Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Triumphs In Staging Previous entry: To My Dear Conservative Friends

That’s it; they’re trying to lose

Rick Davis, campaign manager for John McCain’s presidential bid, insisted that the presidential race will be decided more over personalities than issues during an interview with Post editors this morning.“This election is not about issues,” said Davis. “This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates.”

The Obama campaign replied:

In reaction to Rick Davis’ comments about the election not being about issues, Barack Obama campaign manager David Plouffe released the following statement: “We appreciate Senator McCain’s campaign manager finally admitting that his campaign is not in fact about the issues the American people care about, which is exactly the kind of cynical old politics people are ready to change.”

I will note that what I really liked about Obama’s nomination acceptance speech was that he really went after the issues, which he knows will win him this election.  I have no idea what McCain will say in his.  But I do know that the marching orders in the McCain camp appear to be to deflect attention and refuse to answer any questions that might have some uncomfortable answers.  Having McCain answer, “I don’t know; I’ll have to consult with my advisors,” went from refreshingly honest to annoyingly evasive to obvious and trite over time.

You know what’s fun?  Googling “McCain doesn’t know”.  I first picked up that this was a tactic when McCain claimed he didn’t know if condoms could prevent the transmission of HIV.  At what point, I realized that if you asked him, “Will this apple I’m holding fall to the ground should I let it go?”, he might plead ignorance while wondering to himself, “Fuck, are the fundies now denying the theory of gravity?  Is that why I’m getting this question?”

When McCain dodged a question about insurance coverage for birth control, the overuse of this tactic really captured the mainstream’s attention.  But so far, my favorite stumble was when he plead ignorance when asked how many homes he owns.  That’s not really a question about the issues, but still, it touches on major issues pertaining to the quality of life for the average American—-the growing economic disparity between the rich and the rest of us and the mortgage crisis.  I suspect McCain’s “inability” to answer was a product of this strategy of avoiding all unpleasant questions by pleading ignorance.  It was a stupid move in this case, because not knowing how many houses you have is a fuck ton more elitist and out of touch than being able to answer quickly, even if the answer is high.  The only person that people in this country expect to hear, “I don’t know how many houses I own” from is Paris Hilton.

The McCain campaign is right that if they win, it won’t be on the issues.  They’re banking the whole election on the hope that enough Americans will be scared of Obama’s race and his last name and the rumors about him being the Antichrist that they’ll vote for McCain.  I’m just not so sure that’s something to bet an election on.  It could just reduce turnout, but only amongst people that are suspicious of Obama.  People who love him will be waiting in line to vote for him.

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 07:08 PM • (30) Comments

And should they lose, they can just sit back and bitch about how Obama isn’t doing this and Obama isn’t doing that. They left a huge mess for the next president to clean up.

Comment #1: annejumps  on  09/03  at  07:15 PM

They might really be that tone-deaf. Either that, or possessed of more chutzpah than a great chutzpah-filled thing. In the old days they would have carried it off, too—all the reporters would have figured that if a republican thought he had enough leftover character points even after a blunder like this, then he must be right.

Comment #2: paul  on  09/03  at  07:45 PM

I think they are trying to lose.

I mean, for God’s sake—they started advertising in North Carolina yesterday and Charlie Cook of the Cook Political report rates NC as a toss-up.

They are scared of losing North Carolina. North Carolina hasn’t voted for a Democrat at the Presidential level since before I was BORN!

Comment #3: Ben D.  on  09/03  at  07:49 PM

not knowing how many houses you have is a fuck ton more elitist

I’m not sure how big a “fuck ton” is, but it sounds really, really big.

Comment #4: Quaker in a Basement  on  09/03  at  07:54 PM

What I like about this admission—“It’s all just a big popularity contest—the guy the voters just intuitively like is the one they’ll vote for”—is that it acknowledges that, actually, it’s John McCain who has been running a campaign focused on appealing (but empty) rhetoric and attempts to become a beloved celebrity.  You know, that stuff they accused Obama of doing.

Comment #5: Bradley  on  09/03  at  07:58 PM

not knowing how many houses you have is a fuck ton more elitist

I’m not sure how big a “fuck ton” is, but it sounds really, really big.

Quaker in a Basement

It’s not quite as big as a metric fuck ton though.

Comment #6: Danica Lefse Queen  on  09/03  at  08:16 PM

With Republicans “elite” isn’t money, “elite” is someone who is intelligent or accomplished.

McCain graduated at the bottom of his class, so he CAN’T be “elite”.

Comment #7: Ben D.  on  09/03  at  08:17 PM

Only elitists use the metric system.

Comment #8: Informis  on  09/03  at  08:27 PM

People who love him will be waiting in line to vote for him.

And waiting.  And waiting.  And waiting.

Comment #9: Allan F.  on  09/03  at  08:53 PM

I am seriously beginning to think the McCain campaign is some Producers-style money laundering scheme.

Comment #10: realityfighter  on  09/03  at  08:54 PM

Acting like a monarch when one is a mayor of a small town is highly unattractive: <a href=“http://fairlyconservative.com/the-race-for-president/a-chat-with-anne-kilkenny-from-alaska/”> LINKY<a>

Comment #11: Ms Kate  on  09/03  at  08:55 PM

Rethugs stole my slash! Will try again with great hardship ... LINKY

Comment #12: Ms Kate  on  09/03  at  08:55 PM

Only elitists use the metric system.

only elitists eat salad.

Comment #13: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits  on  09/03  at  09:04 PM

“‘People who love him will be waiting in line to vote for him.’

“And waiting.  And waiting.  And waiting.” —Allan F.

True, Allan.  And many of those who wait all day to vote for him will discover they aren’t on the rolls.  And many of those who are allowed to vote will have their votes recorded as being for McCain.  But none of those gimmicks are going to work this time, because the vote isn’t even going to be close.

Comment #14: Dr. Psycho, Majoritarian  on  09/03  at  09:14 PM

I am seriously beginning to think the McCain campaign is some Producers-style money laundering scheme.

That would make McCain Roger DeBris. Or maybe L.S.D.

I think McCain and much of his campaign team are in it to win, but the RNC is another matter. It makes sense in a twisted way: they punish McCain for campaign finance reform and then daring to challenge Prince Bush in 2000; they use Palin to show the Xtian fantasists that they’ve “gone too far”; they leave a Dem to deal with economic malaise and Bush’s foreign affairs mess; they hound Obama mercilessly for 4 years with the intent of preserving that mess; then they run the Oil-Bitch neoCon team they really want in 2012.

And now I have to put Rick Davis high on the list of suspects for RNC/Rove moles inside the campaign. Or is he just as incompetent as Mark Penn?

Comment #15: Gracchus  on  09/03  at  09:27 PM

But none of those gimmicks are going to work this time, because the vote isn’t even going to be close.

Sorry, Fate. Didn’t mean to dangle that candy bar in front of your face.

Comment #16: junk science  on  09/03  at  09:37 PM

I’m not sure how big a “fuck ton” is, but it sounds really, really big
2000 fuck-pounds?

Comment #17: Jeff452  on  09/03  at  09:40 PM

8900 fuck-newtons.

Comment #18: junk science  on  09/03  at  09:42 PM

ooh fuck-newtons
especialy good when dunked in coffee

Comment #19: Jeff452  on  09/03  at  09:47 PM

I have no idea what McCain will say in his.

I was a POW, and the mean Demoncrats are being mean to sweet little Bristol, Levi, and their mom! And, oh yes, I was a POW.

Comment #20: rea  on  09/03  at  10:03 PM

my fear: Obama won’t be able to fix everything in 4 years, so in the NEXT election we have the Prophet (al la Heinlein’s “revolt in 2300”, which still gives me night terrors)

Comment #21: denelian  on  09/03  at  10:06 PM

Did anyone see that really weird video narrated by Robert Duvall? It was this weird Kodak pastiche thing with Duvall saying, “We are we, because we look out for we, we do.” Boy, have they lost serious mojo.

Comment #22: Jman  on  09/03  at  10:07 PM

my fear: Obama won’t be able to fix everything in 4 years, so in the NEXT election we have the Prophet (al la Heinlein’s “revolt in 2300”, which still gives me night terrors)

Of course he won’t be able to fix everything, but there is bound to be some improvement. I hope a majority of the people are smart enough to know it will take a number of years to turn everything around.

Comment #23: Genine  on  09/03  at  10:13 PM

That’s what really gets me about this; so much has been fucked up that there’s no way to fix it all, and those who fucked everything up will criticize when all the fuckups aren’t fixed by someone else.

Comment #24: annejumps  on  09/03  at  10:14 PM

<i>Of course he won’t be able to fix everything, but there is bound to be some improvement. I hope a majority of the people are smart enough to know it will take a number of years to turn everything around. <>

Yep,
see FDR 1932-1936

Comment #25: Jeff452  on  09/04  at  01:35 AM

Genine I’m not so sure.  Thanks to Bush the economy is *massively* ratfucked.  That means taxes must go up, and unfortunately not just on the upper class.  It also means spending must go down, and that’s where things are going to pinch, because (again thanks to Bush) our infrastructure is in need of a massive cash injection, we’ve *got* to spend money on research to get ourselves out of our energy trap, etc.  Cutting military funding (and reducing our military obligations [1]) significantly makes rational sense, but I really doubt Obama could pull it off in the face of massed Congressional opposition.

And, worse, the Congressional opposition to cutting military spending won’t just be from Republicans, there’s lots of Democrats who love military spending because its pork for their districts.  But, of course, the Republicans will scream about how Obama wants to make America weak if he tries to cut military spending.  Hell, he’ll be lucky if he can cancel obvious boondoggles like Reagan’s beloved Star Wars, much less make any significant cuts into US military spending and obligations.  We’ve got to have those bases in France and Germany fully crewed and operational damnit!

[1] ie: Mothballing our bases in most of Europe, cutting back on US interventionism elsewhere, reducing the number of patrolling carrier groups, etc.  Can’t cut funding without cutting obligations or we overstrain the mil, and that’s a very bad thing.

Comment #26: sotonohito  on  09/04  at  10:56 AM

I just gotta say: that’s my favorite Calvin & Hobbes comic ever. Thanks for reminding me that Calvin used to do much more insightful things than pee on car manufacturer logos; you’ve made my day.

Comment #27: DSimon  on  09/04  at  02:46 PM

ooh fuck-newtons
especialy good when dunked in coffee

OUCH!!!

Comment #28: lightning  on  09/04  at  04:34 PM

The only person that people in this country expect to hear, “I don’t know how many houses I own” from is Paris Hilton.

Actually. Ms Hilton is doing rather well in this campaign.

Note to the McCain camp—when you lose a battle of wits to Paris Hilton, you’re in Real Trouble.

Comment #29: lightning  on  09/04  at  04:38 PM

Thanks for reminding me that Calvin used to do much more insightful things than pee on car manufacturer logos

And he never even did that. He was filling a water balloon (with water). He’s been slandered.

Comment #30: junk science  on  09/04  at  06:27 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.