Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Gay-baiting campaign in Kansas tanks hopes for out lesbian candidate Previous entry: Negativity

The Crust…It Frightens Me

imageThomas Sowell, who every conservative assures me is really, really smart, writes an article so crusty you could name a geological era after it.  The problem with society today, you see, is all those flashy, blingy stars with the weird names and the hair and the disrespect for our old, restrained, quietly fucked up stars of yesteryear.

If our era could have its own coat of arms, it would be a yak against a background of mush. This must be the golden age of endless and pointless talk.

Every sports events seems to be preceded by all kinds of talk — whether by athletes repeating cliches that we have heard a thousand times, announcers making pseudo-profound sociological observations, or fans rambling on incoherently.

Almost as if the market has learned to cater to the desires of rabid sports fans by providing them hours of useless coverage.  Man, fuck capitalism!

Then after the contest come the childish celebrations, the second-guessing and still more cliches.

Even when the action is going on at grand-slam tennis matches, there are interviews with celebrities who happen to be in the stands, while the play on the court is ignored by both, even though it is shown on the screen.

Theatrical hype on the part of both the interviewer and the celebrity are common.

Tennis matches routinely last four hours.  Four hours!  Even people who paid to be there do things besides watch the action, because to sit in a chair and watch the same thing for that long beggars madness.  And ass burn.

Does it ever occur to media chatterboxes that people watch tennis because they want to see tennis, not hear about some celebrity’s latest movie or TV series?

Man, somebody pissed on his French Open coverage.  Does it ever occur to economic genius Thomas Sowell that networks have bills to pay, and the easiest way to do that is to work in thirty-second promos for other things into the coverage?  You’ll get your precious little tennis, Tommy.  Just wait, and let Christian Slater talk about his soon-to-be-canceled TV show.  It’s okay.

If those who lived during World War II were “the greatest generation,” this must be the gratingest generation.

It’s not just the constant meaningless chatter that grates. There is the incessant self-dramatization.

Everybody knows about Manny Ramirez’s hair styling. But there have been many other sluggers over the years, whose haircuts were never noticed. Does anyone remember Ted Williams’ haircut or the haircuts of Mickey Mantle or Hank Aaron?

All those people are remembered for what they did, not how they looked.

No, I don’t remember those people’s haircuts.  And Manny Ramirez may be remembered for his hair, but he’ll also probably be remembered for his lifetime .313 batting average, 500+ home runs and his World Series rings.  I’m sorry that his wacky, weird hair distracts you from his great play, but maybe you need to stop clutching your handkerchief over that time that a Good Morning, Miami promo led you to miss vital hand-wiping action on the part of Rafael Nadal.

And Ramirez could be like Joe DiMaggio, and date the most famous woman in the world.

Or he could be like Ted Williams and throw racist tantrums that ensure one of the greatest players in history don’t join his team.

  Mickey Mantle was a heartthrob.  And Aaron had the audacity to be black and challenge the most revered record in sports.  But, yes, you’re right.  They didn’t have funny hair.  And that’s what’s important.

Boxers and wrestlers must be the worst. Outlandish get-ups and behaving like badly raised brats have become the norm.

When you see old films of Joe Louis or Rocky Marciano, you see adults acting like adults— indeed, like gentlemen.

Boxing is also a dying sport, rotting from its own corruption - corruption that helped promote champs like Joe Louis and Rocky Marciano when they were big, and helped Sonny Liston and George Foreman and Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield and now Joe Whatsisname that’s the Heavyweight Champ now get where they got.  But it was a polite corruption.

There was none of this making faces at an opponent before the fight or loudly boasting afterwards, much less taunting during the contest. In other words, you didn’t have to act like a lout in order to be a boxer.

When Joe DiMaggio hit a ball that was caught up against the 415-foot sign in Yankee Stadium by a Dodger outfielder, at a crucial point during the 1947 World Series, DiMaggio briefly kicked the dirt in frustration while running the bases.

That was as close to an emotional outburst that DiMaggio ever came. That picture has been shown innumerable times, precisely because it was so exceptional for DiMaggio to go even that far.

Like so much that went wrong in American society, the new style of loutish self-dramatization began in the 1960s. When Muhammad Ali became heavyweight champion in 1964, it marked the end of the era when boxers simply did their job, collected their money and went home, usually after a few brief words.

The fact that Thomas Sowell, a black man, doesn’t understand why Muhammad Ali did what he did in the era that he did it…it makes me sad.  Like really, just sad.  I mean, he lived through the 1950s and 1960s

While this trend of self-dramatization is most visible in sports, it extends well beyond athletes.

Parents give their children off-the-wall names. “Mary” has long since lost its place as the perennially most popular name for girls.

There is a high turnover in what names are hot and which ones are not. Apparently everybody has to try to outdo everybody else, even when it comes to naming children.

The last time Mary was the most popular name in America was 1961.  Things change.  And contrary to Sowell’s belief (and my wishes), the most popular girls’ name in America is not Slatternly Whoreface.  It’s the exotic “Emily”.  We live in a culture with greater mass communication than ever, and the ability for new names to enter into the zeitgeist quicker than ever.  People like different things at different times.  It’s how shit works.

Sowell, incidentally, is an allegedly trained economist lamenting the role of evolving consumer choice and differing marketing strategies.  Sowell is also a moron.

Here, as in sports, superficial attention-getters have replaced achievements that speak for themselves. Indeed, the whole notion of achievement is downplayed, if not swept under the rug.

Wait a minute…being named “Mary” was an achievement?  Or is it that getting such a plain name made you succeed on your own, whereas getting named Nevaeh gets you an automatic scholarship to Brown?  Because that part’s true - the 2008 class valedictorian, Fragilebox Nikon Miller, can attest to that.

People who have achieved success are often referred to as “privileged,” especially by the intelligentsia. Achievements used to be a source of inspiration for others but have been turned into a source of grievance for those without comparable achievements.

There have always been superficial dandies but they have not always been admired or regarded as models. Our society is worse off because they are.

So, from what I can tell - people who do things to stand out apart from their achievements, particularly in areas where achievement is very strictly graded and highly valued, get “rewarded” by being noticed briefly until they flame out and go away.  Dennis Rodman didn’t win five championships because he had funny hair.  He won five championships because he was the best rebounder on the planet. And the labret piercing.

UPDATE: I was completely confused as to Ted Williams.  My apologies to him and his family.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 12:00 PM • (34) Comments

Jesse wins the internets for the day.

Comment #1: BABH  on  08/06  at  12:11 PM

People who have achieved success are often referred to as “privileged,” especially by the intelligentsia. Achievements used to be a source of inspiration for others but have been turned into a source of grievance for those without comparable achievements.

Not a bad critique of his own argument.

Comment #2: jTuba  on  08/06  at  12:16 PM

“There have always been superficial dandies but they have not always been admired or regarded as models. Our society is worse off because they are.”

...okay, I assume he’s trying to damn Obama with that, but how did he feel about George “100% Surface and Hollow Inside” Bush and his adopted uncle John “Let Me Tell You About Being a POW and Then Show Us Your Tits” McCain?

Is a complete lack of self-reflection, self-awareness, and empathy a chronic Reichwing malady?...

The only thing Sowell’s drooling lacked was a hearty “Hey! You kids get off my lawn, or I’m calling the cops!”...

Comment #3: MikeEss  on  08/06  at  12:16 PM

What if you switch around those names—Slatternly Fragilebox and Nikon Whoreface? There are all sorts of possibilities!

Comment #4: Incertus, Nacho Daddy  on  08/06  at  12:19 PM

Shorter Sowell: Jack Johnson?  Never heard of him.  Babe Ruth?  Candy bar guy right?

Comment #5: Rob  on  08/06  at  12:20 PM

Hilarious. I guess people like Sowell never realize that in fact they are more shallow than the entertainments they criticize. Entertainment is by nature at least enjoyable to someone, which takes some talent. Sowell’s rant doesn’t even have that advantage… it’s just him obsessing about incredibly dumb shallow things.

Comment #6: atheist  on  08/06  at  12:20 PM

Does it ever occur to media chatterboxes that people watch tennis because they want to see tennis

Actually a fair number of people watch tennis to see people with bodies in the best of physical shape stick their well-toned butts right in the direction of the TeeVee cameras.  Tennis definitely appeals to prurient interests and as such may even fall under the definition of porn.  Shouldn’t “conservatives” be happy that the media chatterboxes are busy chattering rather than letting the viewers watch 4 hours of athletes in their prime moving their well toned, sweaty bodies, wiggling their buttocks ... pardon me, I think I need to take a break. wink

Seriously though—what is the deal with “conservatives” like Sowell bemoaning mass-market culture and then pushing a political and economic agenda whose ultimate net-effect is the coarsening of mass-market culture?  Do these people ever connect “to the extent that the 1950s were as we imagine them, it was because of liberal, New Deal government programs”?  Is there something missing in the cognitive structures of our social conservatives?

Comment #7: DAS  on  08/06  at  12:21 PM

Thomas Sowell is a man of above average intelligence who ended up getting a great job where he can write about whatever he wants and get paid for it.

His audience is invariably made up of people who desperately want to feel as though they’re reading something written by a “smart” person, or even worse, the class-insecure person who admires Sowell because he’s “an intellectual.”

America is subjected to Sowell’s curmudgeonly opinions, and we tolerate it. Make makes Muhammed Ali so much less worthy of being heard in public than Sowell? That, it seems, is likely the source of his complaint.

Comment #8: Tyro  on  08/06  at  12:24 PM

Tennis matches routinely last four hours.  Four hours! Even people who paid to be there do things besides watch the action, because to sit in a chair and watch the same thing for that long beggars madness.

Whereas cricket test matches can last up to 5 days, and still result in a draw. Me, I like snooker - a top level snooker final typically takes a couple of days, with individual frames lasting up to a couple of hours. And God help you if you make any noise (like, opening a packet of sweets) during a frame.

You Americans have no patience. wink

Comment #9: Dunc  on  08/06  at  12:51 PM

You Americans have no patience.

Yet baseball is out national pastime. Go figure.

And am I the only person who has absolutely no idea what Manny Ramirez’s hair looks like? Yet I can easily call to mind Ted Williams, Hank Aaron and Mickey Mantle’s mugs.

Comment #10: Sarcastro  on  08/06  at  01:18 PM

precisely because it was so exceptional for DiMaggio to go even that far.

yeah, he preferred to save his violent temper for the clubhouse or beating his wives.  HelLOO.

And Rodman was perfectly placed in Chicago…as long as he led in rebounds and didn’t cost us a game with his antics, nobody here gave a shit what color his hair was or if he wore a wedding dress.  We knew the difference between superficial silliness and substance.

I’m still not getting the divide between people of achievement and intelligentsia.  I thought the people with the academic achievements <i>were<i> the intelligensia and therefore no good for having a beer with.

Comment #11: Caren  on  08/06  at  01:20 PM

Wasn’t it just two years ago that all the hip conservatives were talking up South Park Conservatism? Now they’re all enraged that time has dared to advance beyond 1951.

Comment #12: Scott  on  08/06  at  01:30 PM

Shorter Sowell: I’m an obnoxious old attention whore.

Comment #13: Tom  on  08/06  at  01:42 PM

I can only imagine the pain Tom Sowell goes through every morning when he sees a black man staring back in the mirror.

The fact that Thomas Sowell, a black man, doesn’t understand why Muhammad Ali did what he did in the era that he did it…it makes me sad.

Sad, but it’s expected, seeing how Sowell has also written time and again against integration and the like. It wouldn’t surprise me if he were to one day whip out a column decrying MLK as “uppity.” The man knows where his bread his buttered and exactly what kind of racist moron turns to him for the Truth(TM), so he plays along.

I can understand the desire for wealth and respect, sure, but Sowell’s taken so many dumps on his own soul that I don’t think it’s able to be repaired.

Comment #14: D.N. Nation  on  08/06  at  01:44 PM

Additionally, his argument completely fails off of two words: Babe Ruth. You know, that baseball player back in ye olden days who was also the biggest star on the planet. Life’s too short to be a moron, Tom.

Comment #15: D.N. Nation  on  08/06  at  01:47 PM

“Slatternly Whoreface” wins the internets.  Damn, JT can write.

Comment #16: Josh  on  08/06  at  02:36 PM

Like so much that went wrong in American society, the new style of loutish self-dramatization began in the 1960s. When Muhammad Ali became heavyweight champion in 1964, it marked the end of the era

as usual for conservatards everything was better before the ni**ers got uppity.  the article should have had the subtitle:  Vote McCain and put Obama in his place

Comment #17: mark  on  08/06  at  03:05 PM

Can we cut out the bullshit about how people resent others who achieve more? Starting on third base and scoring a run is not even as much of an achievement as starting in the batter’s box and reaching first base. The best you can say about the upper-crust types who sometimes work hard (like son-of-an-admiral, grandson-of-an-admiral, married-an-heiress to buy a seat in congress) is that they didn’t screw up too much, and that they worked almost as hard as people who started with far less, and didn’t get any of the same breaks.

This is particularly important because of the way that social and economic mobility have taken a nosedive in the US during the past 30 years. Propaganda arguing that the well-born should be respected for working their way up so that their kids can be even-more-well-born isn’t just stupid, it’s evil.

Comment #18: paul  on  08/06  at  03:22 PM

Actually, I read the other day that Manny plans on chopping the hair a bit soon to please Joe Torre- same as Johnny Damon did when he went from Boston to New York.

And I had never, until today, regretted that our daughter Mary was named for our favorite elderly aunts…

Comment #19: louise  on  08/06  at  03:54 PM

My Ted Williams knowledge is slim to none, but according to everything I can find with a quick google search and a few minutes at Wikipedia, he’s noted more for using his Hall of Fame induction speech to honour Satchel Paige among others than he is for racist rants (I couldn’t find anything about racist rants).

Comment #20: LittleMac  on  08/06  at  03:55 PM

Jesse—
LittleMac is dead on. Your item about Ted Williams is, as far as I know, and that’s pretty far, complete slander. Williams argued with owner Tom Yawkey (a genuine peckerwood racist asshole) about bringing in black players and he took the occasion of his own induction speech into the Hall of Fame to argue for the inclusion of stars from the Negro Leagues.
Christ, man, do better than this.

Comment #21: charles pierce  on  08/06  at  05:00 PM

In other news kids today just don’t have any respect.  They also play on other people’s lawns and listen to weird music unacceptable to the current elderly.  This is all totally a new phenomen indicative of a collapse of western civilization. 

Or possibly the loony rantings of a cranky old man who can’t remember the past worth a shit.

Comment #22: commissarjs  on  08/06  at  05:09 PM

You’re right, I think I got him entirely confused with someone else.  My error.

Comment #23: Jesse Taylor  on  08/06  at  05:10 PM

Jesse—
It is likely that you’re thinking of the famous anecdote in which Jackie Robinson and several other Negro League stars got a tryout at Fenway, and somebody yelled out of the club offices—opinions vary as to who—“Get those n**gers off the field!” It is also true that the Red Sox had the opportunity to sign both Willie Mays and Henry Aaron, but declined to do so. There was never a Curse Of The Bambino, but there damn sure was a Curse Of Jackie Robinson. Me? I just think about Williams hitting behind Mays in the Sox lineup for nine years and weep.

Comment #24: charles pierce  on  08/06  at  05:39 PM

There have always been superficial dandies but they have not always been admired or regarded as models.

This is, from what I gather, the crux of Sowell’s argument.

The funny thing, though, is that it’s not even remotely true. Is he actually claiming that the celebrity industry emerged fully formed from the head of Zeus in 1964? Does he think that all of humanity was running around with unkempt hair in burlap loincloths until Twiggy came on the scene?

He’s clearly never heard of Oscar Wilde, Niccolò Paganini, Mozart, Beethoven, Louis XIV, any number of late 18th-century actors and opera singers, Blackbeard the Pirate, etc., etc., etc.

Comment #25: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  08/06  at  06:03 PM

I also strongly object to the association of the phrase “superficial dandy” with anyone that Sowell mentions by name in his article.

Comment #26: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  08/06  at  06:06 PM

Loutish self-dramatization kicks total motherfucking ass!!!!!

Comment #27: PhysioProf  on  08/06  at  06:16 PM

I am 8 months pregnant with a girl who, until today, was going to be named Mary but who is now going to be named the awesome Slatternly Whoreface.

Comment #28: chines  on  08/06  at  06:36 PM

Jesse - You were thinking of Ty Cobb, not Ted Williams.

Comment #29: Kathy  on  08/06  at  06:48 PM

Kathy - that’s it!

Comment #30: Jesse Taylor  on  08/06  at  10:27 PM

Hi Jesse - Honest mistake; glad you corrected!  There are some of us lefties out there who love baseball (G0 Phillies; boo Mets).  Ty Cobb was a racist SOB as they come, though…but at least he was open and honest about it and owned it, unlike the racism playing out in this presidential campaign.  I come from a white, ethnic working class town outside of Buffalo (hence my love of baseball and the Bills, too, but also know too well how McCain’s ads are playing out back home (and here in white ethnic Philly)).  Do not count out a McCain victory.  I am posting this point wherever I can. A lot of progressives and Obama supporters are not getting it, I fear, and certainly not his campaign, from the way they are (non) reacting to the smears.

PS. I enjoy your posts.

Comment #31: Kathy  on  08/06  at  11:49 PM

This must be the golden age of endless and pointless talk.

I see he fails at self-awareness.

Comment #32: Gozer  on  08/07  at  03:17 AM

That demned Beau Brummel, indulgin’ in the worst kind of shallow self-promotion, dontcher know?

Is a complete lack of self-reflection, self-awareness, and empathy a chronic Reichwing malady?…
I was not aware any readers of this blog had not already drawn a conclusion on this question.

Comment #33: Samantha Vimes  on  08/07  at  05:02 AM

David Mamet, le famous cusser of a playwright said Sowell is our greatest living philosopher. Must be so.

I did read though, that as a poor black intellectual wanna-be, he got a scholarship to Harvard as they were the only one willing to take in a AfricanAmerican selfmade scholar back in the late 40s or early 50s. No major institution in the South would do it. Obviously, they were “liberal” for doing that. And he’s been paying liberals back ever since. Back then William F. Buckley didn’t even want blacks to vote let alone go to college.

Comment #34: datadave  on  08/07  at  11:34 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.