Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Bad Timing Previous entry: Cindy Brady, now there’s a hot chick

The Hysterical Bitch Offensive

It says something about misogyny and presidential politics that one of the most sexist attacks thus far has been launched against the male Democratic candidate…and that it’s considered just a “tough” ad that, through watching cable news seems to be mainly about whether or not Britney Spears should be involved in politics.  (Apparently, all those post-primary investigations of sexism against Hillary Clinton got stuck the same place all the fact checkers did.) McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds:

“This is a typically superfluous response from Barack Obama. Like most celebrities, he reacts to fair criticism with a mix of fussiness and hysteria,” says McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds, before trying to link the attack back to offshore drilling.

The Hysterical Bitch spot:

Let me start by rolling back to this Richard Cohen article from a couple of days ago, and the surrounding coverage it got.  There are Very Simple Rules when it comes to covering presidential candidates.  Republicans are always good people who happen to wander away from their mores because of the icky demands of campaigning, Democrats are always probably weirdos who are just trying to hide it long enough to get to the White House.  It’s an instinct that comes from the internalization of being the Librul Media and the externalization of Oh Shit, We Can’t Be The Liberal Media.  The easiest way to do it is to show that you have a Republican friend, that you can look past your alleged ideology and partisan ties and find something good and honorable in the other side.  In the same vein, you find them all practicing the exact same brand of “Even The” Liberalism, where their main method of addressing Democrats is looking for flaws and failures so as not to seem biased.  Of course, it produces the exact opposite result - a media that constantly focuses on the failures and flaws of Democrats and continually excuses Republican failures and lies because, hey, that’s not really who they are.

John McCain gave a speech this morning attacking Obama - when there’s video up I’ll link to it, but the most telling part of it is that McCain was reading straight off of a sheet of paper.  He wasn’t speaking extemporaneously, he was literally reading off of a report like a seventh grader asked to evaluate The Outsiders who knocked off the report last night based off of Cliffs Notes.  There are two ways of evaluating this:

1.) The Sane Person’s Way:  McCain is so hungry to attack and tear down Obama that he’s willing to read a stream of nonsensical bullshit that he can’t even remember or deliver competently, and embarrassing himself in the process.

2.) The Richard Cohen Way:  John Mccain’s irrepressible maverickness lets him understand that this isn’t really who he is, but it’s something he’s doing to try to win, so we can’t really judge him on it.  When will we see the real, honorable John McCain again?  And when do I get on the new Straight Talk Express?
Where this leaves us is with a constant series of excuses for John McCain and a constant series of challenges for Barack Obama.  Republican “toughness” is a given, so Democratic toughness must be tested and questioned.  A Republican attack is a question for the Democrat, a Democratic attack is a question…for the Democrat.  Case in point: MSNBC’s First Read covering dueling Obama and McCain ads.  When McCain started with the Hysterical Bitch spot, these are the headlines First Read gave their coverage:

OBAMA = BRITNEY AND PARIS?

OBAMA, ‘BIGGEST CELEBRITY IN THE WORLD’?

When Obama responded:

OBAMA CAMP GOES UP WITH RESPONSE AD

imageNote that McCain’s ads become questions to Obama, and Obama’s ad is a description of his campaign’s action.  The basic framing of this always lays responsibility, blame and attachment on the Democrat, leaving the Republican free and clear to keep driving their narrative.  Obama’s Hysterical Bitchiness is a question through and through for Obama and his supporters, and the only real question for John McCain is when it’ll be okay to give him donuts again.

One last comment on this: for a campaign accusing Obama of being a Spears/Hilton-like celebrity, it would probably fucking help if John McCain’s daughter wasn’t dining with Heidi Montag.  It would also be nice if someone with a chair and a mic on cable news pointed out the McCain’s relentless starfucking.  Again, I ask too much.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 10:25 AM • (18) Comments

Remember way back in the day when Britney Spears was a big supporter of George Bush?

YouTube does.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82py_wk5vE4

Comment #1: Zifnab25  on  07/31  at  10:48 AM

The idea of John McCain, the biggest self-styled “celebrity” in the Republican party (he hosted SNL for crying out loud!), accusing anyone of being a big celebrity is appalling.

Comment #2: "Fair and Balanced" Dave  on  07/31  at  11:29 AM

There’s something so Margo Channing about John McCain, isn’t there?  Aging prima donna gets outmaneuvered by rising star and dissolves into hysterics and paranoia.

Comment #3: Mnemosyne  on  07/31  at  11:58 AM

It’s worth recognizing that McCain’s new handlers are using a tactic they’ve successfully used in past elections: Attacking Democratic candidates by turning their perceived strengths into weaknesses - usually by exaggeration and ridicule.  They took a rare image that thrilled and inspired millions of Americans (Obama being greeted by thousands of cheering citizens) and tried to tar it by conflating it with photos of sleazy celebrities.

Comment #4: Northern Virginia  on  07/31  at  12:02 PM

“They took a rare image that thrilled and inspired millions of Americans (Obama being greeted by thousands of cheering citizens) and tried to tar it by conflating it with photos of sleazy celebrities.”

I want to clarify that I meant that it was rare that any American presidential candidate would be cheered by thousands of citizens, in a foreign country.  Eight years of George Bush’s administration have assured that.  Meanwhile, Obama (unlike John McCain) is frequently greeted by thousands of cheering citizens, in this country.

Comment #5: Northern Virginia  on  07/31  at  12:16 PM

I don’t think this will fly any better than most of the previous attacks on Obama.  The wingnuts who buy into this comparison wouldn’t have voted for Obama anyway.  The same seem to be true of the previous attacks.

So when do they take the bold (desperate) step of directly comparing Obama and Hitler in an official McCain ad?  They’ve implied it, and several of the wingnut media figures have said it, but it hasn’t been blatant enough yet, don’t you think?  In honor of the brilliant intellectual genius Jonah “Doughy Pantload” Goldberg, maybe compare him to both Hilter and Stalin in the same ad.  Hell, throw Mao in too.  And maybe Saddam HUSSEIN and compare him to Barack HUSSEIN Obama…


(BTW, FireFox, when the hell are you going to add “Barack” & “Obama” to your spelling dictionary?...)

Comment #6: MikeEss  on  07/31  at  12:22 PM

Excellent analysis, dude!

Comment #7: PhysioProf  on  07/31  at  02:28 PM

If anyone still cares about yesterday’s McCain ad controversy, Business Week has a source that told them that the McCain campaign had a second ad all ready to go in case Obama did visit the troops in Germany accusing Obama of using them for campaign purposes.

You’d almost think it was a fake, ginned-up controversy, wouldn’t you?

Comment #8: Mnemosyne  on  07/31  at  02:43 PM

Like most celebrities, he reacts to fair criticism with a mix of fussiness and hysteria,

Somewhere along the hatching of this strategy Republicans decided that “celebrity” was an effective euphemism for “fag.”  I guess by way of Hollywood/liberal/girly-man/diva.

Comment #9: FlipYrWhig  on  07/31  at  02:49 PM

“Obama is the most beloved political figure on the planet.  That’s a bad thing.  I mean, obviously.”

Comment #10: Raznor  on  07/31  at  03:24 PM

The Republicans are scared by the international welcome Obama’s received. One of the standard attacks against him was that his lack of experience would make him unprepared to be a world leader, Head of State, ready to do politics on the international level. So, Obama went on a trip and showed America he’s not only ready to do it, but that the world would welcome him as the harbinger of change. He could help repair America’s damaged image.
That’s a pretty strong concept for moderates to see demonstrated. So the Republicans are desperate to neutralize it, and their attempts are made of fail.

Comment #11: Samantha Vimes  on  07/31  at  06:13 PM

Am I the only person who sees a gross racist OBAMA IS COMING FOR YOUR WHITE WOMEN!!1! message in the way his face morphs into 2 caucasian blonde women? I might just have campaign fatigue.

Comment #12: june  on  07/31  at  06:51 PM

In all sincerity, this McCain/Paris/Britney ad the worst political ad I’ve ever seen. It plays like an SNL parody of a typical campaign video.

If he’s got any sense whatsoever, McCain should can the person responsible and then flog himself in a dark room for five minutes as penance for his own stupidity.

Comment #13: CHV  on  07/31  at  08:07 PM

The Obama campaign had an off-the-record response to the Britney ad:

The Obama campaign declined direct comment on the celebrity charge, but said it was another example of a McCain negative attack. “On a day when major news organizations across the country are taking Sen. McCain to task for a steady stream of false, negative attacks, his campaign has launched yet another. Or, as some might say, ‘Oops! He did it again,’” a campaign spokesman said.

Hey, if you’re going to play 5th grade, don’t be surprised when the other guy gets all 5th grade right back atcha.

Comment #14: Mnemosyne  on  07/31  at  09:45 PM

I think I may be the only one seeing the subtext of this ad as “Obama is an effete liberal, and probably gay”.  They’ve been trying to get that one out there.

Anyhow, I have to ask again: When is McSame going to actually campaign, rather than just attack Obama?

Comment #15: Damian  on  08/01  at  04:31 AM

Or maybe FlipYrWhig already saw it.  And I didn’t see that.

Time to clean my glasses, it seems.

Comment #16: Damian  on  08/01  at  04:36 AM

I have seen a number of interpretations of the Brittany/Paris ad and I suspect they are all correct, it just depends on who is looking at it.  I definitely get the “black man hits on blonde girls - SHRIEK!!!!!” picture.  I am a white, grey-haired female, by the way, 65. 
I can see the “celebrity” thing, it is dreadful to be popular.  And the not ready to lead as well.

Comment #17: bloomingpol  on  08/01  at  08:02 AM

No one has mentioned the big honking phallic symbols.

Comment #18: kathy  on  08/01  at  09:24 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.