenge to U.S. security and world stability today.” He didn’t just favor military action over Kosovo, he wanted “infantry and armored divisions for a possible ground war” thrown into the mix as part of “an immediate and manifold increase in the violence against Serbia proper and Serbian forces in Kosovo.” But he also thinks that Islamic radicalism is “the transcendent issue of our time” and also that the standoff with Russia is the first “serious crisis internationally” since the end of the Cold War, since Russia is aiming “to restore the old Russian Empire.”

As Max Bergmann (yay! another guy!) says:

The big concern with a McCain presidency – a concern which I am surprised has not been vocalized more fully – is that the U.S. will lurch from crisis to crisis, confrontation to confrontation, whether it be with Iran, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Saudi Arabia, etc. The danger is that McCain’s pundit-like rhetoric will entrap the U.S. in descending spiral of foreign policy brinksmanship. Just think about the very likely scenario of McCain giving Iran/Russia a rhetorical ultimatum and Iran/Russia ignoring it. Now we are stuck - either we lose face by not following through on our threats or we follow through and go to war.  We can’t afford such a reckless approach after the last eight years. For the next eight we need a president not a pundit.

And the truth is McCain is the real empty suit in this race, from the suicidal (and practically nonsensical) foreign policy approach to the POW lunacy to the flip-flop on Roe v. Wade. It doesn’t take genitals of any sort to see that he’s a dangerously bad choice.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Auguste on 07:35 PM • (24) Comments

McCain can follow through.  He just orders airstrikes on random targets of opportunity every time someone doesn’t meet his demands.  He’ll be like the bully in middle school who demands your lunch money, then shoves you into a row of lockers and makes you eat your own socks if you don’t go along.

Sure, it’ll be horribly violent and morally repugnant.  Sure, it’ll be death on anything resembling US Diplomacy for the next twenty years.  Sure it’ll be god-awful expensive to pull off.  Sure it’ll probably jeopardize US access to soon-to-be-ex-allied air force bases the world over.  But by god, McCain will have whipped out America’s wing-wong and beating someone over the head with it, and at the end of the day, that’s all that matters.

Comment #1: Zifnab25  on  08/21  at  08:02 PM

Oh glorious and majestic military might!  Your seductive charms arouse every man, and entice every woman.  Our enemies tremble in fear of our awesome firmness, our unyielding force, our vigorous and powerful thrust! The jealousy of our friends forces them to withdraw their feeble efforts and cower in shame. If we give ourselves to you fully — mind, body, and soul — is there nothing we cannot achieve together?...

Comment #2: MikeEss  on  08/21  at  08:08 PM

He was a POW!

Comment #3: Ben D.  on  08/21  at  08:49 PM

I’m getting tired of this notion that having served in the U.S. armed forces makes one some sort of expert military strategist.  Yes, military service does make you knowledgeable about a lot of things, but it doesn’t mean everyone’s a general or an admiral.

Comment #4: Linnaeus  on  08/21  at  09:02 PM

John McCain’s penis went with him into that POW camp!

Comment #5: Dr. Psycho, shamefully never a POW  on  08/21  at  09:05 PM

Linneaus-

Out of the three major life-or-death wars the United States has had, only during one of them (War of Independence—Washington) was our Commander-in-Chief a career military person.

Lincoln served once in the militia and shot some rabbits, Franklin Roosevelt never held a gun in his life. But they both were great at winning wars.

Comment #6: Ben D.  on  08/21  at  09:05 PM

I think the blockquotes are great, though the emphasis on their authors’ genders puzzled me. Then I saw Ben D.‘s comment, and all of my worries were swept aside.

Comment #7: Warren Terra  on  08/21  at  09:06 PM

Do not forget, fellow males, that Canada may soon elect a Federal LIBERAL government. McSame would easily add that to his ever-growing list of McEnemies.

Comment #8: moeman  on  08/21  at  09:11 PM

OOOH, I forgot oh Manly Man full O Wisdom! Women aren’t in the military! That’s just a Manly! Concern!

Forgive me, I just can’t speak on military issues without succumbing to the vapors.

Comment #9: pheeno  on  08/21  at  09:12 PM

I hope he invades and annexes Canada over that.

That would mean a permanent Democratic majority in the Senate and Electoral College.

Comment #10: Ben D.  on  08/21  at  09:13 PM

Oh glorious and majestic military might!  Your seductive charms arouse every man, and entice every woman.  Our enemies tremble in fear of our awesome firmness, our unyielding force, our vigorous and powerful thrust! The jealousy of our friends forces them to withdraw their feeble efforts and cower in shame. If we give ourselves to you fully — mind, body, and soul — is there nothing we cannot achieve together?…

Apparently you are unable to withdraw it from the hole in which you have placed it.  One wonders whether you will be able to extricate yourselves before it deflates entirely.

Comment #11: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  08/21  at  09:23 PM

OOOH, I forgot oh Manly Man full O Wisdom! Women aren’t in the military! That’s just a Manly! Concern!

Well, it’s true that only men are subject to the draft, which would be the only way McCain could fight all his wars. Additionally, I’m not the one that implied all issues are dichotomous; nor did I even remotely suggest that women shouldn’t be worried about the potential for rise in war.

But apparently I’m only allowed to be concerned about a certain set of issues, and if war isn’t an issue a man can worry about, then maybe nothing is.

(Ooh, have I cracked your code?)

Comment #12: Auguste  on  08/21  at  09:37 PM

Following this analogy, Iraq is some kind of gigantic vagina dentata.

Comment #13: Neil the Ethical Werewolf  on  08/21  at  09:52 PM

“One wonders whether you will be able to extricate yourselves before it deflates entirely.”

...hey!  That’s never happened to us before! It’s gotta be your fault!  Maybe if you weren’t so quick to judge us.  And why do you always compare us to Saddam?...

Just give us a few moments to fantasize about how awesome Gulf War 1 was, and I bet we can get it back up again.  And then you’ll see!  We’ll show you.  Just you wait…

Comment #14: MikeEss  on  08/21  at  10:37 PM

Following this analogy, Iraq is some kind of gigantic vagina dentata.

Don’t be silly.  Iraq is just a stuck-up bitch who doesn’t know what’s good for her and won’t have sex with us, even though everyone knows America is a Nice Guy.

Comment #15: Sour Kraut  on  08/21  at  10:41 PM

Whats Afghanistan?

Comment #16: Ben D.  on  08/21  at  10:43 PM

...hey!  That’s never happened to us before! It’s gotta be your fault!  Maybe if you weren’t so quick to judge us.  And why do you always compare us to Saddam?…

Okay, so it’s pretty large, but you don’t use it very well.  A girl likes a little *finesse* you know, rather than just jumping on and plunging it in.  And that Jacques guy - he’s able to use his tongue as well.  Able to use it very very well, if you know what I mean.

And, quite frankly, that Cuban bondage porn of yours freaks me the fuck out.

Comment #17: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  08/21  at  10:56 PM

Cuban Bondage Porn is the name of my new band…

Comment #18: MikeEss  on  08/21  at  11:00 PM

“Yes, military service does make you knowledgeable about a lot of things, but it doesn’t mean everyone’s a general or an admiral.”

Would you settle for Captain (O-6, equivalent to a Colonel in the Marine Corps, Army, or Air Force) and Commanding Officer of a squadron?


I think that the most Presidential course of action is to rattle sabres at an unstable and Nuclear Pakistan.

Comment #19: Pink Dinkins, QC  on  08/21  at  11:26 PM

only during one of them (War of Independence—Washington) was our Commander-in-Chief a career military person.

And it should be recalled that Washington was not elected President until after that war had already been won—he wasn’t a sitting president Commander In Chief, he was the literal Commander In Chief of the Continental Army.  The USA didn’t have a president yet when the Revolution was being fought.

Comment #20: The Opoponax  on  08/21  at  11:33 PM

“Well, it’s true that only men are subject to the draft, which would be the only way McCain could fight all his wars.”

If I had a nickle for every time I heard a man bring up the draft, I’d have more houses than McCain.


“I even remotely suggest that women shouldn’t be worried about the potential for rise in war. “

How could you, when women aren’t even mentioned? But wait! You weren’t talking about Special Interests! So of course you didn’t even remotely suggest anything. The omission does though.

But continue with your Fresh!Manly!Wisdom!

It’s not like I haven’t heard it before.

Comment #21: pheeno  on  08/22  at  03:36 AM

pheeno,

I’m just learning the lessons taught me in the other thread: I can’t possibly be motivated by anything that doesn’t affect me personally. Therefore, the possibility that women might be affected by war is completely immaterial to me.

That’s not my rule, it’s Q Grrl’s (explicit) and yours (implied) - do you have the ability to retain information from one thread to another or is it all just one big reset every time?

Comment #22: Auguste  on  08/22  at  04:56 PM

I suppose that’s the male privilege translation of what Qgirl actually asked.

She asks what male privilege men will give up and you bring up a subject that actually affects BOTH men and women, but conveniently leave out the women in an attempt to make the subject penis only. And on top of that, it’s something that doesn’t exist anymore and therefore can only be speculated on. Without, of course, considering the possibility that a reinstatement of a draft could include women.

Figures.

Comment #23: pheeno  on  08/22  at  06:22 PM

She asks what male privilege men will give up

No, that’s not what she asked, and suggesting that it is is arguing in bad faith. She asked what men have to fear from a McCain presidency, and when informed, she dismissed. I don’t really believe war is only a male worry, obviously. I also don’t believe that a feminist arguing in good faith believes that McCain’s country-destroying presidency would be just as acceptable to men as an Obama presidency.

Comment #24: Auguste  on  08/23  at  03:00 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.